Peter, whatever happened with Eric P. Dollard?

[Geometric_Algebra]

Sputins,

The book referenced by Mr. Dollard Physics and Mathematics in Electrical Communication by James Owen Perrine Ph. D., published 1958, is probably the best book I have ever read regarding conic sections, hyperbolic sine, cos, tan and exponential equations. If you can find this book I would highly recommend getting it for study and reference. (I picked up my secondhand copy from "betterworld books" on amazon. I don't know if its still in print, so you will probably have to look for a used copy like I did)

In the preface Mr. Perrine lists two books that inspired him to write his book, they are Calculus Made Easy by Silvanous Phillips Thompson and Exponentials Made Easy or the Story of Epsilon by M. E. J. Gheury de Bray. Both of which I have read and found to be great resources for study and reference material.

Two other books that might be of interest are Principles of Elliptic and Hyperbolic Analysis by Alexander MacFarlane and Aplication of Hyperbolic Functions to Electrical Engineering Problems by Arthur Edwin Kennelly.

Garrett M

Garrett,

In the bibliography (page 288 of Kennelly's Application of Hyperbolic Functions to Electrical Engineering Problems, 2nd Ed.), reference #18 is A. Macfarlanes's paper "Application of Hyperbolic Analysis to the Discharge of a Condenser." I extracted the paper from an old IEEE compilation, and posted a while back. Some one probably has a copy floating around here and might just drop a link to the pdf. Also, a record of the discussion session of the paper includes comments by Steinmetz and Kennelly.

Also, just to add to the excitement around Perrine's text, it's an unusual book in that it includes actual basic facts and circuit examples derived from an electrical engineering perspective. This text is a gem!

[Raui]

Hey all,
First the SFTS video and now Eric's Versor posts, I swear everytime there's new material it feels like Christmas! Thank you Eric for kindly distributing your knowledge openly to the public! The synchronicity in the world is amazing, the night that I came home from my maths lecture which introduced me to conic sections I come home to find Eric's lecture talking about them again. Just thinking out loud here but since it's becoming apparent that the geometry underlying the equations of conic sections is that of equal and opposite cones is this a link to Walter Russell's work (or twin opposing cones as he says)?

I have compiled all the parts into one big flv file but it is pretty big (~1.18GB) I don't have hosting anymore though If there is 16 hours of footage floating around I will very lovingly view every second of them, at least 3 times to stay true to the spirit of Tesla.

Skaght,
Don't take my word for it but one thing you might want to look at is your extra coil. If you have a look at the coils in these two pictures you'll notice that the coils windings are spaced out but the majority of your coil is bunched up;
http://www.teslasociety.com/coil3.jpg
http://alchemy2012.com/xmages/tmt%201a.JPG
Like I said I might be off the mark as I have been unable to start my TMT project but I have been reading on and the properties of the extra coil are critical.

Raui

[skaght]

First Build

So I've built a replica of Tesla's three coil system from the Colorado Springs notes. I took a couple of liberties, the main one being the fact that the primary and secondary are square, since my kitchen table was approximately the right size. I'm not opposed to building a circular form, I just figured I'd try the table first since it's convenient.

It's a one turn primary, 26 turn secondary system (kitchen table was close to the right size, but not perfect), approximately matched copper mass. Primary is 'O' wire, secondary is 14 gauge stranded speaker wire. There's research showing that stranded wire does better with higher frequencies than solid core, so I used it to maximize skin effect. The extra coil has a free resonance right at 1 Mhz and used 18 gauge speaker wire. The extra coil form is built of plastic. You need to use thick dowels so they don't bend. I used 1" diameter ABS from ebay and 1/4 inch PVC sheets for the base and top. All of my wire is plastic coated, rather than magnet wire, so it's easy to uncoil and rewrap the system.

The design works with AC or DC input, however the spark still looks like normal electricity. My goal is to produce the strange spark that Eric describes as folding onto itself in counterspace, but so far my system seems fairly normal. My spark gaps are magnetically quenched. I'm wondering if they need to be improved to get it to work right...

