Eric Dollard

[Aaron]

4 New Eric Dollard Update

ERIC DOLLARD UPDATE TOPICS...

• SEISMIC PROJECT SUCCESS!
• ERIC DOLLARD'S PRESENTATION DESCRIPTION
• NEW ERIC DOLLARD PAPER POSTED
• TWO NEW INTERVIEWS

Hi {!firstname_fix},


The last one month has been quite an adventure! We all pulled together and the bond money for Eric Dollar's seismic project has been covered. There is also almost $12,000 that can go towards equipment. Eric is very excited an enthusiastic about this project and thanks everyone for their contributions.


SEISMIC PROJECT SUCCESS!


If you donated through Indiegogo, your Perks will be honored. Eric will be out of touch for a few weeks, but we'll get all those taken care of. Of course some can't happen until the conference or until the project is far enough long to show a demo, etc... He will be writing some thank you letters as soon as he is back at the lab.


If you donated by Paypal directly, we'll even give you the same Perks that you would have for your contribution amount as if you did donate through Indiegogo.


Thank you to the latest donors in Paypal!

Bryce H. $100
N.T. Inc $5
Heinrich B. $15
Troy F. $30

Paypal donations now total $858 + $20,500 in Indiegogo + about $100 in Teslacoin for a grand total of = $21,458 in the last 27 days or so. The campaign expires in just a couple days so anything anyone can pitch in would be greatly appreciated by all! URGENT - Save Eric Dollard's Telluric Project!

Thank you all so very much for all the support!!


ERIC DOLLARD'S PRESENTATION DESCRIPTION


If you are going to the 2014 Energy Science and Technology Conference to see Eric Dollard LIVE and watch him give some demonstrations, you can see the description down under his bio: Energy Science Forum Technology Conference 2014, formerly known as the Bedini-Lindemann Science & Technology Conference

Also, please notice there are TWO SURPRISE SPEAKERS coming to the conference and both of their presentations are relevant to Eric Dollard's work. We'll be announcing who they are soon. There are only about 130 seats left so register now while you can. Energy Science Conference - 2014



NEW ERIC DOLLARD PAPER POSTED

In case you haven't seen it, visit the Feb 5 post by Eric (T-Rex) in Energetic Forum and you can see the first chapter of another book Eric just wrote. He completed over 1000 equations - this is a technical book so watch out! It is spread over about 5 posts.

http://www.energeticforum.com/eric-dollard-official-forum/11855-eric-dollard.html


TWO NEW INTERVIEWS

Here is the recent interview by Gary Hendershot of the Smart Scarecrow Show:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N2fNK29kEsc

This is another interview by Adam Bull a couple days ago: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iJ35FI27108


Sincerely,
http://EricPDollard.com

[Geometric_Algebra]

Okay, now I see what's going on here with the crazy math postings. I somehow missed the recent postings by T-Rex. I imagine his latest posting, the one involving the naperian rate, is headed towards the description of the periodic growth and decay oscillations that I seek. This is all very interesting though, and good to experiment with on paper to get a feel for it. Good discussion, carry on...

[madhatter]

Do you have a book in mind from Seely? I haven't quite connected to the modeling of the oscillating terms.

So do we just generalize h a little bit more to take in the ¼, 1/8, 1/16... rotations to pick off the transient terms?
j^n=(-1)^(n/2)
h=(-1)^(n/(2m)), 360/2^(m-1) angular rotations; m,n in positive integers.
(j^n)*h=(-1)^(n/2)*(-1)^(n/(2m))=(-1)^(n(m+1)/(2m)) ? Something like this in general.
Or do we start pushing towards non-integer multipliers? I almost see this but not quite. I love it, keep going.

If we take a sinusoidal wave or voltage and break that into a fourier series of 5 terms, i.e. B1,B2,etc.. to B5, and define them as Emax, E1/2, E, E-1/2, Emin then we can see that the angle are thus,
wt=0 = Emax
wt=pi/3 = E1/2
wt=pi/2 = E
wt=2pi/3 = E-1/2
wt=pi = E min
That's the basic Fourier series of coefficients used in electrical engineering. notice that 'time' is always a function here, so for a harmonic series there is a calculation required for each frequency.

Seely, uses both Fourier series and some complex functions of sinors in diagrams for AC currents and harmonics in " Electron tube circuits" it's a text book.

A good reference for the use and development of Complex hyperbolic functions, look up "Complex quantities and their use in electrical engineering" by Steinmetz. I think it's been mentioned here in the past and probably by Eric.

something to note: the letter 'j' is a distinguishing index without numerical meaning. it simply defines the horizontal from the vertical component of a sine wave.
so when j=square root of -1
what it is saying is " j is the imaginary unit, and the sine wave is represented by a complex imaginary quantity a + j b "

Another good source is A E Kennelly 'Impedance, angular velocities and frequencies of the oscillating current circuit'

After all this, thinking a bit more. your question is more related to quaternions... Macfarlane 'Algebra of physics' in his 'Papers on Space' book would be a good start.

