Eric Dollard

[Aaron]

Preview of theory, calculation & operation of colorado springs tesla transformer by e

PREVIEW OF THEORY, CALCULATION & OPERATION OF COLORADO SPRINGS TESLA TRANSFORMER BY ERIC DOLLARD

JUNE 5, 2019

20:1 Scale Model Tesla Magnifying Transmitter

For the last 3.5 weeks, Eric Dollard has been at my home and one of the most if not THE most refined presentation he has ever given is being created. It is Theory, Calculation & Operation of Colorado Springs Tesla Transformer, which will be given at the 2019 Energy Science & Technology Conference in July.

This presentation will be the most comprehensive analysis of Tesla’s Colorado Springs Magnifying Transmitter ever given complete with a working demonstration. This is destined to become an instant classic as it is probably the most desired quintessential topic that has defined much of Nikola Tesla’s work and everyone wants to learn about it.

Watch the video here: Preview of Theory, Calculation & Operation of Colorado Springs Tesla Transformer by Eric Dollard - Eric P. Dollard - Official Homepage

[Marcus Neuhof]

3. I suspect from the measurements that the MWO top-load is a more complex distributed resonant load where parameters L, C, M, and K are effectively distributed throughout the ring structures. I would think only the driven ring and maybe the first resonator ring inside this could be treated as the top-load in terms of an LC lumped element calculation. It is also very effected by the coupling coefficient between rings, if the coefficient is high then the top-load really looks like a large lump of metal and C dominates, making the top-load like an accumulator. If the coupling is lower the distributed resonant properties become more important in the measurements as each ring behaves more as a free resonator. From the results I would say the coupling is too tight, and the MWO rings would benefit from being made either into a cone, or on a larger scale with more space between the rings.

This makes a great deal of sense. One question -- by M you presumably mean mutual inductance, but what do you mean by K? Surely not the dielectic constant?

In general, please do post updates here in this thread when you are updating your blog. I think that many people do not check your website regularly and would otherwise miss them.

[Aaron]

Lakhovsky vs Balanced Method

I have the presentation on the MWO by Eric and we may release it when the new website dedicated to the MWO and other physical products is ready to launch, which is probably before the conference in July.

I would not call Eric's coil/wiring method an improvement on the MWO, it is simply different. Eric's would be considered "best practices" for lack of a better term and is the way it "should" be wired as Lakhovsky's lopsided method doesn't make good engineering sense.

The MWO is a lopsided arrangement where one of the phases is grounded. As one coil fires, it goes through the person and grounds through that person from the feet up. The when the other coil fires it does the same thing. About half of what is transmitted goes to the opposite antenna and about half goes through the person to ground. That is very intentional on Lakhovsky's part because the intention is to replicate the ionospheric voltage to Earth ground system on steroids.

With Eric's balanced method, what he discussed at the conference is that the balanced method using the exact same pulse modulator is essentially the CIG or Cosmic Induction Generator method. It will show the dark spot in the tube in the middle or the null point if you will, etc. just like Polakowski's CIG demonstration. And of course like Eric's past CIG builds.

The balanced method has a primary that sits on the ground half way between the coils that are feeding the antennas and is not up on the same coil form as one of the secondaries like with the Lakhovsky method. It is center tapped to chassis ground. As each side fires and if there is someone between, it doesn't go through the person to ground. Instead, the person is simply bathing in the rapidly oscillating field.

However much the Lakhovsky method doesn't make good engineering sense, it is what has historically been proven to get results and that is why it is the only setup being offered at this time and is what most people want. Once we're ahead in production, we will offer the balanced coil arrangement as an add on or alternative method that people can purchase with the pulse modulator.

Perhaps the balanced method gets better results, maybe worse or maybe equal. Those are difficult things to determine but in any case, the balanced method with the pulse modulator is a universal system that can be used for all kinds of Tesla type experiments.

[aminnovations]

Hi Adrian,
Thank you for your as usual high quality experiments and write-ups.

A few questions that arose in the reading:

• You cite a presentation by Eric Dollard on the design of the MWO, ostensibly given at the 2018 ESTC. However Eric Dollard's 2018 talk was on the power grid. Where can we find this presentation on the MWO?
• Your discussion of the SFA adapter board cites the use of equal copper volumes in order to avoid impedance issues. To date I have only seen the 'equal volumes of copper' principle applied in coil design, a very different context. The RF printed circuit / stripline design principles I am familiar with are very different, focusing on e.g track width, board material dielectric constant, distance to adjacent ground planes, board thickness, etc. What evidence is there that the 'equal volumes of copper' approach is useful in the printed circuit board domain?
• Are the resonant points of the MWO top load consistent with the LC tank circuit model, where the inductance of the ring interacts with the capacitance between the two spheres? Evidence that this is NOT the case might be seen in the coil measurements, where the phase shifts are aligned closely with the impedance peaks. This alignment is not seen so much in the top load measurements. The question of the MWO top load acting as an LC resonator is significant inasmuch as this hypothesised behaviour was the inspiration for Eric Dollard's PCB "golden ratio" antenna for the MWO.
• Do you have any plans to perform similar measurements on the above-mentioned PCB "golden ratio" MWO antenna?