[garrettm4]

Conic Sections and Related References

I found particularly helpful with the understanding, the “Conic Sections”:

Part 5:

13.20 [B]“The Archetypes of all our equations is all based on this form called the “Conic Sections”.

Sputins,

The book referenced by Mr. Dollard Physics and Mathematics in Electrical Communication by James Owen Perrine Ph. D., published 1958, is probably the best book I have ever read regarding conic sections, hyperbolic sine, cos, tan and exponential equations. If you can find this book I would highly recommend getting it for study and reference. (I picked up my secondhand copy from "betterworld books" on amazon. I don't know if its still in print, so you will probably have to look for a used copy like I did)

In the preface Mr. Perrine lists two books that inspired him to write his book, they are Calculus Made Easy by Silvanous Phillips Thompson and Exponentials Made Easy or the Story of Epsilon by M. E. J. Gheury de Bray. Both of which I have read and found to be great resources for study and reference material.

Two other books that might be of interest are Principles of Elliptic and Hyperbolic Analysis by Alexander MacFarlane and Aplication of Hyperbolic Functions to Electrical Engineering Problems by Arthur Edwin Kennelly.

As per Geometric_Algebra's request, here's another note worthy paper on the above subject, Application of Hyperbolic Analysis to The Discharge of a Condenser by Alexander MacFarlane (this contains the discussion of the article as well). Also here's one of the references used by Mr. MacFarlane in the afore mentioned paper, Transient Electric Currents by Prof. William Thomson.

The article Hysteresis of the Aether, written by Mr. Dollard sometime in 88-89 and published in the BSRF journal, has some relevancy to the question you were asking, which Dave has responded to (the angle of hysteresis). The abstract of the article is shown below:

Hysteresis of the Aether

Eric P. Dollard, “Wireless Engineer” ©

In the theoretical investigation of electric induction the propagating velocity of the transverse electro-magnetic (T.E.M.) component of induction is the only propagation constant considered. The propagation throughout space of the independent magnetic field of induction and the independent dielectric field of induction is not considered. In reality, however, these fields of induction start at the conductor and propagate from there throughout space at a definite velocity; that is, at any point in space the field of induction of magnetism or dielectricity at any moment in time corresponds not to the condition of induction at the conductor at that moment but that at a moment earlier by the time of propagation from the conductor to the point in space under consideration. Hence the given field of induction lags in time the more, the greater the distance from the conductor.

This lag in phase with respect to distance results in the cycle of energy return of the field of induction falling behind its point of phase opposition with the cycle of energy storage. This lag in phase gives rise to an energy component, that is an effective magnetic resistance or an effective dielectric conductance to the reactance or susceptance of the magnetic & dielectric fields respectively.

The phase angle of this lag in the cycle of energy return has been called the angle of hysteresis of the inductive medium and has become well known for ferrous materials. However, the application of this concept to the inductive medium known as the aether has received no attention except by Steinmetz. The purpose of this paper is the adaptation of Steinmetz' inductive propagation to the study of the hysteresis of the aether and a determination of the propagation velocity therefrom.


Garrett M

[lamare]

Is there a way to download a local copy of this video? It would be nice to scrub back and forth.

Yep, no problem. I'm using Firefox and the downloadhelper plugin:
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/fir...ownloadhelper/

Already have all the parts, but a torrent with the original would be very nice, because then you have it all in one vid and with the original quality.

[Web000x]

I found the SFTS video incredibly helpful in understanding what I've read thus far.

FTR, the part where Eric is explaining his notation, the slides are displaying pages from his book "Symblic Representation of the Generalized (in Time) Electric Wave" - one can follow right along.

Is there a way to download a local copy of this video? It would be nice to scrub back and forth.

pt

I'll see if I can put a torrent file together. Or if somebody has some ftp space available to the tune of about 2 GB, P.M. me and we can work something out.

Dave

[pault]

SFTS video

I found the SFTS video incredibly helpful in understanding what I've read thus far.

