Wesley or stivep1 video high voltage&frequency OU

[Turion]

Duncan,
Glad to see you active. Thought for a while the men in black had you in their clutches!

Here is an old French patent I thought would be of particular interest here.

David

[T-1000]

Why was chosen the caduceus coil and not another type (why this shaping feature makes it special)?

The caduceus coil makes unipolar magnetic field what is needed for our coil-capacitor experiment:
1)The flyback transformer "see" Tesla coil as capacitor. Hence, one lead goes to primary and other lead goes to secondary - same as to capacitor plates instead. That makes open circuit in regards to secondary coil.
2) Using AV (Avramenko) diode plug from single wire of flyback transformer we satisfy capacitor charge/discharge over spark gap to Tesla primary.
3) The induction in capacitor plates is what we need so we have coils instead of capacitor plates. The "normal" capacitor magnetic field vector is 90 degrees from what we need. So Caduceus coil does right angles for induction in Tesla secondary coil. Also there we have 2 "legs" with one running as ballast/antenna instead of ground connection.

Hopefully that explains hard bits.

[stivep]

The most complex instruction to myself

To Mr Kelly and to King
Please post my instruction to myself as informational ,educational material in the book
People that provided successful experiments are
Arunas Lithuanian from England
Aidas Lithuanian from Lithuania
Wesley from NY USA

The person who first start to experiment with "Ferrite Yoke is
Tiger from Kazakhstan
Tiger conformed our experiment as valid one.
Tiger has number of successful experiments done in this area but he never explain it to the extend we did.
Tiger might of have English language problems But I did not get across his instructive videos before the date of our experiment .
Tiger has made "presentational" videos but not instructional one before the time of experiment.
Most of material of Tiger was presented in form black box.
none of his material was provided as step by step process.

Quote from: Neo1 on Today at 03:40:56 AM

Hi Stivep, I have followed your work (and your team) I am attempting to replicate your TV Yoke device.
I have a back ground in electronics - specifically Radio communications test and development.
I have not been able to replicate you waveform show on your website "50Hz carrier wave
with 382KHz resonate wave inside".
I understand the 382KHz with be different in each replication.
I am using a low power mains transformer as a signal generator for the 50Hz into 15T coil,
and a standard signal generator for the high KHz frequency into the 50T coil, and I am monitoring
the output with a scope from the bifilar.

If it was me than:

I should not concentrate on particular frequencies but on the process by itself.
This frequencies will not work for me as every ferrite and every winding will vary .
I have used chain of steps to make it happened.


1.I have connected to 15 winds sweeping generator( does not matter that could be 50 winds as well but 15 winds is easier)


2.on "U" shape I have connected spectrum analyzer ( computer driven is OK as well, model is given on video)


3. I found specific pick on more than 1.MHz on spectrum analyzer It is visible - the highest amplitude.
lets call it F1


4. I than disconnected sweeping generator at 15 winds and disconnected spectrum analyzer at "U"


5.I have connected exactly frequency of response at "U" that means ( frequency F1) from generator


6. Than I connected spectrum analyzer at 50 winds and was looking for biggest response But excluding frequency F1.

7.Than when I found that frequency lets call it F2. (say 375kHz or so)...But even amplitude no ringing signal!!!
I disconnected generator from "U"

8. I connected generator tuned to F2 to 50 winds winding.(no big difference I can connect it first to 15 winds as well to see response
but than voltages on bifilar will be much higher sometime it helps)
If I use 15 winds instead 50 winds to find max response on bifilar I make sure that I have no ringing pattern at bifilar.
And Than I must reconnect generator from 15 winds to 50 winds with the same frequency and vary this frequency to adjust tuning.



