Walter Russell - Understanding and applying his work

[ZeropointEnergy]

Yes.

Has anyone seen the papers that John Bedini has on Walter's work? I watched a video with Tom Bearden and John about transmutation etc... I was just wondering if anyone has seen the book he was showing in the video. The video was from The Energy from the Vacuum series. Thanks!

Hello,

Not the papers but the experiments inspired from Walter Russell's work

The DVD is in the "Energy from the Vacuum" series, #18. When covering transmutation he holds up Walter Russell's book, "The Universal One" and said all the information is in there if we want it. I don't want to be spoon fed but has taken years to build up the nerve to read his work. Therefore, a replicatable experiment is where my mindset is focused on.

Bedini does show the Silver+Ruby slag from the process and the gold transmuted from the copper substraights.
I was inspired to try a test with Hydrochloric acid as described in the EFTV#18 DVD, but I failed to obtain much growth on the steel/also an iron rod in the months was sitting there (used 5 different mineral samples and was suprised NONE showed any promise)
As annoyed as I was by this at the time, now is an opportunity to work out where I went wrong/or how to do it correctly and share it with others to achieve the same results as I will upload.

You are attacking this technology from an angle that is needs clarity for me to 100% grasp the fundermental concepts, time will tell and has been true to form of late

Regards
Zero

[cplouffe]

Hello,

Not the papers but the experiments inspired from Walter Russell's work

The DVD is in the "Energy from the Vacuum" series, #18. When covering transmutation he holds up Walter Russell's book, "The Universal One" and said all the information is in there if we want it. I don't want to be spoon fed but has taken years to build up the nerve to read his work. Therefore, a replicatable experiment is where my mindset is focused on.

Bedini does show the Silver+Ruby slag from the process and the gold transmuted from the copper substraights.
I was inspired to try a test with Hydrochloric acid as described in the EFTV#18 DVD, but I failed to obtain much growth on the steel/also an iron rod in the months was sitting there (used 5 different mineral samples and was suprised NONE showed any promise)
As annoyed as I was by this at the time, now is an opportunity to work out where I went wrong/or how to do it correctly and share it with others to achieve the same results as I will upload.

You are attacking this technology from an angle that is needs clarity for me to 100% grasp the fundermental concepts, time will tell and has been true to form of late

Regards
Zero

Yes I have read most of WR's work... and REREAD after a light bulb goes off. I am now in the phase of gathering as much as I can to replicate and test myself. Intuitively I feel like the powder, acid, seed piece is not the direction I want to head in. I feel like the results John was getting with the furnace was missing the control of the coils etc... He was getting hit and miss results. It feels like other more readily available materials can be used.

Being able to adjust the pressure condition or position on the octave wave of the element being used is critical to me. So adjusting based on the gyroscopic principle will be key.

Working out the math for coil windings, power supply, etc... is where I am at. So I was hoping some of that info could be in papers like John has.

But of course all of the knowledge and power is within us. We just have to decentrate and go within. haha

[ZeropointEnergy]

Coil is easy

Yes I have read most of WR's work... and REREAD after a light bulb goes off. I am now in the phase of gathering as much as I can to replicate and test myself. Intuitively I feel like the powder, acid, seed piece is not the direction I want to head in. I feel like the results John was getting with the furnace was missing the control of the coils etc... He was getting hit and miss results. It feels like other more readily available materials can be used.

Being able to adjust the pressure condition or position on the octave wave of the element being used is critical to me. So adjusting based on the gyroscopic principle will be key.

Working out the math for coil windings, power supply, etc... is where I am at. So I was hoping some of that info could be in papers like John has.

But of course all of the knowledge and power is within us. We just have to decentrate and go within. haha

Hello,

We have all the infomation for the coils and the only unknown is the thickness of the wire to determine the amount of current allowed to pass through that wire. Since the concept is to use HV we can ascertain that any small gauge will work fine, I will use 0.4mm, 0.56mm and 1mm to compare down the track. I have a different concept to achieve with the Conical coils but there is parallel's and thus on the same path. We need to understand the fundermental concepts of these coils, then expand the applications.