FTR, the part where Eric is explaining his notation, the slides are displaying pages from his book "Symblic Representation of the Generalized (in Time) Electric Wave" - one can follow right along.

Is there a way to download a local copy of this video? It would be nice to scrub back and forth.

pt

[Armagdn03]

In common language, those existing in the imaginary time frame of “Daylight Savings Time” are one over jOUT OF STEP with nature. This represents a 30 degree unit displacement on the face of the 12 hour clock. On a 24 hour cycle imaginary time is 15 degrees OUT OF STEP with the rotation of the Earth. In other words for those in imaginary time, this time is a place on Earth 15 degrees distant from the location of its natural occurrence. Your time is now in a place you are not. In A.C. Terms

(12) , percent
The Power Factor

(13) , percent
The Induction Factor

Hence

(14) unit percent
Where

(VI) A common man conception of the versor concept is not complete without a related N.F.G. Historically, the works of J.S. Bach suffered the same fate as the works of Nikola Tesla. Shortly after the death of J.S. Bach (1750) all his important work was thrown into the garbage, this regarded as obsolete junk. If it was not for Herr Forkel, who recovered Bach’s work from the garbage and wrote the first book about Bach, all memory of Bach, and his work, would have been lost forever. Today, it is seen by some, that as with N. Tesla, the works of J.S. Bach is inimitable and profound. But it is of no value to modern society. The music of today has degenerated into the gutter sounds of “Hump N’ Slap,” and “Eubonic Barking Savages”, then the Boom….Boom Boom…….. Accordingly it is seen that the so called Science has followed a parallel path. This is known as “Quantum Mechanics”, the science of delusions. This “Science” in reality is no more than one big “Khazarian Circle Jerk”. And finally? Art! What an absolute joke. To criticize it is like slaying the slain. Today one can obtain a grant from the “Sheisenburg Foundation” to express one’s “artistic talent” by smearing human fecal matter onto a large canvas. Upon calling it “God” it will be worth millions. This is society today, COMPLETELY DEGENERATE.

So verily we are lost souls, hence the importance of reconstructing what has been lost to us. And it is to be noted that even Bach and Tesla themselves are only steps on a path, or as said by Heaviside “There is no finality.” But who is going to support this effort, or who is even interested at all? Rest assured that no support will be provided by our Babylonian society. This endeavor is more like becoming a Christian in Ancient Rome, a dangerous undertaking. See the movie “Fahrenheit 451” for an excellent portrayal of what awaits.

73 DE N6KPH

I remember several years ago reading for the first time your lectures Mr. Dollard on the symbolic representation of waves, And thinking about the unit circle spinning through time (corkscrew was the image I saw). Your explanations given really throw the concept into realm of easily graspable and usable . I just wanted to extend my thanks.

[madhatter]

radiation resistance and the -j operator. by utilizing hyperbolic functions it can been seen that when aligning the fields it eliminates the resistance thru 'counter-space rotation' or plane shifting in Cartesian coordinates which is where we see the folding of space or time invariant function.

I've spent many yrs studying physics and thru so many theories and 'illusions' I've never seen such a simple (and yet highly complex) explanation of the nature of the universe.

Eric's analogy of the clock in the above posts is beautifully simple for those who may not be able to follow the complex algebra. esp since this gets into counter-space and that's more than just 'inverse' it's akin to bizzaro world inside out. take the simple rotation, in counter-space that rotation of the -j operator is shift in planes in x,y,z coordinates that would be best described like folding a sheet of paper to make two distant points touch yet simultaneously not be aware of the 'paper' folding. hurts the brain doesn't it?

There is so much more here, Erics posts and notes are great resource as they outline the structure of what needs to be covered and esp of how much still needs to be filled in to get to useable calculations for engineering applications. There is so much lab work needed to test and explore this to move forward, it may be in our best interest to work collectively and note down in journal form what we find and share that then those with more time and inclination can work on the math and those who'd rather work in lab can do so as well with help from the 'math' group for design and schematics.

