Walter Russell - Understanding and applying his work

[Aha]

Start at the begining

[QUOTE=MonsieurM;170616]If you want to grasp fully Walter Russell's work...Start by decoding his table of Elements... ...angles, flow, positions etc...

Check out the following site

Walter Russell's Cosmology

[MonsieurM]

[QUOTE=Aha;219301]

If you want to grasp fully Walter Russell's work...Start by decoding his table of Elements... ...angles, flow, positions etc...

Check out the following site

Walter Russell's Cosmology

thank you

[m786]

Tesla & Russell

Tesla mentioned important numbers are : 3,6,9 .
Russell mentioned it is all about frequency and wave.

So what is common between them?

Solfeggio frequencies - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[cplouffe]

Cosmic clock, Inert gases, and Elements

Hey guys... I posted this on my site but would love to hear your thoughts and comments.


So I have been really trying to understand the details of the chemical elements, locked potentials, and ratios of everything. I was talking with a new friend(a user on here) who is also a Russell fan and with our dialogue back and forth, a few light bulbs went off.

I looked back at the cosmic clock diagram in Atomic Suicide and noticed a few things. This is the one that has 2 arms on it pictured below.



From this I noticed how this can be used to explain the inert gas/element ratios and it shows how the male and female are mirrored in every step from inert gas 0 to wave amplitude 4 and back again.

I put this quick image together to show what I mean so you can follow the clock arms around during the cycles.



This helped me finally understand what the Russells meant by:

If you now examine the chemical elements, such as oxygen, fluorine, helium, nitrogen, sulphur, phosphorous, sodium or potassium, you will find that their nuclei consists of varying sized holes surrounded by rings of varying sizes and numbers. Helium has four rings with a very large hole within them. Helium divides into four pairs and becomes a solid sphere, which has squeezed the hole outside of it. Fluorine and lithium have one ring with a centering hole smaller than helium. Oxygen and beryllium have two rings with still smaller holes. Nitrogen and boron have three rings with almost no holes. These male and female equal pairs unite in marriage and become two hemispheres, the red and blue halves being divided by an equator. Chemists and physicists have recognized something of this mathematical orderliness and have given it the name of “valence.” They say that oxygen has a valence of two, carbon four, etc., etc., and they balance and vary their mixtures in the ratios of valence by putting two atoms, which have a valence of two, with one which has a valence of four, to equalize their potentials. This they have always done, but their text books give no adequate explanation for doing so. The real reason is that spinning rings which get closer to their Mind-centers in the Mind-nucleus of every atom, gain more and more power in the ratio of that closeness.

From what I understand now the inert gas rings are released one at a time as the plane moves up to each locked position. The rings accumulate until wave amplitude at 4 rings and these rings then mate with 4 mirrored rings on the opposite side. Then the rings are released on the way back unwinding back to the cathode or inert gas.

So we can look at the elements and see that a +1 element has 1 ring that has been projected and 3 inert gas rings surrounding it. As you move towards the wave amplitude the rings encompass the other rings and each one has a smaller hole. This is because of the spin being faster and the compression from the centripetal spinning vortex. So at 4-0-4 the inert gas rings are 0 and so on.

———-

This also got me thinking about modern day science and how they talk about the decay of elements as well as certain notations they use.

1st- I find it interesting that there is an electron configuration that uses Noble/Inert gases as their 1st section telling me that the inert gases are within the element themselves. For example:
K is [Ar] 4s^1
Sc: [Ar] 4s^2 3d^1
Ga: [Ar] 3d^10 4s^2 4p^1
Rh: [Kr] 4d^8 5s^1
Tb: [Xe] 4f^9 6s^2
Hg: [Xe] 4f^14 5d^10 6s^2
Rn: [Xe] 4f^14 5d^10 6s^2 6p^6



2nd- If the inert gases are the 0 seed of the elements and precede them in their octave, then you would think when they decayed or progressed through the unwinding “death cycle”, these things could be measured.

Well lo and behold… I look up a few of them and it matches with what they said. Check Mg and you see it decays to Neon. Check Pu and it decays to Radon(Niton). Check K and you find Argon. Very nice!

Now this also throws a monkey wrench in the current chart of elements that has H as the 1st element but nothing preceding it. How can you have that without an inert gas? How can you have a child without parents?

