Peter, whatever happened with Eric P. Dollard?

[lamare]

I think it's time that Maxwell's dimensions get changed to something more suitable for Electrical Engineers. This I have already presented. As did Steinmetz, I think we really need to go beyond Maxwell, not deeper into it. That can only lead to Relativity.

Not all of Maxwell's work necessarily leads to relativity. Stowe refers specifically to his work "On Physical Lines of Force" from 1861:

On Physical Lines of Force - Wikisource
http://www.tuks.nl/pdf/Reference_Mat...Force_1861.pdf

This was written *before* he wrote his "A Dynamical Theory of the Electromagnetic Field" in 1864 and his "A Treatise on Electricity and Magnetism" in 1873, and way before Heaviside worked further on Maxwell's famous equations in the 1880s:

James Clerk Maxwell - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Maxwell had studied and commented on the field of electricity and magnetism as early as 1855/6 when "On Faraday's lines of force" was read to the Cambridge Philosophical Society. The paper presented a simplified model of Faraday's work, and how the two phenomena were related. He reduced all of the current knowledge into a linked set of differential equations with 20 equations in 20 variables. This work was later published as "On physical lines of force" in March 1861.

Around 1862, while lecturing at King's College, Maxwell calculated that the speed of propagation of an electromagnetic field is approximately that of the speed of light. He considered this to be more than just a coincidence, and commented "We can scarcely avoid the conclusion that light consists in the transverse undulations of the same medium which is the cause of electric and magnetic phenomena."

Working on the problem further, Maxwell showed that the equations predict the existence of waves of oscillating electric and magnetic fields that travel through empty space at a speed that could be predicted from simple electrical experiments; using the data available at the time, Maxwell obtained a velocity of 310,740,000 m/s. In his 1864 paper "A dynamical theory of the electromagnetic field", Maxwell wrote, "The agreement of the results seems to show that light and magnetism are affections of the same substance, and that light is an electromagnetic disturbance propagated through the field according to electromagnetic laws".

His famous equations, in their modern form of four partial differential equations, first appeared in fully developed form in his textbook A Treatise on Electricity and Magnetism in 1873. Most of this work was done by Maxwell at Glenlair during the period between holding his London post and his taking up the Cavendish chair. Maxwell expressed electromagnetism in the algebra of quaternions and made the electromagnetic potential the centerpiece of his theory.

In 1881 Oliver Heaviside replaced Maxwell’s electromagnetic potential field by ‘force fields’ as the centerpiece of electromagnetic theory. Heaviside reduced the complexity of Maxwell’s theory down to four differential equations, known now collectively as Maxwell's Laws or Maxwell's equations. According to Heaviside, the electromagnetic potential field was arbitrary and needed to be "murdered". However, the use of scalar and vector potentials is now standard in the solution of Maxwell's equations.

What leads to relativity is the misconception that the electro-magnetic fields are caused by charge carriers. NOT the idea that the magnetic field may be consisting of vortexes in the aether. Which connects very naturally to the idea of "physical lines of force", BTW.

Now just to be clear: I am not saying that Maxwell or Stowe's choice of dimensions are the most suitable ones. All I'm saying is that as far as I am aware it is possible to describe all known physical phenomena in terms of vortexes, waves and steady state flows in a fluid-like elastic medium. Stowe (and Maxwell) chose to describe this medium in terms of mass, momentum, etc., which is why they get dimensions related to these.

So, I do agree that the aether should be described in more suitable dimensions, but in the end that is a matter of transforming from one set of dimensions to another. Momentum is analogous to induction, for example.

[lamare]

(1) Thank you La-mare for presenting your material. It is however the dimensions presented are a complete denial of everything I have heretofore presented. Nobody gets it. MASS HAS NO RELATION TO ELECTRICITY. Looking at the table given it says capacitance is in pounds per square inch (kg per meter squared), this is absurd. Take a tire on my car; The pounds per square inch is not the capacitance, it is the potential. The capacitance is how much the tire is pushed to the ground for a given P.S.I. Hence the table presented works to destroy the proper form of understanding. Mass means nothing. It does not matter if the capacitor is made of Aluminum or Lead, for a given geometry the capacitance is the same despite the Lead capacitor having many times more mass than the Aluminum. Can we get it?