For example, the crystal set is a prime example of a information rich effects. I personally have the set built but have not gotten the results I want, however it's not been without results as it as given me answers to questions on capacitance by noting the differences in my results to others. however lets say we have one build that is catalog'd and every parameter of the physical construction known. from that it can be altered and the changes noted and then using that it can direct the mathematics to derive the needed equations to refine and move forward.

right now the one thing I've seen is the surface area and capacitance equations, capacitance is frustrating itself as it's always an assumed infinite plane yet we know it's not. high frequency skin effect and resistance of the mass of the 'director' and the geometry all play a role, as seen it gets very complex. I've spent a couple hundred hrs already on just calculations and have now just started to notice a few things I'd like to explore, with some more research into hyperbolic trig I may have some equations that can be tested in the field. I'll share this freely with anyone willing to test on their crystal sets. ultimately I'd like to see if we can all build matching sets and see if we can network them together as Tesla intended.

[Web000x]

Sound quality of the video is ok, however there is a distinct echo with the recording, if anyone has any fancy audio editing software, could the audio be cleaned up at all? Neutralize the echo?


“If we move our plane of reference through this cone we have circles, we have ellipses and we have parabolas, which are all based on the same form. They just represent a different angular displacement”. The angle of the plane. Steinmentz called it ????? (I can’t discern the word).
[/B]

I spoke to George Gaboury yesterday, the head of the San Francisco Tesla Society, and he said that there is about 16 hours of footage of Eric that needs to be edited before it is released. I'm told by another friend of Eric's that there is a better quality version of this Dec. 9, 2007 presentation that is among those recordings. Hopefully by Eric giving George a call, he will expedite making those video's available since George said that the reason he hasn't gotten to those is because he and Eric fell out of communication and he has much going on at the S.F.T.S.

Steinmetz called it the "angle of hysteresis"

Dave

[Sputins]

Initial S.F.T.S. video comments:

The information contained within the S.F.T.S lecture is mind-blowing! It is also a wonderful compliment to the T-Rex Internet Transmissions posted thus far. The extrapolated ramifications are akin to the old “ant heap being stirred up with a stick”.

Sound quality of the video is ok, however there is a distinct echo with the recording, if anyone has any fancy audio editing software, could the audio be cleaned up at all? Neutralize the echo?

From initial viewing and listening from the you-tube segments, I found the following parts and quotes rather interesting (although there are many more):

Part 2:

4.49: The Arc changing in resistance, with respect to time.
(Reminds me of a "story" told about a Jacobs ladder arc being pulsed with a laser to open some sort of dimensional gateway - I have no details though).

9.00: Synchronous Parameter variation.

29:52: “This is what causes objects in space to move towards each other, actually pushed externally, it really is the most sensible view of how gravity operates. But it lead us to conclusions that are very unpopular, because by this type of theory all the planets and the sun have to be hollow, and people don’t like to talk about that”.


I found particularly helpful with the understanding, the “Conic Sections”:

Part 5:

13.20 “The Archetypes of all our equations is all based on this form called the “Conic Sections”.

“If we move our plane of reference through this cone we have circles, we have ellipses and we have parabolas, which are all based on the same form. They just represent a different angular displacement”. The angle of the plane. Steinmentz called it ????? (I can’t discern the word).

(On the conic sections): “The equations of the circle, which is the sine wave, the equations of the ellipse, which is like a dissipating sine wave or the parabola, which is kind of like a sluggish capacitor discharge into a coil. These are all direct physical producible situations for the geometry, these are all called Archetypes that we build our engineering math on, these very simple relationships”.

“If it was taught to you like this in school, you’d be a mathematical genius”

Then Eric gets into the Hyperbola, which is like a circle turned inside out, continuing on through to conjugate hyperbola and here begins the Steinmetz symbolic method. Part 5 onwards.

