Eric Dollard

[Aaron]

Tomorrow live call with eric dollard

ERIC DOLLARD - HE'S RECOVERED AND WILL BE ON A LIVE CALL! - JUST A REMINDER...


February 28th, Tuesday, 3pm Pacific Time, we'll have a live call where you can ask Eric Dollard questions. The topics he DOES want to focus on are Telluric Research, Alexanderson Networks, and other related questions based on any of his books or video presentations. He does NOT want to answer questions relating to topics that are not specifically related to his books/videos.


As you may or may not know, he was in the hospital for about 3 months with a blood cancer and he is now doing really well and we are lucky to have him offer to answer questions live - please honor his request of what he wants to talk about if you get on the call.


Here are the call details, they may not be given again so please write these down and put the date on your calendar:


Conference Dial-in: 1-857-232-0155
Conference Code: 582590

[h2ocommuter]

Any More updates?

Eric is in the hospital but still wants to do a live call - 2pm Pacific today in 15 minutes.

Conference Dial-in: 1-857-232-0155
Conference Code: 582590

Thanks,
Aaron

I know I must be out of the loop. Are there any updates about Erics' health?

[Aaron]

Eric Dollard in the hospital

Eric is in the hospital but still wants to do a live call - 2pm Pacific today in 15 minutes.

Conference Dial-in: 1-857-232-0155
Conference Code: 582590

Thanks,
Aaron

[David G Dawson]

Push-Pull Drivers/Variacs

Hello Eric,
Am currently building a 6SN7GTA Push-Pull driver similar to your schematics and find your information most helpful.
In your letter to JohnP on this subject (6N7s and MagAmps), you made the statement:

"So let's see if the miracle of a parameter EMF can be brought out"

Could you please elaborate on exactly what this 'miracle' is?

Have plans to drive the CSI/CRI with this setup and also your 5R4GYB/2050 thyratron pulser for effect.
What I have also not done but see it as a required component is to raise a capacitor hat well above the Extra Coil.

Anything more you would like to pass on with respect to Vacuum Tubes will be most appreciated as you are talking to about one of the very few that have bothered to build all or any of your circuits.
Cosmic Ray Detector (CRD) still working well with the large 8" donger.
However, it is not talking to me although I do note a change in dong frequency at certain times.
Thanks.

Variable Inductor:
Spent quite some time looking for the impossible and eventually found it - this being a large range variable Inductor.
Most you can buy are large ex Transmitter Finals and are of the Roller type but with very limited range.
The IF cans and similar out of Radios are OK but small and the range is still limited using the Ferrite tuneable cores.
Coils with open core bobbins are good with room to fit Ferrites like antenna rods out of old transitor radios but with a still limited variable range.

I had just purchased two NOS Ohmite 120volt 1.5amp VA2 Variacs and put then to the range test and came out with a variable inductance from 3mH to 1.2H and in such solved the problem.
These all have a broad Copper winding which is about 1" wide at top and bottom and in such make an ideal variable inductor and the way in which they are made by Ohmite, have an extremely reliable contact surface.
Only problem here is the cost, USA about $50 but in Oz at $A100 but I went to Ebay where they went cheaply.

All the best.

Smokey

[Marcus Neuhof]

The contacts were then adjusted again, so that only the non-sparking contact set was cross phased. (In other words, the contact set which varies the positive terminal of the position-varying condenser between the input voltage terminal and the output voltage terminal.)

With this configuration, barely any voltage was observed to appear at the output voltage terminal -- the device appeared not to function at all.


Based on these experiments it appears that neither pure dielectric parameter variation, nor the combination of dielectric parameter variation in combination with sparking or cross phased switching, are sufficient to produce energy synthesis in the PP-18 circuit.

Further avenues for experimentation include the possibility of parametric excitation / resonance in combination with the un-labeled inductances in the military PP-18/AR schematic, and/or the other condensers therein.

Mercury-wetted type relays proved to be unavailable at a reasonable price from the suppliers accessible to me. However I was unable to identify avenues for experiment which they would have allowed, but which were not covered by careful adjustment of the vibrator contacts.

[Marcus Neuhof]

Nevertheless the measurement was performed again using the differential voltage measurement function of the volt meter to measure the change in voltage precisely over a period of one minute.

In this case, a voltage decay rate of 10mV per minute was observed with the vibrator off, and 10mV per minute with the vibrator on.

Measurement of the contact timing with an oscilloscope suggested that both sets of contacts were synchronized to within less than 100 nanoseconds of each other.

Therefore it may be concluded that, while the normally adjusted PP-18 circuit successfully converted an input DC current into an output current of twice the voltage potential, no surplus energy was observed to appear.

Next, adjustment of the vibrator contacts was investigated.

The vibrator contacts were adjusted so as to produce a "cross phased" switching approach: where the contacts responsible for the "Side B" configuration of position-varying condenser in series with the input condenser did not "break" before the "Side A" contacts "made". (Side B being the case where the doubled voltage appears, side A being the condition where the condenser are charged)

(The opposite was incidentally also the case: as a result of this configuration, the Side A contacts did not "break" until after the Side B contacts "made.")

