If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
I have a really good friend who speaks fluent Russian and he knows of this device. He says it will provide 10 KW of electricity. Anyway, he says that there is enough information posted at the Russian site to replicate this device with no problems.
The Russian site is already translated into English. There are three replications of the Kapanadze shown there. Anyway, there is a lot of data there with regard to the replications. My contact is a full time physics, chemistry, and biology professor, so I don't want to burden him to much or I might lose him as a contact. If you had a specific question, that might be a better bet to ask him that. I have another contact who has built the Tiger device and says it works for him. He may share more information in time.
I was busy today, so i couldn't see until now your requests for my schematic, and i have worked today on one another super schematic and now i can share with you both schematics :
First one (you can use it if you want fantastic brightness out from led torch for the minimum current cost 120-220 mAmps...)
Hi cikljamas,
I am a little bit confused by your second schematics, and if you don't mind, can you clarify the following aspects of your circuit?
1) What is the source input at the left hand side written as "phase" and "theta" symbol ? Is it the AC 220V or is it a 12V battery?
2) Are there any reference about the winding and wire gauges of the toroidal transformer, the step=up transformer and the step-down transformer?
3) Is the inverter a conventional DC-AC inverter, or is it a special built one?
Sorry for bothering you with all these questions, but I want to help replicate this good idea of yours, that is why I am asking questions.
Thanks for your great help.
Hey! Utkin maybe right!
there is my oscillogramms!
Hi, Ganzha,
It appears that you were right, that the overunity device is Tiger's device. The other guys, led by Wesley are running around in circles unable to "replicate". OK Tiger has proved his point. Now that we know that he is the INVENTOR! Can he please teach us how to replicate. This is, after all, Tiger's forum. We feel like children who have lost their father. Can you help please?
As Tiger's translator can you ask him to teach us please?
Kidnap our moderator and mentor?Be Scrump'in our apples next !
Bit off making away with our moderator and mentor! even if you think you have backed the wrong horse! I'm sure the team on your thread will work out the missing link in due course! consider this.. you are using almost every electrical effect known and unknown, in a device that looks deceptively easy.. So much use is made of the linear wave, and Linear wave resonance, The use of the sine wave and sine wave resonance, also Impedance matching and the standing wave, 100% conversion conversion between one and the other is achieved ! Tesla, Tom Brown,John Bedini,Tom Bearden and so very many others have already told you there is very much more to the linear wave and its constituent parts than grabbing all the energy you can lay your hands on.for instance I suspect you are actually trying your hand at harvesting this ... Scientist photographed soul leaving the body in death 2nd part - YouTube
The high power high frequency spurious signals you are generating are hazardous to health so be careful!. There is a way forward (as long as you think backwards) But if you expect the knowledge of any traditionally trained electrical engineer or professor be be able to work through to an answer they will not.. you are in the realm of good and evil, ying and yang and with respect to.
What I believe to be the answer to the enigma you now face I have long ago broadcast as that force above directed. Go back to about page 500 of the original overunity.com investigation and study on a few pages and the answer should hit you between the eyes if its meant to. If Tiger has been able to see in reverse and got to the answer.(which he has) whilst others are claiming the "high ground"Then he will feel very hurt, I suggest the rest of that team apologise and asks Tiger to forgive and then we can all move on. Up on that wave the discord is very evident Evil has many faces! I have pointed to this discord earlier and Tiger will be aware of it. It isn't really "an invention" you are uncovering its a god given power of the universe .. do it with care and good intention. If your team is in bedlam then dont ask Tiger directly ask the other members of the team to "come clean" or else the canker will fester!
Hi, Ganzha,
It appears that you were right, that the overunity device is Tiger's device. The other guys, led by Wesley are running around in circles unable to "replicate". OK Tiger has proved his point. Now that we know that he is the INVENTOR! Can he please teach us how to replicate. This is, after all, Tiger's forum. We feel like children who have lost their father. Can you help please?
As Tiger's translator can you ask him to teach us please?
Hi cikljamas,
I am a little bit confused by your second schematics, and if you don't mind, can you clarify the following aspects of your circuit?
1) What is the source input at the left hand side written as "phase" and "theta" symbol ? Is it the AC 220V or is it a 12V battery?
2) Are there any reference about the winding and wire gauges of the toroidal transformer, the step=up transformer and the step-down transformer?
