My Motors got me to Tap into Radiant Energy

[SkyWatcher]

Hi ufo, so did you come here to help or to be offended.
pretty hard not to be offended in this world, though it is still a choice to be offended no matter what anyone says.
If it means anything, I was sincere in my questions, like could you at least describe the setup you are using in that video that was posted, thanks.
peace love light
tyson

edit: reason i am asking questions, is so i can replicate exactly what your doing, isn't that what you want, i hope.

[blackchisel97]

Ufopolitics, Don't get discouraged because people are questioning. Please continue

Thanks
V

I guess it is not gonna happen anytime soon....

[Aaron]

@ufo

The "junior member" listing or "senior member" listing for members is simply an automatic part of the forum. When someone posts X amount of posts, then they are a "senior" member - it doesn't have anything to do with anyone being more qualified over another.

There is obviously a language barrier issue. I said I don't dispute your claims but needed clarification on a few things. And, I said I'm looking forward to the second video.

[Matthew Jones]

Matt,
Or are you evaluating-judging me somehow, because right next to Ufopolitics, on this Forum, it reads "Junior Member"??

No, but you do seem to be touchy about it. Truth hurt or what?

Over my "Lifetime" , I have got shocked with 120 V AC Live wires and wet or grounded many times, as I have done many electrical work with AC...I know the difference.

So your point? Your are comparing apples and Oranges.

Little or no current?...Do you think I do not have equipments?...that I am ignoring Amperage read outs here?

Maybe I missed the current output? Is it High?

Matt, May I ask you...¿How do you know exactly the patterns, spec´s and behavior of Cold Electricity or Radiant Energy to that extent ?

Because I have seen it first hand, and a very little boost circuit did not make it.

Are they also explained in Wikipedia?
Wikipedia's answer: "The page "Cold Electricity" does not exist. You can ask for it to be created, but consider checking the search results below to see whether the topic is already covered..."

The reference I gave for wikipedia is a valid basic Boost circuit just like the one you drew.

I have read many Inventors Matt, and some besides, been also great writers like Mr. Peter Lindemann...which great articles and Videos I love...Along with many others like Tom Bearden, Edwin Gray, I mean many...not to say all
¿Have You Matt?

Ya as matter fact I have. I have also built circuits that emit cold current, (That gets cold), Negative energy (That grows through resistance) and positive energy as well as many other things.

You got it all wrong. You come in, make claims, show a circuit, and try to name it some fantastic thing. Well 8 years ago when I built one it showed alot of funny things to me. Taught me alot, but all in all it was just High frequency high voltage, with low current.

Now if you paid attention and would actually try what I told you might see another side to what your doing. You might actually have something different. I do not think so though.
I'll go back through the post and reread it. Maybe even give it go.

But as far as I am concerned, putting test leads in water along with your hand does not constitute a cold current. And your awfully touchy about someone questioning you, which is the typical behavior of an unsure individual who need a little recognition. You should calm down and address the questions before you continue to get upset.
I know engineers with 40 years of experience, they still cannot explain some of what I do. So your experience is invalid, and it doesn't get you any further ranting and raving about it.

Matt

[FRC]

I would sure like to see ufo continue here. With all the questions being asked,
it reminds me of trying to explain Bedini systems and radiant charging to people
who already have their minds made up that none of it is possible. Ufo does not
have to prove anything to anyone. I believe he already has the proof for
himself. He was willing to share his knowledge with us. Please continue ufo,
hopefully members will keep a more open mind about this. Once we can get
a better understanding of your work we can continue to try to share the
information with others. I think you have found something that a lot of people
have overlooked, and it seems too simple to them, that it can not be possible.
But you know it is, and hopefully we will know it too.

