Eric Dollard

[Aaron]

Colorado Springs Update #3

Colorado Springs Update #3


Lots of pics here:



COLORADO SPRINGS SCALE MODEL UPDATE 3 - Eric P. Dollard - Official Homepage

[Aaron]

Eric Dollard's birthday

Today is Eric Dollard's birthday




Few updates here on his upcoming presentations:



Happy Birthday Eric Dollard! - Eric P. Dollard - Official Homepage

[Aaron]

EPD Laboratories, Inc. update

EPD LABORATORIES, INC. - 501(C)3 NON-PROFIT UPDATE.

In this brief video taken by Scott Hensler, Eric Dollard walks us through some explanations of what kind of equipment is in the racks, etc.
This equipment is needed for the Advanced Seismic Warning System that is based on science from Tesla and Alexanderson.

Eric will give two presentations at the 2019 Energy Science & Technology Conference. The second presentation is: ELECTRODYNAMIC SEISMIC FORECASTING and will be a shorter presentation that will be around 90 minutes long.

EPD Laboratories, Inc. Update 2019-04-01 - Eric P. Dollard - Official Homepage

[VIDEO]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I0kJNdD5-5g[/VIDEO]


Please consider donating to EPD Laboratories, Inc. to support the work of Eric Dollard.


Donate to Eric Dollard - Eric P. Dollard - Official Homepage

[aminnovations]

Hi Adrian,
Thank you for your as usual high quality experiments and write-ups.

A few questions that arose in the reading:

• You cite a presentation by Eric Dollard on the design of the MWO, ostensibly given at the 2018 ESTC. However Eric Dollard's 2018 talk was on the power grid. Where can we find this presentation on the MWO?
• Your discussion of the SFA adapter board cites the use of equal copper volumes in order to avoid impedance issues. To date I have only seen the 'equal volumes of copper' principle applied in coil design, a very different context. The RF printed circuit / stripline design principles I am familiar with are very different, focusing on e.g track width, board material dielectric constant, distance to adjacent ground planes, board thickness, etc. What evidence is there that the 'equal volumes of copper' approach is useful in the printed circuit board domain?
• Are the resonant points of the MWO top load consistent with the LC tank circuit model, where the inductance of the ring interacts with the capacitance between the two spheres? Evidence that this is NOT the case might be seen in the coil measurements, where the phase shifts are aligned closely with the impedance peaks. This alignment is not seen so much in the top load measurements. The question of the MWO top load acting as an LC resonator is significant inasmuch as this hypothesised behaviour was the inspiration for Eric Dollard's PCB "golden ratio" antenna for the MWO.
• Do you have any plans to perform similar measurements on the above-mentioned PCB "golden ratio" MWO antenna?

Hi Marcus,

Again my apologises for the long delay in getting back to you, things have been very, very busy recently. Answers to your questions:

1. At the beginning of the 2018 ESTC Eric gave a short introduction to the MWO development including the differences between the original Lahkovsky generator design, and an improved balanced generator driving a pair of extra coils designed by Eric. He also demonstrated the very low transmitted radiation from this improved generator by placing a medium wave radio next to the generator which was tuned to a radio station and did not pickup interference from the generator whilst it was running. This introduction was at the beginning of the first day and I don’t know if it was filmed. Aaron would know for sure, or maybe would be able to provide the video if it has been filmed.

2. I decided to try applying the same principle of “equal volumes of copper” to the SFA adapter board to see if it would improve the impedance match over the very wide band that needed to be measured, and to also be consistent in my approach to the general measurement of impedance characteristics of macroscopic resonator structures. Equal volumes of copper, (matched boundary conditions), has proven to be an important factor in getting a balance between the magnetic and electric fields of induction in my TMT experiments, (e.g. with the flat coil presented on my website), and hence an optimal power transfer between the primary and secondary circuits. Ultimately further experiments with and without equal volumes of copper would be needed to fully answer your question as to the usefulness of this approach with a printed circuit board.

3. I suspect from the measurements that the MWO top-load is a more complex distributed resonant load where parameters L, C, M, and K are effectively distributed throughout the ring structures. I would think only the driven ring and maybe the first resonator ring inside this could be treated as the top-load in terms of an LC lumped element calculation. It is also very effected by the coupling coefficient between rings, if the coefficient is high then the top-load really looks like a large lump of metal and C dominates, making the top-load like an accumulator. If the coupling is lower the distributed resonant properties become more important in the measurements as each ring behaves more as a free resonator. From the results I would say the coupling is too tight, and the MWO rings would benefit from being made either into a cone, or on a larger scale with more space between the rings.

