Tweet
Two quotes from Dollard with 'corrections' (so to say) in parenthesis:
There is only ONE DIMENSION of Space *(within a field)
• Space *(CENTRIFUGAL FIELD) raised to the positive exponent is simply called space (acre).
• Space raised to the negative exponent is called counter-space *(CENTRIPETAL FIELD) (per sq.
centimeter).
Hence we have FOUR primary dimensions in electrical engineering. These are:
1) Time *(FIELD FLUX VARIATION...“OVER TIME”)
2) Space .....*(FIELD BARRIER, Ether pressure graidents)
3) Dielectricity
4) Magnetism
We can of course give definition TO space, but only as is meant an attribute WITHIN a field, AS a product of a field.
A field containing space is moving at a rate of change of the field as measured BY its attribute, space.
To speak otherwise is like saying There is light (field) expanding into/within illumination (nonsensical). Rather illumination is an attribute co-principle to and as light
Light,/EM , like magnetism itself being a radiation is expanding with its attributional 'field of illumination (space)'. We say we are 'in an illuminated space', when the proper causation would be that we are 'standing within the space of illumination (field)'
where ε0 is the permittivity of space, and μ0 is the permeability of space. Since none of the four Maxwell’s equations is defined to be a causal relation, and since each of these equations connects quantities simultaneous in time, none of these equations represents a causal relation. That is, ∇ · D is not a consequence of ρ (and vice versa),∇ Ĺ~E is not a consequence of ∂B/∂t (and vice versa), and∇ Ĺ~H is not a consequence of J + ∂D/∂t (and vice versa). Thus, Maxwell’s equations, even though they are basic electromagnetic equations (since most electromagnetic relations are derivable from them), do not depict cause-and-effect relations between electromagnetic reactions
I have about 100 pages to write on this WITH mathematical proofs, most of which come from OLEG JEFIMENKO himself. Too bad he died not too long ago.
How did I 'discover' that there are no fields in space? ....I came across countless discoveries along the road, and they all pointed at one unknown point, all of them pointing at a place I had never looked, I wasn't even looking for!,..... finally so many pointing fingers could not be ignored. There is no space outside of a field. It is impossible. Likewise therefore no time. Likewise therefore no inductions. Space is a property of a field, an attribute, but there are none, and never has there ever appeared ‘a field within ‘existing space’ ', because space is the effect, not the "medium" into which there is field expansion.
As is typical of GR and QM, they have been looking at the horses ass, rather than the in the horses mouth. When a field is present, then so too space, but not "a field expanding, contracting, interacting IN SPACE".
GR and QM have it backwards (as usual), they have reified SPACE as a 'thing' that 'does things'. Space has done nothing, never has done anything (as a principle or autonomous entity, since definitionally it has no such existence).
Us crazy humans cannot think this way since the entire world we live in is countless endless ocean of fields overlapping fields overlapping fields etc. Namely also, of course, since all matter itself are trillions of spheres of magneto-dielectric 'bubbles' in temporary equilibrium.
.....likewise GR and QM dismiss 'fields' as a principle of space (rather than a modality of the Ether/Aether).
To reify space is like saying "love attracts a rock".
There IS instant action at a distance regarding fields, because space-time does NOT exist outside of a field, space is effect WITHIN a field.
A field CANNOT,NEVER HAS terminated in space. Space is IN a field, but not the inverse.
Counter-voidance is spatial compression, or what the commoner calls "magnetic repulsion" is spatial compression. Of course these are polarized Ether-fields, but what is being compressed is space itself, as given definition by polarized field gradients at maximum counter-voidance ('repulsion').
As even Dollard admits, Ether always seeks self-voidance, ALWAYS, IN counterspace.
If, as is logically necessitated, space is merely an attribute of a field, then are we splitting hairs by saying someone is moving potato chips rather than moving french fries, since both are modalities of a POTATO. LOL.
They say specificity is divinity, and the clearer the better I suppose.
All radiation is spatial, all magnetism IS definitionally of course, pure termination of electricity, but always attributional TO a subject. Magnetism itself has no autonomous existence like dielectricty.
TEM, magnetism OF a mass "X", etc. Magnetism as co-principle of the universe, unlike dielectricity, cannot , does not exist as 'an island unto itself' Polarization OF magnetism IN/OF X, and thru X
.......This also explains Dollard many mention repeatedly of (NASA) seeing ONLY the sun and the earth FAR outside the field of the earth....but no stars.
No light far outside of earth, because no field = no space = no induction
Magnet is of course polarized, electrification isn’t caused by the magnetic field against a dielectric, BUT the moving space WITHIN that polarized field of the magnet against the dielectric that is causing electrification. People think the field is causing electrification, rather it’s the moving space causing inertial plane torque. Space has only one dimension as within a field, that space is moving (as meant WITHIN a field) is how energy is created, but moving space WITHIN a field. Spatial displacement against an inertial plane causes its torque/breaking. The limit of space is just the boundary-plane of ANY field.
