Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Cosmic Collector Resonance Circuit Schematics

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    Power Lines

    By "coupling to a power line," I mean that you're extracting usable energy from a nearby power line via inductance. Simply put, AC power lines emit waves just like a radio station. By placing a coil, or better yet a tuned LC circuit (coil and capacitor) near a power line, the energy around the power line will be coupled into your coil/LC circuit. The process is similar to striking a tuning fork and placing it near another tuning fork that's tuned to the same frequency. Both will vibrate, the second being affected by the first.

    Through this method, if you're simply lighting up an LED, nobody will complain. However, if you start extracting serious power, it creates an imbalance in the grid and be assured the power company WILL investigate. If they trace it back to you, you're screwed. There are plenty of court cases related to such activity and plenty of people who went to jail for it. That's why I said earlier, DON'T do it.

    Having said all that, there's plenty of electrical "noise" in the air, especially if you're in a big city. The challenge is to figure out an economical way to "funnel" all that noise into a circuit that will combine it all and produce a usable amount of electrical power.

    Like I said previously, study up on crystal radios. They're the basis of such a device. The crystal radio tunes to one frequency at a time (radio stations, for example). Once you've done that, use your intuition ("Use the Force, Luke!") to figure out how to receive multiple frequencies at the same time. Then you'll be on to something!

    Chris

    Comment


    • #32
      I had already mentioned that the way the person drew the diagram is most likely why it looks like a switch is directly across the battery. It's a combination of a schematic and sketch type diagram rather than a strictly electronic schematic. It seems obvious the intent was a full disconnect switch as is shown in a picture further down the document. As in double pole single throw to disconnect both sides of the battery.

      Nate, If you buy a coil of copper as they typically come in a hardware or plumbing store the 3/4" type mentioned in the doc is already wound in a flat spiral as shown. They usually come in 60 foot lengths so you would only need to cut a little less than 9 feet off of it to get the right length. It might take a little pushing and pulling to strap it down as shown but you shouldn't need a pipe bender. I've worked with this exact kind of pipe before. If you have trouble with it just get a helper and it should be easy but I was able to work with it myself (this type copper is used in air conditioning work also).
      The main thing I see in this circuit that might tap ZPE is the way the motor is hooked up and when it's running it may be creating a spike to the collector which might cause it to draw in ZPE energy. I'm really not up to speed on this so I'm not sure. I'd ask Aaron (forum owner) or Matthew Jones or any number of people here who are active in building for an opinion on this also before spending to much. No offense to ChrisW but I'm not familiar with what he has done. I've been involved in researching ZPE and such for over 25 years but I'm still far behind a few people here who I think have a real handle on what works and what doesn't.

      Like this:
      Attached Files
      Last edited by ewizard; 02-22-2012, 06:00 PM.
      There is no important work, there are only a series of moments to demonstrate your mastery and impeccability. Quote from Almine

      Comment


      • #33
        Zinlano posted a schematic a while back that used dc motor she said the motor could be used to pulse the current, maybe thats what its being used for here,
        Some of the experimenters are finding aether energy hard to control, maybe this is a way to control it, and make it useable
        consider everything.
        Half of the Answer is knowing the right Question

        Comment


        • #34
          I'll just add that I finally got the time to read through the whole document (quick read but enough to cover it all). As open minded as I am on all he talks about I do question some of this. I do wish we could bring this person on the forum and see what he actually has running. My biggest issue is with the fact that there is only one connection to the battery bank of 6 volt batteries. Maybe that is Beardon's idea (he said he has studied Beardon extensively) of not breaking the dipole. But unless there is a common ground I have a hard time seeing how that will keep the battery bank charged. I won't say it can't but at this point it doesn't look likely in my understanding. I think one could give this whole idea a try on a smaller scale for cheap. He even mentions he wished he had used smaller copper tubing at one point. I think you can get 1/4" copper tubing (like used for swamp coolers) in 50 foot coils for around $20 to $30. Copper prices have been all over the place the last few years so I'm not sure on that. Just checked fleaBay and looks like $30 to $40 will be more likely your cost on that. Copper is getting ridiculously expensive.
          There is no important work, there are only a series of moments to demonstrate your mastery and impeccability. Quote from Almine

          Comment


          • #35
            Another real problem is the flyback transformer as already mentioned by ChrisW. At the point it is connected supposedly we are getting power from the inverter running off the battery bank. This power would already be 110 or 220 volts AC so why put the flyback there? As he has shown and described it you are going to connect your 110 or 220 volts to the high voltage side of the flyback. This means on the low voltage side you are only going to get a few millivolts of power. And a flyback on the low voltage side can only handle an amp or so so how in the world could you expect to run a house off an amp or two at a few millivolts. I had a TV repair shop for several years before I went to work as an industrial maintenance electrician. I have worked on everything from copy machines to 15 thousand watt industrial Lasers. I have over 50 years experience working in electronics. Do I believe in alternative energy? Absolutely yes. With the help of Matt Jones and some others I have had a TS switch run for over a week lighting a series of Leds and the batteries never went down. Using Matt's latest version I have even had runs of a couple of hours where all the batteries went up a slight amount. I believe there are several people on this forum that are real close to a breakthrough. Look at the 3 battery circuit Turion has posted. I just hate to see people wasting time and money on something that is obviously a piece of junk.