Part 8:

20:39 “Unfortunately I didn’t have time to get into the last part of this, it shows how I use this to receive waves out of another dimension, so to speak”


23.07: “That capacitance in series with the power line sets the time angle back, every time the wave is going through the capacitor station”. - What this does is then, it takes no time for the wave to go from Las Vegas to Los Angeles and the two generators can stay in synchronism but the what power company has done, is made the propagation velocity, through the Alexanderson and Tesla principals; infinite”.
“So there is no time delay in energy propagation, now this is a practical example utilized by the utility companies to bring the two spatially separated items into one unit dimension, in the dimension of time, by neutralizing space”.

“This is one way, this is how Tesla would transmit. He wouldn’t transmit by transmitting the energy (forcing), he worked on the principal that energy is brought into one, by a mutual relationship, where there is no velocity. In Counterspace it’s a counter-velocity, the further apart you are in Counterspace, the closer you are together”.

Further viewing required for better comment.
It seems the end of Part 8 ties in well with the most recent "And in the Beginning" transmission. I love it.

Thank you Mr Dollard.
(and support volunteers)!

[packetizer]

To "LOUD" and "Bill Jensen"

Bill Jensen,

It would be great to have you contribute to the discussion with what you have seen in your experiments, BUT I DON"T THINK PEOPLE ARE LOOKING FOR SOMETHING TO BUY FROM YOU.

The reason I am here is to COLLABORATE with like minded people and to BUILD THINGS FOR MY SELF, what you have demonstrated with your three posts is that you do not wish to do that, which is fine (isn't free agency a great thing to have).

I'm not trying to bash-on or beat-down anyone or their thoughts but, reasonably speaking this is a place for talking about Mr. Dollard's work and for the moment at least, the "Crystal Set Initiative" using telluric reception rather than Hertizan reception, to prove Tesla was right after all and maybe for a little fun as well. So in closing, I don't think we are here to bring up John Bedini or market what ever it is we would like to sell.

Garrett M

Hi Garrett, thank you for your post, and it is always helpful to get put back on point and track with threads here as it is just way too easy to "wander" I wanted to add that I also think we are here to support each other AND our experience, thoughts and research on such subjects with like minded people and there are some folks here that are also interested in reproducing alot of the experiments and results that are contemplated herein but which can sometimes lack the resources or subject matter expertise, experience, or know how & knowledge to build, deploy or engineer such setups so I personally find Bill's work to be invaluable in this regard, and Bill Jensen's 1 Watt kit, and new 500 watt kit are great ways to jump in if you don't have the ability to do so or the $$$ to afford a "Meylesque" setup of coils, and function generator, etc. Bill's 1 watt kit at a price point of $250-$300 will most definetely get this out to the larger community, schools, researchers and relevenat folks that will be able to reproduce the results of related Tesla's Magnifying Transmitter experiments at a fraction of the price of the Konstantin Meyl kit currently sold for thousands of dollars. For those that are unaware, the Meyl hardware/kit setup attempts to reproduce the Tesla Magnifying Transmitter setup and associated experiments by replacing Tesla's High Tension, hugely prohibitive power requirements with a low tension power system at 1 - 10 Watts and replacing the Tesla steered spark gaps with a simple function generator. Bill Jensen's system further lowers the price of admission while also providing GREAT follow on support while keeping everyone in the loop on his progress, updates and further experiments or additions of knowledge and experience.

As well, Bill is very humble from my personal experience in working with him and he has not so far mentioned in the few posts that have been listed here to date, about any of his pioneering work in faithfully and uniquely having reproduced the late Hieronymus Radionic, & Anapathic machines working directly with the Hieronymus estate and having personally preserved a large archive of very valuable and lost or generally unavailable information on same for posterity nor any of his current ground breaking work on Hieronymus termed "Eloptic Energy" and Bill's further experiments and confirmation of same which Bill is currently tying into related Scalar and Longitudinal Wave theory with amazing and sometimes surprising results so I think Bill has alot that he can potentially offer here and as such I'd hate to see him get discouraged so I wanted to present an alternative view for those who do not know him as our personal support is crucial sometimes to good researchers continuing to persevere on doing really good and beneficial work in the midst of financial frustrations and facing the reality of paying your bills. Lastly on my point about helping each other, as you know, it's hard enough to ask for help sometimes (especially individuals who have difficulty with it ) but conversely (and unfortunately in this particular case, ironically) Bill has spent so much time being good natured and generous in not worrying about the commercial implications of his generous support and investment of time with other researchers and big time supports that he gives away freely to further such research to his personal detriment so in his asking for support and assistance while mentioning (ok, even pitching) his machines that are for sale which may also be a great way for folks to jump in and reproduce experiments and results that are contemplated here for those who lack the ability to do so, I personally find to be extremely valuable so it's easy to nudge and remind folks to stay on topic and we can probably overlook a pitch here and there especially if those same folks actually deserve support or have great potential to contribute amazing info and experience as is the case with Bill Jensen.

