Eric Dollard

[Duncan]

Hi John thanks for clear circuit and the simplified drawing . I'm sorry you didn't follow the line I was indicating, That’s hardly surprising as I pointed out before quite apart from everything else we don’t have a glossary of terms, units quite apart from derived units, still you asked me to try and point out what I was seeing .. very difficult without the terms and the universal language of engineering .. maths …. still I have tried .. I found I filled a page … and then another .. and yet another and to be quite honest I'm still not entirely happy with the outcome still I think It portrays how these machines may be made to work. I have tried to demonstrate the parallels betwixt systems I do ramble a bit as I try to explain my stand point and view and why I have come to certain conclusions …. The finished article was to big to load onto the forum and so I have converted to a PDF and loaded it on a server . I hope you manage to find the time to read through what I have struggled to write and manage to get through the video's I’ve linked to .. if only around the times I’ve suggested .. as I know its a long thing.
I shall be interested in what you make of this mental hybrid
http://dnp.s3.amazonaws.com/b/b3/Jpolakow.pdf

Regards Duncan

[David G Dawson]

PhotoCells

Test using ImageShack as File Host.
These are PhotoCells which I intend to use as the 'Receptor' in Eric's 'Cosmic Ray Detector'.
In order are CV248, 927,921 and 868.
First 3 are PE Cells and the 868 is a Sound Cell.
These are in my collection and was 'told' to buy.

ImageShack Album - 4 images

Smokey

[David G Dawson]

Image Testing

Well that gave a URL to the images but how do you get them onto the page?
ImageShack® - Online Photo and Video Hosting

Smokey

[David G Dawson]

ImageShack HTML Codes

HTML Codes:

<a target="_blank" href="http://img641.imageshack.us/i/cv248.jpg/"><img src="http://img641.imageshack.us/img641/1250/cv248.th.jpg" border="0"/></a><br>
<a target="_blank" href="http://img69.imageshack.us/i/927cd.jpg/"><img src="http://img69.imageshack.us/img69/2486/927cd.th.jpg" border="0"/></a><br>
<a target="_blank" href="http://img843.imageshack.us/i/868x.jpg/"><img src="http://img843.imageshack.us/img843/4925/868x.th.jpg" border="0"/></a><br>
<a target="_blank" href="http://img827.imageshack.us/i/921uw.jpg/"><img src="http://img827.imageshack.us/img827/1278/921uw.th.jpg" border="0"/></a><br>


Smokey

[dR-Green]

Nice PhotoCell collection. I have a few that have been salvaged out of various spectrometers and what not I had been wondering how to use in some way, not sure if they'll be of any use though. I'll post some details and maybe an image later.

For posting the images on a forum use the "Forum" links, either full size, or below it is thumbnail size.

[pault]

Well that gave a URL to the images but how do you get them onto the page?
ImageShack® - Online Photo and Video Hosting

Smokey

I think that you can paste image URLs using the image toolbar button.

When you post, there are two rows of buttons above the editor window. It looks like the image button is on the second row, 5th from the right - looks like a purple mountain on a yellow background. You can probably do this manually using open-square-bracket img close-square-bracket URL open-square-bracket slash img close-square-square-bracket. Photobucket provides a handful of copy-paste phrases for various forum formats. I suspect that imageshack provides the same.

Below, I typed this in manually without the spaces after the open square brackets

[ img]http://img641.imageshack.us/img641/1250/cv248.th.jpg[ /img]


pt

[garrettm4]

Parametric AC Reactor - Freebie Design

Up for perusal is an AC type parametric reactor unit that I have been working on. This design is not for the beginner, but can be altered quite a bit, if need be, by anyone who wants to try it out. This setup is intended to be more electronic rather than electrical in nature, as this allows the control of the device to be more precise but much more complicated as a result. The heart of the design requires two MagAmps per phase for AC use and only one unit for DC use. The DC operation is best suited for a DC to DC boost converter and is highly sensitive to the transition time of the parameter change - which constitutes a large part of the engineering process for such operation. Also the signal for the control winding HAS TO LEAD the input "power" pulse to the DC unit for satisfactory results. Otherwise you will have a falling inductance while trying to store energy into it, doesn't make much sense to do this if you don't have to!