That sounds like another whole post about octaves and elements below Hydrogen.

—————————————

Also a few other thoughts and questions:

Walter mentioned that valency could be used along with the locked potentials +1 +2 +3 etc… But I also noticed “oxidation states” follow the same pattern. On the red male side you see +1 for Lithium and +2 for Beryllium etc… and -3 for Nitrogen and -2 for Oxygen. I need to learn more about it but the ratios seem to match up. All of this needs more looking into of course.

A few questions regarding Inert gases.

1. If they are inert how can compounds be created with them?

2. They are mentioned as the seed of the octave, Still Magnetic Light, spiritual elements, etc… How is it that they are able to be measured or mixed with as I mentioned in #1?

Thanks!

[morpher44]

A great idea for a movie...

So I had this interesting idea for a movie.

A bio on Tesla, but a sort of fictional reconstruction of detail
from all the known facts.

Tesla reaches a certain stage of his development where
a) he is essentially black-listed and gets no more funding from
JP Morgan or anyone else because of Morgan
b) he can't patent anything "controversial" either because of his
own "caution" or because of "influence" from parties involved
c) he does want to release what he has discovered to the
public w/o them noticing...

So what does he do?
He develops a set of friendships that he fosters for several years
to enable a timed-release of bits and pieces of his master plan,
which he knows will take 100 to 200 years to accomplish.
Like the "The League of Extraordinary Gentlemen", he selects
certain personalities that can help him accomplish his goal.
a) Mark Twain (Samuel Langhorne Clemens)
SciFi/Humorist Author
b) Walter Russell
Pseudo Science Extraordinaire
c) John Hays Hammond, Jr.
(access to Navy and Military Industrial Complex and
foot-in-the-door for patents w/o Tesla name)
d) Guglielmo Marconi
(Apprentice/Radio Engineer)
e) Alfred Hubbard
Automotive - Transportation - Intelligence Community -
Human Consciousness Experiments
f) Thomas Townsend Brown
Aviation - Space Research
g) Albert Einstien
Theoretical Physics / Mathmetician
h) Kurt Gödel
Master of Mathematics
i) J. Robert Oppenheimer
Nuclear Physicist - Expert in Technology from Antiquity

At the "Institute for Advanced Studies", they undertake the
major problems of the day, some unknown to the general public
such as the Nazi base in Antarctica, the E.T. problem, Time Manipulation,
Dangerous Free Energy Experiments that should be sequestered,
demonology.

I wonder if it happened. Sure would have been cool to be a fly
on the wall watching these guys.

[StweenyA]

Hey guys... I posted this on my site but would love to hear your thoughts and comments.

Thanks, do you have a higher res image for the cosmic clock you drew?

b) Walter Russell
Pseudo Science Extraordinaire

LOL

g) Albert Einstien
Theoretical Physics / Mathmetician

Einstein? but they were rivals.

[morpher44]

Einstein and Tesla

LOL
Einstein? but they were rivals.

Yeah. That is was makes it fun.
We only "think" they were rivals.

One guy believes in the Ether ... the other guy believes in space time.
On guys doesn't believe in speed-of-light being the limit.
The other guy does.
One guy makes stuff that works. The other guy never makes anything,
but his theories work.
They could be arguing about this on-screen as a running joke.
They both appeared to have worked on the Philedelphia Experiment:

True story about Philadelphia Expriment,Unified field Generators, Einstein & Tesla. PART 1 - YouTube

[MonsieurM]

)

your images kind of got me inspired and it dawned on me we can also overlap the Periodic Table :

just thought it worth to share :

[cplouffe]

Here is larger image of just the clock. Crude and quick in photoshop. But it shows how you can use the ratios of space/inert gas/stillness in relation to matter/motion/physical. More to come.

MM thanks for the overlays, I'll take a look at them in depth shortly.

[petar113507]

Hey guys... I posted this on my site but would love to hear your thoughts and comments.


So I have been really trying to understand the details of the chemical elements, locked potentials, and ratios of everything. I was talking with a new friend(a user on here) who is also a Russell fan and with our dialogue back and forth, a few light bulbs went off.

I looked back at the cosmic clock diagram in Atomic Suicide and noticed a few things. This is the one that has 2 arms on it pictured below.