We think of fields as the "breaks" upon the dielectric inertial plane which creates 'dielectric friction' which = electrification, but in speaking in the SAME WAY we accurately state that "space as immediate attribute TO any field is the barrier which causes electrification", we are literally sweeping the attribute of a polarized field, that being SPACE, against a dielectric causing electrification, rather than the interaction of fields, we have their attributes influencing conjugate fields (mag on dielectric fields etc.)
This of course is , almost, one of those "chicken or the egg" situations, but still all math and evidence points to the Space itself OF a field, rather than the field itself. Namely, ALL fields ARE Ether-modalities by definition, logically and reductively so!
Convergent fields (conterspatial) and divergent fields ('spatial', or polarized)
A space (as attribute to a polarized field) sweeping against a counterspace-barrier = Planck / Electrification.
This "NO Causation" (as per fields, since there is no field in space , rather only the inverse) feature is part of a couple of books by
OLEG JEFIMENKO
BUT he NEVER makes the the connection between fields and space!!!! Arggh!
He has the math, he points out the mystery, but he MISSES the connection!!
He states:
It is traditionally asserted that, according to Maxwell’s equation (3), a changing magnetic field produces an electric field (‘Faraday induction’) and that, according to Maxwell’s equation (4), a changing electric field produces a magnetic field (‘Maxwell induction’). The very useful and successful method of calculating induced voltage (emf) in terms of changing magnetic
flux appears to support the reality of Faraday induction. And the existence of electromagnetic waves appears to support the reality of both Faraday induction and Maxwell induction. Note, however, that as explained in section 1, Maxwell’s equation (3), which is usually considered as depicting Faraday induction, does not represent a cause-and-effect relation because in this equation the electric and the magnetic field is evaluated for the same moment of time. Note also that in electromagnetic waves electric and magnetic fields are in phase, that is, simultaneous in time, and hence, according to the principle of causality (which states that the cause always
precedes its effect), the two fields cannot cause each other (by the principle of causality, the fields should be out of phase if they create each other).
And there is one more fact that supports the conclusion that what we call ‘electromagnetic induction’ is not the creation of one of the two fields by the other. In the covariant formulation of electrodynamics, electric and magnetic fields appear as components of one single entity— the electromagnetic field tensor (dielectric). Quite clearly, a component of a tensor cannot be a cause of another component of the same tensor, just like a component of a vector cannot be a cause of another component of the same vector.
Therefore, since it is impossible to interpret both the electric and the magnetic field as relativistic effects, one must conclude that neither field is a relativistic effect.
MINE:
This is why the insane fools of GR and QM (Or as Dollard calls it "Quantum Mysticism")have created a "mystical" effect precedes cause nonsense. They dont grasp that time and space are attributional to fields and field interactions, and they have no existence autonomous OF or from fields themselves.
Ive always called it the "Cult of Quantum"
OLEG JEFIMENKO
jefimenko
(October 14, 1922, Kharkiv, Ukraine - May 14, 2009, Morgantown, West Virginia, USA) - physicist and Professor Emeritus at West Virginia University.
Biography
He received his Ph.D. at the University of Oregon (1956).In 1956, he was awarded the Sigma Xi Prize. In 1971 and 1973, he won awards in the AAPT Apparatus Competition. Jefimenko has constructed and operated electrostatic generators run by atmospheric electricity.
Jefimenko's expansion, or generalization, is based on the existence of the second gravitational force field, the "cogravitational, or Heaviside's, field". Oliver Heaviside first predicted this field in the article "A Gravitational and Electromagnetic Analogy" (1893).
HIS MAIN BOOKS:
Electricity and Magnetism
book link:
Library Genesis: Oleg D. Jefimenko - Electricity and Magnetism : An Introduction to the Theory of Electric and Magnetic Fields, 2nd edition
Gravitation and Cogravitation -- Developing Newton's Theory of Gravitation to its Physical and Mathematical Conclusion,
Electrostatic Experiments -- An Encyclopedia of Early Electrostatic
Electromagnetic Retardation and Theory of Relativity -- New Chapters in the Classical Theory of Fields, 2nd edition,
Causality, Electromagnetic Induction, and Gravitation -- A Different approach to the Theory of Electromagnetic and Gravitational Fields, 2nd edition,
An Introduction to the Theory of Electric and Magnetic Fields, 2nd edition,
Earths Atmosphere as a source for electrical power:
www.kathodos.com/atmospherepower.pdf
download his book "electrostatic motors"
Is magnetic field due to an electric current a relativistic effect?
www.kathodos.com/magneticrelativistic.pdf
Presenting electromagnetic theory in accordance with the principle of
causality
www.kathodos.com/causalityelectromagnetic.pdf
There is only ONE DIMENSION of Space *(within a field)
• Space *(CENTRIFUGAL FIELD) raised to the positive exponent is simply called space (acre).