Using a Neon Sign Transformer (NST) or more if want to vary the input to the 2 coils is the easiest way. I was going to use a variac to control the HV or multiple spark gaps to achieve the fluctuations.

P.S: I feel the information on the "Walter Russell Generator Coils Replication" posted here was not correct since they used a random variable of 50% less and not what is the logical conclusion.

Regards
Zero

[MonsieurM]

ZeropointEnergy , check out this post ..... it might interest you

http://www.energeticforum.com/201534-post29.html

[ZeropointEnergy]

ok.

ZeropointEnergy , check out this post ..... it might interest you

http://www.energeticforum.com/201534-post29.html

Hey MM,

I did start to read that thread at the beginning, has been 3-4 weeks since
I checked on the progress. Thanks for the reminder

Edit: Was a book by Joseph Henry in 1886, I'm suprised thought was other info

Regards
Zero

[cplouffe]

Hello,

We have all the infomation for the coils and the only unknown is the thickness of the wire to determine the amount of current allowed to pass through that wire. Since the concept is to use HV we can ascertain that any small gauge will work fine, I will use 0.4mm, 0.56mm and 1mm to compare down the track. I have a different concept to achieve with the Conical coils but there is parallel's and thus on the same path. We need to understand the fundermental concepts of these coils, then expand the applications.

Using a Neon Sign Transformer (NST) or more if want to vary the input to the 2 coils is the easiest way. I was going to use a variac to control the HV or multiple spark gaps to achieve the fluctuations.

P.S: I feel the information on the "Walter Russell Generator Coils Replication" posted here was not correct since they used a random variable of 50% less and not what is the logical conclusion.

Regards
Zero

Wow... great info. Thanks! I will add this to my info list. I was thinking of different power supplies and I am glad you mentioned the NST. I had wondered that.

[ZeropointEnergy]

Wow... great info. Thanks! I will add this to my info list. I was thinking of different power supplies and I am glad you mentioned the NST. I had wondered that.

My pleasure and that will obtain the desired control of the HV variables.

P.S: I would use 2 seperate NST's.

Regards
Zero

[StweenyA]

Reference: Iron would melt on Jupiter at 2degC

Why Russell Claims that melting point of for example Iron lowers when we go far away from the sun. For example Iron melting point in jupiters position is only 2C.

How is it than possible that space ships for example that NASA sends, I mean probes are not melted for example on the surface of Mars? When Melting point of for example Iron in Mars distance of the sun is pretty lower than at Earth positions

Those are Russell notes from Universal One, so very hard to understand, does not make sense?

Hi Grizli!

Can you give me a page reference for this claim - Ive been reading some of his work, and I like it - but I'd like to read this claim for myself, because I understand your criticism and I'd like to see if I'd interpret it in the same way...

At the end of the day, I think all claims must be backed up by experiments...and preferably ones that make me master of the visible universe. Muhahahha!

The reference is: The Universal One, page 120. Enjoy

[StweenyA]

Molecule diagram, or atoms reacting diagram?

I have been studying "New Concept of the Universe" hard... And whilst I seem to be slowly grasping some concepts, there is one thing that is still getting me down.

I don't think anybody else understands it either, because nobody seems to talk about it, or they ignore it as though it's not important.

But if we can really visualize it, I think the veil could be lifted... So please don't pretend to understand, or tell me that you know if you can't explain - because that means you don't know either.
If we did really know, then there could be a more intimate understanding of all the elements and how they come together. H2O, as the classic example. We would then know precisely how we could apply the coils to 'transmute' elements, or molecules.

No-where in his books have I once seen a diagram of molecules, or elements reacting, whether they are elements of the same substance, or elements of different substances.
Whenever I see a diagram, its always only of a single octave, with single elements in it. I am beginning to find this a bit odd...

Why is this? Does he even know? Or is this the ultimate mystery that's left for us to figure out, that can either make or break his cosmology theories.

I would appreciate an explanation.

[StweenyA]

@purelyconstructive, thanks so much for the post!

