Dear Aaron,
First off, thanks for your hard work and contributions to an amazing place online. And that goes to Peter, and John Bedini and all the great contributors that give a thousand times back to the public than I could ever hope to.
I have a proposal.
Perhaps considering a distinct section, not an individual thread, but section - dedicated to technical debate. In this I mean, the major ideas and technologies put forth, could become threads of this stand alone section; wherein all of the heated debates could be put there, instead of cluttering the individual "working forums". I suggest this, because as the forum grows, so does the clutter. And the heated arguments, challenges to credibility, allegations, naysaying.
At the end of the day, we all tend to want the same thing, and the arguments of scalability, feasibility, cost, potential COP - they are important factors, but they do cloud a thread when presented right in and amongst the experimenters' findings.
If it became policy to place such arguments where they belonged, perhaps a more concise collection of experimental data (in the mainstay section of RE) would remain. And maybe a better overall feel toward the individual contributers, less stabbing, etc.
Just a thought.
Thanks again.
Kyle
First off, thanks for your hard work and contributions to an amazing place online. And that goes to Peter, and John Bedini and all the great contributors that give a thousand times back to the public than I could ever hope to.
I have a proposal.
Perhaps considering a distinct section, not an individual thread, but section - dedicated to technical debate. In this I mean, the major ideas and technologies put forth, could become threads of this stand alone section; wherein all of the heated debates could be put there, instead of cluttering the individual "working forums". I suggest this, because as the forum grows, so does the clutter. And the heated arguments, challenges to credibility, allegations, naysaying.
At the end of the day, we all tend to want the same thing, and the arguments of scalability, feasibility, cost, potential COP - they are important factors, but they do cloud a thread when presented right in and amongst the experimenters' findings.
If it became policy to place such arguments where they belonged, perhaps a more concise collection of experimental data (in the mainstay section of RE) would remain. And maybe a better overall feel toward the individual contributers, less stabbing, etc.
Just a thought.
Thanks again.
Kyle
Comment