Below is a picture of a three-wire twin toroid saturable reactor / MagAmp. This is how you want your unit to look, each core with its own winding then stacked on top of each other with a third mutual winding wrapped evenly across them as a "single" core. Then connect the two individual toroid windings in either anti-series or anti-parallel. This is the best design you can build for the money, however, more advanced configurations can be had but require more parts or special core shapes.



The twin toroid design as given most closely approximates the four legged design by Ernst Alexanderson:



Now on to the circuit layout and notes:



I will let the people who actually build, and hopefully understand the operation, decide if this technology works or not. I'm not interested in talking to anyone who hasn't done their own experiment and or research on the subject.

Engineering Notes:

Copper losses are related to the mean turn length, current density, and skin effect. Iron losses are dictated by the maximum flux density, core volume, conductivity of the core material, and operating frequency + harmonics. A relation between [number of turns]/[wire gauge] and [core area]/[core material max flux density] exists that finds the optimal losses for both. Don't just start wrapping wire on any old toroid you find.

The squareness ratio of the core material dictates the sharpness of the permeability plot, which sets the effective delta change in permeability when the control winding operates and therefore the maximum and minimum of inductance measured for a fixed number of turns on the power winding. The control winding needs to bias the core into a LOW region of this permeability curve (either side) AND when the signal is removed, the permeability should be at a HIGH POINT during the return quadrant of the AC wave. THIS FEAT REQUIRES A SPECIFIC PEEK CURRENT THROUGH THE POWER WINDING TO HAPPEN. The power winding current SHOULD produce the optimal H-field that causes the HIGHEST PERMEABILITY, a current limiting reactance in series with the source supply may be needed to achieve this. If you don't do this don't expect much output to be seen, also expect lots of mindless tuning if you don't sit down and do the math and analysis on the core material used.


The rate of change, in time, between two points on the permeability curve is one of the most important things to understand when building a unit. If it takes longer than 1/4th of a carrier cycle to change from a low permeability to a high value, the phenomena will not manifest in a meaningful way. The overall rule of thumb here: faster the transition time the better. The first and primary thing to know and observe, is to have the inflection point of the parameter change centered on the peek of the current node. Mr. Dollard's usage of the word "SYNCHRONOUS" wasn't Superfluous, it needs to be upheld above all else.

The inductance of the control winding needs to be as small as possible, which requires a larger current input for a lower turn count to achieve the same magneto-motive force or current sheet value to bias the two mutually coupled toroids. This allows you to speed up the change in permeability without resorting to the use of PFNs or other methods of controlling the rise and fall time. A lower inductance will always have a smaller time constant for a given condition.

Finally, for the power winding, remember that a rising inductance with a rising current can store energy that can be gotten back, a falling inductance with a rising current is a loss mechanism that should be avoided at all costs. You want your operating unit to have the power winding see a rising inductance during the falling of current through the unit, this causes the required paradox to manifest that forces the ambient environment to give energy to the circuit. During the rising quadrant, of current from the carrier, we want the power winding to not have any change be seen to the source supply by the control winding as this has absolutely NO benefit for the desired goal. This is why you want your control pulse to lead by a certain amount of time, which causes the rise time of the control signal to effectively not be seen and therefore the inductance during the storage quadrant appears stable and at a low value.

Have fun building and good luck,
Garrett M

[magnetO]

Hi,

why do we need (in case of AC) a unit A for the postive halve-wave of current and a unit B for the negative halve-wave of current?
Why can one Parametric Amplifier (unit) not handle either current directions?


Regards
magnetO

[dR-Green]

Thanks for the reply.

CSI sits there waiting for the next stage but haven't quite caught up here and am having a problem in identifying how one can determine whether a device is working in a Tandem or Concatenated manner.
Appears I have missed something that could clarify that matter.

The easiest way to explain it is this: F = Concatenated mode
Around 1/2 F and below = Tandem mode

Example:



F remains constant (100% in the graph), but the lower resonance peak, Tandem mode, shifts in ratio to F through different secondary and extra coil tunings.

Sec = Secondary
ECD = Extra Coil Direct
EC10pF = Extra Coil 10pF

[garrettm4]

Q&amp;A

Hi,

why do we need (in case of AC) a unit A for the postive halve-wave of current and a unit B for the negative halve-wave of current?
Why can one Parametric Amplifier (unit) not handle either current directions?


