We have been thought in school that magnetism is "a property of materials that respond at an atomic or subatomic level to an applied magnetic field" (Wikipedia). The magnetic field is "demonstrated" in a magnet bar, as the simplest way to visualise it. By extension, the same was demonstrated with an electromagnet.
Next is an example which contradicts all this theory.
We have been presented with the concept of Cyclotron: File:Cyclotron patent.png - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Please note in the figure the "Magnetic Field" which it will make us believe that magnets or electromagnets will be used to create that field.
Now you'll see the principle of Cyclotron demonstrated to a small scale: Ball Cyclotron.
Does anyone sees magnets or electromagnets? Even the title of the video clip says it is an "electrostatic accelerator".
Russell said that the fields at the extremities of a magnet bar are the two opposite electric fields centered by the magnetism which generates and controls them. The same for the extremities of an electromagnet.
The Earth has been presented as:
1. A giant magnet
2. A big ball which like other celestial bodies manifests gravitation.
Except ferromagnetic materials, nobody proved a magnet experiencing gravity-like properties. A bar magnet will not "attract" paper, dust, or metals like aluminium, copper, etc. But an electrostatic charged baton will do it. So it seems an electrostaticaly charged body will manifest gravity-like properties better than a bar magnet.
Regards.
Next is an example which contradicts all this theory.
We have been presented with the concept of Cyclotron: File:Cyclotron patent.png - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Please note in the figure the "Magnetic Field" which it will make us believe that magnets or electromagnets will be used to create that field.
Now you'll see the principle of Cyclotron demonstrated to a small scale: Ball Cyclotron.
Does anyone sees magnets or electromagnets? Even the title of the video clip says it is an "electrostatic accelerator".
Russell said that the fields at the extremities of a magnet bar are the two opposite electric fields centered by the magnetism which generates and controls them. The same for the extremities of an electromagnet.
The Earth has been presented as:
1. A giant magnet
2. A big ball which like other celestial bodies manifests gravitation.
Except ferromagnetic materials, nobody proved a magnet experiencing gravity-like properties. A bar magnet will not "attract" paper, dust, or metals like aluminium, copper, etc. But an electrostatic charged baton will do it. So it seems an electrostaticaly charged body will manifest gravity-like properties better than a bar magnet.
Regards.
Comment