            Carroll
            Just because someone disagrees with you does NOT make them your enemy. We can disagree without attacking someone.

            Comment


            • #36
              I really doubt the viability of this device. Sounds like too much money.

              If it will show signs of anything you can do it with very small parts.

              At one time when analog was the dominant signal in the air you might have collected something worth charging a battery with but not now with digital.

              The biggest thing is don't waste your money. If you want to try it make it small. If you cannot get anything out of it small its not worth going big.

              Matt

              Comment


              • #37
                and as ecm motors come in smaller sizes, thats another good reason to make a smaller one 1st.

                id like to try a LC resonance circuit that can resonate on 7.83 hz (earth's frequency) how can you get the reading of the inductance of a coil?
                ^^^^
                (new at electronics)

                good sketch E wizard~ I wish i could answer those points, but i dont know. I didnt write it
                Last edited by Nasa Nate; 02-23-2012, 01:19 AM.
                0P3N S0UR(E 3NG1N33R1NG

                Comment


                • #38
                  thank you for the suggestion for 3 battery circuit, carroll. it looks interesting, ill look it to it
                  0P3N S0UR(E 3NG1N33R1NG

                  Comment


                  • #39
                    7.83 Hz

                    Nate, as far as getting something to resonate well at 7.83Hz, the formula for wavelength in feet is 984/Frequency in MHz. Okay, so that's 984/0.00000783 = 125,670,498.1 feet. Divide that by four for a quarterwave length. See the problem here? Unless your last name is Rockefeller or Rothschild, this is just not practical.

                    On the other hand, a broadband device designed to suck in energy from all over the spectrum and then recycle that energy through itself would work. A series of nested inductors tuned such that the frequency band is successively squeezed down to lower and lower frequencies is the key. Mind you, that's still a helluva lotta inductance, but it can be done. It's bass-ackwards from normal radio thinking... you want the highest SWR possible.

                    Carroll and Matt -- I must have missed some of your development efforts. Running a bank of LEDs does have merit and value, especially to those of us who run 100% solar. Do you have a schematic you can share? The joule thief circuit only goes so far in this regard...

                    Chris

                    Comment


                    • #40
                      Industrial Lasers

                      Carroll... 15KW industrial lasers!!?? Woooooo-hooooooo!! For cutting and fabrication? I'd love to hear more about your experience....

                      Chris

                      Comment


                      • #41
                        6V batteries

                        One last thing -- don't underestimate the potential of potential (pun intended), I can see where having a substantial potential difference available in an antenna/RF system would be beneficial. Food for thought...

                        Comment


                        • #42
                          Thanks Matt for taking a look at this. The more I look at it (had a little more time today) the more funky it looks. I think something is very wrong with the way it's shown in the document. I think the whole thing could really create some usable energy but only if there are some major changes in the schematic and directions. It's nagging me that something here has great potential but it was either put together in this document as a puzzle or the person who wrote up the document got some things very wrong from the way it was actually built. Remember the author said he had a Traumatic Brain Injury? Maybe he really built a working unit intuitively but when it decided to document it then it came out scrambled. Just a wild guess but I know this thing is similar to something else which I am fairly sure works. When I get the time I'm planning on correcting the diagram and document to how I think it was intended. What I have in mind fits the basic premise of most if not all free energy devices. It's discussed elsewhere here by some members and is what I see in most or all of Don Smith's devices.
                          There is no important work, there are only a series of moments to demonstrate your mastery and impeccability. Quote from Almine

                          Comment


                          • #43
                            The best things are simple. If they are to complicated they probably don't work.

                            Matt

                            Comment


                            • #44
                              i look forward to your revision ewizard!
                              0P3N S0UR(E 3NG1N33R1NG

                              Comment


                              • #45
                                Originally posted by ChrisW View Post
                                This device reminds me of Larry Rayburn's TREC (Tesla RECeiver) from several years back.
                                I think that this is the technolgy that Patrick, in his Chapter 7, regards
                                as fabulously and sensationally dangerous. At the UK Free Energy conference
                                of 2008 (it might have been '07), I reckon he said that he was reluctant to
                                even mention it in his ebook.

                                Be afraid; be very afraid.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X