I would like to encourage everyone to take a look at Bill Jensen's 1 watt system if you are too shy to speak up about being unable to reproduce the necessary hardware setups or technology know how here as this is a good and inexpensive entry level setup which provides great value for the price and comes with great follow on support and further sharing of experience and new results from someone who can also provide some very good info and resources in the Radionic Machine and Eloptic Energy areas.

For tranparency to everyone, I'm a customer who has purchased the Hieronymus Radionic machine from Mr. Jensen which IMHO is one of the most faithful reproductions available on the market today and which is also extremely powerful which has personally generated some amazing results for me which would prob. also generate alot of skeptics here given the very unique nature of experiments I have been able to perform with this Radionic machine. I am also, full disclosure, currently contemplating a purchase of the Pancake Coils and 1 Watt aforementioned system from Mr. Jensen as I was considering the Meyl setup and kit but it's way out of my price range currently so I'm also the use case I previosuly described above.

OK, I'll shutup now

regards,

[jake]

How to adjust M, L, K, C

I believe the secondary is made up of maximal inter-turn MUTUAL-capacity K not self-capacity C, hence why you get two resonant frequencies, LC and MK, when doing a frequency sweep of the coil. With special reference to Borderland Science - Transverse & Longitudinal Electric Waves [1988] (Specifically, about 7 minuets into the video)

I might be wrong but, you could look at the secondary coil's individual loops as isolated metallic rings in which there is a mutual capacity K between all of them where the lines of dielectric induction are cut buy the individual "rings"(essentially a giant "elastor") frequency is in "per radians" as opposed to radians, next all the winding can be looked at as a single wire and their lines of dielectric induction interacting with the "ground" as a capacitance C, frequency in radians.

Its EASY to CONFUSE the two because you can look at an elastor as a capacitor when viewed from coil end-to-end. The understanding of self-induction and mutual-induction is the guiding light that clears this up.

Now there is the self-inductance L which is distributed along the coil's length, seen as a single long wire, next there is a mutual-inductance M between the individual windings, seen as a group of separate shorter windings. The magnetic induction of the self-inductance, L, is 90 degrees spatially out of phase of the magnetic induction of mutual-inductance, M. The LOOPS of magnetic induction for L are only along the wire's surface the LINES of magnetic induction M cut, or terminate on, each separate loop, the frequency of L is in radians whereas M is in "per radians". That takes winding a "coil" to the "next level", quite interesting if you ask me.

M & K are aligned in the same axis of propagation, both cut, or terminate on, separate "repetitive metallic structures" of the coil (other loops), L & C are 90 degrees spatially out of phase with M & K, and being in the form of self-induction as opposed to mutual induction the whole length of the wire is considered in their calculation as opposed to the individual structures of the coil. Quite complex if you ask me.

A helpful reference to the above description is:
E. P. Dollard - Condensed Intro to Tesla Transformers [1986] (With specific reference to "Analysis", Figures 6, 7 & 9 and pages 16-31)

Now we come to the quadra-polar view of "Voltage and Current" e & I and E & i. Note that Voltage is not the dielectric and current is not the magnetic. EACH TAKE BOTH FORM. The geometry of the space surrounding the ENERGY of DIELECTRIC or MAGNETIC determines whether they are seen as Volts or Amps. Confusing I know, possibly enlightening when fully digested.

