If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Yep. Joit, have experimented a bit with Leedskalnin's PMH. I have a YouTube vid where ferrite is shown to work - SO - this concept seems very real. It's the double pulsing of different frequencies that is the new departure in many ways.
Such resonance tuning by the Horiz and Vert circuits on a TV is a very very novel approach (to my knowledge anyway), though, in my case, I doubt I have both sections still in place on any old CRT monitor lol.
There's no need for hidden batteries, in my opinion. It's a conversion to light, where heat and motor torque are not required...both of those are the kickers for free energy creation. HV and transformation to higher outputs of primarily light are easily capable quantities, when considering wireless energy Tesla tower circuits. Ringing the energies that would dissipate as heat removes one waste factor and must surely boost efficiency, as these fellows seem to be demonstrating.
Resonance and pulsing are clear favourites for new energy production methods in the future.
There's no need for hidden batteries, in my opinion. It's a conversion to light, where heat and motor torque are not required...both of those are the kickers for free energy creation. HV and transformation to higher outputs of primarily light are easily capable quantities, when considering wireless energy Tesla tower circuits. Ringing the energies that would dissipate as heat removes one waste factor and must surely boost efficiency, as these fellows seem to be demonstrating.
Resonance and pulsing are clear favourites for new energy production methods in the future.
I agree, I think we will find, in the near future that illumination can be created, more efficiently, essentially. With no need to call it free energy. Driving two 100 watt light bulbs to complete illumination, without using 200 watts... well... that is indeed a horrible methodology for displaying free energy, no? Show me an enclosure heated with a 200 watt element, the before and after temperatures, time, volume etc...
Point being, I have done a couple of things that stop me from falling into the "quick-to-believe that light is X-watts" frame of mind:
1. I have driven 3 tubes, 15 watt fluorescents, with a 21" Slayer exciter, using MOSFETS, 10 watts in, and I'm pretty damn sure I was producing the same lumens as one driven conventionally using 15-20 watts. And I say this, because the room was, well, just brighter - period.
So, was it free energy? Not a chance. No way it was.
You can also partially illuminate an LED with micro amperes using completely dead AA's. Take the amp load reading, and that's right, that LED is drawing micro amps. No fancy circuit, no oscillator, no joule thief, just dead batteries.
So on each end of the scale, lumens is a ****ty way to demonstrate free energy, period. There are too many ways to vary how you produce them. Joules of heat energy, proven, is the only acceptable method, really. Raise the temperature of 1 litre of water, 10 degrees C, or something.
I'd love to believe this thing works, but quite frankly, I think it is pulsing inverter thats efficient as using HV / pulse technology to get 2 lightbulbs nearly as bright as they might be when driven hard with current.... using way less current. Not a lot different than what lasersabre is doing right now. Basically I believe that we spend too much energy heating up molecules of various light emitting compounds and we are find ways to run lamps cooler.
Cool stuff either way tho. Great off grid applications.
Last edited by kcarring; 11-01-2011, 04:48 AM.
Reason: typo
---------------------------------------------------- Alberta is under attack... http://rethinkalberta.com/
Has anyone seen my Bedini Ceiling Fan that pushes the warm air down, and charges batteries as an added bonus? Me neither. 'Bout time I made one!!!!! :P
Wesley's Group is Tariels Kapanadze good friends. Tariel is very ill from being poisioned over a month ago. TK is giving his device open source thru Wesley's group. This is the Kapanadze device but is revised (as always happens, technology evolves). The ferrite core is from an old CRT yoke. Full discussion can be had following the hot topic on it at Overunity.com. Suggest you read from pages 500 up. There will be a dloadable PFD made later since this is all forefront happenings.
The basic concept is on wave collision and scalar buildup. Suggest you subscribe to his video channel for build assistance.
It is good to be with you all in such a knowledgable forum.
PS You can cut ferrite cores with a tile cutter (wet diamond continous wheel). If you need a safe large HV capacitor I would try a CRT (picture tube or o scope display) they are made for it. Edited
The basic concept is on wave collision and scalar buildup.
And atomic spin resonant frequencies!
We are pushing electrons out of orbit and making elliptical orbits and when our fields disappear, it go back to normal orbits. This is where we get strong magnetic oscillations.
Thanks again for sharing this information. You mentioned that all 3 coils needed to be set up as "tank" circuits. Is this correct? Would the output coil ( secondary - 150turn coil ) be set up at 60hz? Also, the primary 15T coil at 60 hz ( 50hz ). The second primary ( 150turn ) set up for natural resonance from tests.
2 of the 3 seem quite easy but the 15T primary capacitance would need to be extremely large if it's at 60 hz.
I have a test coil made up, the easy part... now it's down to clarification and details...
