Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Eric P. Dollard is crazy.

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Eric P. Dollard is crazy.

    Please for the love of God don't try to duplicate any of this work. You will get yourself killed. These guys are quacks and they have no idea what the hell they are talking about.

    Some highlights from this video:

    1) There was no mysterious current between the two close circuits, all it was was Faraday's Law and this perfectly well understood. That guy Eric Dollard has no idea what the hell he is talking about. This phenonema moves at the speed of light and he is too stupid to realize it is 200 years old.

    2) Magnetic forces can't point in the direction of the propagation, this would contradict one of the fudamental laws of E.M. and would also invalidiate all of Tesla's work on motors. These guys are too stupid to realize it.

    3) D.C. current does not have a "scalar frequency" it has no frequency. Frequency by defintion implies osscilation.

    4) He has no idea what a square wave is practically.

    5) You do not **** around with equipment like they are doing.

    6) He doesn't know what displacement current means.

    7) Coils function as inductors not capacitors.

    8) He doesn't understand anything about basic circuit theory.

    9) For the love of God you do not **** around with thousand of amps if you're not in a professional laboratory.

    10) Circuits loops are not named after radiation.

    11) He is just playing around with his equipment. There is no way any of this is statistically valid meaning on top of not understanding the theory, experiment, etc he has no idea whether his data is just due to random variation.

    12) His "longitudinal current" is most likely noise from this big cathode.

    13) He doesn't have enough equipment to measure the speed of the wave. Meaning he thinks he is measureing the speed of the wave but he is to dumb to realize he isn't.

    14) He doesn't understand what an inverse is. The basic things he was saying about capacitors, inverses, etc were all wrong. This guy has had no formal training, at all.

    15) They have no idea how to demonstrate a longitudinal wave. THIS IS VERY IMPORANT: That longitudinal wave they claim is moving at unlimited speed is actually moving much slower than the speed of light.

    16) Nerves to do not communicate with each other with longitudinal radiation, they do so with current.

    17) The aether was not banned. Sometimes reputable scientists still talk about it but most have abandoned it since it allowed us to drastically simplify theory and led us to relativity theory. These guys have no idea of the history of this things.

    18) Jesus Christ, transformers are completely understood by using Faraday's Law. Good god the stupidity is just overwhelming.

    19) You do not need a toroid in between the loops to cause a current in the other loop. Air is more than enough. This is simply Faraday's Law, they are actually confusing this with radiation and think this is mysterious?

    20) FLUX LINES DON'T HAVE TO TOUCH THE WIRE AS LONG AS THEY ARE CONTAINED WITHIN A CLOSE AREA! Good God, have these guys never even taken a course in E.M. This stuff was understood in the 19th century.

    21) Electrostatics mean no moving charge. They are actually talking about an entirely different phenomena without realizing it.


    These guys are not electrical engineers they are stupid electricians and its completely obvious. My minor is in electrical engineering and there is no way you could ever complete an introductory class in E.M in a reputable university and believe any of the stuff these guys are staying.

    In short, please don't try to duplicate these wacko's work. They are lucky they haven't killed themselves yet; you may not be so lucky. Please go to a reputable source if you want to learn about capacitors, inductor, current, etc.

    These guys are conspiracy theorists on top of it all, like 9/11 types. Did you see there crazy diatribe at the end how they were claiming Einstein was persecuted since he believed in the Aether. FOR THE LOVE OF GOD ALL OF EINSTEINS WORK WAS ABOUT DISPROVING THE AETHER. This flew in the face of everyone and he was actually not widely believed early on because of it. In other words, they are claiming Einstein was persecuted for believing in a theory that he was the one that disproved in face of the convention that believe in it.

    My favorite quote: 15 minute exposure and I found I was getting a 100% mutation in radish seeds.

    WTF!

    As one more small point, there is no way he is producing the radiation he is claiming at that frequency because if he was he would already be blind.

    Here's a big point: Can any of you explain what a longitudinal wave is in terms of vector calculus? If not, you have no credibility because you don't even understand what a E.M wave is mathematically.

    You call these waves Magneto-Dielectric, can you please tell me: In a dielectric, what is the difference between H and B and explain the occasional difference in conventions between these defitions.
    Last edited by Tenaus; 10-09-2012, 11:40 PM.

  • #2


    Clearly you haven't read any of Mr. Dollard's work, past and present, it's all heavily referenced and stand's on it's own through experimentation. Anyways, nice try.

    Comment


    • #3
      Can't answer my questions?

      Comment


      • #4
        I'm not going to feed the troll, it seems you misunderstood the information which was conveyed, as alot of your points are misinterpreted information and not what Mr. Dollard says in the video. Most of your points are actually addressed by Mr. Dollard in his writings on this forum. You can find all his papers online, and numerous other videos on youtube as well.

        Comment


        • #5
          I'm not trolling, I really would like a legit answer. If no one can give me one then why should I believe in something which may or may not be true, if the group of people associated with it don't even know what they're doing?