It is not absurd, it is just a consequence of the model he chose to describe his aether with. He uses a description of an ideal superfluid in terms of Newtonian mechanics, which has everything to do with mass, etc., which is why you get these seemingly strange dimensions.

And BTW, mass has everything to do with electricity, because gravity is the gradient of E, the electric potential. See TT Browns experiments with anti-gravity....

So, IMHO, if we take Stowe's model and replace his aethermodel, his superfluid description, with an analog description in terms of electric parameters/dimensions, we can use his work and get the same results, only with different dimensions, the correct dimensions from an electrical engineering point of view.

The bottomline is this: there is a real physical aether and every phenomenon we know of can be described in terms of the properties/dimensions of the aether. And the dimensions you chose to describe your aether with lead to the description of everything in terms of these same dimensions.

It's really a matter of taste which dimensions you prefer, cause in the end all you describe is waves, vortexes and steady state flows in a fluid-like medium.

[t-rex]

Back in the Bowl Again

(1) Thank you La-mare for presenting your material. It is however the dimensions presented are a complete denial of everything I have heretofore presented. Nobody gets it. MASS HAS NO RELATION TO ELECTRICITY. Looking at the table given it says capacitance is in pounds per square inch (kg per meter squared), this is absurd. Take a tire on my car; The pounds per square inch is not the capacitance, it is the potential. The capacitance is how much the tire is pushed to the ground for a given P.S.I. Hence the table presented works to destroy the proper form of understanding. Mass means nothing. It does not matter if the capacitor is made of Aluminum or Lead, for a given geometry the capacitance is the same despite the Lead capacitor having many times more mass than the Aluminum. Can we get it?

(2) I have reached the conclusion that anyone holding a college degree will never get that damned physics crap out of their head. If everyone run's back to mama's skirt how in god's name can we make any progress? The units and dimensions I gave all can be equated to physics through the "Bogo", etc. I figured physicists would just love the Planck but such is not the case. No! Lemmings cannot be deflected from the course to destruction.

(3) Note on Primary Circuit,

For those who have no knowledge of resonance and etc., you must work to gain that knowledge. I have no special drug for you. Here is how you do it: find a "Radio Amateurs Handbook", around 1960 - 1965 edition. Read it, and make a crystal A.M. broadcast radio. When this is done then I can answer any questions, not beforehand. You must do the work, not me. And we need more La-mare's, those who experiment with ideas and materials.

(4) Stop pecking at your keyboards and get up and do something. It seems "Internet Society" engenders a "Mass Mental Impairment" (M.M.I. Disorder). This issue is becoming an issue now in the real "Hard Hat & 10-C Oil" electrical engineering workplace. Also this condition is becoming problematic for the U.S. Military. "Mass Mental Impairment" Disorder is much more the problem than bar room fights about the inscrutable Aether.

(5) Maxwell's Original Dimensions:




I think it's time that Maxwell's dimensions get changed to something more suitable for Electrical Engineers. This I have already presented. As did Steinmetz, I think we really need to go beyond Maxwell, not deeper into it. That can only lead to Relativity.

73 DE N6KPH

[lamare]

We have landed, and it is now possible to understand electricity with complete freedom from the shackles of Physics. We are now entering a New World and it is yet to be discovered what wonders may lay ahead.

We have broken the “Einstein Barrier”. He has been left behind on the Prison Planet, but Oliver has been taken with us. We are not done with him yet. No one will live long enough to exhaust the works of Heaviside, and in all probability, Human Society will not either.

The electrical “System of Units and Dimensions” that have been established and taught in the “Schools” of today is encapsulated in a thick coating of E equals mc square, intermingled with the likes of four pi and one over c square, and peppered with a multitude of arbitrary powers of ten. This system is really a complete, absolute, mess.