Wesley's Group is Tariels Kapanadze good friends. Tariel is very ill from being poisioned over a month ago. TK is giving his device open source thru Wesley's group. This is the Kapanadze device but is revised (as always happens, technology evolves). The ferrite core is from an old CRT yoke. Full discussion can be had following the hot topic on it at Overunity.com. Suggest you read from pages 500 up. There will be a dloadable PFD made later since this is all forefront happenings.
The basic concept is on wave collision and scalar buildup. Suggest you subscribe to his video channel for build assistance.
It is good to be with you all in such a knowledgable forum.
PS You can cut ferrite cores with a tile cutter (wet diamond continous wheel). If you need a safe large HV capacitor I would try a CRT (picture tube or o scope display) they are made for it. Edited
That's what I've used above. The ferrite ring / yoke came from an old CRT TV.
Re cutting the ferrite in half and for people without a diamond cutter. I have a Panasonic TV TX/21S3T/Z and the ferrite is in made in 2 halves and is glued to the CRT gun (easy to pry off).
Regards
John
Re cutting the ferrite in half and for people without a diamond cutter. I have a Panasonic TV TX/21S3T/Z and the ferrite is in made in 2 halves and is glued to the CRT gun (easy to pry off).
Regards
John
Cook ferrite in HOT boiling water
Glue will soften
you can easily take it apart inside boiling water
Works 100% perfect for glue inside PC PSU ferrite transformers. Havent tried TV core yet
Glue will soften
you can easily take it apart inside boiling water
Works 100% perfect for glue inside PC PSU ferrite transformers. Havent tried TV core yet
It works , however most of those yoke cores composed of two parts are simply joined with clips and can be quite easily dismantled when clips are removed.
Still some more Questions about the Setup from this Crt Ferrit Core, is this Braid still needed there? It seems like there is are more Wire inside, the Braid itself shall be the Dielectric, the Wire inside the Braid should only be looped with a Spark Gap?
T100 can you answer this?
Last edited by Joit; 11-02-2011, 03:54 PM.
Reason: spelling
Theorizer are like High Voltage. A lot hot Air with no Power behind but they are the dead of applied Work and Ideas.
Ok i reviewed it and the Answer is allready there.
The Braid is connected to a HV Transformer, the Primary from this Transformer is driven with the Resonant Frequency from the Core,
where i guess, that Iron Core may have a lower Resonance Frequency as Ferrit, but Ferrit has lower Losses.
Theorizer are like High Voltage. A lot hot Air with no Power behind but they are the dead of applied Work and Ideas.
We are pushing electrons out of orbit and making elliptical orbits and when our fields disappear, it go back to normal orbits. This is where we get strong magnetic oscillations.
I find this very interesting as it seems to be within the realms of the work I have been doing in the past and present.
I will put my neck out and say what you have shown is true. I have been working for many years on using two frequencies and combining them, the one which is near to what you are doing is the STEAP which is also similar to Dr. Stifflers e-cat. Here is used one frequency to create the drive for a parametric oscillator. This parametric oscillator creates two frequencies as one side is an LC circuit which creates a secound frequency, these two frequencies are then fed into a transformer where they combine and it is at this point that energy is pumped in from the vibrating molecules much like what you have said above.
My present work is vibrating molecules in water vapour and gases in the same way, but here the energy is created in the water and gas molecules "they vibrate at very high frequency and create extreamly high heat within those molecules". In your setup and in STEAP the vibration is in the magnetic medium which is picked up by the output coil and hay presto you create power.
I would like to make up what you have done, the problem at the moment as some will know from Aarons jet engine thread, is that I have my son in hospital and my time is very very limited to say the least.
The high voltage injection at a third frequency is a novel idea, I would be very careful of the frequency as ferrite can stress very easily and explode when it is very thin, also the spark gap will determine the frequency as you have said that you use, that could be a problem of stability "just thinking aloud on that one"
Well all the best, I will be keeping a eye on this thread
In this circuit I see at work more than one of the things that Tesla promoted. I see his high frequency current circuit, which the spark gap is incorporated into. I also see the issue of proper tuning, ie: resonance, at each stage of the circuit. I also see tesla's improved "magneto-coil" which is the bifilar coil that reconnects to itself with the functional result of increasing the potential between adjacent windings, which in turn lowers the self inductance of the coil. These guys are BRIGHT. They've incorporated many of Tesla's works into one functional unit, which I have no doubt Tesla would have already known about but would not have revealed to others.
To be quite frank, I don't see a single thing that makes me question the circuit or be suspicious about it. I've been at the stage of studying resonance myself and I already know from studying Tesla's work that the place where you would want to create your loop is right where the capacitive discharge effect occurs, which in this circuit, is the metal braids/copper plate, that has been inserted about the ferrite core.
My only concern is whether or not the ferrite cores are required as Tesla made plenty of air coils and the air coils may permit higher frequencies with out the problem of cracking a ferrite core.
To boost the output from such a system one would want to boost the voltage/frequency before the spark gap.
My hat is off to these guys and I will work on my own replication as time permits.
Comment