Eric P. Dollard is crazy.

[Tenaus]

Unfortunately for you, the first post is so outlandish that you are now experiencing the consequences of people reading it and immediately reacting, you threw the boomerang and now it's coming back rapidly towards your head. Perhaps you should edit the first post and explain BEFORE the commentary that what follows are not your words, otherwise you can probably expect some more insults. But there's no escaping for the expert I'm afraid, the fate of the thread as far as productivity goes was lost or swamped before it even began.

That's fine, I suppose. It tells me a bit about the character of the community, not to say that it is necessarily bad.

[dR-Green]

That's fine, I suppose. It tells me a bit about the character of the community, not to say that it is necessarily bad.

Make no mistake, the community members also tend to argue amongst themselves As you can see from the boomerang analogy, it merely illustrates the point that it's coming back with exactly the same disregard with which it was sent

[pentarbe]

hmmm

Hmmmm... who would I believe?

Eric Dollard or a video game junkie from Omak?

Probably Eric, since he has shown actual experiments that absolutely prove that most "credentialed" physicists and mathematicians are the real ones practicing junk science.

This is not just a guessing game - Eric actually has shown not just evidence but PROOF that he knows what he is talking about.

[Tenaus]

Ooh, someone can back-trace my IP, scary. Or was it my Email that gave it off...? What's my name?

[David Fine]

Nicely Said

I like the way you think and write.

Unfortunately for you, the first post is so outlandish that you are now experiencing the consequences of people reading it and immediately reacting, you threw the boomerang and now it's coming back rapidly towards your head. Perhaps you should edit the first post and explain BEFORE the commentary that what follows are not your words, otherwise you can probably expect some more insults. But there's no escaping for the expert I'm afraid, the fate of the thread as far as productivity goes was lost or swamped before it even began.

[mr.clean]

re-post: To Tenaus: holy... dumbass!

Oh jeez, i try to be easy on newbies, but actually given that your comment is SO intentionally rude and unwarranted, i hope you leave this post up here to clearly demonstrate your ignorance for later after you learn some basics.

you are so far off its not even funny

hehe it is evident out of your many incorrect statements, that you are very new to electronics and certainly the unconventional topics discussed here.

actually there are many faults with your rant, but to correct one, is the "capacitance of a coil", can be greatly increased bringing the furthest winding of a coil overlapping the first winding. or even having the windings closer or further can affect this.
this can increase the "self-capacitance" of a coil. thats white-belt stuff.

you do this enough times and you have a higher "self-capacitance", and you can then create an LC tank circuit within one component, needing only its resonant freq and a given amplitude.

that "resonant" freq determined by factors L and C, and LC being contained together is a great thing. any builder knows that

that didnt need any calculus or formal training of any kind

ideal DC could be in fact considered a scalar function, (simply put, not varying in time or space) given that the voltage is not decreasing. and it would be more accurate to call the DC current 100% duty cycle at whatever the voltage.

the term frequency and DC dont really make sense together, unless you were pulsing on and off say 60hz, that would give a square wave at the freq of the pulse.
and the duration of the on-time within that frequency, could be called duty cycle.

In the early 1900's Tesla said he knew based on his results and work that indeed hertzian wave travels at the speed of light, but that there is another "impulse" which travels thru the ground at a "much faster rate".

He observed these impulses, and had very detailed calculations of all his work.
a must read are the Colorado Springs Notes 1899-1900.
Much of the topics you tried to de-bunk were well known 100 years ago
...and documented... Tesla is not the only one who knew about the Longitudonal wave

these are very basic things which should be obvious to a know-it-all like yourself

You do realize that Eric overloaded the reverse breakers at the power station in Belanus California while conducting his Tesla-type experiments?...

meaning that for a moment before the breakers switched, he was producing more power than the entire town...
...in other words, more than the towns entire power source (impossible to you, but thats what happened)
His "radio devices" now banned there.
i guess the city had a major shut-down resulting
oh well, shouldve used higher value components eh Belanus?

you see "crackpots" get ignored, and are discovered very quickly in public presentation...

..Eric was invited and has spoken at multiple public lectures regarding advanced electronics and even conventional minded experienced HAM operator lectures...

...guess what...after all this time... YOU are the only one who is disagreeing with Eric's work right now....


in fact, the evidence now dictates that "your" input is completely irrelevant, and even dis-informative.

so do us all a favour and leave your message up
and when you re-confirm Eric's information, you will be greatly embarassed

here is some of my own work, and Eric Dollard helped me a lot in my learning
Don Smith Device Project Part 31: 3 Watts In, 20 Watt Halogen Lit Bright - YouTube

[Aaron]

@Tenaus

This thread will be closed since it serves no purpose other than to
aggravate respected members of this board who contribute.

References were already posted on Eric's work so anyone that has an
issue with him can simply study that and build something then post results
and there are already Eric Dollard threads for that.

@Tenuas - IP addresses are private for the same privacy reasons that
members email addresses and passwords are not visible.