Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Eric Dollard

Collapse
This is a sticky topic.
X
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Aaron
    replied
    Four Quadrant Theory

    Raphael,



    You should at least know what Eric is talking about in regards to his Four Quadrant Theory instead of making an argument about something that has absolutely nothing to do with what he is teaching.



    ----------------------------------------------------------------



    From Four Quadrant Representation of Electricity by Eric Dollard



    Nikola Tesla was the first to realize that mechanical and electrical energy could be transmitted by a "rotating magnetic field." That much is reported in the history books. Even electric motor technicians are aware of the fact that an AC Induction Motor operates because the rotor is dragged around by a "rotating magnetic field" in the stator.


    But what is not understood by most engineers and motor specialists is the fact that the "rotating magnetic field" is inherent in the electricity itself, and not just an artifact of the stator coil arrangements!


    Tesla's invention of "poly-phase, Alternating Current" electricity is actually much more complex and interesting than most people think, and I have spent the better part of my adult life experimenting with and developing an understanding of it.


    You see, when Tesla discovered "poly-phase, alternating current" electricity, it came to him in an intuitive flash! He built the first working models from this basic understanding. But when other people, including General Electric, wanted to engineer large systems, they needed a way to mathematically model what the electricity was doing.


    General Electric hired Charles Steinmetz to develop that mathematical modeling of Tesla's poly-phase AC electricity. It was really Steinmetz, not Tesla, who "wrote the book" on how the system works! But General Electric was only interested in understanding just enough to make the system work so they could make money with it. They really didn't care what else was possible!


    But in the meantime, Steinmetz came to understand many of the systems "deeper secrets." You see, the possibility of electricity is embedded deeply in the Natural World. It is one of those Secrets that took human beings millenia to even envision, much less to make use of. And Nature has its own unique ways of being that humans who spend their whole lives in cities will never understand.


    The Four Quadrant Theory has deep roots that travel back in time to when humans were more in contact with the Natural World. I discuss these origins, as well as the archane math involving "the 4 roots of One".


    This is, by far, the most comprehensive discussion of the history, philosophy, and development of the understanding of electricity that I have ever produced. I'm sure you'll enjoy making it a valued part of your study library!

    Leave a comment:


  • Raphael37
    replied
    Originally posted by Nhopa View Post
    Hi Raphael37:

    So who is this man. give me the name. The reference you gave shows a number of articles about the swastika, which I am not interested in.
    okay


    https://at37.wordpress.com/2012/03/2...asymmetry-etc/

    OK I get it you are not interested in the swastika though it can be linked to the aether and to what entanglement is too via what is gravity ... ?

    okay
    now whose problem is that when looking for the ultimate 4-quadrant model to use to effectively harness the wheel work of what we can NOT see?

    Originally posted by Aaron View Post
    Why don't you explain to all of us your understanding of how Eric is applying a four quadrant model to electricity and explain who else has been able to explain it like Eric?
    whoa now instead of you geniuses telling me to learn electrical blah blah [I am merely a theorist] ... I do see hundreds of ye wise guys tinkering and thinking on this site ... BUT maybe it is time Eric leaned over the shoulder of folks who are using a 4-quadrant model and making it work on the nano level?

    the nano is the future and electricity gurus need to know how it works

    what is wrong with ye electrical gurus taking cues from folks who are making the 4-quadrant swastika work on the nano level, work wonders I might add.

    PhDUH ye fellas seem more interested in proving blah blah blah, not willing to eat crow or humble pie or bumble berry pi.



    maybe the electrical engineers need to learn from the nano engineers who are way ahead of fellas like Eric making this 4-quadrant model work.
    the question is ... that I keep asking in a snake oil promises promises world, and this one question never ever changes .... has Eric been able thus far to generate useful applications for his 4-quadrant electrical AHAs in the here and right now?

    what are they?
    oh you need more funds to make it work?
    in order to save future lives I should donate some johnny ca$h?

    okay now that we have dispensed with the promises in what the electrical gurus have been able to do manifest using the 4-quadrant model ...

    maybe it is time everybody stopped being so ignorant of what others are accomplishing using the same 'basic model' to generate AHAs!

