Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Eric Dollard

Collapse
This is a sticky topic.
X
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • cyborg
    replied
    science and experiment.

    The results were correct, as I have shown. You made false assumptions that prevented you from understanding/accepting it, and on that basis, you disagreed with the results.

    What's more you told me to use a formula, which I did do. Your own formula gave you an answer you didn't like, so then you claimed that I was "playing a shell game with numbers to obfuscate the fact that TC FTL is a myth".

    ???

    Science, eh?
    The proof of the pudding in any experimental result is repeatability. Has anyone independently verified your result?
    It is possible that you made an error in your measurements and or methods?
    Will you entertain such a thought?
    Even Tesla was known to make a mistake or two in his calculations!

    None of my coils has been close to FTL, no matter the geometry involved.
    The pointing vector "short cicuit" distance doesn't hold water either. the TC is oscillating, so the energy shuttles back and forth between the inductor and capacitive elements. there are also still dielectrics involved.(media)
    So far I have not found anything different than what has been put forth by well understood engineering principles. ( A radio engineering handbook by Terman ( I think) from the 40's will show just how far they went with it).
    It sure takes a lot of the guess work out of "coiling".

    There are lots of "anomalous results" out there that nobody can seem to replicate. case in point: the hendershot generator.
    To me, it was evident that machine is doomed to fail, but there are those who have tried to replicate only to realize that they have been the victim of a hoax.
    Why do people perpetrate these hoxes? I don't know, but in some cases it's to make money with kits and books or perhaps for others, the notoriety is enough...

    Leave a comment:


  • orgonaut314
    replied
    Some true scientific failures are:
    In the sixties dr. A. Hoffer found out that vitamines work as tranquilizers. His patients with mental problems where for 90% cured with these vitamines. The same time other chemical tranquilizers where discovered and they seemed to work too except for the side effects that where not studied then. Now this controverse went on and finally the government ordered a studie to finally say if vitamines worked. The studie (financed or pressured by pharmaceutics?) concludes that all patient that where cured where misdiagnosed and that vitamines did not work. Now I myself had som problems and refused the chemical **** and my problems did not get better. Than I discovered this Hoffer studies and tried the vitamines as he described and I was cured almost instantly. In the meantime I cured almost everyone in my near environment. People know nothing about these vitamines. Farmaceutic industry did suppress them and is effectively killing people every day turning them into zombies.
    Science? A not so funny joke

    Or another story the Rife microscope. RCA has destroyed Rife and the fellow scientists did not look at his results because they did not have Rife's microscope. Cancer can be cured and these Tesla coils doe exactly that. I am curing myself from a virus that I believe is the course of mental problems and I do it with my Tesla coil. It simply works. Rife Lakhovsky etc. They are all ignored and their instruments can not work so are not svn tested.

    Wel keep dreaming. This hole society is on a chemical downfall deep into the pit.

    Leave a comment:


  • dR-Green
    replied
    Originally posted by cyborg View Post
    I am not trying to "dampen momentum" of discovery, but point out the errors in the experimental processes that are leading to false results.
    The results were correct, as I have shown. You made false assumptions that prevented you from understanding/accepting it, and on that basis, you disagreed with the results.

    What's more you told me to use a formula, which I did do. Your own formula gave you an answer you didn't like, so then you claimed that I was "playing a shell game with numbers to obfuscate the fact that TC FTL is a myth".

    ???

    Science, eh?

    Originally posted by cyborg View Post
    I can't say for sure, because I have not been to the center of the Earth, but geologists who spend a lot of time and money studying the planet, seem to think so.
    Why would they want to defraud us? What would be the motivation?
    You are making the assumption that they know the truth of everything and wish to deceive the rest of the population. In truth they are not deliberately deceptive, they are ignorant.

    They must also choose their projects wisely and research things that will ensure funding for next year. They don't want to live on the street. And they also don't want to be ridiculed by their colleagues for thinking "nonsense" things within the existing paradigm and dogma.

