Peter, whatever happened with Eric P. Dollard?

[vrand]

link to video?

/edit - is that the one Lindeman built?

Here is the 1987 Santa Barbara Borderlands, 2 hrs long video:

Free Energy Research with Eric Dollard, Peter Lindemann and Thomas Brown on Vimeo



The 15 min. AC Faraday disk design starts at 45 min. into the video. That was a Worlds first AC Faraday disk design. Maybe with modern NIB magnets, the AC voltage output would be higher than the estimated 0.5 volts?

Peter Lindemann wrote a little about that AC Faraday Disk on this thread:

http://www.energeticforum.com/renewa...html#post88061


Cheers Mike

[Pinwheel]

I have a D.C. transmission line, the conductors are 2 inches in
diameter, spacing is 18 feet. How many ounces of force are developed
upon a 600 foot span of this line, for the following;
1. 1000 ampere line current.
2. For 1000 KV line potential?
I am waiting.

This must mean forces between the conductors(?) and not F = Work/Distance(?)

[LtBolo]

So it sounds to me like Mr. Dollard likes poking the hornets nest. Great fun. I don't hear any actionable intel here though.

I guess I qualify as one the idiots Eric. I'm not terribly smart and most of the math goes over my head. However I am quite gifted at taking real technology and producing real products that solve real problems. Been doing that for about 20 years now and have built a very nice life for myself and my employees. When your theories have been distilled to actionable technologies, I'd love to have the discussion on how that can become a benefit to humankind and a poke in the eye to the establishment.

In the meantime, I wish you all great success in the lab. Back to lurking.

[Pinwheel]

No one yet on how many Plancks constitute a Watt-second-second. Where is
an understandable quantity of this dimensional relation? Look at laser
light on white surface, notice all the tiny little Plancks? Well?

How many Plancks are in a Watt-second-second?

Well, a Planck per second is a joule. And a watt second is a joule...

Let me remind everybody that I would probably (likely) fail a high school math course if I were to take one... (not joking)

so... I'm left with 1 per second. Q/sec.

No?

I didn't do the laser part.

[Pinwheel]

link to video?

/edit - is that the one Lindeman built?

[vrand]

Hi Eric

Can you please suggest a simple experiment/device where we can build a free energy device to power our homes and cars? Around 10 kw power output?

Cheers Mike

Here is Eric's reply on his Yahoo egroup n6kph forum:
n6kph : N6KPH

Thank you Eric

Cheers Mike




>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

From: Eric Dollard
Sent: Friday, September 30, 2011 1:55 PM
To: n6kph@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [n6kph] Response to the forum


Santa Barbara Rotary Parametric Transformer, tested gave transformation
ratio, power it to power out, of 108% +or- 5% error of measurement. It
works, see video.

No one yet on how many Plancks constitute a Watt-second-second. Where is
an understandable quantity of this dimensional relation? Look at laser
light on white surface, notice all the tiny little Plancks? Well?

I have a D.C. transmission line, the conductors are 2 inches in
diameter, spacing is 18 feet. How many ounces of force are developed
upon a 600 foot span of this line, for the following;
1. 1000 ampere line current.
2. For 1000 KV line potential?
I am waiting.

Whoever answers these two basic questions will then possess knowledge
for discussion of energy related apparatus. The law of energy perpetuity
was invalidated at Santa Barbara. Free yourself from bondage.

There is an interposed relation between energy in and energy out, an
angle of hysteresis. Find a switchboard power factor meter and its
related wattmeter. Study them and make large models of them for study.
Read Steinmetz’s “Theory and Calculation of A.C.” book, chapter on
“Power and Double Frequency Quantities.” (cross product – “conjugate
product”, dot product, and also scalar product) Here math useful for
Phi, Psi to Planck unions.

Forget about f*ck*ng electrons. J.J. Thompson says that a hydrogen atom
has 1000 electrons, we say 1 electron, what do you know about them,
nothing. Go read and learn before parroting. Find Sir William Crookes’ work.

In general, whatever fragmentation is produced in forum is just fine.
I’m just “instigating the ants” to watch them swarm. N.F.G. frequency
will be in proportion to idiot factor. Some just can’t help being
idiots. Those who make equations and machines relevant to energy
synthesis more than make up for all the repetitive idiots. I’ll take
care of them with N.F.G. fun.

My interest in Russian paper is the equations, not the machines. It is
the compound differential forms. Use a damn Alexanderson Mag-amp, not
mechanical rotors, etc. Use harmonics of line frequency on the control
winding. Use a car alternator or other machine to generate them, not
solid state. Tune the control winding with a series condenser (watch for
high voltage)

As for oscillating solenoidal winding, read these;
1. Theory of Wireless Power - E.P. Dollard
2. Abnormal Voltages in Transformers, A.I.E.E. Proceedings or
Transactions – Boyajin and Bloom.

No velocity of light when coil oscillates. How many times must I repeat,
NO VELOCITY OF LIGHT. Read Tesla Colorado book, do the math on the
“extra coil.” Find that it is 1.8 times light. Read! Yes, harmonic
oscillations in coil windings generate parametric dielectric energy
storage co-efficients. Farads per second. Good path to follow.