From this I noticed how this can be used to explain the inert gas/element ratios and it shows how the male and female are mirrored in every step from inert gas 0 to wave amplitude 4 and back again.

I put this quick image together to show what I mean so you can follow the clock arms around during the cycles.

Very good. You are examining the relationship of "Matter body" versus "Space body". That is one way to use the cosmic clock.

The the nucleus/"dense matter body" exchange with the opposite mate -- the space body as you outlined.

If I could but add to your thought tangent -- in that the "space body" not only governs what the density of the forming nucleus (and therefore mass), but crystalization bond angles, and electrochemical valence.

If I could add onto that thought that the "space bodies" are governed by the E/W magnetic poles -- we would be cookin' with gas, my friend

It is not good enough just to have the theory. I will do my best to tie the theory together with practical application. Maybe we'll synthesize the gas that we'll be cooking with

In order to know how to utilize those two relationships -- we must not only understand the unwinding space body by the E/W poles -- but also the role of the N/S poles.


First, what you say. Then, what I say.

This helped me finally understand what the Russells meant by:



From what I understand now the inert gas rings are released one at a time as the plane moves up to each locked position. The rings accumulate until wave amplitude at 4 rings and these rings then mate with 4 mirrored rings on the opposite side. Then the rings are released on the way back unwinding back to the cathode or inert gas.

So we can look at the elements and see that a +1 element has 1 ring that has been projected and 3 inert gas rings surrounding it. As you move towards the wave amplitude the rings encompass the other rings and each one has a smaller hole. This is because of the spin being faster and the compression from the centripetal spinning vortex. So at 4-0-4 the inert gas rings are 0 and so on.

———-

This also got me thinking about modern day science and how they talk about the decay of elements as well as certain notations they use.

1st- I find it interesting that there is an electron configuration that uses Noble/Inert gases as their 1st section telling me that the inert gases are within the element themselves. For example:
K is [Ar] 4s^1
Sc: [Ar] 4s^2 3d^1
Ga: [Ar] 3d^10 4s^2 4p^1
Rh: [Kr] 4d^8 5s^1
Tb: [Xe] 4f^9 6s^2
Hg: [Xe] 4f^14 5d^10 6s^2
Rn: [Xe] 4f^14 5d^10 6s^2 6p^6



2nd- If the inert gases are the 0 seed of the elements and precede them in their octave, then you would think when they decayed or progressed through the unwinding “death cycle”, these things could be measured.

Well lo and behold… I look up a few of them and it matches with what they said. Check Mg and you see it decays to Neon. Check Pu and it decays to Radon(Niton). Check K and you find Argon. Very nice!

You could also say that the electron shells are inert gas rings, oblated into various spiral orbits...

Now this also throws a monkey wrench in the current chart of elements that has H as the 1st element but nothing preceding it. How can you have that without an inert gas? How can you have a child without parents?

That sounds like another whole post about octaves and elements below Hydrogen.

—————————————

Also a few other thoughts and questions:

Walter mentioned that valency could be used along with the locked potentials +1 +2 +3 etc… But I also noticed “oxidation states” follow the same pattern. On the red male side you see +1 for Lithium and +2 for Beryllium etc… and -3 for Nitrogen and -2 for Oxygen. I need to learn more about it but the ratios seem to match up. All of this needs more looking into of course.

And those solid metals are oxidized from gases who have an opposite "space body"



It's like two puzzle peices fitting together. One gap, one solid.

[petar113507]

A few questions regarding Inert gases.

1. If they are inert how can compounds be created with them?

2. They are mentioned as the seed of the octave, Still Magnetic Light, spiritual elements, etc… How is it that they are able to be measured or mixed with as I mentioned in #1?

Thanks!

If you are asking how you can take one gaseous substance of inert gas, and force them into unity with other substances -- it takes tremendous pressure.

The compounds are not created with them -- they are created around them, and cage them in. Water will form "clusters" around the inert gases if given sufficent pressure.
(matieralist)

If you are not asking about the substance itself -- and instead the pattern of motion which produces the inert gas -- Different crystaline structures, when on a sufficently small scale (nanoscale) -- can "simulate" the inert gases. What I mean, is that their structure.