    See what happened to professor of psychology John Mack at Harvard University after he decided to research ET and UFO experiences/interactions not as delusions, but as a valid case for scientific study, on the basis that the majority of the "patients" reported exactly the same experiences. Big mistake! Of course, no self-respecting, rational thinking and sane scientist would even entertain the possibility! Colleagues who were previously his friends wouldn't even acknowledge him when walking past them in the corridor. He had to fight the university through legal battles just to keep his job. This is science today.

    [edit] It would seem that the biggest problem with science is that no one is willing to admit that they're not exactly sure, they won't say that it might be wrong but this is our best guess so far. They simply authoritatively disseminate the current belief as truth to the rest of the population as if they have figured it all out.

    Eric isn't the one who makes the claim that the earth (and other planets) is hollow ultimately. As he says this is what the data shows or implies, it's common among radio guys. But what do radio guys know about geology, right? "Stick to your own field". Because, naturally, each part of the universe is independent of every other part, one field of research is completely irrelevant to another! Compartmentalised rubbish.

    And of course some disgusting humans are deliberately throwing all kinds of trash into the mix either to deliberately deceive or to take advantage. Like that woman who claimed to channel Tesla, for a price. These idiots are not helping matters either.

    I will say no more on the matter.
    Last edited by dR-Green; 12-10-2013, 05:59 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • cyborg
    replied
    Originally posted by orgonaut314 View Post
    I think that what cyborg is also missing is that this surface wave mutual between the rings of the coil is an evanescent wave in modern language.
    Evanescent waves are the tunneling waves in quantum mechanics. They are the mysterious senses that insect seem to have in quantum biology. Paul Dirac pointed out that these wave are found with Maxwell equations if you use imaginary wavelength but this whole Maxwell building simple does not hold when Coulomb lines are really measured and they do not have an infinite velocity.
    These evanescent waves are mostly known for tunneling between two optical wave guides. They are from the side where total reflection arises but they are on the other side
    The whole evanescent thing is a way to fix Maxwell but it does not work. Take once step further back and you are at the counterspace wave or the longtitudional wave Tesla was talking about. Orgon. The only problem in seeing all this clearly is that we are not ready yet to accept tha we lost something fundamental in our scientific building but we might be in the future when we really understand electro biology.
    The problem is that one can't prove something without some method of measurement.
    Perhaps our present day tools do not have the resolution required ?
    Theory is fine, but empiricism is better.

    Leave a comment:


  • cyborg
    replied
    Experimentation and proof vs. annedotes

    Originally posted by Sputins View Post
    It’s evident that there was some renewed momentum happening here, both with the TMT & the CRD.. But that couldn’t be tolerated.

    So Cyborg /Jimm arrives to dampen down the momentum. He offers help and advice with the left hand while he jams the screwdriver into the cogs with the right hand.

    We are not the ‘Flat-Earth society’, nor a cult. Cyborg may want to point out that the Earth is round, but here we want to also show the Earth is hollow, the Universe is electric, faster than light longitudinal propagation is possible, instantaneous propagation may be possible through Alexanderson / Tesla principals and the Aether is the medium which allows the Creative Force to manifest through.

    The Einsteiners are squirming.

    This is the Eric P Dollard Channel, N6KPH.
    Sputins,

    You may "want to show" something that no experiment done here or anywhere else has shown. Perhaps FTL is possible for some yet to be discovered particles, but folded space or inter-particle connection of some sort is more likely to be discovered first which may only appear to be a velocity.
    For example,what is this action at a distance phenomena about? This has been proven but not understood.

    I am not trying to "dampen momentum" of discovery, but point out the errors in the experimental processes that are leading to false results.

    I was taught that the earth had the crust , mantle,outer and inner cores. This outer core is molten liquid and it;s motion is responsible for the geomagnetic field.
    It sounds perfectly reasonable to me, especially when evidenced by volcanic eruptions with magma and a magnetic field.
    I can't say for sure, because I have not been to the center of the Earth, but geologists who spend a lot of time and money studying the planet, seem to think so.
    Why would they want to defraud us? What would be the motivation?
    Geology has been around a lot longer than Einstein!