George

[LutherG]

Ok, here I drew a better circuit, arranged the components in a more understandable fashion. (And put letters to all ) However, I am also adding the magnetic polarity of Coil at both stages of Oscillator signals, Red is our "Artificially" created Magnetic Field result of our Input to Coil. Blue is the Naturally created by Radiant Energy opposite magnetic field...
Now, what we are getting out are "Pure Inductance Counter Electro Motive Forces (As Physics Says)...or Back EMF.
The Field created by Radiant Energy is way bigger in spectrum, flux force and of a MUCH Higher Frequency than Our Input created Field. In my previous picture of the Fluorescent Lamp 125 Watts, the two Extech meters are showing Hertz on both fields, left at 2033Hz is Radiant, right meter 800Hz is ours. In the video, I uploaded in YT, by final part, when I am turning on-off by hand, you could see meters deflect at Load-No Load. However, always keeping the differences between them. If there is a certain time with no load, the Radiant Field becomes 'Stabilized' with Primary (Ours), meaning same Hz...
Now , just to go over some Physics Concepts related to Inductors versus Motor Generator Coils.

Physics says that the reason the Inductor changes polarities is due to the Collapsing of the ORIGINATING Field, where "The shrinking" of the Magnetic Field, starts changing direction of the flux lines cutting the wires lines in an opposite direction, therefore,inductor shows reversed polarities. They also say is due to Inductor trying to keep current (I) Constant.
When Physics explains the same exact phenomena, (A Simple Coil of Enameled Wire) but applying it to Dynamo-electric Machines...then 'remembers' about Faraday's Laws...mentioning is a "Dragging Force" THEN, call it C EMF, not related to Electro Magnetic Fields, BUT instead, to Electro 'Motive Force'...and it is a very high coincidence, the fact that even the meaning been so different, the "Letters are Identical"...How could we dispute which is which between C EMF or C EMF?

The readings of the Radiant Energy Electromagnetic Field, at all shows, the least signs to be collapsing, fading or shrinking, on the contrary, it is Superior in many parameters to the "Originating" One. And been Opposite in Polarity Orientation, is understood that its Output Voltage is reverse of ours.
However, since Inductors are static components, and do not play any roll into 'Magnetic Interactions' , we could say that mentioning about Magnetic fields reversing, is "not that important"...

I have tried this output on typical DC brush motors, they go beyond estimated top speed...rated to go that fast at a consumption of @ 36 Volts, However using this just simple arrangement of Coil-Diodes it uses 4.0 Volts, going over speed limits, but the must impressive thing is...as they accelerate they become much colder...I will be filming this and using an Infrared Digital Thermometer...

The Diodes should be the lowest resistance than the IN4000 family (rated @600 Ohms)...I use the NTE576...rated at 400 Volts and @400Ohms. besides being a bigger body diode...however, I have Blown them with low voltage input but RE feed back spikes when Load was 'demanding too much' ...but there are many available that would do the job, Fast Switching is very Important!

Well, I think this is all I wanted to say...besides thanking all of you for being so patient and nice to me.

So See You tomorrow...
And have a nice evening!

Ufopolitics

You're using the DC positive pulses to make the energy come to you... Like getting a cat to chase a string... just a fast enough, short enough pulse to get the ambient to leap toward you in response...

Please stick around and share what it is you want to share. Also, would you mind posting your drawing again please? I see the placeholder for the drawing but I don't see the actual drawing you're discussing...

many thanks!

Luther

[FRC]

ufopolitics

Here is an exert from a post by Duncan on the David Smith thread that is very appropriate here too. So please do not be discouraged from continuing.

QUOTE=Duncan;179132],, Notice the OU claim is made very clearly here but not by me! Any mention of OU seems to attract the attention of undesirables and endless pages of “measuring techniques”
and such like waffle[/QUOTE]

George

[blackchisel97]

I was able to find my diodes - HFA16PB. They're ultrafast rated at 600V/15A continuous. Now I need to find MOSFETS. I'm really curious about this.
I'll be back.

