Uncovering the Missing Secrets of Magnetism. 92 pages, using tips from E. Dollards

[Kokomoj0]

I wasn't expecting a rational or logical rebuttal,

Lux et Veritas

If we take a bar magnet and assume magnetism has a vortex just sitting on the bench that would suggest 'something' is moving. (a current of some nature) Since I doubt you cannot have a vortex without 'something' moving.

How do we know its not just some force that just sits there with a static potential, say like a leyden jar?

MIT Physics Demo -- Dissectible Capacitor - YouTube

[TheoriaApophasis]

If we take a bar magnet and assume magnetism has a vortex just sitting on the bench that would suggest 'something' is moving. (a current of some nature) Since I doubt you cannot have a vortex without 'something' moving.

How do we know its not just some force that just sits there with a static potential, say like a leyden jar?

MIT Physics Demo -- Dissectible Capacitor - YouTube

What is moving is nucleal precession.

its called gyromagnetic rotation due to nucleal precession. Even MRI techs know about the larmor frequency,


Its the incommensurate system of the magneto-dielectric fields which are in a binding system that have a specific field geometry AND PRECESSION (the magnetism does)

Read the book, its free, explains it all.

https://archive.org/details/magnetism1small



I have 12 diff. testing methods currently to SHOW this.

Ive got 12 diff testing methods that have NOTHING to do with zapping a magnet.

I have and use suspensions, ferrofluid lenses, lasers with beam splitters

Well, I wrote the last section on the missing secret of TEM, which is NOT (entirely) electromagnetic, but has a Z axis radial dielectric. I wrote that section for a reason based upon Heavisides implications on the genuine nature of light. However even he didnt ever "get it".


We have established a "device" using 3 to 6 wavelength lasers (I will not specify) but here is ONE channel at a wavelength of 635 nm , and only snapshots off a video,.....NO VIDEO will be posted (I will not post it until things are locked in).

Nobody here can/will figure out how the device works since it uses a good bit of equipment ;D, splitter, a special lens, XXXXX, and yes, (obviously) a special spinning prism

But, suffice to say, I can reproduce (obviously using lasers) the magneto-dielectric field of a strong magnet in some amazing details.

It still blows my mind to see a laser, a single channel form a vortex as it 'paints' the field within which the magnetism of the magnet displaces the dielectric component of light, or along the dielectric where the magnetism is torn asunder in the light

This is ONE device out of 5 nobody ANYWHERE (except for 3 of us) has ever seen before to show magnetic field reciprocation, and using ALL channels, easily shows the dielectric, the centripetal and centrifugal 'working' together as you twist the magnet, and move the broadcast beams.




















Also---------


See HIS videos here that I inspired:

See last 7 videos he made

https://www.youtube.com/user/TinManPower/videos

[TheoriaApophasis]

would suggest 'something' is moving. (a current of some nature)

[Kokomoj0]

What is moving is nucleal precession.

its called gyromagnetic rotation due to nucleal precession. Even MRI techs know about the larmor frequency,


Its the incommensurate system of the magneto-dielectric fields which are in a binding system that have a specific field geometry AND PRECESSION (the magnetism does)

Read the book, its free, explains it all.

https://archive.org/details/magnetism1small



I have 12 diff. testing methods currently to SHOW this.

Ive got 12 diff testing methods that have NOTHING to do with zapping a magnet.

I have and use suspensions, ferrofluid lenses, lasers with beam splitters

Well, I wrote the last section on the missing secret of TEM, which is NOT (entirely) electromagnetic, but has a Z axis radial dielectric. I wrote that section for a reason based upon Heavisides implications on the genuine nature of light. However even he didnt ever "get it".


We have established a "device" using 3 to 6 wavelength lasers (I will not specify) but here is ONE channel at a wavelength of 635 nm , and only snapshots off a video,.....NO VIDEO will be posted (I will not post it until things are locked in).

Nobody here can/will figure out how the device works since it uses a good bit of equipment ;D, splitter, a special lens, XXXXX, and yes, (obviously) a special spinning prism

But, suffice to say, I can reproduce (obviously using lasers) the magneto-dielectric field of a strong magnet in some amazing details.