          Please don't get me wrong, I love Tesla and his work, but I cannot subscribe to an idea that makes incorrect, the years and years of amazing scientist's work who use equations and other facts to back up what they observe. People like Maxwell, Faraday, Hertz, etc.
          Last edited by Tenaus; 10-10-2012, 01:53 AM.

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by Tenaus View Post
            Please for the love of God don't try to duplicate any of this work. You will get yourself killed. These guys are quacks and they have no idea what the hell they are talking about.
            Tenaus
            You have a lot of nerve coming here with your first post and slagging off Eric Dollard. A man held in high regard on this forum & within the Alternative Science and Tesla research communities for many, many years. Do you like to wave a red flag at many angry bulls? So you think Eric Dollard’s theories are bull & he is crazy & a quack. Well you can have your opinion, good on you. - However I certainly do not agree!

            Do not tell us what we should believe and /or what to experiment with or duplicate. You have no clue as to the experience of experimenters and their ability to work this kind of equipment. Although thanks for the warning, I see you have concern for our safety. (? Hardly). Myself like many other experimenters and researchers here have worked with high powered equipment for years in private locations and at work. (X-Ray technician).

            In general, I hope your post / thread disappears into oblivion rather quickly.
            "Doesn't matter how many times you kick the coyote in the head, it's still gonna eat chickens". - EPD

            Comment


            • #7
              Tenaus, it is very obvious you are either a misinformation plant or are much too dumb to understand anything Eric has said. I worked in electronics for over 50 years and I am quite sure the conventional theory does not always tell the whole story. You claim you have a minor in electrical engineering. Maybe you should wait until you actually have some experience in electronics before you start talking about someone else who is way way beyond your comprehension level. I have worked on systems that involved thousands of amps in an industrial environment. I have also worked on systems that involved thousands of volts and I am still here to write about it. Just because you are afraid of a few thousand amps or volts is no reason for you to be telling a professional person what they should or should not do. As far as your EE minor goes it doesn't really impress me any. I worked in a design department for 5 years where my job was to take the circuits the EE's designed and figure out why they didn't work! Then I would change them until they did what the EE wanted them to do.

              Respectfully,
              Carroll
              Just because someone disagrees with you does NOT make them your enemy. We can disagree without attacking someone.

              Comment


              • #8
                @Tenaus

                If you have a flashlight and turn it off and on 10 times in 1 second, you have DC at a FREQUENCY of 10 cycles per second without the polarities changing. You assume DC has to be steady. This doesn't show what you know - your questions reveal exactly what you don't know.

                If you want to post your real identity, I'll consider letting you continue your questioning as long as you drop the insults but understand that Eric nor anyone else has any obligation whatsoever to tell you anything.
                Energetic Forum Administrator
                http://www.energeticforum.com

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by Tenaus View Post
                  Please for the love of God don't try to duplicate any of this work. You will get yourself killed.
                  Too late. What exactly are we missing from circuit theory? You seem to be the one missing something.



                  http://www.teslascientific.com/

                  "Knowledge is cosmic. It does not evolve or unfold in man. Man unfolds to an awareness of it. He gradually discovers it." - Walter Russell

                  "Once men died for Truth, but now Truth dies at the hands of men." - Manly P. Hall

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by Tenaus View Post
                    7) Coils function as inductors not capacitors.






                    Originally posted by Tenaus View Post
                    15) They have no idea how to demonstrate a longitudinal wave. THIS IS VERY IMPORANT: That longitudinal wave they claim is moving at unlimited speed is actually moving much slower than the speed of light.
                    Coil dimensions:

                    Diameter = 8.28cm
                    Height = 8.28cm
                    Number Of Turns = 93.25
                    Conductor Length = 24.256 metres
                    Luminal Wavelength = 97.024 metres

                    Magnification Factor = 55.21

                    Free Space Propagation = 187%
                    Actual Propagation = 129.14%

                    Free Space Frequency = 5778.074 kc
                    Luminal Frequency = 3089.879 kc
                    Actual Frequency = 3990.5 kc


                    Self Capacitance = 3.8088pF
                    Effective Burdened Capacitance = 7.985pF
                    Effective Capacitance for sine quarter wave distribution:
                    By Steinmetz = 5.083pF
                    By Miller = 6.472pF

                    Self Inductance (Wheeler) = 488.72µH
                    Effective Inductance for cosine quarter wavelength current distribution:
                    By Steinmetz = 311.13µH
                    By Miller = 244.36µH

                    Characteristic Impedance:
                    By Steinmetz = 7823 Ohm
                    By Miller = 6144 Ohm

                    ω = 25144141.97 Radians/sec
                    Frequency = 4001.814 kc
                    Last edited by dR-Green; 10-10-2012, 04:28 AM.
                    http://www.teslascientific.com/

                    "Knowledge is cosmic. It does not evolve or unfold in man. Man unfolds to an awareness of it. He gradually discovers it." - Walter Russell

                    "Once men died for Truth, but now Truth dies at the hands of men." - Manly P. Hall

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by admin View Post
                      If you want to post your real identity, I'll consider letting you continue your questioning as long as you drop the insults but understand that Eric nor anyone else has any obligation whatsoever to tell you anything.
                      Hit the nail on the head, there.