In order that we may continue to utilize the established size of the Ohm, Volt, Henry, and etc, and remain in accord with the new system of dimensions that has been presented in my series of writings, a mathematical “adapter” must be derived. This adapter will also make lucid the sheer extent of the mess. (See table at end)

I think Paul Stowe already derived an interesting mathematical “adapter”. He essentially describes a superfluid medium in terms of familiar Newtonian mechanics ( aether populational momenta (p)). Since the only way we have to interact with the aether is by means of electro-magnetic waves, it does not make much difference how you describe your fluid-like medium, as long as it correctly models the electro-magnetic (and dielectric) waves propagating trough the medium. So, a description in terms of Newtonian mechanics is as good as any mathematical description of the medium. I think you could easily replace his description with the electrical engineering analogies for momentum, etc.

He comes to very interesting results:
Tuks DrippingPedia : Stowe Personal E Mail

I have determined that in my opinion all of physical processes can be defined in terms of the aether populational momenta (p). Such that,

Force (F) -> Grad p
Charge (q) -> Div p
Magnetism (B) -> Curl p

Gravity for example is Grad E where E is the electric potential at x. This resolves to Le Sagian type process as outlined in the Pushing Gravity models. The electric potential E in turn is created by charge which is Div p...

My model is a direct extension of Maxwell's vortex model of interacting rings (the smoke ring model). I have been able to define all fundamental constants in terms of basic parameters, including the gravitational constant G. Further, G is, within this system, seamlessly integrated to all others, fitting into a unified system.

The key to this system's definition is the realization that charge is fundamentally a result AND the measure of the compressibility of Maxwell's aether. See: The nature of Charge - Paul Stowe for futher details on this. This is a logical and natural extension of Maxwell work (Ref: http://vacuum-physics.com/Maxwell/maxwell_oplf.pdf )

Quantity SI Conversion Factor to Maxwell's Ether Based Units

Length meter   (m)                  meter(m)
Mass Kilogram  (kg)                 Kilogram (kg)
Time Second    (sec)                second (sec)
Force Newton   (Nt)                 kg-m/sec^2
Energy Joules  (J)                  kg-m^2/sec^2
Power Watts                         kg-m^2/sec^3
Action         [h] (Planck's Const) kg-m^2/sec
Permitivitty   [z] (Q^2/kg-m^3)     kg/m^3 {1}
Permeability   [u] (kg-m-sec^2/Q^2) m-sec^2/kg {2}
Charge         [q] (Coulomb)        kg/sec
Boltzmann's    [k] (J/°K)           m-sec
Current        [I] (Amp)            kg/sec^2
Electric Field [E]                  m/sec
Potential      [V] (Voltage)        m^2/sec {3}
Displacement   [D]                  kg/m^2-sec
Resistance     [R] (Ohms)           m^2-sec/kg
Capacitance    [C]                  kg/m^2
Magnetic Field [H] (Henries)        m^2
Magnetic Flux  [B] (Gauss)          (dimensionless)
Inductance     [L]                  m^2-sec^2/kg
Temperature   [°K] (Kelvin)         kg-m/sec^3

{1} - density
{2} - modulus
{3} - Kinematic Viscosity

The basic physical quantities in this system are the medium properties identified by Maxwell in his 1860-61 "On Physical Lines of Force". We quantify the mean momentum (quanta) [ß], characteristic mean interaction length (quanta) [L], the root mean speed [c], and a mass attenuation coefficient [¿].

Their values are,

ß = 5.154664E-27 kg-m/sec
L = 6.430917E-08 m
¿ = 3.144609E-06 m^2/kg
c = 2.997925E+08 m/sec

In other words, all of the major observed and measured constants of physics can be derived from the above terms.

There are two dimensionless factors also. These are shared with the standard systems of measure as,

á = 7.297353E-03 (Fine Structure Constant)
ƒ = 1.001159E+00 (Electron Magnetic Anomaly)

Now to the fumdamental constants. I'll now show that h, z, u, k, q, G resolve from the above.

h = 2ßL
q = 2ß/L
k = L^2/c
u = áL^3/ßc
z = ß/áL^3c
G = (áßc/2piL^3)¿^2

Note, rounding to six significant digits in the above numeric definitions can affect the results slightly. What I don't know is why the value of the Magnetic Moment Anomaly is required to bring the more basic expressions in line with measurements. What I do know is the MMA is the square of the dielectic and magnetic suseptability of air. Don't know why this is either.