By a versor is meant an amount of arc of a great circle on the sphere • it
has an axis and an amount of angle. A versor, as a whole, may be denoted by
a small black letter as a, and analytically by a^A , where a denotes its axis,
and A the amount of its angle in circular measure. Thus a^Pi/2 is the imaginary square root -1 for the axis.

[upgradd]

Starting with the basic functions:

y = h(m) = (-1)^m

y = j(n) = i^n

Due to the over lap, we can say that

i^(2n) = (-1)^m

and conversely

i^n = (-1)^(m/2)

From these equalities, we can define each function using only one dependent variable (m or n). Also, its arbitrary which base to use (i or -1), but as GA has already used -1 lets continue with it.

j(m) = (-1)^(m/2)
h(m) = (-1)^m

For the case of j(m) * h(m) we get

(-1)^((3/2)m)

for unit vector of arbitrary angle of rotation:

k(m,n) = (-1)^(m/n)

where theta, angle of rotation for k(m,n), is found per GA as

theta(n) = 360 / 2^(n-1)

(Integer values for n less than 1 give rise to multiples of 360.)

Or alternately where

k(m,n) = (-1)^(m/n) = a + bi

In degrees, the angle can be found as

theta = arctan(b/a)

Since the output of k(m,n) can be a complex number a+bi, we use the reactive component as the numerator and the real component as the denominator.

For the case of k(m,n) * k(m,n) we get

(-1)^(2(m/n))

Using rational values for the independent variables of function k(m,n) (giving greater freedom for the index of rotation), it may be possible to describe the circuit impedance due to parametric change.

There is also the possibility of merging ohmic terms with reactive terms using the unit vector k(m,n); allowing for simplification of impedance. For example, a capacitor has resistance capacitance and inductance, using k you could write its complex impedance as a single term using k(m,n) to express the magnitude of its ohmic and reactive components in a tidy way.

Since circuit impedance defines the amplitude of vectors E and I, of an arbitrary waveshape, functions based on e, sin and cos with application of k(m,n), to denote the time variant impedance effects of the circuit (resistive and reactive currents and voltages), may be useful.

[Geometric_Algebra]

Do you have a book in mind from Seely? I haven't quite connected to the modeling of the oscillating terms.

So do we just generalize h a little bit more to take in the ¼, 1/8, 1/16... rotations to pick off the transient terms?
j^n=(-1)^(n/2)
h=(-1)^(n/(2m)), 360/2^(m-1) angular rotations; m,n in positive integers.
(j^n)*h=(-1)^(n/2)*(-1)^(n/(2m))=(-1)^(n(m+1)/(2m)) ? Something like this in general.
Or do we start pushing towards non-integer multipliers? I almost see this but not quite. I love it, keep going.

[madhatter]

Assuming use of complex plane,

j in function form:

y=j(n)=sqrt(-1)^n

where
j(n) is a "quadrantal" unit vector function of n
y = rotational multiplier (multiples of 90* increments)
n = positive integers and is the index of rotation
sqrt(-1) = i

Since imaginary numbers are 90* rotated from real numbers multiplication by j results in discrete intervals of 90* rotations.


h in function form:

y=h(n)=(-1)^n

where
h(n) is a "mirror image" unit vector function of n
y = rotational multiplier (multiples of 180* increments)
n = positive integers and is the index of rotation

Since negative ("fictitious") numbers are a 180* rotation from positive numbers, multiplication by h results in discrete intervals of 180* rotations.


As might be noticed, unit vectors h and j overlap: j^2 = h^1, j^4=h^2. Thus AC operator j(n) has only two unique indexes of rotation; giving rise to reactive energy as retarded currents (+j) and retarded potentials (-j). The DC operator gives rise to voltage sources and voltage drops.

And if one wants to find real world applications of this, go back in time to the old publications on vacuum tube circuits. Dr. Samual Seely comes to mind as a good source for practical applications in verbage most current students could understand.

[Tesla_Bcn]

Replication of Eric's Longitudinal electricity from Spain.

Dear Aaron, Dr-Green and specially T-Rex.

In Spain we are planning to replicate Eric's famous vintage experiment, that was replicated in the Summer 2013 Conference. Our main goal is to achieve a source of truly Longitudinal Electricity.

Our first step should be to replicate the Fischer Diathermy Machine (we can not afford to buy one), but in the schema that we see in this link, there's something that we would like to confirm, and please apologize if what I gonna say is a non-sense or it's been said before (I did not find it).

The main question is with the first HV transformer in which there's some question's that come up to my mind when I first saw it;

¿ Is that copper strand what is used in the two secondaries of the first transformer? ¿ Bifilar or normal? If it's that the case, then it should be reasonable to think in a considerable self-capacity which would make that transformer to resonate in a low frequency, as well as to increase the longitudinal effects ¿ Do they both aspects sound reasonable?

¿ Is that 5 Kv output ? The guy in the video said 2,5Kv. He also said that in the next step, the Tesla Coil, there's 90 turns in the secundary. If it's that the case, and there's 7 turns in the first, then we should expect a higher voltage output of 60 Kv. ¿ Which output voltage (non-specified) does the FD deliver?

