Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Collecting best quotes from Eric Dollard proving his points

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    This is my favorite quote of Dollard, from his video I purchased:



    What Tesla accomplished is…those transmission lines you see everywhere, that allows us to have a giant drive shaft that we can take rotary motion from a massive turbine plant and convey it thru an electromagnetic structure that operates with reflected waves and time frames etc. that works just like a drive shaft, bounces back and forth, twists, and rotates. But you can stand outside and look at those thick lines that go down any public street and in the space between those lines, the energy there is the energy of one railroad locomotive moving at 95% of the speed of light down the space between those wires, and there is NO evidence that anything at all is happening except the wires are slightly pushed apart and warm.

    So it’s a type of drive shaft that exists in another dimension. Then you put the synchronous machine on the other end (of that power line) and you couple out of that (electrical) drive shaft like a transmission and you have rotary force again. These things (rotary Tesla generators) are no more than stamped iron in patterns. By making this special arch form and its influences on the formative forces in the ether …Tesla’s invention is the most powerful arch form the human race has ever conceived.

    Comment


    • #17
      on the fallacy of electrons (as particles)


      Electrons represent energy dissipation. However, the pedant, the mystic,
      and the dis-informer all tell us that the electron is what conveys energy, the
      complete opposite!


      Dollard quoting even (the idiot) Einstein on fallacy of electronic 'particles' :

      “Relativity”, by Albert Einstein, Random House Publisher, 1916,
      Consider Einstein’s statement on the same page 50;
      “In the theoretical treatment of these electrons we are faced with the
      difficulty that electro-dynamic theory of itself is unable to give an account
      of their nature.” “For since electrical masses constituting the electron
      would necessarily be scattered under the influence of their mutual
      repulsions, unless there are forces of another kind operating between them
      the nature of which has hitherto remained obscure to us.”



      The notion exists that the electro-motive force, E.M.F. in volts, is
      established by “cutting” lines of magnetic induction via a so called electric
      conductor. This “cutting” is then said to impel the motions of so called
      electrons within the conducting material. It is however that a perfect
      conductor cannot “cut” through lines of induction, or flux lines, Phi.
      Heaviside points out that the perfect conductor is a perfect obstructor and
      magnetic induction cannot gain entry into the so called conducting
      material. So where is the current, how then does an E.M.F. come about?
      Now enters the complication; it can be inferred that an electrical generator
      that is wound with perfect conducting material cannot produce an E.M.F.
      No lines of flux can be cut and the aether gets wound up in a knot.
      Heaviside remarks that the practitioners of His Day “do a good deal of
      churning up the aether in their dynamos”.

      Comment


      • #18
        Originally posted by TheoriaApophasis View Post
        Investigating dielectric capacitance a bit further, consider an experiment of Ben Franklin, the father of the electro-static condenser. Here we will dispel the “electronics nerd” concept that a capacitor stores “electrons” in its plates. Taking the pair of copper plates as in the previous experiment, but now we have two pairs of plates, one pair of plates distant from the other pair of plates. Upon one pair of plates is imposed an electro-static potential between them. The cube of 10-C oil is inserted between this “charged” set of plates. This hereby establishes a dielectric field of induction within the unit cube of 10-C oil. Now we then remove this cube of oil, withdrawing it from the space bounded by the charged pair of copper plates, and taking this unit cube of oil, it is then inserted into the space bounded by the other un-charged pair of plates. Upon insertion it is found that the un-charged pair of plates have now in fact become charged also. It here can be seen that a cube of dielectric induction can be carried through space, from one set of plates to another set of plates. This induction is contained by the boundaries of the 10-C oil. Well golly-gee Mr. Wizard, what happened to all those electrons, Isn’t oil an insulator?




        <<< Any have video of this quote and proof from Dollard?
        what does it mean in terms of volts that the cube gained if any? Is this like sound resonace? Does the oil resonate with the charge on the plates bro?

        Comment


        • #19
          How bad is it, Eric?

          Comment

          Working...
          X