Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Eric Dollard

Collapse
This is a sticky topic.
X
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • dR-Green
    replied
    Originally posted by jimm View Post
    Dr. Green,

    Thank you for responding.
    The CS notes has various references to the length being less than lamda/4 but the first one I came to on a quick look was on page 72 at the bottom of the page. As far as know, the oscillator was more or less pure EM, but the difference was in the "antenna".
    I also remember reading his account of a low power test of Wardenclyfe where he calculated the pulse return time around the circumference of the earth using the standard speed of light.

    I have not seen any evidence of the FTL aspect in my TC. It follows the
    1/(2*pi*sqrt(LC)) in my lab fairly close. Any differences can be attributed to geometry and distributed capacitance.
    Distributed capacitance in the coil is what results in it's "natural resonance".
    The secondary is the Telluric transformer and it will work with or without an extra coil. With a vertical wire or a small terminal capacitance the energy radiates into space like a normal transmitter, but with a large capacitance the energy is contained and reflected back into the coil, into the earth, and back into the coil and so on. It doesn't need the extra coil.

    How did you test your coil? Geometry does play a role which is one of the things that must be considered, but capacitance calculation is based on geometry alone and doesn't consider wire length which is the thing in question here. Propagation velocity is measured in terms of (supposed) distance travelled I.E. wire length.

    (Extra coil) Diameter = 8.28cm
    Height = 8.28cm
    93.25 Turns
    Conductor Length = 24.256 Metres

    Luminal Wavelength:
    = 4*24.256
    = 97.024 Metres

    Luminal Frequency:
    = Velocity Of Light/Luminal Wavelength
    = 299792458/97.024

    = 3089879 cycles/sec

    Measured Frequency:
    Direct = 3676700 cycles/sec
    10pF = 3990500 cycles/sec

    Originally posted by jimm View Post
    Could you share more details on your setup and test methods?
    I'm intrigued...


    Originally posted by jimm View Post
    E.D's demo on the beach was just the reception of an RF carrier. The tone was produced by the radio's BFO. It's just a radio hooked up to a novel tuned antenna, nothing special. At that distance a coil of wire and a ground would have had the same result.
    I wanted to see a demo of the much touted "lossless" power transmission.
    You seem to understand how the signal was produced/transmitted, so what did you expect to be done differently in that respect? The coil is the same however you choose to power it. An unmodulated carrier is the transmission of power. I can't say what was done 15 years ago but I've sure seen enough in my own experiments through the fact that the amount of power received varies depending on the distance between the transmitter and receiver earth terminals. The coils remain in the same place the whole time, distance between the "antennas" makes no difference.

    People working with this stuff must experience a lot of "accidents" that conveniently allow everything to work every time they turn it on that's all I can say

    Leave a comment:


  • t-rex
    replied
    Notes on Cosmic Ray Detector

    1. For small capacitance like 10 pico-farad the potential required to trigger tube will be kilovolts. The particles of radiant matter will be but a small fraction of a picofarad, but have a very high potential.

    2. The shape of the curve for trigger voltage vs capacitance is very important for study.

    3. The phototube may work better outdoors for certain experiments.

    4. The Western Electric 313-C is similar to 0A4-G

    Leave a comment:


  • chazza
    replied
    Originally posted by kostja View Post
    ... p.s. it's Tesla's Birthday today
    Well it will be on the 10th.

    Born 10 July 1856, Smiljan, Austrian Empire (modern-day Croatia)
    Died 7 January 1943 (aged 86), New York City, New York, USA

    Happy Birthday Nicola

    Leave a comment:


  • jimm
    replied
    Tesla notes

    Dr. Green,

    Thank you for responding.
    The CS notes has various references to the length being less than lamda/4 but the first one I came to on a quick look was on page 72 at the bottom of the page. As far as know, the oscillator was more or less pure EM, but the difference was in the "antenna".
    I also remember reading his account of a low power test of Wardenclyfe where he calculated the pulse return time around the circumference of the earth using the standard speed of light.