• Space raised to the negative exponent is called counter-space *(CENTRIPETAL FIELD) (per sq.
centimeter).
Hence we have FOUR primary dimensions in electrical engineering. These are:
1) Time *(FIELD FLUX VARIATION...“OVER TIME”)
2) Space .....*(FIELD BARRIER, Ether pressure graidents)
3) Dielectricity
4) Magnetism
We can of course give definition TO space, but only as is meant an attribute WITHIN a field, AS a product of a field.
A field containing space is moving at a rate of change of the field as measured BY its attribute, space.
To speak otherwise is like saying There is light (field) expanding into/within illumination (nonsensical). Rather illumination is an attribute co-principle to and as light
Light,/EM , like magnetism itself being a radiation is expanding with its attributional 'field of illumination (space)'. We say we are 'in an illuminated space', when the proper causation would be that we are 'standing within the space of illumination (field)'
where ε0 is the permittivity of space, and μ0 is the permeability of space. Since none of the four Maxwell’s equations is defined to be a causal relation, and since each of these equations connects quantities simultaneous in time, none of these equations represents a causal relation. That is, ∇ · D is not a consequence of ρ (and vice versa),∇ Ĺ~E is not a consequence of ∂B/∂t (and vice versa), and∇ Ĺ~H is not a consequence of J + ∂D/∂t (and vice versa). Thus, Maxwell’s equations, even though they are basic electromagnetic equations (since most electromagnetic relations are derivable from them), do not depict cause-and-effect relations between electromagnetic reactions
I have about 100 pages to write on this WITH mathematical proofs, most of which come from OLEG JEFIMENKO himself. Too bad he died not too long ago.
How did I 'discover' that there are no fields in space? ....I came across countless discoveries along the road, and they all pointed at one unknown point, all of them pointing at a place I had never looked, I wasn't even looking for!,..... finally so many pointing fingers could not be ignored. There is no space outside of a field. It is impossible. Likewise therefore no time. Likewise therefore no inductions. Space is a property of a field, an attribute, but there are none, and never has there ever appeared ‘a field within ‘existing space’ ', because space is the effect, not the "medium" into which there is field expansion.
As is typical of GR and QM, they have been looking at the horses ass, rather than the in the horses mouth. When a field is present, then so too space, but not "a field expanding, contracting, interacting IN SPACE".
GR and QM have it backwards (as usual), they have reified SPACE as a 'thing' that 'does things'. Space has done nothing, never has done anything (as a principle or autonomous entity, since definitionally it has no such existence).
Us crazy humans cannot think this way since the entire world we live in is countless endless ocean of fields overlapping fields overlapping fields etc. Namely also, of course, since all matter itself are trillions of spheres of magneto-dielectric 'bubbles' in temporary equilibrium.
.....likewise GR and QM dismiss 'fields' as a principle of space (rather than a modality of the Ether/Aether).
To reify space is like saying "love attracts a rock".
There IS instant action at a distance regarding fields, because space-time does NOT exist outside of a field, space is effect WITHIN a field.
A field CANNOT,NEVER HAS terminated in space. Space is IN a field, but not the inverse.
Counter-voidance is spatial compression, or what the commoner calls "magnetic repulsion" is spatial compression. Of course these are polarized Ether-fields, but what is being compressed is space itself, as given definition by polarized field gradients at maximum counter-voidance ('repulsion').
As even Dollard admits, Ether always seeks self-voidance, ALWAYS, IN counterspace.
If, as is logically necessitated, space is merely an attribute of a field, then are we splitting hairs by saying someone is moving potato chips rather than moving french fries, since both are modalities of a POTATO. LOL.
They say specificity is divinity, and the clearer the better I suppose.
All radiation is spatial, all magnetism IS definitionally of course, pure termination of electricity, but always attributional TO a subject. Magnetism itself has no autonomous existence like dielectricty.
TEM, magnetism OF a mass "X", etc. Magnetism as co-principle of the universe, unlike dielectricity, cannot , does not exist as 'an island unto itself' Polarization OF magnetism IN/OF X, and thru X
.......This also explains Dollard many mention repeatedly of (NASA) seeing ONLY the sun and the earth FAR outside the field of the earth....but no stars.
No light far outside of earth, because no field = no space = no induction
Magnet is of course polarized, electrification isn’t caused by the magnetic field against a dielectric, BUT the moving space WITHIN that polarized field of the magnet against the dielectric that is causing electrification. People think the field is causing electrification, rather it’s the moving space causing inertial plane torque. Space has only one dimension as within a field, that space is moving (as meant WITHIN a field) is how energy is created, but moving space WITHIN a field. Spatial displacement against an inertial plane causes its torque/breaking. The limit of space is just the boundary-plane of ANY field.
