Tweet
I'm sure it will be obvious that I'm new to this forum. And even more obvious that I'm relatively new to the "Concept" of Renewable Energy. My background: Retired, self-taught, engineer (mechanical but in an electronics field) of some 30 plus years in industrry.
For many years (since first U.S. energy crisis), I've had an interest and have studied the known and suspected nature of energy within our universe. More recently, in retirement I have taked a more hands-on approach to what we all choose to call renewable energy, with an emphisis on so-called "free energy" and/or over unity.
At this point I have not built a single motor/generator/MEG to prove or disprove any suspected or preceived to-be-known principal(s). But what I have done is collect information on the stated discoveries, concepts, and, formulated principals of the appointed and/or self-appointed leaders or "principals" within this "movement". And, when I say collect information, I talking about many many hours of study and many thousand pages of ...what should I say, perhaps "stuff". I phrase it that way because it has run the gambit from critical thought to trash.
Now, based upon this start within a very interesting field of study, I have developed a few conclusions that i would like to throw out for discussion. I would be pleased to have your input(s). Please follow my thought patern and conclusions (below). I will value the input of anyone with thoughful comments. And, I can assure you, I will have meaningful input into this forum...that may be of interest to you.
Early on my study was directed toward Tesla (didn't everyone start there?) First I stumbled upon Joseph newman, then Tom Bearden & his close associate; John Bedeni. Then there was Don Smith and last, Robert Adams, and his associate; Harold Aspden.
Joseph Newman is a unique individual, totally self taught and at some point in his life (he's been at this task for 30 plus years) he has had phenominal insite into the workings of the physical-electromagnetic universe. He was one of the first and was the first to receive absolute and uncondition rejection from the scientific and industrial world. If you should watch his presentations (performances) today, He comes across an an absolute blithering idiot - I think "they"(the rejection) have driven him to the edge of sanity. Nevertheless, his motor/generator worked. It did exhibit over-unity.
Tom Bearden, without a doubt has a huge understanding of conventional science and the unconventional & mostly unknown "actions-of-nature" not yet understood by most of us, but which forms the basis of what little we do know about the natural concepts of "energy from the vaccumn. He, the scientist, along with his long time friend, John Bedeni, the techinician, have done a pretty good job of proving their concepts with working prototypes. Bedeni has even offered comercially viable related products into the market place. Unique pulse battery chargers.
As a matter of interest, there is evidence that Bearden and Bedeni gained their initial interest and knowledge of "free energy" from the very early works of Joseph Newman. The problem with Newman was that he had workable principals but never was able to significently tell the world how it worked. Ton Bearden has the necessary exposure to all the science to do about the same thing and put it into the right words! Bedini had the necessary skils to put the concepts into prototypes and are probably closer than anyone else in producing commercially viable devices. But in spite of all the leading edge knowledge into the vaccumn and its energy, there is not today, after 30 plus years, a comercially viable device that can consistently and reliably power anything of significence!
Somewhere along the line Don Smith came into the picture. I think Don started out with workable concepts, about the same as Newman, Bearden and Bedini, but favored higher voltages. These higher voltages DID have their merit. He has built high voltage devices with some "free energy" and perhaps COP somewhat over 1 but has NEVER made any device that come close to commercial practicality, AS HE IMPLYS! He does seem to make a few pretty prototypes, but if and when they work, it is under"questionable conditions and circumstances. I think Don "lost it" early on when he just could not make his marginally unique devices perform up to his expectations.
Next came The Adams motor and the contributions made by Harold Aspden. If there is anyone in the field that understands what is going on with over-unity/free energy, to the extent that Tom Bearden does, then it is; Harold Aspden. In a few words, Adams made it work, and Aspden told him and the rest of us why and how it worked.
In my opinion The Adams/Aspden motor and their patent offers the best blueprint for a suscessful prototype and future commercialization of the embodied concepts.