    I have not seen any evidence of the FTL aspect in my TC. It follows the
    1/(2*pi*sqrt(LC)) in my lab fairly close. Any differences can be attributed to geometry and distributed capacitance.
    Distributed capacitance in the coil is what results in it's "natural resonance".

    Could you share more details on your setup and test methods?
    I'm intrigued...

    E.D's demo on the beach was just the reception of an RF carrier. The tone was produced by the radio's BFO. It's just a radio hooked up to a novel tuned antenna, nothing special. At that distance a coil of wire and a ground would have had the same result.
    I wanted to see a demo of the much touted "lossless" power transmission.

    In ham radio, when propagation is favorable, there have been reports of accidental contacts hundreds of miles away, while the transmitter was under test on a dummy load. ( a resistive element that dissipates power in heat for testing and is not supposed to radiate) . Sometimes it doesn't take much...

    Leave a comment:


  • dR-Green
    replied
    Originally posted by jimm View Post
    Very true. In Tesla's Colorado springs notes, he used wire length on his calculations only to find that the frequency was lower than expected. This is due to the inductance and slower velocity factor.

    Use the inductance formulae found in engineering text or the ARRL handbook and you will be very close to the desired resonance.
    The frequency of what was lower than expected? Tesla's extra coil measurements show 123% luminal propagation velocity. Taking this 123% as an example, what I was referring to was using 1.23 times the wire length to bring the frequency back to the original intended value. The wire is made 1.23 times longer because propagation is 123% the speed of light. If F = 1000 kc then by using the engineering textbooks you will have a measured frequency of 1230 kc. Extend the wire length to 1.23 times what the textbook says and you are back to 1000 kc.

    Originally posted by jimm View Post
    In the end, he still had serious attenuation, since he could not light any bulbs on the beach! All he proved was that it was a viable EM setup. No scalar, no lossless power transfer.
    I didn't get the impression that he was trying to light any bulbs on the beach. It was a different setup. It was a transmission of an audio signal through the earth as a demonstration of Tesla's principle, ham radio style (legal and non-interfering). By the way scalar is a dirty word here.

    Leave a comment:


  • jimm
    replied
    Originally posted by dR-Green View Post
    I don't think it's that simple. I've tested two different extra coils on this basis, that is adjusting the wire length in order to end up at a particular frequency. Unfortunately it has no meaning, at least on such a simplistic level. My conclusion is that an extra coil of any random wire length will work with any random secondary if thinking this way about it, and you'll end up with some "random" frequency that relates to the secondary and extra coil as one length of wire, no magic, no different than using "matched" coils under the illusion of using 1.57 times wire length, there is no real matching at all. Also you would have to assume 157% extra coil propagation velocity in order to make the theory work that far, maximum I've achieved so far is 130%.

    I think what Eric had in mind was concatenated resonance where the frequency of each coil is the same alone and connected in series; 1/4 + 1/4 = 1/4, not 1/2 frequency (approx) as above, it was and still is experimental. The way Tesla did it in CS was with the extra coil as a series inductor so the secondary frequency was raised by the extra coil. That requires an extra coil of a particular inductance, not frequency or wire length.
    Very true. In Tesla's Colorado springs notes, he used wire length on his calculations only to find that the frequency was lower than expected. This is due to the inductance and slower velocity factor.

    Use the inductance formulae found in engineering text or the ARRL handbook and you will be very close to the desired resonance.

    I don't understand all of this "golden section" mysticism that is being introduced into the coil design. Eric Dollard got two resonant peaks on his demo due to the way the coil was wound. In the end, he still had serious attenuation, since he could not light any bulbs on the beach! All he proved was that it was a viable EM setup. No scalar, no lossless power transfer.

    IMO,The Tesla system had more to do with electrostatics and VLF than any of this other stuff. Read the notes and patents and you will see what I mean.