In this picture I have circled the hollow rings which are the inert gases.
Notice that the red and blue waves intersect in the center of these rings.
Notice further, by following where they intersect -- that they follow until they are in the center of a crystaline looking strucutre.

Bedini uses gaps in the crystaline structure to conduct ions -- what if you had several of these "gaps" to form a "cage" like a bubble from within an element?

What if you selected two opposite mates on russell's table, and they oppositely balanced each other. If each imbalanced mate are divided from their parent inert gas -- and their opposite mate is the inverse of their solid body -- wouldn't the cubic crystaline structure "line up" of those two substances, where the inert gas would otherwise be, if it were not divided?



Inside out -- is space on the outside. Matter, surrounded by space.
Outside in -- is matter solids with space in the center.

And so, through crystalographic strucutres, by forming a "cage" and thus simulating inert gases -- might be able to progress up or down the octaves


I'm not going to pretend that I know exactly what I'm talking about here -- I've been reading this stuff like just about anybody else could -- but if you're willing to chew this stuff over, I'm down to share what I'm thinkin.

[petar113507]

I will be referencing these:
Documents | The Light Coalition

Download them
Print them out
Highlight them, draw on them.

I cannot express how much this has helped to comprehend the concepts at hand. They are

I beleive Russell's cosmology is not going to work with "just a passing glance" -- you must fully immerse yourself.
I will not pretend to be finished with doing so.
I will also not pretend to have a full understanding.
What I am outlining is what I am thinking after having looked at Russell’s work for a several years.
I do however, I think I have the mechanics sufficently clear in my mind, soas to begin a "group experiment". That means if you guys understand why I think these things work this way, we can all work together

These thoughts are distilled from his work – gleaning from his perpective with the intent of bringing his Philosophy and work towards a practical application.

This is a STARTING point.

I will, however, be using russell's ideas presented in "NCOU = New Concept Of the Universe" -- under careful examination – let us see if it gives us a starting point to establish an "open source" for atomic transmutation.

Here are the things I beleive I have sufficently clear in my mind:

• I will overview the experiments -- because they are the practical application of russell's theory.
• Then, examine what russell thought an inert gas is, and why it is important.
  
• From examining what an inert gases wave feild seems to be, I would like to collectively propose experiments which might help us discern magnetic angles to synthesize inert gases.
  
• With the "space body" magnetic cycle clearly outlined -- we would collectively be a few steps away from establishing the required conditions to produce useful elements from atmospheric gas through experimentation. (New hydrogen elements, Hydrogen, oxygen, nitrogen)
  
• If the principal of gas transmutation is understood in concept -- we would be close to testing the synthesis "new metals" -- steel produced from carbon and silicon.

If you are not familiar with russell's work -- this might confuse you. If you've read his work (New concept of the universe), and pondered on his gas transmutation -- we might get some practical application out of this.

If you think I'm wrong, this'll be a good discussion.

Either way, Open source is the only way we can all collectively challenge the industries governing our personal freedom


Let us first look at The Dr’s experiments
http://lightcoalition.org/wp-content...er%2CKovac.pdf
Overview:

• Walter Russell brings an evacuated tube of distilled water up to 300 Degrees Centigrade.
• Makes a spectral emission to confirm that it is distilled water. It is.
• Cools the tube from 300 degrees centigrade, while subjecting it to a magnetic field, composed of four individual solenoids at different angular relationships to each other.
  
• The gasses which emerge, differ based on the coil’s relationship. None of the seventeen “gas samples” which russell had examined resembled distilled water.
• In russell’s experiments, Nitrogen, oxygen, hydrogen, and helium appeared in the samples.
  
• In Grotz, binder, and kovac’s experiment replication – they also heated water up to its auto ionization temperature/pressure – and found they could produce fluorine, and nitrogen gases from the water samples.

====================================

For now – take away that the magnetic field "rudders" and their relationship to each other .

I will examine the function of magnetic field “rudders” in the presence of ions, and ionized gases later.

The "Rudder" concept will only be useful after you know what walter Russell thought magnetism IS -- how magnetism cycles through each element.

When you can see the same pattern throughout Russell's table of elements, then you will be able to see where our table has "holes" -- and therefore, where there is great potential for new substances.
=====================

http://lightcoalition.org/wp-content...20Articles.pdf

Overview:
Ron, toby and Tim followed up. They took nitrogen – and heated/cooled it – and examined the gases with a quadropole mass spectrometer.