Wow, I didn't haven't seen that notes document before! Did you write it? Is there any way I can download it to read on my tablet? scribd won't let me download. Thanks

[artoj]

Ode to Walter

As an artist, I am in concordance with Water Russell, please enjoy.

This is a revamp on the circular 1926 Table of Elements By Walter Russell.

His table had only 121 total elements:
(9 Inert, 63 Elements, 49 Isotopes )= 121
If you complete the table at Nobelium in place of the omega Tomion then you have:
(9 inert, 63 Elements, 56 isotopes ) =128
This is the complete table:
(11 inert, 70 Elements, 68 Isotopes)= 149
The Academic version would be:
(7 inert, 43 Elements, 68 Isotopes) = 118 and an array of subatomic particles(not defined).

You must remember this is the Russellian version, isotopes are a musical division of the elements.
Also apha and omega Tomions are joining.

This is one of the diagrams from one of the chapters in my new book. This is version 1.

I have added new particles to complete the table.

Before alpha Tomion : 3 added Elements + 1 Inert Gas

ETHERON - As per Chris Illert’s model
TESLARON - Nicola Tesla
RUSSELON - Walter Russell
GOGUNON - Gogu Constantinescu

After omega Tomion : 19 added Isotopes + 4 added Elements + 1 Inert Gas

Regards Arto

[MonsieurM]

artoj .... and thank you for the amazing reproduction of WR Table of elements

As an artist, I am in concordance with Water Russell, please enjoy.

This is a revamp on the circular 1926 Table of Elements By Walter Russell.

His table had only 121 total elements:
(9 Inert, 63 Elements, 49 Isotopes )= 121
If you complete the table at Nobelium in place of the omega Tomion then you have:
(9 inert, 63 Elements, 56 isotopes ) =128
This is the complete table:
(11 inert, 70 Elements, 68 Isotopes)= 149
The Academic version would be:
(7 inert, 43 Elements, 68 Isotopes) = 118 and an array of subatomic particles(not defined).

You must remember this is the Russellian version, isotopes are a musical division of the elements.
Also apha and omega Tomions are joining.

This is one of the diagrams from one of the chapters in my new book. This is version 1.

I have added new particles to complete the table.

Before alpha Tomion : 3 added Elements + 1 Inert Gas

ETHERON - As per Chris Illert’s model
TESLARON - Nicola Tesla
RUSSELON - Walter Russell
GOGUNON - Gogu Constantinescu

After omega Tomion : 19 added Isotopes + 4 added Elements + 1 Inert Gas

Regards Arto

[cplouffe]

Does this not go against the foundation of Walter and Lao's work? Why the need to add more inert gases which adds more octaves? Just curious.

[artoj]

Ode to Walter

Hi, as you can see I did not diminish his 9 octave cycle. Walter used Tomion as the alpha and omega of his musical element octaves, this completes the 9 octaves as Walter envisioned. I gave it some new information that can be seen to extend his table. The added 4 smaller particles were there to complete the cycle of octaves as the aesthetic sensibilities and the logic of Mr Russell would have done. Added information can be a way of reconciling the differences that the modern nuclear scientists cannot. This table had been slowly worked up over the last 10 years. The added octaves are only for completeness, this is a reverence of his understanding and hopefully generate some thought into the modern misunderstanding of nuclear physics.

Remember he formulated this in 1926, I replaced the unknowns with the current names and the extension only exists because of new knowledge. Walter would not want dogmatism replacing creativity as all his writing and artwork show.

I have presented this table to the Energetic forum freely, I hope it can of great value to those who seek knowledge, Thank you and Regards Arto.

[artoj]

Ode to Walter

Addendum:

Please read Chris Illerts "Alchemcy Today", not the a simple read but, it clearly demonstrates the need to re-write how nuclear physics operates. I knew Chris back in the 1990's not long after he shook up the Einstein crowd of misinformers with his clarity and complete knowledge of nuclear physics as the system understood it. What Chris did with one line of simple maths replaced the rubbish they scribbled on 2 blackboards.

Regards Arto