    I find pages 126-131 rather interesting and informative
    https://books.google.ca/books?id=MlP...norods&f=false



    https://at37.wordpress.com/2013/10/1...ht-mill-motor/
    ^^^ honestly if I understood nano engineering and electrical engineering as well as all of you I would study the architecture of 4 quadrant nano swastika folks ....
    ... they can use the 4-quadrant swastika model to unzip the DNA of 'we the sheeple' ...

    so while ye folks are trying to get folks to unzip their wallets and maybe fleece folks (I hope that is not your intention) the nano swastika light mill will be unzipping the DNA of we the sheeple from the inside out and maybe changing the world ... while Eric ponders the hollow sun.

    Last edited by Raphael37; 11-03-2015, 11:49 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • Nhopa
    replied
    Wilkin Brattle

    Hi dR-Green:

    Since currently no scientific discussion is going on, I have a question about Wilkin Brattle. Was he for real? We have a TV series going on here in the U.S. with the title of "The bastard executioner" and the story supposedly depicts the life of Mr. Brattle (or at least part of his life). Can you give us any insight? Thank you.

    Leave a comment:


  • Aaron
    replied
    dvd

    Originally posted by Nhopa View Post
    Hi Aaron:

    Is Eric's video "The power of aether as related to music and electricity" available as a hard copy, rather than a downloadable video? Thank you, Nhopa.
    Right now, it is only a download.

    We plan to make them available on DVD later on.

    Leave a comment:


  • Aaron
    replied
    four quadrant model

    Originally posted by Raphael37 View Post
    I can clearly see that you are suggesting that the 4-quadrant theory that Eric Dollard and *others* promote is not new or special at all.

    In fact there is only one person today linking the 4-quadrant theory to what gravity is ... and to what entanglement is hinting at ... yes there is a genius among us ... and it is not Eric Dollard ... who has recovered a model that even truth defaults to, and that is a good sign.

    https://at37.wordpress.com/?s=swastika+entanglement
    ^^^ it would be this fella here, a virtual newcomer to the world of virtual reality, a nobody who came out of 'nowhere' ...

    http://www.energeticforum.com/renewa...-machines.html
    ^^^ closer to home

    selah
    Why don't you explain to all of us your understanding of how Eric is applying a four quadrant model to electricity and explain who else has been able to explain it like Eric?

    Leave a comment:


  • Nhopa
    replied
    Hi Aaron:

    Is Eric's video "The power of aether as related to music and electricity" available as a hard copy, rather than a downloadable video? Thank you, Nhopa.

    Leave a comment:


  • Nhopa
    replied
    Hi Raphael37:

    So who is this man. give me the name. The reference you gave shows a number of articles about the swastika, which I am not interested in.

    Leave a comment:


  • Raphael37
    replied
    Originally posted by dR-Green View Post


    I can clearly see that you are suggesting that the 4-quadrant theory that Eric Dollard and *others* promote is not new or special at all.

    In fact there is only one person today linking the 4-quadrant theory to what gravity is ... and to what entanglement is hinting at ... yes there is a genius among us ... and it is not Eric Dollard ... who has recovered a model that even truth defaults to, and that is a good sign.

    https://at37.wordpress.com/?s=swastika+entanglement
    ^^^ it would be this fella here, a virtual newcomer to the world of virtual reality, a nobody who came out of 'nowhere' ...

    http://www.energeticforum.com/renewa...-machines.html
    ^^^ closer to home

    selah

    Leave a comment:


  • Aaron
    replied
    downloads

    Originally posted by Nhopa View Post
    Hi Aaron:

    I have purchased Eric's video and CRI text. How long before I get the email, so I can down load them?
    Hi Nhopa,

    Thank you for supporting Eric work!