9. than I connect oscilloscope (or small light bulb at first.) to bifilar winding (at oscilloscope I should see no ringing on bifilar for that particular signal)
10.than I look at highest amplitude possible to achieve still being sinusoidal and no ringing - at bifilar winding
I was - careful HV may damage my equipment ( if the voltage is to high than voltage divider or right probe must be connected to oscilloscope)
I was varying F2 left right for the best results

11.Than I connect 50 Hz from another generator( this is modulating frequency)and heaving still first generator connected to 50 winds)

12.Than I vary 50Hz left /right for the best results.(In my case that was 47Hz)

13. I Connect the stronger light bulb and or light bulb if I have had no light bulb connected before.. ( playing with smaller light bulb
from the beginning of my measurement at bifilar gives me advantage of heaving lower voltage at bifilar.)

14. I re-tune F1 and F2 to the best light from light bulb. At this point I should have already 150W

15. I than spark from Flyback to "U" wind
15a. I need to keep in mind that by applying spark from flyback (from old TV ) I induce much higher voltages
at 15 winds and 50 winds so these generators are in danger to be damaged. The generators need protective buffer !!!!!!

16 I should be able to get around 1 KW out of bifilar.By connecting stronger and stronger chain of light bulb I can check it out.

17. I should keep in mind that ferrite yoke from old TV may change resonance frequency
at U shape winding with time and if I have had
only generator operating to max of 2MHz than
I would not be able to play with new frequency of response over that rane so heaving
Generators that goes to more than that is critical.!!!!
!7a. I should keep in mind that It might be much higher frequency of response than 2 MHz at the beginning of
as different ferrite has different material properties.
17b. I should keep in mind that it would be good to scan ferrite yoke to say 50MHz or more to see what interesting might of be there.

17c. I should keep in mind that not every ferrite may work as it is related to
ferrite material from yoke.I may try to cut in halves big ring ferrites and see if that effect
was related to material only or maybe to material SHAPE say Conical shape.


17d. I should keep in mind that strange effects might of happened
including extreme, unknown and enormously strong (but suspected by me) EM field and NOT ONLY.!!!!
That might or might not affect my health. (never scientifically conformed)


I BLAME SHAPE THAT MEANS SPECIFIC GEOMETRY OF THE FERRITE YOKE ( CONICAL SHAPE.- GRADUALLY BEND AND CIRCULARLY
PROGRESSING ) FOR THE ADDITIONAL PHENOMENA IF ANY SHOULD BE PRESENT


This may lead also to something that is much bigger and much more important than OU I'm looking for.
as a hint- "I found few articles and experiments ,standing about time being affected )
From scientific approach i have never tried nor conformed nor tend to believe in that he he he
You know what I really think,

!7e.I should keep in mind that application for additional phenomena if any might lead me to unpredictable application including weaponry.
17f.I should keep in mind that application for additional phenomena should be at peaceful nature and that my work is directed to benefit of humanity ONLY!!!!!!!!

17g. Please keep in mind that thin paper divider should be present to interrupt magnetic flux between two halves of ferrite from TV deflection yoke

This is my most complex instruction to myself ever made.



Legal note : Please notice that all of my comments are in form of
I connect
I measure
I than


and so on....
This is my steps to myself directed as a memo only...
Please fallow my safety notes
Never do it ,never play with it.
I represent myself only and nobody else.
I do not take responsibility for anybody action.
I gave this information public as educational material only.
I'm in within the group of voluntaries,there is no head of that group and group does not have any leadership or any particular
agenda other than being fascinated with science.
Any of my comments from the past and/or present and in the future
in regards to wording used should be understand as my comments only and/or directly attached to safety notes of mine.
Any comments that might sound as encouragement or invitation or advertisement or in any other form
should be understand as in line with safety notes.
The reason for confusion as how to understand my comments is that I was not born American and English is not primary language.Therefore I experience language problem and proper format of expression problem.
I have some of progress in my English skills so:
If I ever used anywhere and in any form of expression world "You" that must be understand as" me" and "me" only.
I express opinion of mine and nobody else based on my USA Constitutional Rights
I'm not responsible for my opinion expressed in anyplace, as I might not fully understand wording that I have used to express myself.
To write part LEGAL NOTE I have used help of fellow who I think understand English better than me.
USA is country of emigrants and based on Constitution we are allowed to express our self to the best of our ability

End of legal note.