4. I certainly plan to do measurements on golden ratio antennas and structures, not just for the MWO, but also with the TMT designs I am working with. When I get there I will of course write-up and post the results for more discussion.

Best wishes,
Adrian

[Aaron]

Lakhovsky vs Balanced Method

I have the presentation on the MWO by Eric and we may release it when the new website dedicated to the MWO and other physical products is ready to launch, which is probably before the conference in July.

I would not call Eric's coil/wiring method an improvement on the MWO, it is simply different. Eric's would be considered "best practices" for lack of a better term and is the way it "should" be wired as Lakhovsky's lopsided method doesn't make good engineering sense.

The MWO is a lopsided arrangement where one of the phases is grounded. As one coil fires, it goes through the person and grounds through that person from the feet up. The when the other coil fires it does the same thing. About half of what is transmitted goes to the opposite antenna and about half goes through the person to ground. That is very intentional on Lakhovsky's part because the intention is to replicate the ionospheric voltage to Earth ground system on steroids.

With Eric's balanced method, what he discussed at the conference is that the balanced method using the exact same pulse modulator is essentially the CIG or Cosmic Induction Generator method. It will show the dark spot in the tube in the middle or the null point if you will, etc. just like Polakowski's CIG demonstration. And of course like Eric's past CIG builds.

The balanced method has a primary that sits on the ground half way between the coils that are feeding the antennas and is not up on the same coil form as one of the secondaries like with the Lakhovsky method. It is center tapped to chassis ground. As each side fires and if there is someone between, it doesn't go through the person to ground. Instead, the person is simply bathing in the rapidly oscillating field.

However much the Lakhovsky method doesn't make good engineering sense, it is what has historically been proven to get results and that is why it is the only setup being offered at this time and is what most people want. Once we're ahead in production, we will offer the balanced coil arrangement as an add on or alternative method that people can purchase with the pulse modulator.

Perhaps the balanced method gets better results, maybe worse or maybe equal. Those are difficult things to determine but in any case, the balanced method with the pulse modulator is a universal system that can be used for all kinds of Tesla type experiments.

[Marcus Neuhof]

3. I suspect from the measurements that the MWO top-load is a more complex distributed resonant load where parameters L, C, M, and K are effectively distributed throughout the ring structures. I would think only the driven ring and maybe the first resonator ring inside this could be treated as the top-load in terms of an LC lumped element calculation. It is also very effected by the coupling coefficient between rings, if the coefficient is high then the top-load really looks like a large lump of metal and C dominates, making the top-load like an accumulator. If the coupling is lower the distributed resonant properties become more important in the measurements as each ring behaves more as a free resonator. From the results I would say the coupling is too tight, and the MWO rings would benefit from being made either into a cone, or on a larger scale with more space between the rings.

This makes a great deal of sense. One question -- by M you presumably mean mutual inductance, but what do you mean by K? Surely not the dielectic constant?

In general, please do post updates here in this thread when you are updating your blog. I think that many people do not check your website regularly and would otherwise miss them.

[Aaron]

Preview of theory, calculation & operation of colorado springs tesla transformer by e

PREVIEW OF THEORY, CALCULATION & OPERATION OF COLORADO SPRINGS TESLA TRANSFORMER BY ERIC DOLLARD

JUNE 5, 2019

20:1 Scale Model Tesla Magnifying Transmitter

For the last 3.5 weeks, Eric Dollard has been at my home and one of the most if not THE most refined presentation he has ever given is being created. It is Theory, Calculation & Operation of Colorado Springs Tesla Transformer, which will be given at the 2019 Energy Science & Technology Conference in July.

This presentation will be the most comprehensive analysis of Tesla’s Colorado Springs Magnifying Transmitter ever given complete with a working demonstration. This is destined to become an instant classic as it is probably the most desired quintessential topic that has defined much of Nikola Tesla’s work and everyone wants to learn about it.

Watch the video here: Preview of Theory, Calculation & Operation of Colorado Springs Tesla Transformer by Eric Dollard - Eric P. Dollard - Official Homepage

[BroMikey]

That is awesome to hear Aaron. This will be a landmark, finally a
working model proving that electricity can be shared from a single
output.

This is something everyone will want to see, such exciting news.

I saw one guy on youtube get close.

[Aaron]

Preview of Electrodynamic Seismic Forecasting by Eric Dollard

25 minute video.

This is a preview of what is to come in one of two different presentations that Eric Dollard will be giving at the 2019 Energy Science & Technology Conference.

All seats are already sold out, but you can pre-register for the 2020 ESTC at 2019 Energy Science & Technology Conference ? Exclusive conference with the Pioneers of the modern day Tesla & free energy movement!. The registration will show it is for 2019, but all those registrations will be moved across to 2020 so please disregard the date. Also, if you already registered for 2019, you do NOT have to re-register as all registrations will be carried over for 2020.