It still blows my mind to see a laser, a single channel form a vortex as it 'paints' the field within which the magnetism of the magnet displaces the dielectric component of light, or along the dielectric where the magnetism is torn asunder in the light

This is ONE device out of 5 nobody ANYWHERE (except for 3 of us) has ever seen before to show magnetic field reciprocation, and using ALL channels, easily shows the dielectric, the centripetal and centrifugal 'working' together as you twist the magnet, and move the broadcast beams.




















Also---------


See HIS videos here that I inspired:

See last 7 videos he made

https://www.youtube.com/user/TinManPower/videos

maybe its just me but I dont see a vortex, just beam scattering.

[TheoriaApophasis]

maybe its just me but I dont see a vortex, just beam scattering.

You will have to define VORTEX in your mind,


magnetism is radiation=spatial=polarization

[TheoriaApophasis]

]

I CRACKED IT!!!!! IVE PROVEN THE LAST LEG OF THE THEORY!!!!!!



golden ratio reciprocation

PROOF THAT MAGNETIC RECIPROCATION IS = PHI CUBED (1/PHI^3 = Phi Cubed) ~!~!~!!


SEE VIDEO HERE:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vwnM5c0aOes

THEN SEE THIS CHART::::

[Dingus]

Neat spirograph. What does it mean?

[TheoriaApophasis]

Neat spirograph. What does it mean?

thats not a "spirograph" generated image, its the ACTUAL view of the interlacing divergent and/or convergent magnetism from a FERROCELL


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wHDsnO3y7CA

[TheoriaApophasis]

I just found this full quote:


Nikola Tesla November 1928 interview:
Toward the end of the interview, we asked Tesla which arena of science most appealed to him. While we expected him to mention radios and airplanes, the world wireless system, it was not the induction motor; instead it was the discovery of the principle that preceded the induction motor, the “rotating magnetic field”.

Tesla answered: “rotating magnetic fields were dear to my heart. When I made the discovery of the rotating magnetic field, I was a very young man. The revelation came after years of concentrated thought and it was my first great thrill. It was not only a valuable discovery capable of extensive practical applications. It was a REVELATION OF NEW FORCES AND NEW PHENOMENA unknown to science before”.


“No”, Dr. Tesla said with some feelings, “I would not give my rotating field discovery for a thousand inventions, however valuable, designed merely as mechanical contraptions to deceive the eye and ear!”

Then saying: “A thousand years hence, the telephone and the motion picture camera may be obsolete, but the principle of the rotating magnetic field will remain a vital, living thing for all time to come.” - Nikola Tesla


Article: “A Famous Prophet of Science Looks into the Future” (Popular Science Monthly)

[TheoriaApophasis]

3RD EDITION UPLOADED

www.kathodos.com/magnetismsmall.pdf

236 PAGES

37 Megabytes


another DOWNLOAD SITE HERE (in case you have issues downloading it):
https://ia902502.us.archive.org/31/i...tism1small.pdf


torrent download site:
https://kickass.to/uncovering-the-mi...-t9596912.html











Sorry that I only got around to (there is just SO MUCH MATERIAL TO ADD!!!) to adding 1/4 or so of what I intended this edition


but i HAVE the material, and I WILL add it all to the 4th edition.

[rossum]

Endorsment and criticism

Hello Ken,

I appreciate the book and your discoveries presented in the book, mostly the connection of quantum mechanics and magnetism which I also independently discovered (we can talk about it later). I also enjoyed very nice pictures, photographies and lots of experimental evidence. However your book is to my taste a little "messy": it doesn't contain clear enough expressions, pictures are often confusing, and lacking mathematical or other symbolic expressions make it very hard to grasp your model and your explanations. You are using concepts like "dielectric inertia", "ether modality" e.t.c. but you don't define them, so one can only guess what you really mean.

I would be also interested about what is your model of atom. I find it poorly explained.

Lastly there are some mistakes in your book regarding history of science and atom models. My main focus (regarding atom models) is on the Schrodinger model of atom which is contrary to what most people think a pure wave model. In short Schrodinger thought that atoms are a kind of generalized standing electromagnetic wave. His model is directly based on classical ether theories even though he doesn't admit it. (You can find it in his collected works). I think his model is actually correct and most probably doesn't conflict with yours at all, it was just left unfinished as he died and unfortunately the people who could give him the missing pieces of informations were dead at the time he was working on it...

I have very little time, but if you would be interested I could help you turn your book into a real scientific book. I think it is very important to write a good book on this that is understandable for scientists. Otherwise people will be dismissing the evident forever...

Best wishes
Jan