Tuks DrippingPedia : Stowe Foundation Unification Physics

Many of apparent inconsistencies that exist in our current understanding of physics have results from a basic lack of understanding of what are called fields. These fields, electric, magnetic, gravitational...etc, have been the nemesis of physicists since the birth of modern science, and continues unresolved by quantum mechanics. A classical example of this is the problem of an electron interacting with it's own field. This case results in the equations of quantum mechanics diverging to infinity. To overcome this problem, Bethe (1) introduced the process of ignoring the higher order terms that result from taking these equations to their limit of zero distance, in what is now a common practice called renormalization.

These field problems result in class of entities called virtual, existing only to balance and explain interactions. These entities can (and do) violate accepted physical laws. This is deemed acceptable since they are assumed to exist temporarily at time intervals shorter than the Heisenberg's uncertainty limit. It has been known for some time that such virtual entities necessitate the existence of energy in this virtual realm (Field), giving rise to the concept of quantum zero point energy.

As a result of this presentation I will propose the elimination of both the need for renormalization and any such virtual fields. This will be accomplished by replacing the virtual field with a real physical media within which we define elemental particles (which more precisely should be called structures) and the resultant forces which act between them.

Tuks DrippingPedia : Stowe Nature Of Charge

The basic continuity equation of Continuum Mechanics is given as :

d(rho)/dt + (rho)Div v = 0

Where rho is the field density, and v is the mean velocity. If the field is incompressible this simplifies to:

(rho)Div v = 0

Since with the incompressible assumption, there can be no change in density. We can further simplify the equation by removing density (dividing it from both sides) we then get:

Div v = 0

This definition requires infinite propagation speeds of any perturbations in such incompressible systems, eliminating any possibility of wave activity.

Conversely, in compressible mediums we see that (rho)Div v equals the time rate of change in the density d(rho)/dt. For the limit, as a volume element [s] go to zero, we get:

s(rho)Div v = s(d(rho)/dt)

This is based on the observation that for the two terms to sum to zero, and therefore must have opposite signs. This leads directly to:

mDiv v = dm/dt

And cannot be zero. This is an important finding, it describes a unique characteristic of all compressible systems. The result of this is a fixed finite propagation speed for any perturbations in the resulting continuum, leading to standard acoustic behavior.

In general the physical consequences of this definition has been overlooked, due to an almost universal adoption of the 'assumption' of incompressibility, in evaluating the general behavior of such systems. This eliminates many higher order terms, greatly simplifying the equations, and generally doesn't introduce significant errors in the results obtained.

It does however eliminate this property and any resulting consequences from any such evaluations. As should be obvious, as a limit, this definition has a unique value fixed by the density and velocity of the constitute continuum.

[lamare]

Notes to the reader this was a much larger project than anticipated so I will update this periodically for the equations, lists and tables left out. Also being such a large volume there are bound to be error so please let me know and I will correct them ASAP. (On a side note, its quite an annoyance posting this in web friendly formatting)
the dude

I have already done much digitizing work on the TWP, which includes the Oscillating Current Transformer:

Tuks DrippingPedia : Theory Of Wireless Power
Tuks DrippingPedia : The Oscillating Current Transformer

There are some other people helping already, and in case anyone of you feels like helping with digitizing Eric's work on my wiki, the secret you need is the name of this forum, without "forum" and then a 3 for the second e. The wiki has a module that supports entering formula's in latex format...

[Geometric_Algebra]

Disruptive discharge primary circuit

In the disruptive discharge primary circuit, what was the reasoning behind maintaining the ratio: L1/C1 <= 10*L2/C2 ?

Littelfuse Inc manufacturers gas discharge tubes with various break voltages, which may be useful in this application. What is a typical EMF amplitude that we should design our disruptive circuit around?

Looking at the set of inductors (L2), is their a style of inductor (ceramic, iron core, phenolic, etc.) that is preferred in this application?