    Morley et all tried to find the aether, but came up short. Maybe a better experiment can be done with modern instrumentation, but so far, no one has accessed the aether realm experimentally. I hope you are the first, but make sure your methods are impeccable.
    I does seem as if it should exist, but it appears to be beyond our current abilities to capture it. Could it be that we are thinking about it in the wrong way? Are we trying to capture a butterfly with a bear trap?

    If Eric claimed that the moon was made of green cheese, would you set out to prove him right or would you objectively do your best to probe the true nature of that satellite?

    JUst scan the internet, there are all kinds of stories. I watched a you-tube of a guy ( who just happens to be selling a book) claiming that he was part of a secret troop of US school children who groomed to use a secret DARPA teleporting machine, which sent them cross country in seconds. ( who would let their child do this?????)
    According to him, this machine was originally conceived and build by Tesla shortly before his death, then it was refined by captured alien tech.

    Really, to me, it sounded like a collage of sci-fi movies and TV shows that I have seen. Just sayin'.

    Leave a comment:


  • orgonaut314
    replied
    Oh and I forgot Eric is very clear in the scientific analyses of this situation in the Tesla coil you just have to go way back in time to find the study with Bewley and after that the community did not study these coils anymore. Eric saved a peace of knowledge to humankind here. There is nothing mysterious about the waves in these coils. They are just not very well understood and seem to have a bio electrical effect and usage.
    Bewley introduces exactly the Mutual parameters Eric is talking about in differential equations no one has solved yet.

    Leave a comment:


  • orgonaut314
    replied
    I think that what cyborg is also missing is that this surface wave mutual between the rings of the coil is an evanescent wave in modern language.
    Evanescent waves are the tunneling waves in quantum mechanics. They are the mysterious senses that insect seem to have in quantum biology. Paul Dirac pointed out that these wave are found with Maxwell equations if you use imaginary wavelength but this whole Maxwell building simple does not hold when Coulomb lines are really measured and they do not have an infinite velocity.
    These evanescent waves are mostly known for tunneling between two optical wave guides. They are from the side where total reflection arises but they are on the other side
    The whole evanescent thing is a way to fix Maxwell but it does not work. Take once step further back and you are at the counterspace wave or the longtitudional wave Tesla was talking about. Orgon. The only problem in seeing all this clearly is that we are not ready yet to accept tha we lost something fundamental in our scientific building but we might be in the future when we really understand electro biology.

    Leave a comment:


  • David G Dawson
    replied
    Cosmic Ray Detector

    Cosmic Ray Detector:
    Should have mentioned that my choice for Test #2 was the 2 uF Ducon oil/paper can capacitor as I did a check of the size of the flash and the results as follows:
    0.15uF 1/8"
    0.47uF 1/4"
    1.0uF 1/4"
    2.0uF 3/8"

    This was a ball flash and not what you see as a flash across the entire Cathode surface as coming from the working CRD.

    Smokey

    Leave a comment:


  • David G Dawson
    replied
    Cosmic Ray Detector

    Thankyou all for your support and some excellent Posts with all the work that has been happening in support of The Professor.
    Looking forward to seeing the CIG in operation.

    Cosmic Ray Detector (CRD):
    Bells are ringing again.
    CRD working but not happy with the reset switch and needs refinement.
    Difficult to adjust and not sure you have made solid contact.
    Waiting for the next step in this one and will do some work to improve operation and will try the other Geiger Tubes.
    The Western bell ringer arm is too close to the top of the solenoid centres and would prefer more movement on the donger arm so make sure you have one that has at least 3/8" of movement or at least 1/4" and this will allow a better switch arrangement between the bell and the donger arm.
    May swap with my other 3 who all have greater arcs.
    Working without the magnet on the fulcrum arm but is very touchy.
    Tried to take a close-up of the working 0A4G but switched my digital camera off completely each time I got close.
    Was able to activate the device by rubbing a cotton rag along a plastic ruler and does also respond to me being too close.
    Touching the HT wire makes it go crazy.
    Had a thunderstorm while it was working but didn't appear to be activated by lightning.
    Suspect lots of outside interference triggering this machine and would now like to hear from Eric as to a next step - Thanks.

    0A4G working with 6" Geiger Tube - Copper is 110mm long x 20mm diameter and appears to work well.



