Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

3 Battery Generating System

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • L0stf0x
    replied
    Originally posted by Wistiti View Post

    Huuum! Split the positive but not only electrical... Interesting concept...
    Interesting indeed but maybe for a different thread, I really don't want to disturb this great thread, and the guys that working on here.

    Leave a comment:


  • L0stf0x
    replied
    Originally posted by Turion View Post
    LOstfOx,

    How long did you spend researching the split positive system to come to your conclusions about it’s worth as a source of energy? Just curious, since in the ten years we have been here talking about it we havenot heard a peep out of you, yet you suddenly appear as an “informed” researcher claiming we can’t, can’t, can’t do things we have already DONE, DONE, DONE. Just because YOU are not capable of getting a split positive system to produce energy does not mean the technology to do so cannot be developed. Especially since, in this case, it already exists. As to exactly HOW MUCH energy it can produce, I’m not going to go into that.

    As to your comment that we are wasting our time with voltage boosters and inverters, well that is YOUR opinion. Here is mine. The real waste of time is reading your post as you are obviously here to self promote your secret new technology that you are not ready to share yet and have no clue what is possible with the technology we have been working with. You attempt to discredit something we happen to KNOW works, and promote something you won’t share yet nearly made me spit up my cereal. At least it was worth a good laugh! But I hate it when cereal comes out my nose. You are not the first nor will you be the last to try this tactic. And you MIGHT be able to convince SOME of the folks tuned in on this thread to abandon hope and follow you off into the sunset with your secret energy device. But not Matt, and certainly not ME. Because WE have seen what YOU have just stated is not possible. So either YOU are full of crap or WE are. I have a generator sitting in my garage that puts out over 2,000 watts continuous on an input of less than 350 watts. Now of that 350, I can recover all but about 70 watts. That’s a COP of 28. And I have pretty much ABSNDONED that project because it is obsolete. We know so much more now than we did when I started that project five years ago. So you have a nice day, but it would probably be better if you didn’t dismiss something you obviously haven’t adequately investigated and clearly know nothing about. Some people may be impressed, but as for Matt and I, well it kinda makes you look a little “ridiculous” to put it in as polite a term as possible.
    Relax buddy!!
    There is no need to be so attacking! , I am in your side, I love split positive like you..

    If you already achieved truthfully what you say, then I maybe be wrong and I apologize for being absolute. I didn't say split positive cannot give more, I said, it can give more, but not enough (at least for me), so if you really did achieved so much gain, then I say a big Bravo to you and I am sorry I didn't know about it.. you see I am not frequent reader lately and I may lost the big news. If you have it open to the public I would love to study it. If its not open, then think about open it

    As for my prototype, its not ready yet, I am working on it and I promise you to reveal it when its ready.

    Leave a comment:


  • Turion
    replied
    Lmfao

    LOstfOx,

    How long did you spend researching the split positive system to come to your conclusions about it’s worth as a source of energy? Just curious, since in the ten years we have been here talking about it we havenot heard a peep out of you, yet you suddenly appear as an “informed” researcher claiming we can’t, can’t, can’t do things we have already DONE, DONE, DONE. Just because YOU are not capable of getting a split positive system to produce energy does not mean the technology to do so cannot be developed. Especially since, in this case, it already exists. As to exactly HOW MUCH energy it can produce, I’m not going to go into that.

    As to your comment that we are wasting our time with voltage boosters and inverters, well that is YOUR opinion. Here is mine. The real waste of time is reading your post as you are obviously here to self promote your secret new technology that you are not ready to share yet and have no clue what is possible with the technology we have been working with. You attempt to discredit something we happen to KNOW works, and promote something you won’t share yet nearly made me spit up my cereal. At least it was worth a good laugh! But I hate it when cereal comes out my nose. You are not the first nor will you be the last to try this tactic. And you MIGHT be able to convince SOME of the folks tuned in on this thread to abandon hope and follow you off into the sunset with your secret energy device. But not Matt, and certainly not ME. Because WE have seen what YOU have just stated is not possible. So either YOU are full of crap or WE are. I have a generator sitting in my garage that puts out over 2,000 watts continuous on an input of less than 350 watts. Now of that 350, I can recover all but about 70 watts. That’s a COP of 28. And I have pretty much ABSNDONED that project because it is obsolete. We know so much more now than we did when I started that project five years ago. So you have a nice day, but it would probably be better if you didn’t dismiss something you obviously haven’t adequately investigated and clearly know nothing about. Some people may be impressed, but as for Matt and I, well it kinda makes you look a little “ridiculous” to put it in as polite a term as possible.
    Last edited by Turion; 07-04-2018, 01:18 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • Wistiti
    replied

    Huuum! Split the positive but not only electrical... Interesting concept...

    Leave a comment:


  • L0stf0x
    replied
    Originally posted by Matthew Jones View Post
    Somehow I doubt any of this is true. We'll all hold our breath in anticipation of your tech that puts out 1000%.

    I am wondering if this is a BroMikey alter personality. He has a few you know..
    Hello Matthew! Thanks for quoting..

    First of all I don't want to disrupt any off you doing experiments on split positive, Its a great experience to witness this amazing dropage in consumption.. I complete my experiments on this field before few months. I have the immediate experience to tell you that split positive alone, even you get more at output cannot provide decent energy.. I had positive results from time to time, But far from what you expect to get.

    It is normal and you have the right to doubt it. I wish I could tell you more for our prototype, but I can't right now. The point is not what we have, soon you ll see it and you ll value it accordingly ... the point for writing this comment is to help the experimenters see beyond..

    Have any of you tried to apply split positive in non electrical way?
    Have any of you combined split positive with other free energy tech?

    Or you still waste your time with hopeless combinations with voltage boosters and inverters?