Regards
magnetO

Two saturable reactor units are NOT absolutely necessary, but eases the problem of timing and trying to get as sharp a permeability change as possible - which is highly desirable. You can add an entire second set of windings to a single unit to get the effective operation as given but you lose out on the benefits of having an inactive time for the rise-time of the control signal (fall of the permeability) to take place. A falling inductance during the charging quadrant of the carrier wave constitutes a loss that can not be recovered, this is why I choose to eliminate it from being effectively seen by the source supply. You don't have to engineer this design choice into your unit. I find it to be useful, however at the expense of 2x materials and cost for a small gain in efficiency.

As I have stated in an earlier post, analog engineering isn't a strict path, it is purely up to your personality and personal experience as to how you want to make it do what I have outlined. There are HUNDREDS of ways to get the effect, just think about a few of the things I have said and make sure you synchronously change the permeability with the current waveform and keep that rate of change as small as possible in time (it shouldn't take longer than 1/4th the carrier period to change from 10mH to 100mH) and you will find you have a working device.

If you have a low effective delta seen in the inductance, say a few hundred micro henries, you need to crank up the applied frequency to get a meaningful amount of reactance energy on the return quadrant. This is where getting a low parameter change duration and correct synchronization becomes a very large problem. It's better to start out with low frequency large inductance and then work your way towards a faster carrier wave. The output energy is determined as the delta change in storage capacity and the FREQUENCY of operation. If energy moved per half cycle remained the same, a higher frequency of operation can move more energy over one second, when integrated, as opposed to a lower frequency.

Remember this was a FREELY given design, it wasn't intended to be something that was super awesome and have a million to one COP - you need to do your part of the work if you want that. My post was intended to to be a basic reference to get people thinking in the right direction. You can change the design as much as you see fit, but remember to follow the basic rules of operation, if you don't, then obviously it wont work.

Garrett M

[7redorbs]

After reading garetts posts on negative resistance and cumulative oscillation techniques in analogue devices I thought it timely and relevant to share my magnetic oscillator.

Oscillator. Knowing the laws of Leverage, Weight & Balance. Edward Leedskalnin. - YouTube

It is capable of storing energy in it's swing, which dictates the frequency of the impulse decibels per second.

Thanks for your time, but thank you Eric Dollard and Steinmetz most of all, without their work on this I could not have conceived this device or operating methodology, furthermore, without Tesla I could not have aimed for decibel or cycle decibel based electrical system.

1. A.C
2. D.C
3. Impulse
4. Osc

This is 3 and 4, by being provided by power from 2, and produces also 1. Coils are ~720 turns, equal mass. Adjusted assymetry and balance to increase "boundary" of mechanical oscillations which interact with quadrature of analogue magneto-dielectric impulse, thereby a self-referencing "beyond 2nd order" interactive system is produced.

At the higher frequencies the sound waves produced by it probably begin to start interacting with the conductors, at per time -1, I believe Eric calls this counter-space. I hope my thoughts are well received,

A lot of the work and details, devices and instruments I have built and uncovered, directly confirm Eric Dollard and Nikola Tesla's claims. It was not hard, in fact, it was quite easy, This same device produces zero impedance and negative impedance. Only with current types 3 and 4. Current Types 1 and 2 are no good. They need to be varied.

Varied so that it is like in my system, or rather Eric Dollards, Tesla's and Edward Leedskalnins system. Where, Resistance is going UP after the impulse current is applied. This is how it should work. Resistance is going down when the impulse current is applied.

As you may note, for the negative resistance to be measured there must be current coming in from somewhere. Each time there is negative impedance (resistance) magnets are pulled into the device. That is how this works. You will note that you will need a large frame and base for it to work sufficiently, sheet metal and 1.5 inch iron cores are a good place to start, In the impusle system I am working with it appears that the longer the transmission line subjected to an impulse current of sufficient volteres results in a decrease of the total resistance for the next impulse stop and start. This appears to be for the same reason why the A.C transmission line is able to "keep in so many of it's volts", because during the zero pressure rest period of the A.C cycle there is a suction of the surrounding magnets in the air.

Radio engineers and electricians here probably think that radio waves are vertical, they aren't. They are horizontal. Whilst the A.C transmission line is capable of synthesisng energy by pulling the surrounding earth current in it - my electrical generator test device based on Erics and Leedskalnins and Tesla's current work is pulling the surrounding earth current into it. I actually think that the magnetic field does not exist how it is drawn with the left hand rule. We are taught the electrons put the magnets at a right angle, but it looks to me that electrons flowing in at one angle causes magnets to flow in from left to right at 90 degrees to it. The problem being that nobody has seen an electron I thought it a good idea to test this, and sure enough, magnets running against another magnet can create the electron. We are taught that magnets are created by electrons, but here the magnets are creating the electrons. Which one is the base?