    Leave a comment:


  • jimm
    replied

    Very few are tooled up with Vacuum Tube technology and you don't get to see plasma with solid-state.
    What resides below the Aether - plasma.

    Smokey
    I designed/built a small TC with a solid state driver- works just fine. Produces plasma too! It has various feedback and modulation improvements that you won't find on a garden variety TC, all withing a small package. To do the same with tube-tech would fill half the workbench.
    Tubes are fine for some very high power applications, but since we have better technology for most things, why not use it?

    BTW, if you want a good book on the subject of plasma production and properties:

    "Ionized gasses" by A. Von Engel, published by the American Institute of Physics.

    Leave a comment:


  • dR-Green
    replied
    Originally posted by David G Dawson View Post
    Coils:
    Should also make loud sounds about what lamare and jake were talking about back here in the Eric_P_Dollard Forum:

    http://www.energeticforum.com/renewa...dollard-7.html

    Where a wound coil is not the same as a long length of wire with respect to frequancy and the 1/4 or any other wave and I think Eric was aware of this but had gone astray with respect to the Extra Coil and will do some futher calculations to confirm.
    I don't think it's that simple. I've tested two different extra coils on this basis, that is adjusting the wire length in order to end up at a particular frequency. Unfortunately it has no meaning, at least on such a simplistic level. My conclusion is that an extra coil of any random wire length will work with any random secondary if thinking this way about it, and you'll end up with some "random" frequency that relates to the secondary and extra coil as one length of wire, no magic, no different than using "matched" coils under the illusion of using 1.57 times wire length, there is no real matching at all. Also you would have to assume 157% extra coil propagation velocity in order to make the theory work that far, maximum I've achieved so far is 130%.

    I think what Eric had in mind was concatenated resonance where the frequency of each coil is the same alone and connected in series; 1/4 + 1/4 = 1/4, not 1/2 frequency (approx) as above, it was and still is experimental. The way Tesla did it in CS was with the extra coil as a series inductor so the secondary frequency was raised by the extra coil. That requires an extra coil of a particular inductance, not frequency or wire length.
    Last edited by dR-Green; 07-07-2013, 04:29 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • David G Dawson
    replied
    Gravity Exposed

    From Raphael37,
    "In Tesla’s dynamic theory of gravity all matter is constantly absorbing ether all the time at the tachyonic speed of 1.37 times the speed of light. This is the world of ether. By its nature, the ether exists in a realm that transcends the speed of light.

    So, what then is gravity according to this theory? Gravity is simply the absorption of ether by, for instance, the Earth. The reason we fall back to the earth when we jump up is not because of some mysterious disconnected force called gravity; we fall back to the earth because we are in the way of the influx of ether. That is what gravity is. It is absorption of ether by the elementary particles. It is the elusive Higgs boson, or God particle, the force/process that gives matter its mass. And it happens in a continuous fashion all the time."

    At long last my theory of gravity being caused by an electric phenomena and not of a physical mass is now supported by this Aether extract from Raphael's site he has directed us to.
    Thankyou!
    This is also what keeps the Earth battery charged and gives us the energy we seek and why I am into Eric's 'Cosmic Ray Detector'.

    Lots of reading ahead and looking forward to it.

    Coils:
    Should also make loud sounds about what lamare and jake were talking about back here in the Eric_P_Dollard Forum:

    http://www.energeticforum.com/renewa...dollard-7.html

    Where a wound coil is not the same as a long length of wire with respect to frequancy and the 1/4 or any other wave and I think Eric was aware of this but had gone astray with respect to the Extra Coil and will do some futher calculations to confirm.

    Conference:
    Sorry to hear of Eric's ending to what started out to be a re-awakening of Eric's theories and why I invited him here to Australia to get away from that type of harrassment as it will be ongoing.
    Some are not individually capable of achieving what we seek and will use whatever tools are available to make that happen.
    You can only work with this man as I hope I am doing with the CRD and help him achieve the answers he requires as he cannot do all the work himself and see this as the best way of contributing.