    Uploaded with ImageShack.us

    The small Russian Geigers are for a Counter Kit yet to be built but not suitable for the CRD.



    Uploaded with ImageShack.us

    Tesla Transformer Pulse Generator (TTPG):
    Now that I have it working, will concentrate on some pulse shapes and see if I can't monitor on the oscilloscope as we need to know what shape we are in.
    Finally have gotten to understand the 'concatenated' form of the CSI and will be doing some tests to confirm my operating condition - (dR-Green - thankyou).
    The accident with Hendershot and the 11,000 volts through a loose connection has me thinking that the multivibrator is also a specific pulse device where the pulses are endless and you can't see the tails on the oscilloscope as they are so short in time and abrupt and will attach to the CSI and see what manifests - this is what I call 'the Tesla instant'.
    May need to have a spark or plasma gap here ( a simple loose connection) and reverting back to the Tesla original.
    Have Ion Valves here as well which can be gap tuned and several different types of Vacuum Tubes that could also be uitilised - 1S2, 1B3GT, 6BK4, 2C53 and all of the regulator types 0A3, 0C3, 0B3 etc - its the vacuum or gas I am after here.
    Why not?!
    Exactly as you said, Arto, not doing what the textbook says you must do, how else are we able to discover for ourselves?
    Have never ever been into the Math, it took me away from what I was attempting to achieve, trying to understand the logic which was all too illogical.

    Sputins, keep up the good work and learning curve and please yell out if you need assistance in finding Tube and circuit information back in the vintage era.
    A huge vintage Library here.

    Smokey

    Leave a comment:


  • artoj
    replied
    Excellent Progress

    Great work David, dr Green and Sputins and all the other Experimenters that have put some time and effort to give these most vital initiatives some legs, and thanks to Eric for encouraging those who are engaged.

    Here is a excerpt of some of what I am still working on, from my next volume:

    The Modern Electronic Engineering practice is to follow a simple jigsaw puzzle, one that has very little involvement in true electrical understanding, just follow the corporate menu and their rules of engagement and you will have a device that behaves just like you wanted and expected. Well behaved and controllable, albeit very sterile and non chaotic. You learn to comply to a methodology laid out by a system of restricted parameters , developed to avoid transient behavior, lock step to a theoretical model.

    A lot of Electronic Engineers consider this as true knowledge and defend this paradigm of indoctrination in corporate variables and methods as their science. The true picture emerges as this is what is taught in Universities and Colleges, where knowledge has been hijacked by corporate interests.

    If you are looking for electrical knowledge then throw away pre-packaged items and start from scratch, then start to learn to create chaos and transients, this will give you the most fundamental insights into electricity that are in essence the same as the great pioneers, Galvani, Oersted, Faraday, Heaviside, Henry and Tesla. This will put you squarely in the mindset of Eric Dollard and why we are here in this forum.

    To tame the wild beast of electricity is to tame the stress you have caused in the first place. Rather than tame it with resistance clamps and redirected flows, it would be a lot simpler to try to understand its nature and comply to its natural actions. The universal medium has not been clearly understood by its primary state and has only been understood by the secondary and tertiary effects, while the modern electrical engineer has only the tools of a blind man using calculations and devices that are even further removed from even the tertiary effects and only deal with isolated parameters that are only triggers and nothing more.

    This is the simple truth of digital electronics, where electricity has very little to do with what you are designing. The bit manipulations that make the modern industry has sat on the backs of the pioneers and have not made any deep understanding of what electricity truly is, where the modern physicists have created models that only comply to tertiary effects, still far removed from how a physicist worked a 100 years ago where new ideas were tried and tested thus creating many new theories, each one being a turning point for a new understanding of the primary causes.

    Today this does not occur in academia as they do not hold the purse strings to the science budget, alas another slave to monetary fascist elite. Only individual researchers , inventors, artists and other open minded tinkerers are presenting a compelling body of work that fly in the face of the indoctrinated masses. This activity of the experimenters have created an opposing system of paid trolls and misguided individuals that spend an inordinate amount of time and text to try to distract and misguide the many that are trying to come to grips with new and old information, regardless if this information is right or wrong, these trolls pretend to be the abettors of the best public interest, only they really become a corrosive and a unwanted noise in the public debate.