Video is here: Preview of Electrodynamic Seismic Forecasting by Eric Dollard - Eric P. Dollard - Official Homepage

[Marcus Neuhof]

PREVIEW OF THEORY, CALCULATION & OPERATION OF COLORADO SPRINGS TESLA TRANSFORMER BY ERIC DOLLARD

JUNE 5, 2019

20:1 Scale Model Tesla Magnifying Transmitter

For the last 3.5 weeks, Eric Dollard has been at my home and one of the most if not THE most refined presentation he has ever given is being created. It is Theory, Calculation & Operation of Colorado Springs Tesla Transformer, which will be given at the 2019 Energy Science & Technology Conference in July.

This presentation will be the most comprehensive analysis of Tesla’s Colorado Springs Magnifying Transmitter ever given complete with a working demonstration. This is destined to become an instant classic as it is probably the most desired quintessential topic that has defined much of Nikola Tesla’s work and everyone wants to learn about it.

Watch the video here: Preview of Theory, Calculation & Operation of Colorado Springs Tesla Transformer by Eric Dollard - Eric P. Dollard - Official Homepage

Thank you for posting this. It is a wonderful preview of what looks like a superb presentation. I look forward to buying the video once it comes out. (I trust you will still be able to accept Bitcoin as last time!)

[David G Dawson]

Tesla Magnifying Transmitter (TMT)

Tesla Magnifying Transmitter TMT:

I bought a Book by Ernst Willem von den Bergh on the above subject and had it read within two hours - "recreating Tesla's Dream".

Two subtle decisions for me emerged from the excellent detective work initiated by the Author:

1. Rain:

How rain is made to fall and what is required to do so, meaning a new Rainmaker is on the table but also a change in the methodology of using the devices that I currently have. Tesla always hinted at frequency and vibration and this now shows that I need both the positive and a negative Ion Generator as a catalyst for rain. I built a positive Ion gun after the negative but never used it but that is what is required - the frequency and vibration side. The unknown here is the size of the apparatus needed but early testing should reveal this consideration. This is also what the CSI could be used for as these tests are under investigation as to what may be required and again, size is of significance.

2. TMT:

The Extra Coil of the TMT is now seen in a different light after building Eric Dollard's 'Crystal Set Intitiative' (CSI) and this will now be reviewed with his 5R4GYB/2050 Thyratron Pulser driving the device. Frequency again of concern in that used by Tesla at 11.77 hertz. A receiver required here and at last the penny dropped as to why Eric also presented his 'Regenerative Magnifying Receiver' (RMR) using the 2C22 which would be used to monitor the transmitted signal some 84.9uS later - the time the signal takes to travel around the Flat Earth. Circumference of the Earth used here 25,470 miles and this operation is easy to clarify using a two channel oscilloscope. This then also will prove the correct Circumference of the Earth. Tesla didn't have these tools in his day.

If Tesla had ever mentioned a Flat Earth in his time he would have been laughed out of society as is still being done today without the accuser doing the slightest amount of research to discover the real truth or at least, something closer to the mark.

I have had to put my Flat Earth studies aside but at this point will bring it all back to the fore as it is now being further questioned by comments made by James Clark Ross in his 'voyage of discovery' of Antarctica in 1839/43and more on all of this later as it unfolds. How can you use a Sextant aimed at the Sun at midnight in late January/February in Antarctica waters to find your position?

One criticism of Ernst in that at the end of the Book in his brief summary of 'Capturing Cosmic Rays', he mentions a thingy called an 'electron' and yet through the entire Book, not one single mention of that thing that doesn't exist in reality. Eric Dollard was also well up on track with the energy contained in Cosmic Rays as my 'Cosmic Ray Detector' is also proving which, to this day, is still the only one in operation from Eric's initiative. A possible source here of the elusive energy required to power an 'Energy Synthesis' device.

Whose reality? Yours if you want to spend the hard yards in time doing the research.

After reading the Book, I then did some digging of my own and you can all have it here for free as it is the same as the Book but covers the subject in much greater detail with much clearer diagrams and pictures:

https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B70...JORnZGVTg/view

Just hit the blue 'Download' button.

Further information at 'steemit' from Ernst:

https://steemit.com/science/@mage000...esla-s-secrets

https://steemit.com/science/@mage000...patent-decoded

There are a further 8 documents here to download for the full picture.

Further into this is an explanation of what gravity and inertia really are and nothing to do with the corrupted Newton version accepted by controlled society and this from a Russian in Vesselin Petkov which I have attached.