See also, on aether, Gustav Le-Bon’s books, may be important. Also find
the Mendelev pre-hydrogen series periodic table. Report your findings on
the forum.

So get cranking…
Eric

[vrand]

Dimensional Relations of Volts and Amperes in Time and Space


In conclusion, the force exists in a counter-spatial gradient, where as the potential, or M.M.E., exist in a spatial distance. The potential e is the integral of the force d, and the M.M.E. i is the integral of the force M. Read the introductory chapters of Heaviside’s “E.M. Theory, volume one.”

73 DE N6KPH

Hi Eric

Can you please suggest a simple experiment/device where we can build a free energy device to power our homes and cars? Around 10 kw power output?

Cheers Mike

[t-rex]

Dimensional Relations of Volts and Amperes in Time and Space

Dimensional Relations of Volts and Amperes in Time and Space

We have heretofore firmly established a concept of the two fundamental laws of induction, Faraday’s law of electro-magnetic induction and Maxwell’s law of magneto-dielectric induction. 
Electro-motive force E is a magnetic reactance to a change in the net quantity of magnetic induction, displacement current I is a dielectric suceptance to a change in the net quantity of dielectric induction. E in Volts and I in Amperes are the result of inductive variation with respect to TIME.

However, also in the same units of volts and amperes exist the electrostatic potential, e in Volts, and the magneto-motive force (M.M.F.), i in Amperes. This situation does not recommend itself.

The E.M.F. E and the M.M.F. i have a conjugate relation thru the metallic structure of the electric system. The displacement I and the electro-static potential e have a conjugate relation within the dielectric structure of the electric system. E and i in the metal, e and I in the insulator. This suggests the electric activity E times i and another activity e times I, both in Watts. Conversely, electrical activities of E times I, as well as e times i suggest themselves. Hence we have arrived at a four polar form of electrical activity. Four distinct wattages. These represent the four terms of the “Telegraph Equation” of Oliver Heaviside in their primordial form.

The reactance E.M.F., E, via the dimension of time, T’, gives rise to an electro-static potential, e, across the dimension of space, l. In conjugate form the suceptance displacement, I, via the dimension of time, T”, gives rise to a M.M.E., i, across the dimension of space, l. It may be said that E & I are the cause, where e & i are the effect, chicken or egg.

The metallic-dielectric geometric structure bounding the electric field of induction engenders the mechanical forces developed by this bounded field. Where E and I are strictly electric forces, e and i give rise to mechanical forces upon physical matter thru the dimension of SPACE. i and e are the seat of magnetic forces pushing the metallic and of dielectric force pulling the metallic. i is a pushing force, e is a pulling force.

How does the dimension of space enter into e and i, both spawned of the dimension of time? From time to space, but Volts and Amperes in both. This is a problem yet to be solved, a dimensional complication. e and i are not complete but are misrepresentations. They are figments of time. Forces due to e an i are more properly expressed as the dielectric gradient, Volts per centimeter and the magnetic gradient, Amperes per centimeter. e over l gives d the dielectric, and i over l gives m, the magnetic. d is the dielectric force, m is the magnetic force, of the dielectric field Psi in Coulombs and the magnetic field of Phi in Webers respectively.

Hence we have arrived at a pair of new dimensional relations:

1 Delectric force, d
Volts, e, per c.m., l.
Or Weber per centimeter – second.

2 Magnetic force, m
Amperes, i, per c.m., l.
Or
Coulombs per centimeter – second.

The dimension of time and its relation to space is evidenced by these dimensional expressions. Here a condition exists where dielectric force is derived magnetically, and magnetic induction is derived dielectrically, both thru the dimension of time. However, we are not interested in time here, we are interested in only space. It seems like we are stuck in a loop.

The way out is to utilize the new pair of dimensional relations, that is
d the dielectric gradient
and
m the magnetic gradient
as primary dimensional relationships.

Effort will be made along the way to express these relations in an alternate expression, thru the concept of inductance and capacitance.

If this pair, d and m, both with no one’s name, or real definition, are taken as primary dimensional relations then the electro-static potential e is derived as a secondary relation to d. Likewise the M.M.E. i is derived as a secondary relation to m. It is then
e equals the product of d and c.m.
Volt – centimeter per centimeter
And
i equals the product of m and c.m.
Ampere – centimeter per centimeter
These dimensional relations give rise to centimeter per centimeter. What can we make of this, a space scalar. This dimensional condition represents a SPACE INTEGRAL. Integration, as it is known, is derived from the Newton – Liebnitz concepts and represents the inverse of differentiation. This application to c.m. per c.m. is called the line integral of d or m. Integration is best avoided.

What we are doing is this; the electric forces dimensionally are in PER C.M., that is, in a counter-spatial form. In the integration, the product of the counterspace span in per c.m. is multiplied by spatial distance of the span. Per c.m. time c.m. the product of counterspace and space results in a dimensional cancellation, or numeric. This is called a SPACE SCALAR condition. It is dimensionless but posesses an “angle.”