Wesley
Please read in between the words.

term:"read in between the words." means all comas and ,(,),., and symbols of that nature
heeeeee

term "heeeeee"
means my good lough and I have constitutional rights to express myself and/or lough as response to
any emotion of mine .That "heeeeee" is not associated with any of this topic.

[RAMSET]

Very nice to see you Happy Wesley!!

Very Nice!

""Thank you"" ....just isn't good enough ?
Someday I hope to shake your Hand and give you a big hug!!



Chet

[tagor]

Duncan,
Glad to see you active. Thought for a while the men in black had you in their clutches!

Here is an old French patent I thought would be of particular interest here.

David

Meyer-Mace Isotopic NMR Generator

on: 22 March 2008, 22:59:16 »QuoteI'm impressed by simple effective devices, and the FR2680613 patent from Michael Meyer and Yves Mace could be a fine example of simplicity, if it works. This patent has been noted once before in the Selfrunning cold electricity circuit from Dr.Stiffler thread. My main interest is in replicating the Barbat patent, but couldn't resist looking at this one as it also uses three coils to produce an effect
This should be a good replication project for those without years of knowledge and experience and access to $s and $s of equipment.
Generator of energy by resonant nuclear ferromagnetism, consisting of a "U"-shaped chassis made of mild steel containing a cylindrical bar made of ferromagnetic fuel rod on which at least 3 induction coils act. The first coil is an electromagnet, the second is a nuclear magnetic resonance actuator, the third recovering the induction energy present in the bar. Device intended particularly to supply commercially exploitable electrical energy.
The Michel Meyer-Mace solid state energy converter
http://l2.espacenet.com/textdoc?DB=E...&QPN=FR2680613
http://freenrg.info/TESLA/Tesla_Switch/D3.pdf page 45-46

[barbosi]

The caduceus coil makes unipolar magnetic field what is needed for our coil-capacitor experiment:
1)The flyback transformer "see" Tesla coil as capacitor.

Just this statement makes me believe you were inspired by Naudin's work:
The Scalar Waves Transmitter by JL Naudin

Before going any further, I would like to point to some facts, which unfortunately are lost from the common knowledge.

Wikipedia tells us (like main stream science) that a single conductor carrying an electric current generates a [magnetic] field like in figure 1.

However, in the old times the information was different. See "Electric discharges waves and impulses" by Charles Proteus Steinmetz. It is shown at the page 10 a similar figure with a bit more details. Here you have it in figure 2.

In that book it is said:

The conductor is surrounded by a magnetic field, or a magnetic flux ................ With single conductor, the lines are concentric circles ................

An electrostatic, or, more properly called, dielectric field, ............... With a single conductor, the lines of dielectric force are radial straight lines, as shown dotted............

As one sees, the electrostatic (dielectric) component/field has been omitted and not even thought in school.

With this in mind, let's analyse Naudin's statement:

This coil has a cancelling effect of the magnetic fields at the nodes ............
Once the magnetic field is cancelled, you are left with a field of pure potential. This field will have longitudinal scalar wave pattern. This field will be a narrow thread like beam parallel to the cylindrical axis.

The coil is wound on a 45 degree angle up and down the length of the form creating a series of 90 degree intersections where the windings cross (caduceus coil).

The magnetic field do not cancel in the nodes, because in those spots they are not in the same plane, but rather in perpendicular planes.

I'll let you visualise within your imagination to determine what happens with the dielectric field.

My point is that coils with different particular shapes are adopted in order to shape, cancel or enforce a field or another. Tesla is famous for using different shapes and he did it for a well understood reason. Hence my original question why did you chose that shape for the coil.

Moreover, I don't know how that particular coil got the name "Caduceus". A real Caduceus is shown also in the attached picture. The wires do not touch. And at any point one wire is perpendicular to the second one. Please try to visualise both fields generated by each wire and how those interact. The same for your adopted coil. Is that what you want? Secondarily I wonder, may the head of the snakes act as a spark gap?

Hopefully that explains hard bits.

