Other Boost convertor test configurations
My Goal was to address the differential voltages and simplify the battery rotation scheme by only switching between 2 or 3 24v banks. Also to determine how much (if any) of the losses in the system could be made up for by the boost convertor + cap dumper arrangement.
The boost voltage to the load could be set to a constant 14.9v or higher. It could also be set lower but the load would start out at the max differential voltage minus the output diode voltage drop until battery A+B drops below the boost convertor set point.
The cap in series with the load maintained a steady 10.3v due to the fact the chipset of the boost convertor connected across the cap would cease to function when the source voltage drops to 10.3 volts. I took advantage of that operating characteristic to maintain a higher voltage differential.
I did this some time ago but can't find my test notes so this is from memory.
The comparator cap dumper peak voltage/dump frequency could be adjusted easily for maximum charging rate of battery (bank) C. I had best results by setting the comparator for only a few volts above battery C with several discharges/sec. That was what my batteries (in the shape they were in) seemed to like best.
In Peter Lindeman's SG Beyond presentation, for some reason he didn't include or forgot to mention battery charge/discharge efficiencies as part of the losses in the system. He only mentioned wire/coil resistances and voltage drops across transistors and diodes as the minimal electrical losses that needed to be overcome. He indirectly inferred the DC generator waveform of the constant current followed by a spike would address the charge efficiency of the battery in the charge position.
The boost convertor in concert with the comparator cap dumper boosts the charge efficiency of battery C on the basis of Teslas method of conversion in my opinion. IE, converting a low voltage low current source into high voltage high current impulses to produce a gain.
Recycling the inductor charging current from the negative leg of BC #1 in the second config extends the run time of batteries A and B.
If your load can tolerate the full differential range of 14.9v to 11.7v, you could omit BC #1. Using a cap in series with the load provides a higher voltage differential for the load/ boost convertor + load to work with.
I make no claims on the COP of this arrangement. It would need much more cycle testing than I had time to complete but the experiment looked promising. Your mileage may vary.
Alex
My Goal was to address the differential voltages and simplify the battery rotation scheme by only switching between 2 or 3 24v banks. Also to determine how much (if any) of the losses in the system could be made up for by the boost convertor + cap dumper arrangement.
The boost voltage to the load could be set to a constant 14.9v or higher. It could also be set lower but the load would start out at the max differential voltage minus the output diode voltage drop until battery A+B drops below the boost convertor set point.
The cap in series with the load maintained a steady 10.3v due to the fact the chipset of the boost convertor connected across the cap would cease to function when the source voltage drops to 10.3 volts. I took advantage of that operating characteristic to maintain a higher voltage differential.
I did this some time ago but can't find my test notes so this is from memory.
The comparator cap dumper peak voltage/dump frequency could be adjusted easily for maximum charging rate of battery (bank) C. I had best results by setting the comparator for only a few volts above battery C with several discharges/sec. That was what my batteries (in the shape they were in) seemed to like best.
In Peter Lindeman's SG Beyond presentation, for some reason he didn't include or forgot to mention battery charge/discharge efficiencies as part of the losses in the system. He only mentioned wire/coil resistances and voltage drops across transistors and diodes as the minimal electrical losses that needed to be overcome. He indirectly inferred the DC generator waveform of the constant current followed by a spike would address the charge efficiency of the battery in the charge position.
The boost convertor in concert with the comparator cap dumper boosts the charge efficiency of battery C on the basis of Teslas method of conversion in my opinion. IE, converting a low voltage low current source into high voltage high current impulses to produce a gain.
Recycling the inductor charging current from the negative leg of BC #1 in the second config extends the run time of batteries A and B.
If your load can tolerate the full differential range of 14.9v to 11.7v, you could omit BC #1. Using a cap in series with the load provides a higher voltage differential for the load/ boost convertor + load to work with.
I make no claims on the COP of this arrangement. It would need much more cycle testing than I had time to complete but the experiment looked promising. Your mileage may vary.
Alex
Comment