The atoms move around all by themselves. In fact, if they didn't none of the acids could take the magnets from the zinc or iron, or other battery metals in, and they would not be able to generate electrical current. The acid has less electrons around it, and so magnets, and is able to get close enough to the electrons and mass in the zinc, and other metals, the acid motion is compatible with the zinc motion, and, so we have a reaction. The problem being it was not zinc that made the current, nor was it the acid, nor was it the zinc and the iron. What made the current was the motion of two objects. Two objects that move around in their "inactive" state.

If that state is inactive the question arises, why is it perpetually moving, and if each periodic element can be described purely by movement, then there is no need for the particle system whatsoever in calculating these "paths", indeed, the billions of times superior tesla system of negative resistance is a function of energy sucking, present only with impulses, wheras the hertzian system of positive resitance is a function of energy radiating, present only in made-for-profit engineering.

I do have a working system. I do. With 12 volts and 20 amperes I can make iron boil, I can make light bend, and I can make electricity run lengthwise instead of crosswise along a transmission line, generator, field magnet or transformer coil. What is that worth to you all?

Eric dollard is to thank for ALL of it. I must however thank garrett for several of his most delightful posts on this subject, and, would point out that his thoughts and great visions were of much assistance, and in many cases confirmations. You have my deep respect, all of you do. Even if you cannot give me yours, future will stand testament to these claims. As will mans societal group persona; how will we act on this?

Thank you.

Best,
A

[7redorbs]

I also put up an anonymous underground chat server, where people can discuss "live" the "dollard" "landers" situation and the Nikola Tesla "suppression".

And how to go about bringing forward negative resistance and superconductive iron devices in the sub thousand Kelvin ranges. Parametric Transformation as well as T.M.T efforts, or plasma work is encouraged. Particularly with high currents and metals.

Nothing like this exists on the internet. I know. I've been searching for years.

I have gone out of my way significantly to try and make an effort to support Eric. Have spent countless years, and now weeks ensuring this can be done.

Hope this can help.

Mibbit.com Webchat client

It IS an anonymous network, and I host the server in germany. I cannot see your IP address. Your browser will connect through the mibbit network and connects to conspiracy.co on port 6666 and joins a room called #dollard . This way , if the german server I own is compromised it will still not be able to see your IP. It will only see mibbit.

If you are paranoid about visiting the mibbit URL and it being framed by your ISP I recommend using bittor or a SSH dynamic tunnel which will allow for an additional level of host dns and protocol anonymity. Proper protection though, totally shielding yourself from local snooping a tor network client browser pack) can provide complete client level anonymity if you wish for yourself to be untraceable to mibbit, and your ISP. Hoping this will allow a more fluid interaction for some of the active members, and provide an outlet of trust and total technical anonymity. I am sure many are holding back things,

If you wish for even further anonymity it is recommended you use a unix shell on a secure machine and connect directly to conspiracy.co port 6666 either by hyperterminal, *****x, irssi, mirc, or some other communication client. Unfortunately in my country owning a scanner is illegal, so this has had to do.

No tricks. Seek advice if you are in doubt, I have gone to a lot of trouble for Eric. I hope it is appreciated,




Best,
A

PS David you will need to use the [ IMG ]http://www.somesite.com/someimage.jpg[/IMG] TAGS

[David G Dawson]

Receptors/PhotoCells

[IMG]http://imageshack.us/a/img641/1250/cv248.jpg
http://imageshack.us/a/img69/2486/927cd.jpg
http://imageshack.us/a/img843/4925/868x.jpg
http://imageshack.us/a/img827/1278/921uw.jpg[/IMG]

Smokey

[7redorbs]

Smokey you need the two IMG tags for each image!!

Best,
A

[SERG V.]

Hi Mr.Web000x

One question for you. How is Mr.T.Rex? Is he OK ??

I wish him all luck i can imagine. He proved the real meaning of MAN - a HUMAN !! Thank you Mr. E.Dollard simple for that you have balls and mind against Jewish NWO bankers and war-mongers-dogs of wars !! Thank you in my name again!!

Keeo it up !!

Regards
Сергей В.