Thanks for your explanation and I wish you won't take offensive my remarks, as I merely point to some errors that may be avoided.

I also wish you may point to a single set of schematics describing the overall functioning of your apparatus. As there are many hand draw schematics in different places, along with video clips which show sometimes different setups, it is confusing to follow the concept you envision.

Thanks again for sharing.

[dllabarre]

Before going any further, I would like to point to some facts, which unfortunately are lost from the common knowledge.

Wikipedia tells us (like main stream science) that a single conductor carrying an electric current generates a [magnetic] field like in figure 1.

However, in the old times the information was different. See "Electric discharges waves and impulses" by Charles Proteus Steinmetz. It is shown at the page 10 a similar figure with a bit more details. Here you have it in figure 2.

Also from that same book, this image showing the magnetic field between 2 wires where the current is flowing in opposite directions from each other like in a Tesla Bifilar wound coil I presume.

[thedude]

Moreover, I don't know how that particular coil got the name "Caduceus". A real Caduceus is shown also in the attached picture. The wires do not touch. And at any point one wire is perpendicular to the second one. Please try to visualise both fields generated by each wire and how those interact. The same for your adopted coil. Is that what you want? Secondarily I wonder, may the head of the snakes act as a spark gap?

Yes, i've seen many descriptions or uses of the word "Caduceus" in relation to coils of differing orientation. I've even heard a Tesla Pancake refered to in such a way. It does become confusing. Speaking of Tesla Pancake coil, I'm winding one today. I'm using the heaviest foil tape i could get and dry wall seam tape as an insulator. Wesley and team are refering to it as a coil capacitor, and thats ok with me too. :P

Am I correct in my understanding that a Tesla pancake coil is self inducing to some degree? Capacitance and inductance of coil and wire length in the yoke coil does definitely make a difference. I am using my two new signal generators and doing my best to generate a 1.2mhz frequency resonance in my cap bank .97nf across the spark gap with out ionizing the gap. Pretty close there, however, my resonances within my 50 and 15 wind primaries are much different as I am using 16 gauge wire not 18.

I am able to light a 15watt 120volt incandescent bult on about 37 volts AC showing on the secondary with only the (1) signal generator on the 50 wind primary with a frequency of 17khz. Cool. Made me happy to see it light up and get warm. So thats just one generator doing that. I may have made a reasonably efficient low current AC transformer! But there may be some differences. lol I do see how the analogy of "Caduceus" is being related to the orientation of the secondary pickup 75 wind side. It is at a union at the bottom (or innermost) point of the coil where with capacitance is of issue, but i'm not convinced its an applicable label on the yoke design. The new cylinder design, in essence, does tapper as a cone as it comes to a point at the bottom and there is a union there, so i see that as being more applicable to the name.

The other odd issue i'm having in understanding what i'm looking at is that i am completely unable to measure the ac current being consumed at the bulb. With the 15watt bulb disconnected, i'm showing 37 volts AC across the 31.3nf bank of caps and the voltage drops from 37V to 14V when lighting the bulb. However, when i use a inline amp meter or an external one i'm unable to register any amp flow whatsoever?? Is it longitudinal? I am unable to feel any current when holding both ends with my fingers with or without the bulb in place. It is strange, but i'm not convinced that its anything exceptional at this point. There are some anomalies though and thats what interesting to me.

I'm back at it today and i'm testing right now. Going to post some pictures and maybe a video later. Charging up camera ATM.

[Slovenia]

PDF File for Wesley Device

I put together a pdf file for this device. It's a little easier to study from because it just has input from the three team members of Wesley's team. Enjoy!!

[thedude]

WOW thanks!! Slovenia

I put together a pdf file for this device. It's a little easier to study from because it just has input from the three team members of Wesley's team. Enjoy!!

Wonderful PDF and explanations. I only had a quick look at it but i can tell it is really what we need to get these devices working at full output.

I have to apologize that i haven't posted any results here recently as i'm currently building a 4'x8' triple bus bar 6"x6" solar panel. Been routering my own frame from green treated 10' 2x4s , painting and staining and have had to clear space in my lab to build the panel recently.