• Nitrogen turned into lithium 5, and helium gas. Not when the gas was heated or cooled -- but rather when the nitrogen was ionized.
  
• The commonality between the two tests:
• Ionization + dual polarity magnetic fields = transmutation of the parent gas into new matieral + inert gas

========================

The concepts to take away here -- was that russell understood a relationship between magnetism and the elements evolution that I would like to investigate.

This ionization (I might go further, and say dielectric breakdown), when subjected to magnetic feilds in very precise ways -- results in transmutation.

With the goal in mind -- to understand the potential practical application of transmutation by understanding the mechanics behind russell's cosmogony -- we can begin by examining magnetism.

Again, I'm not perfect, but this should give you some ideas....

[petar113507]

Magnetism





I don't care what science says magnetism is. Russell could transmute gases, and science can't. So I'm willing to suspend whatever I think magnetism is to take on russell's perspective. I'd suggest you do the same.



What are the two electric workers?



Looks like the E feild of a magnet to me.



Magnetic poles are opposite polarities. Got it.



Opposite polarities void each other.



It seems to me, based on these pictures above -- that russell is talking about the intereference of the E feild and the B feild, and their relationship to each other.



Polarity, could be relating to the E feild, and how it divides -- or comes between two magnetic feilds of opposite polarities....



Annnnd.... The fulcrum could be the crossed B and E feilds. Isn't that the A feild?

Can someone give me a citation on that? Bearden referred to it, and I can't think of the guy who named the effect right now...

I think it sounded like baranov?

Anyways....

[petar113507]

Inert Gases 1



We can transmute elements, only as fine as our understanding goes.



What are we waiting for? Let's expand that understanding!



Let us therefore start from the beginning ,and examine the magnetic angles required to produce an inert gas.

Let us examine what walter Russell thought the inert gases were, soas to comprehend why they were important in their relationship to the two pairs of magnetic poles.



Let us learn how inert gases begin as a zero, so that we may grow from their seeds any matieral which we could need.
We might even find out how inert gases are wound up into dense matter.

What magnetic angles would be nescessary for inert gases?
Allow me to be more specific:
What intensity between the two pairs of magnetic poles (gauss), and what angular relationship would be nescessary?
How would that shape the E feild around the atoms?




Perhaps in learning about the atomic structure of the inert gas, we may understand which crystals simulate the zero balance of the inert gas.

If we were to comprehend which crystals have the master tone structure of a noble gas– we might discover how crystal structure progresses the cycle as dense matter’s “seed matieral”.


If matter is born in a zero plane equal potential – it follows that the zero plane of equal potential is matter’s beginning.



If that plane of zero potential is a ring – Walter Russell must have left other clues in his work that this was how he saw it.

That Implies that the rings have a seed centering them.
That implies that the ring structures contain the seeds inside them.
That implies that the plane of equal potential means BALANCE.

[petar113507]

Inert Gases 2



Note that on the E/W axis are where the hollow centered rings are – the inert gases. They are the result of unwinding.

Note also that they are where the two waveforms (red/blue) cross and balance each other.

Note also, that they cross in the center of the crystaline structure on the far right hand side. I will come back to this later – but this is a clue that inert gases atomic “micro” structure are simulated in a “macro” crystaline structure composed of many atoms.



This one is so that you can see where helium – the zero – is located



This one is so you can see the color scheme. Note that carbon has the yellow radiating arms, and the hot central sun.



This one is where you tie it all together.

The ring is in the top right hand corner. That is the”top view”. There are several arrows pointing to the “side view” of where the top view fits into place. Hollow center, ring, and between two wave amplitudes.



Inert gas is in the middle – on the zero "equal potential".



In the above two pictures, The red sphere is the nucleus at wave amplitude.
Inert gas -- White, balanced, and middle of the octave.
Carbon – wave amplitude – maximum heat.
It will help if you are familiar with this.
If I repeat this enough, it’ll stick. Why do I want it to stick? What will it do with that fresh in your memory?



What is the “one magnetic light” which becomes divided? (I think it's the B+E Feild)


They are everywhere. Look for them.
If you’re looking for the inert gases – you might find their purpose.
It naturally follows, What purpose do the inert gases have?