Some more "food for thought" is looking at things as SERIES or PARALLEL (shunt) ENTITIES. Example; resistance, r, series element, inductance, L, series element, elastance, K, series element, conductance, g, parallel element, capacity, C, parallel element, enductance, M, parallel element. While you can "convert" a parallel element into a series element, such as an elastance into a capacitance, (by using its reciprocal) it doesn't change how the lines of induction are propagated in the element so the conversions are "mental gymnastics" that confuse the mind into thinking they are equivalent. Numerically they are equivalent, Spatially, in terms of axis of propagation, they are not equivalent.

In conclusion, an MK wave is different from an LC wave and theoretically you can have MC & LK waves as well. This probably predicts why you can have Transverse-Magnetic TM waves (with Longitudinal-Dielectric LD wave byproduct), Transverse-Electric TE waves (with Longitudinal-Magneto LM wave byproduct) and pure Transverse-Electro-Magnetic TEM waves. As for pure Longitudinal-Magneto-Dielectric LMD propagation, pure MK, little is known and even less is openly available on this subject, aside from Mr. Dollards work.

Hope this wasn't off the mark (I'm just a High School dropout so don't take my word for it), hopefully Mr. Dollard will point out any errors in my understanding (or misunderstanding).

Garrett M

Now that people are starting to complete and play with their TRTs I'm looking for opinions on how to tune or how to know where to tune.

Here are a few of my ???

On a 20 secondary with spaced windings does approaching the coil with your hand increase its mutual capacity K, or its self capacity C??? but before you answer think what would happen if you had a long straight wire and could measure it's C. What would happen to the meter if you approached the wire?

I also have the same ?? Bouncing around in my head about L, and M.

Now also seems like a good time to talk about the function of each part?

[t-rex]

And in The Beginning, Versors (3 of 3)

In common language, those existing in the imaginary time frame of “Daylight Savings Time” are one over jOUT OF STEP with nature. This represents a 30 degree unit displacement on the face of the 12 hour clock. On a 24 hour cycle imaginary time is 15 degrees OUT OF STEP with the rotation of the Earth. In other words for those in imaginary time, this time is a place on Earth 15 degrees distant from the location of its natural occurrence. Your time is now in a place you are not. In A.C. Terms

(12) , percent
The Power Factor

(13) , percent
The Induction Factor

Hence

(14) unit percent
Where

(VI) A common man conception of the versor concept is not complete without a related N.F.G. Historically, the works of J.S. Bach suffered the same fate as the works of Nikola Tesla. Shortly after the death of J.S. Bach (1750) all his important work was thrown into the garbage, this regarded as obsolete junk. If it was not for Herr Forkel, who recovered Bach’s work from the garbage and wrote the first book about Bach, all memory of Bach, and his work, would have been lost forever. Today, it is seen by some, that as with N. Tesla, the works of J.S. Bach is inimitable and profound. But it is of no value to modern society. The music of today has degenerated into the gutter sounds of “Hump N’ Slap,” and “Eubonic Barking Savages”, then the Boom….Boom Boom…….. Accordingly it is seen that the so called Science has followed a parallel path. This is known as “Quantum Mechanics”, the science of delusions. This “Science” in reality is no more than one big “Khazarian Circle Jerk”. And finally? Art! What an absolute joke. To criticize it is like slaying the slain. Today one can obtain a grant from the “Sheisenburg Foundation” to express one’s “artistic talent” by smearing human fecal matter onto a large canvas. Upon calling it “God” it will be worth millions. This is society today, COMPLETELY DEGENERATE.

So verily we are lost souls, hence the importance of reconstructing what has been lost to us. And it is to be noted that even Bach and Tesla themselves are only steps on a path, or as said by Heaviside “There is no finality.” But who is going to support this effort, or who is even interested at all? Rest assured that no support will be provided by our Babylonian society. This endeavor is more like becoming a Christian in Ancient Rome, a dangerous undertaking. See the movie “Fahrenheit 451” for an excellent portrayal of what awaits.