                      The OP is commentary from a physicist who has a bachelors in Applied Physics with a minor in Electrical Computer Engineering.

                      A masters in pure physics.

                      I wanted to post his commentary to see how people would respond. The first few comments didn't give me any confidence. The last three are much better.

                      Having had a long discussion with him on this subject, I decided to come here and get the other side of the story. I suppose I'll apologize for all the insults.

                      Now can you please answer the questions:

                      1. Explain what longitudinal waves are in terms of vector calculus

                      2. Explain how longitudinal waves are transmitted and how one could get a ham radio to transmit them if at all possible.

                      I have a few more that have escaped me at the moment, but I guess we can stick to these for now.

                      I love Tesla's work and I want to duplicate it and I also want to get other scientists and engineers to believe it universally so that everyone can enjoy what he has accomplished. So please don't get me wrong I just want to see who I want to believe.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        "The Measurement of Retarded Phase In Single Wire Power Transmission"

                        "Discussion
                        When the current is phase inverted relative to the voltage, the effective resistance of load
                        resistor is negative. In this case, the current acts like to charge the source. This is the first
                        time to achieve negative resistance. It is anticipated that this technology can be used to
                        generate electric power."


                        http://vixra.org/pdf/1109.0043v1.pdf
                        http://vixra.org/pdf/1108.0010v1.pdf
                        http://vixra.org/pdf/1110.0004v1.pdf
                        http://vixra.org/pdf/1104.0052v1.pdf
                        http://vixra.org/pdf/1204.0084v1.pdf

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by Tenaus View Post
                          Now can you please answer the questions
                          You can start reading here:

                          http://www.energeticforum.com/renewa...html#post90090

                          Then the posts by T-rex.
                          http://www.teslascientific.com/

                          "Knowledge is cosmic. It does not evolve or unfold in man. Man unfolds to an awareness of it. He gradually discovers it." - Walter Russell

                          "Once men died for Truth, but now Truth dies at the hands of men." - Manly P. Hall

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            They all pick on Eric.

                            Well,
                            Eric Dollard is not doing his best in that movie and I guess none of us do at times. But he did explain his theory and it does work. Eric has thrown away more notes on a good day then we can generate in years.
                            If such a learned man is asking the questions and he is already brilliant why does he need to ask here, or is it you that need to know the answer. Eric hates me for using the term Scalar but it takes two to couple to make energy.With that said,
                            Vector Calculus or as known as Helmholtz Theorem is the fundamental theory of Calculus,
                            The vector field and a solenoidal divergence vector field is known as H decomposition.
                            A vector Field is F and is generated by two potentials a Scalar potential ( Oh it's that hated word again) and a vector potential, So, if your torn between a field of study and you do not know and must ask questions, it's not your field. Good work dR- Green, nice pictures. Have a good day.
                            John B
                            John Bedini
                            www.johnbedini.net

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              To add to Mr Bedini's comment above if you want to see Eric at his best then this is a great place to start; Eric Dollard - S.F.T.S. - Dec. 9, 2007 - Part 1 - YouTube Although I believe that this video is better viewed after reading the bulk of Eric's writings.

                              It's good to see you've changed your hostile approach to us, hopefully you've learned something from that. Also one thing to bear in mind with physicists is that they are the first to pull the 'stay in your own field' card when it comes to people from other fields trying to contribute to physics but the first to try and do it in other fields. I'm also not sure on the technicalities of an electrical computer engineering but I will say that computer system design very rarely has to deal with the essence of what electricity is rather than say a power systems engineer who has to say distribute power across long distances or, at the turn of the century, a telegraph engineer. It is interesting to note that Heaviside's equations and study came from problems arising in telegraphy.

                              I personally am studying electrical engineering and so far have not run into anything which I can say disproves anything Eric has said, infact there have been times in discussions with lab demonstrators that they've asked me 'what's going on here' and I give them an explaination based on ideas stemming from what Eric is talking about and they tell me that is a really interesting way to look at the situation. One example the other day was that the tutor asked why the iron core of a solenoid attracts into the middle rather than shooting straight through and I said that the inductor attracts the iron core as to maximize it's energy storage capabilities. No one else he asked gave an answer and he said that he really liked my answer. It doesn't give you an equation like a physicist might like but it does give you a level of understanding that a board of greek letters won't. My friends come to me when they have a problem conceptually in electrical classes and they react much better when I talk in ways which reflect what Eric is teaching because it's more intuitive and less like board of jumbled letters which are what most introductory EE classes are.

                              As for the questions you posed, it would be good if we could get at what point in the talk Eric said the things that are being refuted and which part (out of 6) it took place. I personally think that a few of them are a little ambiguous without knowing in what context they are being said and some of them are just plain wrong or are not even in the video, where in the video is he even measuring velocity for example?.

                              Bottom line; don't goto a physicist when it comes to anything Tesla, they still think his wireless electricity concept involved the ionosphere despite Tesla stating often that this is not the case. Proves how much they've actually read Tesla.

                              Raui
                              Scribd account; http://www.scribd.com/raui

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X