    After checking out of the shopping cart, it should take you directly to the login page so you don't have to wait. Simultaneously, 2 emails come with the login info.

    Please forward your Clickbank receipts to Jeff at the email on this contact page: Contact Us - A & P Electronic Media by Aaron Murakami & Peter Lindemann and he will help you out.

    Leave a comment:


  • Nhopa
    replied
    CRI video and text

    Hi Aaron:

    I have purchased Eric's video and CRI text. How long before I get the email, so I can down load them?

    Leave a comment:


  • Nhopa
    replied
    Aether

    Check out this web site Resonant Frequency Of The Aether
    Should we design our coils to some of these frequencies listed in the article?
    Last edited by Nhopa; 10-20-2015, 04:26 PM. Reason: Left out a sentence.

    Leave a comment:


  • orgonaut314
    replied
    Aaah entanglement. Yes food for thought. Einstein did not want to abandon the locality principle. Bohm had an interesting theorie that works mathematically and abandons locality. It says that the two particles are one non local entity. He identified the pilot wave that is a non local wave describing the collective behaviour.
    Quantum Physics: David Bohm / Bohmian Wave Mechanics

    But about the cat. I find it interesting that we are starting to fight here after I published my ideas that it is the backward wave that is irritating the aether. This wave is identified in the Tesla coils and Eric identified it in the Alexanderson antenna's and the longitudional networks. So my conclusion is we should make devises that make backward waves.

    there are tubes known to do this. The Alexanderson antenna does this. The left handed LC network does this.

    The Backward Wave

    Last edited by orgonaut314; 10-19-2015, 01:18 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • Nhopa
    replied
    Hi orgonaut314:

    Sorry to hear about your cat's problem. Probably most animals, including cats and dogs or birds are very sensitive to signals we are deaf to. I think your cat figured out you are onto something and got away before became part of the experiment. Since what we do involves hi frequency, who knows?
    Interesting to note that toward the end of his life, Einstein had some doubts about things he said earlier. I am sure by now he has figured it all out.
    Food for thought: the entangled particles. Could they be communicating with each other thru aether at instantaneous velocity across any distance?
    Take care.

    Leave a comment:


  • orgonaut314
    replied
    Hi Nhopa, I found it very difficult to make progress. I remember that finishing the secondary coil in some mysterious way made my cat run away. I spend a month searching. She was found in the end almost dead. Allways bad things happen when I push the devellopment. Perhaps it is not allowed?


    One very different thing about Einstein that I also see as critisism on Dollard.
    There is the Fizeau experiment where light is dragged by water but the speed can only be explained by partial dragging of the aether. The experiment is measuring the speed of light in streaming water. They expected to see the sum of the speed of water and light but it was smaller.

    Than there is the Michelson Morley experiment that can only be explained by complete dragging of the aether by the earth.

    So faced with these outcoms Lorentz hypothesed length contraction. Meaning that length of the aether is changed by the speed of the observer.

    Lorentz thaught hard about another explanation but simple could not hold the aether dragging hypotheses up.

    Later Einstein explaned that the aether exists but not in the way it was understood earlier.

    I have thought long about it and I hold on to the Lorentz aether. Meaning there is a frame of absolute rest. Relative to that frame the universe works like a lens contracting space and time relative to the observer.

    Only by ignoring Fizeau it is possible to believe in a simple aether.

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fizeau_experiment
    Last edited by orgonaut314; 10-17-2015, 07:35 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • Nhopa
    replied
    Hi orgonaut314:
    So where do you stand with your experiment? I know my problem was that darn extra coil, which now we can ignore for the time being. Also I did not realize how important a good ground is. So now I am starting from square one and I think things will go better. My ground is almost finish, so we will see.
    As far as all the equations, versors and so on concerns, unless they have immediate PRACTICAL value, I don't care. I would rather read Kurt Gödel's Collected Works If I would have the time. Take care.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X