V

[Farmhand]

Hi Ufopolitics, "emf" means electromotive force, I am referring to emf and back
emf or back electromotive force which is also called counter emf or counter electromotive force.

I don't think there is any such thing as a "back electromagnetic field". Not
that I know of. If there is I'm not referring to that, I'm referring to back
electromotive force.

Electromotive force - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

If you are trying to educate us then please continue. How do you measure
the back emf and how do you use it ?

If you could just answer this one question below.

Are you talking about the collapsing magnetic field of the coil as being back
emf ?

That's a simple question, if that's what you are doing and you don't want to
see it any other way then fair enough. Just say so and I'll leave it at that.

When people read the thread they will see both sides of the argument and
decide for themselves.

Cheers

P.S. Please note I am not asking for measurements themselves, I'm asking how it is you actually go about measuring the back emf.

When it was pointed out to me that the collapsing magnetic field was emf and not back emf I was very thankful.

..

[Ufopolitics]

PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING HERE

Good morning,

I have decided to 'reset my systems' and come back here. The reason?
I am very stubborn, and so persistent that never has given up, ever. I feel this is something I must do, want to, and will finish.
Plus, there are many here, who have been very nice to me, had addressed their questions in a very nice form, polite and positive attitude.
And they want to know about it, So, I feel They deserve the right to know, and I will do so, no matter who opposes.

However,This is My Post ,Thread or whatever you want to call it. So it is like "My House" here, I built it. And as long as I do not violate and stay within the scope of the Site Rules,I am here.

However, I will adopt the following Procedures in this Post that I have created.

1-I did not come here to be judged nor to be "evaluated" as to my background or my expertise in any of this fields. I did more than 'plenty' in my Introduction post. Enough for You to have a "Hint".
I came here to established my FREE, OPEN TECHNICAL DISCLOSURE as a Free Human Right to Do. Express myself freely and openly.

2-I did not come here to argue with Anyone that disagree on the GROUNDS of My Disclosure. You could render your opinion, I will render mine, if they do not "match" nor satisfies your desires, sorry, life is not always a Paradise.
If You have a problem with that, I suggest you just go and Open another Forum here or somewhere else of your choice, where you would be free to openly express yourself about your disagreement. Or state your complain to the proper authorities. Up to You.

3-I will not accept ANYONE at all, to approach to me in ANY form, that I may consider as inappropiate, and that goes, and applies "but not limited to":
All kind of Bad Attitude, ranting, severe criticism, irony, rude or polite less approaches and all related lack of Social Networking Manners.
And, learn a bit about Forum manners, so, SAY HELLO, whenever addressing to ANYONE here. If You are used not to do it in other rooms here, or in your life...that's fine and Dandy, BUT NOT HERE!!

4-I am NOT CLAIMING absolutely nothing, Claims apply and belongs to Patents, I am just making a Technical Disclosure Openly and Publicly, period. If I wanted to Establish any Patent Claims, I know exactly where to go for it...Here, in case someone else wants to make some claims go to:
<http://uspto.gov>

5- A Technical Open Disclosure, means an Idea that would be of public domain. Therefore, will become automatically "Prior Art" . Any newer, similar or related claims that falls on "post date" to prior art, will be a solid ground to deny acceptance of such Application.
5(a)- Please do not worry about my IP (Intellectual Property) as I also know the right place to do that, and what it does is Assign a Permanent Number and a Stamped Date, in a Journal that links directly to the Examiners for Patents within the Scope of the PCT (Patent Commonwealth Treaty) which is Worldwide. And costs much less than a Utility Patent (@$250.00USD). And according to USPTO Laws, you could file an Application in US within a Physical year of your IP Disclosure. However not in EU.
The site has a very convenient domain name, very easy to remember
<http://ip.com>

6- I am NOT HERE TO:

6(a)- I am NOT HERE TO:Explain about Radiant Energy, Radiant Energy is everywhere on the Net, so, do your own search.
6(b)- I am NOT HERE TO:Explain about Cold Electricity, there are great books and DVD's about it.
A Great one I recommend , The Author is right here on this site: Mr.. Peter Lindemann, and there is an specific location to purchase it. So, Ask Aaron Murakami, the Co-Founder and Moderator of this site and He is also here on this post.