    Good luck all

    Leave a comment:


  • wantomake
    replied
    Good example

    Originally posted by i_ron View Post
    Isn't that the truth though?

    But you can always tell the good things as they are on somebodies bad for you list!

    Lots of chocolate and two mugs of coffee a day... and i will be 83 in August.

    Ron

    PS: thanks James, but I don't like to fly anymore, so here's to ya
    I usually start with mocha and cinnamon in my coffee. My diet is no carb and no sugars. GMO is not making it through our doors. We are very health conscious family as the wife's Japanese parent's were.

    Happy 4th of July to everyone. Be safe, behave, enjoy this holiday and be blessed.

    Thanks for being a good example at 83 Ron. Yes I've been flying for 40 years plus some and my arms are tired. Hahaha. Coffee is cold and needs nuked. Here's to All this good morning
    wantomake

    Leave a comment:


  • Matthew Jones
    replied
    Originally posted by L0stf0x View Post
    Hey all, long time to be here, I was busy researching and building my prototype.. I will present it to you soon

    ------
    I wanted to tell you that split positive or 3 or 4 battery systems are good only for reducing the consumption of the system. It cannot stand alone, even I have witness from time to time more output than input, It will be almost impossible to sustain it for ever. Even you succeed and have a stable system, the cop will be too small. A decent free energy device would give at least 1000% more output.

    Split positive have to be combined with a real free energy device. It is a great way to consume less only.


    find a way to get the free energy first and then boost it using split positive to raise the gain. That is what I do.

    Keep experimenting.. Cya soon guys

    Somehow I doubt any of this is true. We'll all hold our breath in anticipation of your tech that puts out 1000%.

    I am wondering if this is a BroMikey alter personality. He has a few you know..

    Leave a comment:


  • L0stf0x
    replied
    Hey all, long time to be here, I was busy researching and building my prototype.. I will present it to you soon

    ------
    I wanted to tell you that split positive or 3 or 4 battery systems are good only for reducing the consumption of the system. It cannot stand alone, even I have witness from time to time more output than input, It will be almost impossible to sustain it for ever. Even you succeed and have a stable system, the cop will be too small. A decent free energy device would give at least 1000% more output.

    Split positive have to be combined with a real free energy device. It is a great way to consume less only.


    find a way to get the free energy first and then boost it using split positive to raise the gain. That is what I do.

    Keep experimenting.. Cya soon guys

    Leave a comment:


  • i_ron
    replied
    Originally posted by Matthew Jones View Post
    But next week it will kill you quicker than radiation.

    I still haven't made that drawing. Lot of drama over the weekend. I did describe a few post back.

    Matt
    Isn't that the truth though?

    But you can always tell the good things as they are on somebodies bad for you list!

    Lots of chocolate and two mugs of coffee a day... and i will be 83 in August.

    Ron

    PS: thanks James, but I don't like to fly anymore, so here's to ya
    Last edited by i_ron; 07-04-2018, 02:09 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • Matthew Jones
    replied
    Originally posted by i_ron View Post
    Hey mind if I join you in a cup?

    Ron

    https://ca.news.yahoo.com/fresh-grou...150417802.html
    But next week it will kill you quicker than radiation.

    I still haven't made that drawing. Lot of drama over the weekend. I did describe a few post back.

    Matt

    Leave a comment:


  • wantomake
    replied
    Live as long as possible

    Originally posted by i_ron View Post
    Hey mind if I join you in a cup?

    Ron

    https://ca.news.yahoo.com/fresh-grou...150417802.html
    Ron,
    Our house has been called a House of Peace. We have housed a student from Israel in our home. We have family from Japan come to stay in our house. Friends from Mexico and El Salvador have walked our floors.

    All are welcome in our house of Peace. We have the word "Shalom" on our front door.

    I love coffee in the morning and would share one with you my friend,
    Oakway, South Carolina 6:30 - 7:00am every morning.
    James
    wantomake

    Leave a comment:


  • i_ron
    replied
    Originally posted by wantomake View Post

    Coffee needs nuked. Hey is that science?
    wantomake

    Hey mind if I join you in a cup?

    Ron

    https://ca.news.yahoo.com/fresh-grou...150417802.html

    Leave a comment:


  • wantomake
    replied
    Scientists that be

    Originally posted by Turion View Post
    That's a conversation Matt and I have had many times. the laws of physics that apply to electricity ONLY apply to systems where ground equals -0-.

    The electrical circuit simulators you can find on the internet DO NOT ALLOW the ground of 12 volts, because the MATH used in current electrical theory can't account for it. The powers that be can't handle it, so they sweep it under the rug and ignore it. Some things that are just flat OUTSIDE current electrical theory.

    And when you live outside the box, amazing things happen.
    That's the answer right there, "the powers that be" or "the scientists that be".

    Both believe only they have the answers to all questions. Too bad. I like science and the advantage of building with it. I'm not versed in science enough to add to this conversation.

    It's a tool to be used but must be understood properly to use it.

    Dang it should have been born smart instead of good looking.....

    Coffee needs nuked. Hey is that science?
    wantomake

    Leave a comment:


  • Matthew Jones
    replied
    Originally posted by bistander View Post
    Just like this?
    Funny you couldn't argue the physics portion of that post. Shouldn't use big words you don't understand. Or make quotes out of context.

    Leave a comment:


  • Turion
    replied
    Physics

    That's a conversation Matt and I have had many times. the laws of physics that apply to electricity ONLY apply to systems where ground equals -0-.

    The electrical circuit simulators you can find on the internet DO NOT ALLOW the ground of 12 volts, because the MATH used in current electrical theory can't account for it. The powers that be can't handle it, so they sweep it under the rug and ignore it. Some things that are just flat OUTSIDE current electrical theory.

    And when you live outside the box, amazing things happen.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X