73 DE N6KPH

[t-rex]

And in The Beginning, Versors (2 of 3)

During the era following the church modes, the versor expressions of time became increasingly developed. This led to the “Age of Clocks”. Time versor operators became important parts of the music structure. The CANON is the most basic versor relation and it led to the more developed FUGE. Time versor algebra reached its greatest heights in the works of J.S. Bach, 1685 – 1750. In many ways Bach’s work is analogous to that of Steinmetz, and moreover J.S. Bach can verily be regarded the Tesla of the music world. Here is where to begin the understanding of versor algebra. A simple music keyboard, and a set of church modes is all that is required. Listening to the music of J.S. Bach replaces the reading of the equations of C.P. Steinmetz. In many ways the two are the same. As a musical reference is “Switched on Bach” performed by Carlos, in particular Bach’s “Brandenburg Concerto Number Three”.

(IV) As for the “Age of Clocks”, the versor positions of the clock face provide a most fundamental and intrinsically basic system for the study of the use of versor operators. The versor operators of music on the other hand provide a most complex but intrinsically heuristic system for the study of the theory of versor operators. For the engineer the clock represents a most important primordial advancement in the conception of versor algebra. It should be noted that the clock, the music keyboard, and the calendar, all serve as analog computers for the expression of versor position in time and/or space. The Grand Pipe Organs of Europe, some with more than 10,000 pipes, stand as the greatest analog computing systems ever to be created. Here engineering rose to heights incapable of being reached today.

The clock as an analog computer is a link to the cycles of the Earth, Moon, and Sun, in a manner of resembling that of the American Aboriginals. In the era of the clock, these analog versor systems developed into advanced analogs of the entire solar system, superclocks. These superclocks came to be known as “Planetariums”. In its fundamental expression the common clock involves the most basic cyclic functions. In its simplicity the divisions are equidistant and the hands remain unit length during progress thru the cycle. And importantly, it is divisible into four quadrants. Hence our rudimentary examination of versor operators begins with the ordinary clock face.

The basic versor operator for the clock, in hours, is given by the expression

unit

And thereby,

(4) unit

Is the versor operator. This is to say there are 12 hours, or unit divisions, of one complete rotation on the face of the clock. All other degrees of rotation are fractional. Hence the unit division of one hour is represented by the symbol, k. This is the fundamental versor operator of the clock. The expression,

(5) unit

Is called “Noon”, fig (1). Hence for this versor operator, k, it is

,



,



,



(V) Let the versor operator

(6) unit

Be called Standard Time, fig (2).

Let the versor operator

(7) unit

Be called Daylight Time, Fig (3)

Hereby there exists two distinct time frames, let us say Pacific Standard Time, P.S.T. and Pacific Daylight Time, P.D.T. These two time frames now co-exist in the same space. In symbolic form let Standard Time be real, or h time, and let Daylight Time be imaginary, or j time. This is now in accord with A.C. theory, but with a twelfth root rather than a square root. The two versor operators, h and j, are called co-axial versors. This is to say, the h hand, and the j hand are on the same axis, fig (4). Here Daylight Time is a unit DISPLACEMENT on the face of the clock. Depending upon the time frame chosen there now exists the complication of two noons, fig 4a & 4b, but only one noon can be real. Noon by definition is that position in time when the Sun is at its highest position in the sky. This position is evidenced by the condition of a shadow being in its shortest length upon the Earth. This is the reference versor, or top dead center. In the imaginary time frame (P.D.T.) noon in that frame is one unit versor leading, or conversely real noon is one unit versor lagging. This can be expressed as,

(8) unit

Or simply

(9) unit

Where,

(10)
a, real noon
b, imaginary noon

This is entirely analogous to A.C. theory. Hereby versor theory is now extended beyond its application by Steinmetz, and the versor operator j remains a transform between the real and imaginary co-ordinate systems. The time in the imaginary (P.D.T.) system must be multiplied by the versor operator j in order to transform to the real positions of noon and midnight. This in a way vindicates Steinmetz’s assertion that the most general algebraic number can always be expressed by

(11) unit,

But this can only be true for the dimension of time.