[jpolakow]

In other words, ferrite can carry the inductance of a single turn, however neglects the multi turn inductance? This make sense. However this means that mutually coupled domains are dependent on CONDUCTION???? Does this explain conduction?????????

WHAT CAUSES THIS....Where in the equations is this? If it is not there....which is fine, what do we FEEL is responsible?

This seems VERY connected to what I show in the cross field capacitor thread. An order of operations for "conduction" vs parameter change?

Eric said he has the very same questions you do concerning mutual inductance. No easy answer unfortunately.

[OrionLightShip]

The so called Hairpin circuit is really no more than Tesla's first experiments with the one turn primary. Since a short section of transmission line serves as an inductance then hence the Hairpin.

It is great to find a point of discussion, the Energetic Forum has been very boring to me, like talking to my own echo.
DE N6KPH

I'm going to attempt to model the behavior of the hairpin circuit using LTSpice. Then I will model the "anti" TEM configuration.

Not that anyone else will care, but it seems like a fun project.


What resonant frequency should I shoot for as I work out the values of the circuit components.

Any suggestions on starting values of L1, L2a, L2b, C1 C2?

questions I hope to answer: Is there a way to superimpose a 2nd or 3rd hamonic to parametrically pump Fo?

Orion

[Armagdn03]

Question:

It was stated that conduction oriented in the same axis as magnetic flux (many windings in the transformer electrically isolated) equates to a greater change in permeability. (could be wrong please correct me)

What I determined through experiment is that ferrite can carry the self inductance but not the mutual inductance. The audio guys had similar complaints. The navy uses very very fine steel tape(insulated). It seems that its important that the iron have conductivity electrically in the same direction that it is carrying the magnetism inductively.

In other words, ferrite can carry the inductance of a single turn, however neglects the multi turn inductance? This make sense. However this means that mutually coupled domains are dependent on CONDUCTION???? Does this explain conduction?????????

WHAT CAUSES THIS....Where in the equations is this? If it is not there....which is fine, what do we FEEL is responsible?

This seems VERY connected to what I show in the cross field capacitor thread. An order of operations for "conduction" vs parameter change?

[peacepenguin]

Eric Dollard resource

Eric Dollard’s “Radio Archaeology” | Journal of Borderland Research
For those seeking out Dollards work, this is a good read.
Note the difference between "Wireless" and "Radio".

TEM vs. LMD again!

Maybe there's something to that 1980's borderlands VHS where Eric shows us the difference between the two wave forms...

How hard was it to make that analog computer...

[ren]

pics of unusual laminations.

Here are the pictures of the transformer I referred to earlier:





You can see the laminations in this photo more clearly. I believe the transformer was designed for step down from 240vac to 25vac (multiple low voltage outputs) from memory, Ive got the sticker that was on it somewhere.





Here is the details on the model number





Also, I was reading some of the info Eric shared and came across this:

"Winding on solid or continuous formers rather than spaced slender rods, as shown in fig. 1, greatly retards wave propagation as indicated in equation (6), thereby seriously distorting the wave."

This brought to mind a small fluro inverter chip I have been playing around with. I was fascinated by the way the secondary seems to be wound. On the right hand side you can see the primary which I measured somewhere in the 70kHz range from memory, a nice clean sine wave from 12vdc source. The secondary seems to be divided into three sections, and since I cannot see any joins on the bottom of the PCB I am assuming that all three are tied in series for the HV output (with a series capacitor). This was another first for me, I have read others descriptions of winding a secondary like this but never seen it implemented. As you can see Im not using it to power a fluro, makes a nice little arc in that flash tube...

Perhaps Erics post above explains why it has be designed this way?





Regards

[amigo]

Thank you jpolakow, that was very resourceful.

Although, I do not subscribe to any kind of mysticism, as that's has been used as a tool of mass manipulation for a long time now on this planet.

So, there must be a more rational explanation (factual rather than faith) as to why the specific numbers relate to specific things (perhaps geometry based rather than arithmetic).