Hi Marcus,

Again my apologises for the long delay in getting back to you, things have been very, very busy recently. Answers to your questions:

1. At the beginning of the 2018 ESTC Eric gave a short introduction to the MWO development including the differences between the original Lahkovsky generator design, and an improved balanced generator driving a pair of extra coils designed by Eric. He also demonstrated the very low transmitted radiation from this improved generator by placing a medium wave radio next to the generator which was tuned to a radio station and did not pickup interference from the generator whilst it was running. This introduction was at the beginning of the first day and I don’t know if it was filmed. Aaron would know for sure, or maybe would be able to provide the video if it has been filmed.

2. I decided to try applying the same principle of “equal volumes of copper” to the SFA adapter board to see if it would improve the impedance match over the very wide band that needed to be measured, and to also be consistent in my approach to the general measurement of impedance characteristics of macroscopic resonator structures. Equal volumes of copper, (matched boundary conditions), has proven to be an important factor in getting a balance between the magnetic and electric fields of induction in my TMT experiments, (e.g. with the flat coil presented on my website), and hence an optimal power transfer between the primary and secondary circuits. Ultimately further experiments with and without equal volumes of copper would be needed to fully answer your question as to the usefulness of this approach with a printed circuit board.

3. I suspect from the measurements that the MWO top-load is a more complex distributed resonant load where parameters L, C, M, and K are effectively distributed throughout the ring structures. I would think only the driven ring and maybe the first resonator ring inside this could be treated as the top-load in terms of an LC lumped element calculation. It is also very effected by the coupling coefficient between rings, if the coefficient is high then the top-load really looks like a large lump of metal and C dominates, making the top-load like an accumulator. If the coupling is lower the distributed resonant properties become more important in the measurements as each ring behaves more as a free resonator. From the results I would say the coupling is too tight, and the MWO rings would benefit from being made either into a cone, or on a larger scale with more space between the rings.

4. I certainly plan to do measurements on golden ratio antennas and structures, not just for the MWO, but also with the TMT designs I am working with. When I get there I will of course write-up and post the results for more discussion.

Best wishes,
Adrian

[Aaron]

EPD Laboratories, Inc. update

EPD LABORATORIES, INC. - 501(C)3 NON-PROFIT UPDATE.

In this brief video taken by Scott Hensler, Eric Dollard walks us through some explanations of what kind of equipment is in the racks, etc.
This equipment is needed for the Advanced Seismic Warning System that is based on science from Tesla and Alexanderson.

Eric will give two presentations at the 2019 Energy Science & Technology Conference. The second presentation is: ELECTRODYNAMIC SEISMIC FORECASTING and will be a shorter presentation that will be around 90 minutes long.

EPD Laboratories, Inc. Update 2019-04-01 - Eric P. Dollard - Official Homepage

[VIDEO]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I0kJNdD5-5g[/VIDEO]


Please consider donating to EPD Laboratories, Inc. to support the work of Eric Dollard.


Donate to Eric Dollard - Eric P. Dollard - Official Homepage

[Aaron]

Eric Dollard's birthday

Today is Eric Dollard's birthday




Few updates here on his upcoming presentations:



Happy Birthday Eric Dollard! - Eric P. Dollard - Official Homepage

[Aaron]

Colorado Springs Update #3

Colorado Springs Update #3


Lots of pics here:



COLORADO SPRINGS SCALE MODEL UPDATE 3 - Eric P. Dollard - Official Homepage

[Vinyasi]

Ernst Alexanderson's Variable Induction Alternator

I noticed the image is broken in this post of Eric's...

https://www.energeticforum.com/204306-post72.html

So, I've added it's archived version here...

[Sputins]

I am back in a cage. Two new presentations under construction

1 - electrodynamic seismic forecasting

2-theory, calculation, and operation of the colorado springs tesla transformer

also,the 20 to one scale model is under construction

as expected,the fatuity of employing maxwell's equations and scalar waves will be made evident so as to irritate the ieee boys and girls.this presentation is directed towards engineering solutions and definitions relating to the design and operation of such apparatus.

I am disappointed in the lack of response to my last presentation. Let it burn?

73 de n6 kph

Your last presentation showed there’s almost a deliberate “Trojan Horse” being built in to the U.S. electrical networks. – Perhaps one day when an EMP event happens, people will begin to realise the importance of that particular presentation. – Except their Computers won’t work anymore…

The two new presentations sound like they will hold more interest in general. - Electrodynamic seismic forecasting via listening to the electrodynamic signature of the Earth’s interior makes a lot of sense. - Particularly for the Electric Universe (EU) folks, who should have a high interest in it.

As for the theory, calculation, and operation of the Colorado Springs Tesla Transformer – I think this is the presentation that everyone has been waiting for… Something they can engineer (models), build, experiment with and begin to understand such apparatus – all done in true Dollard style and in opposition to the IEEE’s version of explanation.