Bottom line, though, most of the devices are escentually the same and after 30 years there is just not much real progress toward powering our homes, shop, businesses, and autos for the PRESENT STATE OF THE ART.
Please tell me what you think.
For many years (since first U.S. energy crisis), I've had an interest and have studied the known and suspected nature of energy within our universe. More recently, in retirement I have taked a more hands-on approach to what we all choose to call renewable energy, with an emphisis on so-called "free energy" and/or over unity.
At this point I have not built a single motor/generator/MEG to prove or disprove any suspected or preceived to-be-known principal(s). But what I have done is collect information on the stated discoveries, concepts, and, formulated principals of the appointed and/or self-appointed leaders or "principals" within this "movement". And, when I say collect information, I talking about many many hours of study and many thousand pages of ...what should I say, perhaps "stuff". I phrase it that way because it has run the gambit from critical thought to trash.
Now, based upon this start within a very interesting field of study, I have developed a few conclusions that i would like to throw out for discussion. I would be pleased to have your input(s). Please follow my thought patern and conclusions (below). I will value the input of anyone with thoughful comments. And, I can assure you, I will have meaningful input into this forum...that may be of interest to you.
Early on my study was directed toward Tesla (didn't everyone start there?) First I stumbled upon Joseph newman, then Tom Bearden & his close associate; John Bedeni. Then there was Don Smith and last, Robert Adams, and his associate; Harold Aspden.
Joseph Newman is a unique individual, totally self taught and at some point in his life (he's been at this task for 30 plus years) he has had phenominal insite into the workings of the physical-electromagnetic universe. He was one of the first and was the first to receive absolute and uncondition rejection from the scientific and industrial world. If you should watch his presentations (performances) today, He comes across an an absolute blithering idiot - I think "they"(the rejection) have driven him to the edge of sanity. Nevertheless, his motor/generator worked. It did exhibit over-unity.
Tom Bearden, without a doubt has a huge understanding of conventional science and the unconventional & mostly unknown "actions-of-nature" not yet understood by most of us, but which forms the basis of what little we do know about the natural concepts of "energy from the vaccumn. He, the scientist, along with his long time friend, John Bedeni, the techinician, have done a pretty good job of proving their concepts with working prototypes. Bedeni has even offered comercially viable related products into the market place. Unique pulse battery chargers.
As a matter of interest, there is evidence that Bearden and Bedeni gained their initial interest and knowledge of "free energy" from the very early works of Joseph Newman. The problem with Newman was that he had workable principals but never was able to significently tell the world how it worked. Ton Bearden has the necessary exposure to all the science to do about the same thing and put it into the right words! Bedini had the necessary skils to put the concepts into prototypes and are probably closer than anyone else in producing commercially viable devices. But in spite of all the leading edge knowledge into the vaccumn and its energy, there is not today, after 30 plus years, a comercially viable device that can consistently and reliably power anything of significence!
Somewhere along the line Don Smith came into the picture. I think Don started out with workable concepts, about the same as Newman, Bearden and Bedini, but favored higher voltages. These higher voltages DID have their merit. He has built high voltage devices with some "free energy" and perhaps COP somewhat over 1 but has NEVER made any device that come close to commercial practicality, AS HE IMPLYS! He does seem to make a few pretty prototypes, but if and when they work, it is under"questionable conditions and circumstances. I think Don "lost it" early on when he just could not make his marginally unique devices perform up to his expectations.
Next came The Adams motor and the contributions made by Harold Aspden. If there is anyone in the field that understands what is going on with over-unity/free energy, to the extent that Tom Bearden does, then it is; Harold Aspden. In a few words, Adams made it work, and Aspden told him and the rest of us why and how it worked.
In my opinion The Adams/Aspden motor and their patent offers the best blueprint for a suscessful prototype and future commercialization of the embodied concepts.
Bottom line, though, most of the devices are escentually the same and after 30 years there is just not much real progress toward powering our homes, shop, businesses, and autos for the PRESENT STATE OF THE ART.
Please tell me what you think.
Comment