So basically what you now have is all the information from both Eric and Ernst and coming in from different directions which should allow for a further leap into this amazing Tesla technology which is still untamed.

Respectfully

Smokey

[David G Dawson]

TMT Gravity/Inertia

TMT Gravity/Inertia:

I didn't realise that the Gravity/Inertia paper by Petkov wouldn't be attached in this medium so have provided the URL:

https://epdf.pub/relativity-and-the-...spacetime.html

Have presented this testimony on the TMT by Ernst a week before the 2019 ESTC so that it may aid in digesting what Eric will present at the Conference as it is simply coming from another direction.

If Eric is going to present the full construction details of the TMT I will surely be in line for the first print as it comes off the press. Most impressed by the build so far - we are all still only Artists at this point.

During the build of the Crystal Set Initiative (CSI), I was a little taken aback by the lack of response to my observation that I was able to receive a signal off the Extra Coil at a distance of about 21" away from the coil using high impedance headphones on a 3" silver faced RF capacitor plate as the receiver. Nobody made comment and this was using no external power source other than the telluric connection which we could assume to be near zero volts. So then what would happen if this is then pulsed with the Dollard Pulser at 600 V dc, what distance could I expect to be removed from the device to again hear the signal in the headphones?

Food for thought.

Smokey

[Aaron]

Versor algebra part 1 in paperback available

SURPRISE ERIC DOLLARD PAPERBACK RELEASE

It's taken a lot of work to get this into a paperback template, but Versor Algebra - As Applied to Polyphase Power Systems Part 1 is now on Amazon!!!

Go here for more info: Eric Dollard's Versor Algebra Part 1 - Now available in paperback on Amazon - A & P Electronic Media

[Marcus Neuhof]

TMT Gravity/Inertia:

I didn't realise that the Gravity/Inertia paper by Petkov wouldn't be attached in this medium so have provided the URL:

https://epdf.pub/relativity-and-the-...spacetime.html

Have presented this testimony on the TMT by Ernst a week before the 2019 ESTC so that it may aid in digesting what Eric will present at the Conference as it is simply coming from another direction.

If Eric is going to present the full construction details of the TMT I will surely be in line for the first print as it comes off the press. Most impressed by the build so far - we are all still only Artists at this point.

During the build of the Crystal Set Initiative (CSI), I was a little taken aback by the lack of response to my observation that I was able to receive a signal off the Extra Coil at a distance of about 21" away from the coil using high impedance headphones on a 3" silver faced RF capacitor plate as the receiver. Nobody made comment and this was using no external power source other than the telluric connection which we could assume to be near zero volts. So then what would happen if this is then pulsed with the Dollard Pulser at 600 V dc, what distance could I expect to be removed from the device to again hear the signal in the headphones?

Food for thought.

Smokey

That all sounds very interesting but your previous post was talking about "Flat Earth" theories and it seems like you have not bothered to take the most elementary steps (like taking an international flight) to verify these theories for yourself... maybe worth doing?

[Aaron]

Dollard's colorado springs presentation coming thursday, july 25, 8am pst

DOLLARD'S COLORADO SPRINGS PRESENTATION COMING THURSDAY, JULY 25, 8AM PST

Eric Dollard's presentation on Tesla's Colorado Springs Magnifying Transformer will be released this Thursday at 8am in the morning. If you're receiving this email, you'll receive the link. The 20:1 scale model replication cost about $24,000 USD, which includes parts, labor, motor freight to get it to the conference and a couple thousand to get Bruce Gavin here to bring his equipment to run the demo. Fortunately, it cost EPD Laboratories, Inc. about $6500 or so rather than the full cost, but we do need to raise some funds.

The presentation will include a 4 hour presentation video, 553 page PDF of the presentation, 20 minute presentation video and a 35 minute whiteboard presentation explaining how the demonstration was setup and what equipment was used. *** YOU GET 100% OF EVERY BIT OF INFORMATION NECESSARY TO REPLICATE THE 20:1 SCALE MODEL ***

This presentation should be selling for well over $100 but it will be released at a ridiculously low introductory price of $37 for the first 24 hours, then it will go to $47 Friday morning - no exceptions, we cannot give you the $37 introductory price after the price is raised. A portion of the proceeds from the sales of this presentation will got to EPD Laboratories, Inc. to help support the amazing work of Eric Dollard. If you were at the 2019 ESTC, you will have a special code that will give you a bit of an extra discount.

The next presentations to be released after this will be both presentations by Dr. James DeMeo - you can get either one or in a combo at a deeper discount. These may be avail next Tuesday or possibly sooner.