Could you please ask Eric if he would talk to us about Radiant Energy? I've recently heard references to RE and Tesla's work being used in physical teleportation and/or time travel (?!) experiments by our "overlords", which adds yet another tangent to all the (dis)info one can read about RE on the Net.

[jpolakow]

Here you will find further informatino on the Chaldean System:
Chaldean Numerology, Chaldean Vibrations, Compound Numbers

A short excerpt from the website here:

"As you may already have noticed, no alphabet letter was assigned to the number 9. The reason why the number 9 was omitted under Chaldean Numerology system was because the Chaldeans felt the 9 was holy, sacred, and thus to be held apart from the rest. However, should your name or that of someone you know total 9, then the 9 remains. Let's analyze a sample name under Chaldean Numerology system:

LESLIE

3 + 5 + 3 + 3+1+5 = 20 - 2 + 0 = 2

ERIC

5 + 2+1 + 3 = 11 - 1 + 1=2

Total: 2 + 2 = 4

All numbers, whether found under this system or the Pythagorean one, have basically the same meanings, symbols, nature, and character. This seems to be the universal rule of all number systems.

However, under the Chaldean Numerology system, it isn't enough to know what the single numbers mean. One must also know what the "compound," or "double," numbers mean is well. The single Chaldean Numerology number simply represents the physcal outward appearance of a person's name, whereas the compound Chaldean Numerology number represents the deeper, metaphysical, hidden influences or forces behind the name. In our above example, although the name adds up to the single num*ber 7, the name also has three compound numbers—20 in the first name, 11 in the middle name, and 21 in the last name.

Once the physical (single number) and metaphysical (compound number) aspects of your name have been determined, the next important step is your date of birth.

Your date of birth means the day of the month you were born under, for it too has its own occult symbology and significance. So, Leslie Eric Scott, born on the 8th day of December, would also be considered a number 8 per*son under this system. Your date of birth is extremely important because it is unchangeable and therefore a constant, like the needle pointing north on a compass. A person may undergo a series of name changes over the years because of marriage, adoption, and the like, but the birth date remains the same."

[jpolakow]

Wonderful, I missed on four months of postings.

Eric, if that's really you, thank you for returning. I know a simple thank-you does not get you far, never the less I appreciate your courage to post the volumes of information so far, despite the forces working against you.

Oh, a question for you, did you ever figure out what Tesla meant about knowing the significance of 3, 6 and 9 as being the key to the Universe?

Eric told me the following while he was making dinner:

Here Tesla was referring to numerology. Take all the numbers in anything in your life (your ph number, address, license plate, etc.) Add all the numbers together, when you reach 9 you start over again (A Base 9 system). For example say your License plate is 134. Add the numbers together: 1+3+4 = 8. So your number is 8. Another example license plate: 568 = 5+6+8 = 19 = 1+9=10 = 1 in a base 9 system. Mind is a little foggy so not sure on the exact details. You will find these numbers will ocurr everywhere in your life. It is an ancient Egyptian thing, called the Chaldean system. Theoretically based on your cosmic "attunement" you will see the numbers occur more or less often. Tesla made sure everything he did in his life was based numerically on the number 3. 3 phase power uses the least amount of copper of any wire line transmission system. The reason why remains a mystery today. Steinmetz attempts to explain it in his AC book. (by the way the Holy Trinity is a popular Christian archtype. Tha father, the son, and the holy ghost). Tesla's father was a priest. Tesla was supposed to be a priest. Tesla became a priest of different field - science. Read opening chapters of J.J. Thompson's "Electricity and Matter".

[amigo]

Wonderful, I missed on four months of postings.

Eric, if that's really you, thank you for returning. I know a simple thank-you does not get you far, never the less I appreciate your courage to post the volumes of information so far, despite the forces working against you.

Oh, a question for you, did you ever figure out what Tesla meant about knowing the significance of 3, 6 and 9 as being the key to the Universe?

@All: as an original poster I have just a small request (as I do not have moderation powers over my own thread):

Would you please tone down with the "noise". No offense to anyone, but this thread is about Eric, not you. Please let him write, as he has much he could tell us. Thank you.