    If an individual has something to contribute, it must be of such a standard that includes no character assassination and marginalization of any group member and keep within the boundaries of the subject in debate where denial of the subject is clearly not going to expand the subject parameters only to contract the arguments to semantics and nothing more, this simple premise will exclude about 30% of all the public boards now operating, this is the sad state of this type of trolling infection.

    Thanks for reading my rant, Regards Arto

    Leave a comment:


  • dR-Green
    replied
    Originally posted by David G Dawson View Post
    Have completed Test # 2 for the CRD without problems:
    Will present pictures for others who are getting themselves involved with this adventure of Erics we are travelling along with.
    Have decided to part dedicate my Lab to Eric's work such that he has another resource to carry out the work that is remote from whatever occurs in the USA.
    I am doing my own projects but will concentrate more on what Eric is offering in an attempt to assist in making his revelations become a reality.
    Made this decision after listening to the Adam Bull audio as much more detail was obtained from that discussion than Eric had previously divulged.- Thanks Adam!

    Test #2 Setup:



    Uploaded with ImageShack.us

    Caps and Test Bed:


    Uploaded with ImageShack.us
    Test Request:


    Uploaded with ImageShack.us
    Test #1 Results:


    Uploaded with ImageShack.us
    Test #2 Results:


    Uploaded with ImageShack.us

    Caps used can be seen in the background.
    Oil-Filled gives a bonus but too large and cumbersome and could not get any lower than the 88 volt for this particular 0A4G and have anywhere from the 0.15uF to the 2uF with equal brilliance.
    Noticed in some instances the gas fired late but was probably a borderline case.
    The 0.047uF gave 90 volts on a second attempt.
    On the 10,800pF, all I could see was an arc between starter and cathode but no gas fired.
    Will put the second Test on Chart and Post later.
    I do not make schematics for these tests but why I take the pics as a reminder.

    Can someone pass this on to Eric please and we can get down to some serious business.
    In the meantime I will get the CRD back up and running and refine whatever I can.
    Think both Tests have shown that something in the 0.33uF area appears to be the best but that will be for Eric to decide.

    Smokey
    Thanks for posting all that Smokey. After you posted this I decided to look on ebay and managed to grab myself 2 0A4G tubes for about £3 each, just caught the auction before it ended. Which is a bargain compared to the ones that remain listed.

    [Post quoted in full as it got drowned out the first time round]

    Leave a comment:


  • Sputins
    replied
    Inertia

    As Eric has mentioned and also in the videos about J.J. Thompson and his theory of the lines of force terminating on metals (on a car). And when you hit the brakes the lines of force have to discharge and this is what produces the inertia, or words to that effect. And if (the car) could be referenced to another point, another ground, a universal ground (apart from the Earth), I.e. grounded to Counterspace, the Lines of Force terminating on the car would all be neutralised. The car would experience no inertia, and you would come to an instantaneous stop when you hit the brakes. The car would have its inertia neutralised. Likewise the inertia cancellation for acceleration and turning.

    Sounds like a fantastic story eh?

    Well this reminds me of another fantastic story and it is only a story, I cannot verify it. It relates to the so called Joe Cell. (The topic of which belongs in its own thread but the story relates). A device called the Joe Cell is a water cell of sorts but not really. It is constructed of concentric stainless steel cylinders, with water as the dielectric medium, it is essentially a water capacitor. It is not really meant to generate hydrogen as such, it is an Orgone accumulator if you will. However no-one really knows how it works.
    The story relates to a vehicle with the Joe Cell fitted and at one point the car started to experience a loss of inertia! The car would corner sharply like it was on rails! The occupants experienced much less inertia. It was said that the car would sharply corner and the occupants heads would no move. They had a weird feeling on their bodies. Indeed a fantastic story! Again it is a story.

    I have somewhere a set of secret books written from transcribed audio recordings from Joe himself. In parts of the books he talks about the “waste spark management” system from the induction coil ignition system. However the details on this are all very sketchy.