3) Is the inverter a conventional DC-AC inverter, or is it a special built one?
Sorry for bothering you with all these questions, but I want to help replicate this good idea of yours, that is why I am asking questions.
Thanks for your great help.
1. AC 220V
Instead of answering questions 2 and 3 i made much simpler test and with twice better result by conducting current through primary of just one toroid (2 x 12...50 VA) and using secondary to light led torch (fully brightness)
So we have 10 % of efficiency like that because if i have to light two 11 W or two 15 W bulbs through primary to get from the secondary enough current to fully light 3 W led torch it is around 10 percent i guess of efficiency.
That means i am not showing anything special, i am just demonstrating (as i already wrote) working principle of using "collateral damage" of conducting current through primary of the transformer and using that "collateral damage" for lighting led torch. Why led torch? Because there is not enough current to light cfl, at least not cfl which needs more than 11 W to light.
But what i tried to achieve with my experiment is to motivate people who are good in theory to help us calculating how should we construct or even what kind of already made transformer we should buy to be able to use same principle and pull out from that "collateral damage" much, much more (as that russian Alexander) current and much, much better efficiency (over 90 %, or even OU).
Now, i hope you all understand the whole point of my experiment.
I hope Duncan is one of those who knows how to achieve OU using this principle, but i am not sure that he is going to answer my question because he is man of principle, i mean he does not want to talk about something that might be even just a little bit off topic, if i am wrong then i send big sorry to Duncan.
If i am not wrong than thanks to Duncan anyway and welcome someone else who knows the secrets that we are looking for.
Hi cikljamas ,
very hard to understand, what you exactly mean.
So did you measure any input and output power in your circuits ?
Do you get more output power out, than you are putting in ?
Did you get any phase shift to 90 degrees in the input, so the input
power is just reactive ( blind reactive power only) when you draw
current at the output (active power) ?
P.S: These are vertical leakage currents inside the CCD or CMOS elements...
nothing extraordinary, just comes from the internal structure of these
photosensitive circuits...
hartiberlin you are absolutely correct with your post! it is commonly called "CCD smear"
I have a friend who works in the photography equipment industry and is a very keen professional photographer and I showed him last night, some of the images supposedly containing strange phenomena and he just smiled and said " I thought you told me these pll are electronics wizards"
he basicly explaned that this only happens in CCD sensors but not CMOS sensors and he spoke about global shutters and their failures!
He said that when you get purple beams with wavy lines it is called "Dark smear"
The history of science shows that theories are perishable.With every new truth that is revealed,we get a better understanding of Nature and our conceptions and views are modified. - Nikola Tesla
There is another thread dedicated to this subject but basically http://www.energeticforum.com/renewa...tml#post168066 there is an algorithm that can and is used (probably by your smiling friend also) but it is the mathematical base at the heart of the formation that is in question. If your smiling friend could compile the Fourier compilation that would be useful! Still thanks for the input to an interesting phenomena.a bit like saying "they " call it dowsing it gives no information on dowsing at all!
hartiberlin you are absolutely correct with your post! it is commonly called "CCD smear"
I have a friend who works in the photography equipment industry and is a very keen professional photographer and I showed him last night, some of the images supposedly containing strange phenomena and he just smiled and said " I thought you told me these pll are electronics wizards"
he basicly explaned that this only happens in CCD sensors but not CMOS sensors and he spoke about global shutters and their failures!
He said that when you get purple beams with wavy lines it is called "Dark smear"
The history of science shows that theories are perishable.With every new truth that is revealed,we get a better understanding of Nature and our conceptions and views are modified. - Nikola Tesla
This rolling shutter is what is going to shed some light on the effect.(intended)
I have said this before but no one has done it yet.
While filming the effect, barrel roll the camera. This will put the CCD in a different orientation and the rolling shutter follows that orientation. If the laser line in the recording stays vertical, then it is not the shutter or smear causing the effect.
This rolling shutter is what is going to shed some light on the effect.(intended)
I have said this before but no one has done it yet.
While filming the effect, barrel roll the camera. This will put the CCD in a different orientation and the rolling shutter follows that orientation. If the laser line in the recording stays vertical, then it is not the shutter or smear causing the effect.
I also noted it does not move with camera! to..wit Kapanadze OIL 18 KW 3 / 3 - YouTube .. as you will see here where camera is moving ... as previous there is another thread!
Comment