Suffice it to say that i'm excited to get back to working with this line of experimentation. My attention wavers and switches around alot. Its like the wind. But it eventually always comes back.

Thanks so much for thinking of us here on this thread. This is going to be very helpful. I'm also putting together a new PC system in my lab for broadcasting as well as for using as my spectrum analyzer. Haven't had one in my testing and calibrating procedures so i've had some trouble getting to know the resonance in my yoke core. Trial and error, and thats no good. I worry about my new PC going into a room with all the disruptive discharges i usually play with. Lots of BEMF in other experiments, thats why my old system with analyzer is down. Need to build a faraday cage, but thats not going to help with grounded PC and leads running out. Have to use the analyzer carefully, i've got fluke 100mhz 2 ch scope. I really want to make these bulbs run brightly. I've got them lite, so i'm feeling some pure motivation here. Have found that sweeping around alot is good for providing me with a headache. :P

Thanks again, and sorry for my rant here.

[Slovenia]

Thank-You!!

Nice to hear from you. You are welcome!! I'm glad to be of help.

Wonderful PDF and explanations. I only had a quick look at it but i can tell it is really what we need to get these devices working at full output.

I have to apologize that i haven't posted any results here recently as i'm currently building a 4'x8' triple bus bar 6"x6" solar panel. Been routering my own frame from green treated 10' 2x4s , painting and staining and have had to clear space in my lab to build the panel recently.

Suffice it to say that i'm excited to get back to working with this line of experimentation. My attention wavers and switches around alot. Its like the wind. But it eventually always comes back.

Thanks so much for thinking of us here on this thread. This is going to be very helpful. I'm also putting together a new PC system in my lab for broadcasting as well as for using as my spectrum analyzer. Haven't had one in my testing and calibrating procedures so i've had some trouble getting to know the resonance in my yoke core. Trial and error, and thats no good. I worry about my new PC going into a room with all the disruptive discharges i usually play with. Lots of BEMF in other experiments, thats why my old system with analyzer is down. Need to build a faraday cage, but thats not going to help with grounded PC and leads running out. Have to use the analyzer carefully, i've got fluke 100mhz 2 ch scope. I really want to make these bulbs run brightly. I've got them lite, so i'm feeling some pure motivation here. Have found that sweeping around alot is good for providing me with a headache. :P

Thanks again, and sorry for my rant here.

[Slovenia]

Working Device

I know someone who has one of these working, so enough information has been provided here to make a working machine. It's a very interesting device indeed.

[Slovenia]

Many Thanks!!!!!!!!!!!

I've been studying the information provided by Wesley and his team. It is fantastic information and we owe a great deal to you guys. I want to offer special thanks to the Wesley Team:

Arunas
Aidas
Wesley

You guys are great men. Thank-you very much!!

[FaradayFaith]

Hello

Hi all,
I have read up on some of the stuff on this forum and have read many books and watch too many videos regarding FE devices to name. I have been trying to get some basic experiments to test theories out and to better understand my knowledge of electricity and anything that I may be able to work on.
I had contacted WITTS and have been listening to their show for the last two weeks, but it's seems that this forum will share more information that they will. I really feel they have good intentions, but are going about the best way to help people in the wrong way. They greatly underestimate how many other people with the advent on the internet might be able to replicate a device if they would show how it works.

That being said I was trying to find out if anyone other than who seem to be affiliates of WITTS themselves has had any verifiable evidence as to there energy devices or fuel enhancement etc.

I really hate that as much information there can be done about the problems that every human on this planet is facing it is equally met with people that want nothing else than to make money off of those that just want to help the cause.

Any comments from people who have donated and gotten devices from them etc would be of great help.

Thanks

[TAURADA NUTAD]

hello, hello...

knock, knock...is somebady here?
come on to work...!
it's a new year, with new ideea and new energy-maybe free ....
let's go to catch some electron's who don't have a master and play arouns us...