73’s.

Sputins and his Chickens.

[t-rex]

New presentations

I am back in a cage. Two new presentations under construction

1 - electrodynamic seismic forecasting

2-theory, calculation, and operation of the colorado springs tesla transformer

also,the 20 to one scale model is under construction

as expected,the fatuity of employing maxwell's equations and scalar waves will be made evident so as to irritate the ieee boys and girls.this presentation is directed towards engineering solutions and definitions relating to the design and operation of such apparatus.

I am disappointed in the lack of response to my last presentation. Let it burn?

73 de n6 kph

[Aaron]

03-17-2019 Eric Dollard Live Call Recording

03-17-2019 Eric Dollard Live Call Recording

03-17-2019 Eric Dollard Live Call Recording - Eric P. Dollard - Official Homepage

[Aaron]

The Revival of the Science of Electricity in the Digital Age

Revival of the Science of Electricity in the Digital Age

In this paper, Eric Dollard covers the historical perspective and theoretical basis for electrical engineering. This is necessary since the modern-day idea of Electrical Engineering has degraded in to what he considers delusive denouncements enforced by a cabal of academic theoreticians. Eric covers the foundations, which originated from Faraday’s experiments and Maxwell’s mathematics.


This foundation laid out by Faraday and Maxwell and it was essential for the Aether to be involved. Later, the “Electron” and the Einstein-Minkowski Relativity replaced this model although the Aetheric model was functional, sensible and engineerable.


Learn what the real pioneers of the electrical sciences thought of this cover-up, which pushed out the Aether, worshipped “Maxwell’s Equations”, which are not Maxwell’s equations, and put the Electron on a pedestal even though it’s “discoverer” J.J. Thompson admitted it is useless.


This paper includes many of their quotes in the proper context as well as all the references so you can verify it yourself. A list of Eric’s work is included on the last page.


This information is an important part of his presentation coming up at the 2019 Energy Science & Technology Conference where he straightens out what Tesla’s Colorado Springs transformer is about as well as a scale model demonstration.


Get the free paper here: Revival of the Science of Electricity in the Digital Age - Eric P. Dollard - Official Homepage

[Aaron]

Colorado Springs Update

UPDATE ON COLORADO SPRINGS SCALE MODEL REPLICATION FOR ERIC DOLLARD'S UPCOMING PRESENTATION

http://ericpdollard.com/2019/04/08/c...model-update-1

[Aaron]

Eric Dollard Live Call coming Sunday

Eric Dollard Live Call Scheduled - March 17, 2019 at 1pm pacific daylight savings time.



Conference Dial-in: 1-857-232-0155
Conference Code: 582590


I always post the phone number and pin code and people keep asking how to get on the call. This is just a simple, old-school telephone number that you dial and then enter the conference code when asked and it will let you into the call. It will most likely be recorded and put on YouTube afterward.

[Marcus Neuhof]

Hi,

For anyone interested I have made a set of impedance measurements on the Lahkovsky multiwave oscillator (MWO), covering so far:

1. Z11 for the drive coil both with and without the MWO rings, in the range 0.1Mc/s - 20Mc/s.

2. Z11 for the MWO rings only, in the ranges 0.1Mc/s - 500Mc/s and 500Mc/s - 1.3Gc/s.

I have written-up and presented the measurement technique and apparatus, the measured results, and some analysis of the results, in two pages on my website.

Links to the pages are as follows:

Multiwave Oscillator Impedance – Part 1
Multiwave Oscillator Impedance - Part 1 | AMInnovations

Multiwave Oscillator Impedance – Part 2
Multiwave Oscillator Impedance - Part 2 | AMInnovations

Best wishes,
Adrian

Hi Adrian,
Thank you for your as usual high quality experiments and write-ups.

A few questions that arose in the reading:

• You cite a presentation by Eric Dollard on the design of the MWO, ostensibly given at the 2018 ESTC. However Eric Dollard's 2018 talk was on the power grid. Where can we find this presentation on the MWO?
• Your discussion of the SFA adapter board cites the use of equal copper volumes in order to avoid impedance issues. To date I have only seen the 'equal volumes of copper' principle applied in coil design, a very different context. The RF printed circuit / stripline design principles I am familiar with are very different, focusing on e.g track width, board material dielectric constant, distance to adjacent ground planes, board thickness, etc. What evidence is there that the 'equal volumes of copper' approach is useful in the printed circuit board domain?
• Are the resonant points of the MWO top load consistent with the LC tank circuit model, where the inductance of the ring interacts with the capacitance between the two spheres? Evidence that this is NOT the case might be seen in the coil measurements, where the phase shifts are aligned closely with the impedance peaks. This alignment is not seen so much in the top load measurements. The question of the MWO top load acting as an LC resonator is significant inasmuch as this hypothesised behaviour was the inspiration for Eric Dollard's PCB "golden ratio" antenna for the MWO.
• Do you have any plans to perform similar measurements on the above-mentioned PCB "golden ratio" MWO antenna?