    Given that the Water Capacitor (Joe Cell) is meant to be electrically isolated from the vehicle (apart from the negative terminal or ground). Possibly the inter-molecular water molecules directly interact with Counterspace within a special type of water capacitor Cell? This Cell perhaps charged from a resonant back-wave of an ignition coil, perhaps the car begins to reference its self to the Cell, which in-turn begins to reference its self to Counterspace? The lines of force from the Earth’s magnetic field on and around the car begin un-attach, the inertia neutralised??

    A fantastic loony bin story? I don’t know. However J.J. Thompsons theory of the lines of force disappearing if the cars body could be un-attached (neutralised) from these lines of force terminating on it, supports the fantastic story of inertia loss on a particular vehicle fitted with a Joe Cell.

    Sputins

    Leave a comment:


  • Sputins
    replied
    CW Vacuum Tube Transmitter Testing.

    With the filament transformer now fitted, the testing phase of my single ended 6AG7 & parallel 807 vacuum tube CW transmitter (100Watts) has begun. Hooking it up for the first time it seems to work! A few teething issues like the when keyed, the voltages need to be correct for the screen, on the 6AG7 or there is too little drive to the finals. Also my VFO and amplifier for vacuum tubes also work, with plenty of drive to the grid of the 6AG7. In fact I could most likely drive the 807 grid directly from it. But I’ll go with what works for now.

    I am also going to try with the output of the 6AG7 into a 1:1 voltage balun from unbalanced (single ended) to balanced (centre tapped), for use to drive two 807’s in push-pull configuration. Not sure if that will work yet, but I can’t see why not?

    Next is to finish off the (Test only) tank circuit or pi-network for the 807 finals into a test coil / light bulb arrangement for resonance & output wattage tests and ‘dipping’ the meter etc.

    This from a novice concerning vacuum tube CW transmitters, lot of learning, lots of mistakes, some more learning, rewarded with some results in the end. Glad to have cut my teeth on this single ended version. The next step is to design / configure it to drive the TMT coils at resonance etc. Some pictures to come later.

    If successful the a larger push-pull version using the more powerful 304TL tubes will begin.

    Sputins

    Leave a comment:


  • Sputins
    replied
    Eric P Dollard Channel

    It’s evident that there was some renewed momentum happening here, both with the TMT & the CRD.. But that couldn’t be tolerated.

    So Cyborg /Jimm arrives to dampen down the momentum. He offers help and advice with the left hand while he jams the screwdriver into the cogs with the right hand.

    We are not the ‘Flat-Earth society’, nor a cult. Cyborg may want to point out that the Earth is round, but here we want to also show the Earth is hollow, the Universe is electric, faster than light longitudinal propagation is possible, instantaneous propagation may be possible through Alexanderson / Tesla principals and the Aether is the medium which allows the Creative Force to manifest through.

    The Einsteiners are squirming.

    This is the Eric P Dollard Channel, N6KPH.

    Leave a comment:


  • cyborg
    replied
    Originally posted by dR-Green View Post
    I haven't mentioned any "suppressed technology". You are confusing me with your other friends.

    I haven't claimed that there will be two frequencies.

    A straight wire's natural resonant frequency can't be higher than what is achieved through the numbers I posted. For Tesla's 789.9848887 Metres conductor length the speed of light limit dictates that the frequency can't be greater than 94.872 kc. The measured frequency of the coil is 116.3 kc.

    I've already said that Eric said himself nothing is actually moving faster than light in this case.

    You are overlooking the fact that unlike a straight piece of wire, the inter-turn capacitance in the coil also provides a path for the energy to flow, so it doesn't go all the way around and along the wire as it would do if it was laid out straight. The effective distance is less.

    As I said, the data is for engineering use through predicting behaviour and using it to deliberately design systems, which is the essence of science.
    Ok, we could go on and on about how that happened ie; the inter turn capacitance, insulation dielectric properties, changes due to coupling, arcing turns etc, etc. The main point is that there is nothing "mysterious or suppressed" going on like FTL.

    As you say, otherwise it's academic...
    I want to stop here before UPGRAD starts talking about stripline impedances and we get way off topic!!!

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X