7- Mr. John Bedini's Patent may have or have not some similarity with mine, however, in electronic circuitry, just one diode performing an specific function, not appearing in compared circuit, is enough ground as to be considered "Not Similar Art". This goes also for the Boost Converter Diagram, and again, it may be your thinking, that's your problem, not mine.

This may or may not be all of them Rules, I will keep thinking if adding more or not. Is also "My Choice"

Anyone that uses that Kind of approach listed here...simply

WILL BE COMPLETELY IGNORED BY ME. YOU MAY GET A FASTER RESPONSE FROM THE CLOSEST WALL NEXT TO YOU.

Now, You approach to me in a nice, smooth and gentle way...I will be exactly the same way back.

So it is very simple rule ...

YOU GET BACK WHAT YOU SENT OUT.

If anyone disagrees with any of My Rules here, is ok, we have the right to also disagree, but go to cry somewhere else, not here.

Now, if ANYONE, wants to go ahead, and declare war to me here, I am ready, go for it.

Ufopolitics

[Ufopolitics]

I would sure like to see ufo continue here. With all the questions being asked,
it reminds me of trying to explain Bedini systems and radiant charging to people
who already have their minds made up that none of it is possible. Ufo does not
have to prove anything to anyone. I believe he already has the proof for
himself. He was willing to share his knowledge with us. Please continue ufo,
hopefully members will keep a more open mind about this. Once we can get
a better understanding of your work we can continue to try to share the
information with others. I think you have found something that a lot of people
have overlooked, and it seems too simple to them, that it can not be possible.
But you know it is, and hopefully we will know it too.

George

Hello George!

I'm here.

Regards my friend

[Ufopolitics]

You're using the DC positive pulses to make the energy come to you... Like getting a cat to chase a string... just a fast enough, short enough pulse to get the ambient to leap toward you in response...

Please stick around and share what it is you want to share. Also, would you mind posting your drawing again please? I see the placeholder for the drawing but I don't see the actual drawing you're discussing...

many thanks!

Luther

Hello Dear LutherG!

You have somehow, a very close approach, I feel your words of knowledge and openness to our beautiful Mother Nature.

Regards

[kcarring]

@ufopolitics

Thanks for posting your findings. And coming back. I'm having a bit of a hard time seeing past the circuit as how a nixie driver for example would work. Is there something special about the coil; also are you setting your output voltage with your frequency by way of loading a cap on the front end at all? Then adjusting the PWM/input pulse, so to speak?

Thanks
Kyle

[Joit]

Ufopolitics, right. Stay like this.
Ignore Questions what you actually dont want do answer its may the easier Way.
I still dont get it, how Peoples allways can handle it again, to go more or less Off Topic with questioning about Things what are not really relevant now.

And for all these over-curious fussy Guys, remember, you may had by yourself Results where you had not the right Terms to explain it well, that anyone could understand it like you do by yourself. But how would you feel like, when you are more or less criticised for each second Sentence what you write. Figure it, does it feel well?
Live and let Live is may a more better Way as to have allways running Battles, and actually, you can allways say the same Thing in two or more different Ways, no need for a offending Attitude.
I know still too that a few want to see real Results but actually thats no Reason to smash anything else down.

Gladly (or not) i still got a mess at home from my moving and can do nothing from my tinkering, because anything is in anywhere in a different Corner.
But please all, work together, not against all. The real enemys are somewhere else, as you see in other Threads allready.

[FRC]

Thanks for staying

Thanks for staying ufopolitics. Looking forward to hearing more information from
you. You have me very curious about your motor designs, especially the dynamo electric motor that can utilize radiant energy.

George