¿ How much is the top resistance in the variable reactor?

Waiting for your answers.

Thanks from Spain.

[upgradd]

Assuming use of complex plane,

j in function form:

y=j(n)=sqrt(-1)^n

where
j(n) is a "quadrantal" unit vector function of n
y = rotational multiplier (multiples of 90* increments)
n = positive integers and is the index of rotation
sqrt(-1) = i

Since imaginary numbers are 90* rotated from real numbers multiplication by j results in discrete intervals of 90* rotations.


h in function form:

y=h(n)=(-1)^n

where
h(n) is a "mirror image" unit vector function of n
y = rotational multiplier (multiples of 180* increments)
n = positive integers and is the index of rotation

Since negative ("fictitious") numbers are a 180* rotation from positive numbers, multiplication by h results in discrete intervals of 180* rotations.


As might be noticed, unit vectors h and j overlap: j^2 = h^1, j^4=h^2. Thus AC operator j(n) has only two unique indexes of rotation; giving rise to reactive energy as retarded currents (+j) and retarded potentials (-j). The DC operator gives rise to voltage sources and voltage drops.

[madhatter]

Vector addition in hyperbolic functions:
Two successive applications of the j operator thus reverse the
direction of a line, or rotate it through 180 ; so that [tex]j x j[tex] or
[tex]j^2[/tex] is equivalent to giving the negative sign to a complex
number without changing its angle. Thus we have the well-
known relation
[tex]j=\sqrt{-1}[/tex]

[tex]\\j^2=-1\\j^3=-j\\j^4=+1[/tex]


For what ever reason latex seems to not work...

[tgraca]

My favorite living rooms until now have had pool tables in them... I am now convinced that coils in my living room is the way to go! Thanks for posting!

[tgraca]

[QUOTE=Aaron;239016]

never underestimate the power of stupidity.

George Carlin is credited as saying "Never underestimate the power of stupid people in large groups!"

[tgraca]

The Evolution of Matter by Gustave Le Bon

This is really a fascinating read indeed, which was recommended by Eric.

Free to read online at the Internet Archive.

This link goes to the Google books app, which won't let you download PUBLIC DOMAIN books to your computer. It is available if you search on "The Evolution of Matter Gustave Le Bon PDF" - if for any reason you can't find a copy, let me know and I will post it on one of my websites and provide a DIRECT link to it here. -teo

[Sputins]

Notebooks

The photo of the notebooks shown above, was sent to my phone by Roy. I have all the messages in my phone from Roy saved, where he admits to having the notebooks in his possession and also refuses to return them.

I'm not sure exactly what his motives are, but he refuses to work with me. Eric is not pleased.

These notebooks contain the blueprints for the working Landers Earthquake prediction system, and would be incredibly useful to Eric in re-creating the Seismic Warning System.

Something must be done, the notebooks must be returned to their rightful owner- Eric.

Why would he not return the notebooks? What right does he think he has to keep them? His motives sound like he is dangling the carrot to invoke Eric’s anger and a ransom. (Now that he can see there is some potential money floating about from the Advanced Seismic campaign). So what is his ransom? What does he want for them and why then does he then refuse to work with you? (JP). He sounds like a real A-hole. Eric would be livered! - This I think is the real motive here, to anger Eric to the point where he disappears into ‘Camp-never-to-be-seen’ and sending all associated projects into oblivion, or successfully stalling them! - So tell Eric not to fall for (their) deliberate dirty tactics.

No doubt the police would not give a damn over some (allegedly) stolen notebooks, etc. So who can you turn to? Hired strong-arms tactics? – No, as illegal activities or violence is not Eric’s way.. (Suggesting this might get me banned anyway).

So it might be worth posting the messages from Roy saved on your phone, or at least using these against him in some way. – Embarrass him publicly enough to have him return them? Or as a last resort, negotiate a payment of ransom. Although, not what one would want to do or give him the pleasure of.

Even if the notebooks were returned, what guarantee would be given that they are not damaged or critical pages torn out etc.? Another tactic is, perhaps simply adopt the same policy of the government, and have “no negotiations with terrorists” & (sadly) forget about the notebooks ever being returned (serving as a distraction) and / or simply embarrass him about the situation.

Although having those notebooks back and complete would be a great advantage to the Advanced Seismic Warning System and related technologies I'm sure. Goodluck.

[Aaron]

$19,355 Indiegogo

$19,355 in Indiegogo now!

[Aaron]

Eric Dollard's Seismic campaign update

Campaign good news:

Thank you for all the newer donations to Paypal!

John L. $10.00
Martin L. $50.00
John G. $25.00
Michael W. $50.00
Craig B. $25.00
Mark M. $30.00
Sharie H. $10.00
Riccardo R. $20.00
Nicolas D. $100.00
Mark B. $35.00
Jim D. $50.00
Gordon E. $25.00

Newer paypal donations totaling $430.
Brings total donations in Paypal to $725!

$18,855 Indiegogo + $725 Paypal = $19,580 and we don't know what is donated by check or money order by mail yet.

We have a few days left - URGENT - Save Eric Dollard's Telluric Project!