We think of fields as the "breaks" upon the dielectric inertial plane which creates 'dielectric friction' which = electrification, but in speaking in the SAME WAY we accurately state that "space as immediate attribute TO any field is the barrier which causes electrification", we are literally sweeping the attribute of a polarized field, that being SPACE, against a dielectric causing electrification, rather than the interaction of fields, we have their attributes influencing conjugate fields (mag on dielectric fields etc.)
This of course is , almost, one of those "chicken or the egg" situations, but still all math and evidence points to the Space itself OF a field, rather than the field itself. Namely, ALL fields ARE Ether-modalities by definition, logically and reductively so!
Convergent fields (conterspatial) and divergent fields ('spatial', or polarized)
A space (as attribute to a polarized field) sweeping against a counterspace-barrier = Planck / Electrification.
This "NO Causation" (as per fields, since there is no field in space , rather only the inverse) feature is part of a couple of books by
OLEG JEFIMENKO
BUT he NEVER makes the the connection between fields and space!!!! Arggh!
He has the math, he points out the mystery, but he MISSES the connection!!
He states:
It is traditionally asserted that, according to Maxwell’s equation (3), a changing magnetic field produces an electric field (‘Faraday induction’) and that, according to Maxwell’s equation (4), a changing electric field produces a magnetic field (‘Maxwell induction’). The very useful and successful method of calculating induced voltage (emf) in terms of changing magnetic
flux appears to support the reality of Faraday induction. And the existence of electromagnetic waves appears to support the reality of both Faraday induction and Maxwell induction. Note, however, that as explained in section 1, Maxwell’s equation (3), which is usually considered as depicting Faraday induction, does not represent a cause-and-effect relation because in this equation the electric and the magnetic field is evaluated for the same moment of time. Note also that in electromagnetic waves electric and magnetic fields are in phase, that is, simultaneous in time, and hence, according to the principle of causality (which states that the cause always
precedes its effect), the two fields cannot cause each other (by the principle of causality, the fields should be out of phase if they create each other).
And there is one more fact that supports the conclusion that what we call ‘electromagnetic induction’ is not the creation of one of the two fields by the other. In the covariant formulation of electrodynamics, electric and magnetic fields appear as components of one single entity— the electromagnetic field tensor (dielectric). Quite clearly, a component of a tensor cannot be a cause of another component of the same tensor, just like a component of a vector cannot be a cause of another component of the same vector.
Therefore, since it is impossible to interpret both the electric and the magnetic field as relativistic effects, one must conclude that neither field is a relativistic effect.
MINE:
This is why the insane fools of GR and QM (Or as Dollard calls it "Quantum Mysticism")have created a "mystical" effect precedes cause nonsense. They dont grasp that time and space are attributional to fields and field interactions, and they have no existence autonomous OF or from fields themselves.
Ive always called it the "Cult of Quantum"
OLEG JEFIMENKO
jefimenko
(October 14, 1922, Kharkiv, Ukraine - May 14, 2009, Morgantown, West Virginia, USA) - physicist and Professor Emeritus at West Virginia University.
Biography
He received his Ph.D. at the University of Oregon (1956).In 1956, he was awarded the Sigma Xi Prize. In 1971 and 1973, he won awards in the AAPT Apparatus Competition. Jefimenko has constructed and operated electrostatic generators run by atmospheric electricity.
Jefimenko's expansion, or generalization, is based on the existence of the second gravitational force field, the "cogravitational, or Heaviside's, field". Oliver Heaviside first predicted this field in the article "A Gravitational and Electromagnetic Analogy" (1893).
HIS MAIN BOOKS:
Electricity and Magnetism
book link:
Library Genesis: Oleg D. Jefimenko - Electricity and Magnetism : An Introduction to the Theory of Electric and Magnetic Fields, 2nd edition
Gravitation and Cogravitation -- Developing Newton's Theory of Gravitation to its Physical and Mathematical Conclusion,
Electrostatic Experiments -- An Encyclopedia of Early Electrostatic
Electromagnetic Retardation and Theory of Relativity -- New Chapters in the Classical Theory of Fields, 2nd edition,
Causality, Electromagnetic Induction, and Gravitation -- A Different approach to the Theory of Electromagnetic and Gravitational Fields, 2nd edition,
An Introduction to the Theory of Electric and Magnetic Fields, 2nd edition,
Earths Atmosphere as a source for electrical power:
www.kathodos.com/atmospherepower.pdf
download his book "electrostatic motors"
Is magnetic field due to an electric current a relativistic effect?
www.kathodos.com/magneticrelativistic.pdf
Presenting electromagnetic theory in accordance with the principle of
causality
www.kathodos.com/causalityelectromagnetic.pdf