    Very few are tooled up with Vacuum Tube technology and you don't get to see plasma with solid-state.
    What resides below the Aether - plasma.

    Smokey

    Leave a comment:


  • Raphael37
    replied
    Originally posted by artoj View Post
    Hi David,
    I have contacted Christopher Dunn, Stephen Mehler and Graham Hancock regarding my work on the Kings Chamber and The Pyramid, Stephen replied and was very interested in my understanding and conclusions. It seems my work is a whole new way of interpreting the Kings chamber, I know most investigators have not spent 15 years in study of Quantum Arithmetic, so I do not expect most people to even understand my work. Dale Pond from SVP is one of the few who can truly know how I worked out all the fine parameters. The resonant frequency of the Kings Chamber is related to the Earth frequencies. Please refer to my Blog on this, Regards Arto

    The Earth Pulse Hydrogen Resonator | Artojh's Renderings

    The Kings Chamber | Artojh's Renderings
    I left this same message on your WordPress site.

    you said:
    This length reduces the problem required by making the height now 13 CS and the diagonal D3 become double value of 26 CS.

    AHA I say:
    13 and 26 are associated with the tetragrammaton YHVH

    Interesting coincidences eh?
    It gets so much better IMHO
    It is IMHO because it is my POV
    naturally

    get lost
    and when I say get lost what I mean is get lost in this link here:
    Newton’s Science 137 – 26 Constants – the EM MEme drEaM thEME pARKs | Alternative Thinking 37

    dive into it.

    selah V

    Leave a comment:


  • Geometric_Algebra
    replied
    7/6

    07/06/2013, 7+6=13 on 13, with an 11:11 stamp no less, and my dc power supply just happens to be flashing 7.6 volts. I see no reason why the universe would ever get excited about gov-co contracts which restrict something that would otherwise be accessible for exploration by all. Maybe it's just 13 on Friday with some bad voodoo vibes coming out of Spokompton.
    Last edited by Geometric_Algebra; 07-06-2013, 06:01 AM. Reason: friday night coffee shakes

    Leave a comment:


  • dR-Green
    replied
    Originally posted by zerofossilfuel View Post
    I'm sorry of this is off topic but does anyone know if Eric is aware that N6KPH expired 06/17/2013 in the FCC database? It is still listed as active but for how long?

    Z
    FCC web site said
    = Pending Application(s)
    Now it says

    History
    07/06/2013 License Renewed

    Leave a comment:


  • jimm
    replied
    N6kph

    Originally posted by zerofossilfuel View Post
    I'm sorry of this is off topic but does anyone know if Eric is aware that N6KPH expired 06/17/2013 in the FCC database? It is still listed as active but for how long?

    Z
    I emailed a contact person last week and his renewal is in progress.

    Leave a comment:


  • zerofossilfuel
    replied
    I'm sorry of this is off topic but does anyone know if Eric is aware that N6KPH expired 06/17/2013 in the FCC database? It is still listed as active but for how long?

    Z

    Leave a comment:


  • David G Dawson
    replied
    Test 2

    Cosmic Ray Detector Test 2:
    Took some time to work this one out but found best way in the end and happy with results.
    No need for a Chart here.
    1pf up to 470 pF would not trigger 0A4G up to a max voltage of 186 volts.
    1,000 pf trigger at 133 volts
    4,700 pF trigger at 106 volts
    10,000 pF trigger at 100 volts
    22,000 pF trigger also at 100 volts but slightly better than 10,000 pF.

    1,000 pF had to use switch on power supply with Variac at set voltage to activate 0A4G.
    4,700 pF and above was triggered by Variac alone being swung rapidly up to expected trigger voltage.
    Recommend 22,000 pF or 0.022 uF.

    Test 1 recommendation is 0.33 uF.
    0A4G is an RCA with the rounded cathode.
    Do we now use these values in the CRD and is there anything else we need to accomplish here?

    Smokey

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X