In this configuration, a great deal of sparking was observed from one side of one set of contacts. However, extreme energy loss was observed: the output condenser never reached more than half its operating voltage.

The sparking was observed on the set of contacts which alternate between the input voltage terminal and ground. Specifically, between the negative end of the position-varying condenser and the input voltage terminal.

The contacts were re-adjusted to eliminate the cross-phased action on the other contact set. This way, only the contacts which were observed to produce sparking operated in the cross-phased mode.

Applying voltage, nearly the same effects as with the previous cross-phased configuration were observed. This time, sparks appeared at both A and B contacts in the cross-phased contact set. However, the extreme voltage losses were still observed, and the output voltage condenser only reached half its voltage.

[Marcus Neuhof]

Mr. Dollard,

as a means of further exploring the potential anomalous effects of dielectric parameter variation, I re-wired my prototype / replication of the PP-18, and performed a number of tests with the intent of observing even the finest, most minute appearance of surplus energy in the circuit as a result of dielectric parameter variation.

None were found.

Here were the experiments performed:

In this new configuration, the vibrator coil itself was powered by a separate battery. There was thus no load placed on the condensers and source voltage whatsoever -- apart from resistive losses.

The purpose of this new configuration was to determine if any surplus Joule-seconds were being produced at all.

Given the lack of any significant load, if this configuration of dielectric parameter variation was producing surplus Joule-seconds, then one would expect to see either a voltage gain or at least no voltage drop across the input or output condenser.

The experiment was performed by powering on the vibrator using the separate battery. Then, a second battery was used to charge up the condensers in the circuit.

A volt meter with 0.001mV accuracy was placed across the output (24V) filter condenser, the condenser which is charged by the action of the position-varying condenser in combination with the input condenser.

Upon removal of the "charging" battery, with the vibrator coil still operating off its separate power source, the measurement was observed.

The voltage across the 2200uF output condenser was seen to decrease at a rate of approximately 1 millivolt per second.

Performing the identical measurement across the 6800uF position-changing condenser, with the vibrator still operating, revealted a decrease in voltage of approximately 1 millivolt per 8 seconds.

Finally, the voltage across the 6800uF input condenser was seen to decrease at a rate of approximately 1 millivolt per 6 seconds.

Removing power from the vibrator, the measurements were observed again.

The voltage across the 2200uF output condenser decreased at approximately 1 millivolt per second.

The voltage across the 6800uF position-changing condenser decreased at approximately 1 millivolt per 6 seconds.

The voltage across the 6800uF input condenser decreased at approximately 1 millivolt per 6 seconds.

The observed difference between the rate of voltage decay in the position-changing condenser while the vibrator was operationg, and when it was not, is within the margin of error of my observations.

[Marcus Neuhof]

I seem to be having trouble posting.

[wheatbelt.radio]

in regards too the PP-18 voltage doubler,

its just occured too add too list possible list of working principles, the posssility that it is all common earthd, and the inductance is sucking in electrons from the chassis , ive noticed that such big lumps of iron after often as good as a ground earth for increasing current flow in circuits, personally i find this more likey from personal experience than the plasma being the mediator for this current flow - and if it isnt wired up too allow this possibility, it could be

[Marcus Neuhof]

Cross phase is a power line term where two different phases are connected giving a short circuit condition.

In this case it is when both contacts in a SPDT switch contact the central terminal shorting the normally open to the normally closed contact.

From a theoretical perspective, why would the simple act of varying capacitance NOT be enough to produce surplus current flow... why would additional current flowing through the condenser, or other conditions, be necessary?

Editing to add:

There are a variety of ways to construct a parametric variation device.

One may optimise for the highest possible number of parameter variations per second.

One may optimise for the most rapid possible parameter variation.

In the case of the PP-18, one may over-charge one or both condensers to above 12V. One may under-charge one or both condensers.

One may even produce parametric excitation or resonance in the PP-18 through careful choice of timing and the input inductance. (This seems unlikely given the design parameter of minimum ripple.)

And yet, I was under the impression that the 'energy surplus' appeared at the moment of parameter variation: when the e.g increase in capacity produced a positive conductance (G = C / time).

The positive conductance in turn resulting in a reduced voltage potential (across the varying capacity) or increased current flow -- V = I / G or, rearranged, G = I / V.

Yet if "cross phased" switching is required to produce any significant effect then it would seem likely this description is not complete:

From my point of view "cross phased" switching ought not to change the time rate of change of capacity (and therefore conductance), except in as much as the breaking of the arc might occur more quickly than a mechanical switch break.

In other words, if "cross phased" switching is required then the appearance of positive conductance would seem to be only part of the picture.

Other phenomena are evidently also required, acting in concert, to produce either or both of an increase in dielectric or magnetic induction.

This increase in either or both dielectric or magnetic induction, in turn, produces the second-order increase in electric induction which produces, according to your theories, Joules.

Indeed since dielectric parameter variation does not change the quantity of dielectric induction, at work would seem to be most likely an increase in magnetic induction, producing Volts.

But I see no clear path to understanding where this might come from in the domain of dielectric parameter variation.

Therefore, is it understood what the precise moment is at which the apparent energy surplus appears?

[Aaron]

live call in 1 hour

TOMORROW NOON PACIFIC DAYLIGHT SAVINGS TIME - LIVE CALL WITH ERIC DOLLARD - have questions? Call in and ask him yourself - Conference Call Dial-in: 1-857-232-0155
Conference Code: 582590

Live call in 1 hour.

[Aaron]

Live call - Eric Dollard tomorrow

TOMORROW NOON PACIFIC DAYLIGHT SAVINGS TIME - LIVE CALL WITH ERIC DOLLARD - have questions? Call in and ask him yourself - Conference Call Dial-in: 1-857-232-0155
Conference Code: 582590

[Marcus Neuhof]

Mr. Dawson,

Have you been able to produce an 'Energy Synthesis Device' at all, without regard to the design parameters that you specify?

[David G Dawson]

Free Energy Design Criteria

Free Energy Design Criteria:
Hello wheatbelt.radio,

I had made my mind up on day one to remove myself from physical rotation (motors/generators etc) and that a passive vortex device was the base criteria needed and this simply to eliminate the maintenance/noise/fuel costs.
This for a house power plant eliminating poles and wires.
Spherics came along at 'Overunity' whilst I was designing the organisation as I had already considered a 4 pulse coil design and the need to pulse each coil at the 120º offset as I had made a point of buying old TV Neck Ferrites (a dual coil + bifilar wound) and was most fortunate in acquiring the AD-YU delay lines required to do this.

http://www.overunityresearch.com/ind....0;attach=9863

Plus all the vintage GLOM (General List OF Material or BOM - Bill Of Material) I could put my hands on like multivibrators, Tubes, ignition coils and flybacks for high voltage.
Vacuum Tubes were the essential pulse ingredient here as solid state was also eliminated in the original design criteria as bandwidth was required with harmonics present.
Everything today was 'fine tuned' and was considered that the very opposite phenomena was an essential requirement into OU - TEM vs LMD.
Eric's thyratron pulser met these demands as I had already come to this conclusion when experimenting with the Don Smith 'Impulse Discharge' design and why Eric Dollard's input on TEM & LMD is most beneficial to me for ALL free energy designs - that I needed thyratrons to do the down conversion into a useable AC.
Batteries and Inverters were also eliminated in the base criteria - simply a total change in thought as to what we were going to use.

People are here asking Eric for a free energy device to do what I am engineering and it is all contained in the information that he is providing and why I presented the TEM/LMD/Negative Resistance association.
LMD = PI/2*c

I cannot stress more that people need to pull themselves away from keyboards and actually do something at the bench - Eric's 'electrical experimenter'.

A document coming shortly on 'Impulse Discharge' as this is the second experimental road into OU after the 'Spherics Tetrahedral Device' (STD) and a third is Expansion/Implosion in the Fran De Acquino Tower Device and that is also being attended to and a 4th in Bruce Perrault's Radiant Energy collector.
And last but by far not the least of significance is Eric's 'Crystal Set/Radio Initiative' (CSI/CRI) which is also here with intent to modify and be Tube pulsed with a duplicate receive coil arrangement.

All five are on the bench for experiment with adaptations but progress is slow as I also cover other research fields including Rainmaking after TJ Constable and FLAT EARTH and Sun Distance.
Which device has the most potential to fill the house power criteria? - the 'Spherics Tetrahedral Device' (STD).

If anybody would like further information, it is available at Yahoo Groups 'dltorsiondevices' or you can connect at my Email:
smokey9s@bigpond.com.
Only dedicated individuals also at the bench please as my time is limited and wondering how it may be possible to reverse time as in an LMD arrangement.

Further information will be presented here as it is actually using some results of Eric Dollard's information which has been one of the connecting threads for all of free energy but only a very few are awake to that fact.

Summary for an 'Energy Synthesis Device':
No physical rotation.
No Solid State - Vacuum Tubes preferred initially
No Batteries or Inverters
No noise, or use of Fossil Fuels
Low maintenance
No power outages like during storms etc
No poles or wires
No long wire or similar Antenna except for a smart design using LMD principles which I am working on
Safety paramount
Practical size

Smokey

[wheatbelt.radio]

Dear David Dawson,

Spherics Tetrahedral Device - was of particular interest too one of my flywheel based projects recently, delivering the purpose of generation stability in a single spacial dimension, teemed i might add with various groupings of fellow symmetrical tetrahedral flywheels too offer little more than stability and inertia in the typical fashion, however in my readings i have noted a few anomalous uses that others have experimented with and i understood as being atypical too either traditional function. without getting into the scifi ufo stereotyping of their uses, can you point me towards a page you have used for inspiration in your work