In conclusion, the force exists in a counter-spatial gradient, where as the potential, or M.M.E., exist in a spatial distance. The potential e is the integral of the force d, and the M.M.E. i is the integral of the force M. Read the introductory chapters of Heaviside’s “E.M. Theory, volume one.”

73 DE N6KPH

[lamare]

Hi all,

I managed to disprove Einstein's relativity theory once and for all:
Tuks DrippingPedia : Ruins 96 Years Einstein Relativity

Last week the newspapers were filled with the discovery of "impossible" particles traveling faster than the speed of light. A month ago an "impossible" star was discovered and earlier the Pioneer space probes also refused to adhere to the law. This way, the scientific establishment will slowly but surely be forced to return to reality, the reality of the existence of a real, physical ether with fluid-like properties. The inevitable result of that will be that Einstein's relativity theory will go down in the history books as one of the biggest fallacies ever brought forth by science. In the future they will look back to relativity with equal disbelief as to the "Earth is flat" concept. The relativity theory not only goes against common sense, as Tesla already said in 1932, a fundamental thinking error has been made by Maxwell in his equations. This eventually lead to the erroneous relativity theory, as is proven in this article. It is therefore no exaggeration to state that the scientific establishment is going to have a religious experience.

This article has been published in Dutch on a few websites and an interview with me was published in a regional newspaper read by about 300.000 people about this.

Of course I referred to Eric's work in the article and I refer to this forum as "peer review"

Hopefully, the next stop will be the Keiser Report on RT:
Twitter

Keeping my fingers crossed...

Update: Now also posted on BeforeItsNews:
Before It's News - Electrical Engineer disproves Einsteins Relativity Theory

Please don't hesitate to comment there and may be return a couple of times (or use the F5 button) to increase popularity

[LtBolo]

@Pinwheel

It was our own design, based strictly on finding the most convenient method to alter inductance synchronously.

The first major revelation was that it took a *decrease* in inductance to cause an *increase* in current. Many had stated that it was an *increase* of inductance for an *increase* in current. Of course for a given amount of energy, that is exactly what you would expect...current must go up if inductance goes down. Obviously there must be some gain there, or the system would not ramp up to high power levels.

The second major revelation was that mechanically reducing inductance takes work, and work isn't your friend. From what we could tell, we were heading toward unity at best.

I had actually dug through the Russian document at the time and had already concluded that their motor was loading like ours. They were not using a ferrous core, so my guess is the parameter change mechanism is a magnetic field in the rotor created by eddy currents. Aluminum simply wouldn't provide enough of a permeability change to alter the inductance much. The aluminum would be very happy to oppose the magnetic field in the inductors via it's own field though. I don't have proof of that, but their statement that they were unable to go to higher current due to the motor limitation was a big clue. Magnetic damping gets bad fast.

It's clear that synchronous parameter change can be used to produce energy, and it may even be possible to do it without an offsetting bit of mechanical work...however...I suspect that it will require parameter change in some kind of light speed scenario. Meaning that the real answer to power synthesis is not directly in parameter change, but is in some kind of quadrant manipulation that shifts the action/reaction to 90 or 0 degrees instead of 180.

Resonant solenoids are standing wave devices where the operating frequency is inherently related to speed of light (if correctly tuned), whereas LC resonances are not necessarily so. As such, I suspect that the answer will not be found in the simple LC, but in the coil. I feel that the C implicit in the coil is not symmetrical, and that the asymmetry manifests increasingly as the standing wave amplitude increases. That may provide the parameter change in a quadrant friendly way, and if that is true, the coil may exhibit gain by parameter change without any external intervention other than normal excitation. Since the coil would be gaining energy during a portion of the cycle, and giving it back during the other, it would have to be externally harnessed and would not have the potential for internal runaway. A dual coil arrangement would offer the possibility of a runaway, if it could be phased correctly.

It is my hope that EPD is moving in the direction of eventually reducing the theory to 'when A, B, and C are true, reaction-less energy production D occurs'. My gut tells me the math will bear that out, but applications are our focus here, not theory.

[Pinwheel]

@LtBolo

Your variable induction parameter machine - was it your own build or was it an attempted replication of what is in the Russian paper? I thought I saw that you were building it before we had the English translation.

[Pinwheel]

At this point the Einsteiner would say that you traveled from earth to mars in “another dimension.” Then, after a big blast off the bong, now it’s a wormhole!

The Big Bong Theory!

[t-rex]

Dimensional Meanings

Dimensional Meanings

So far we have strongly emphasized dimensions and dimensional relations. Dimensional representation is the most direct method of analysis and synthesis with regard to the electric phenomena.. Electrical engineering has four primary dimensions;
Metrical,
(1) time, t, second
(2) space, l, centimeter
Substantial,
(3) magnetism, Phi, Weber
(4) dielectricity, Psi, Coulomb
There are no other electrical dimensions, that is it! The electric-dimensional RELATIONS are derived from these primary dimensions, but the relations are not new dimensions. There are no others than “the four.”

Consider a certain hypothetical transmission system, the Integratron system of George Van Tassle. (not the Goddess temple “Integratron” of today) The Integratron effects transmission around space. Let us say one is on earth and another is on mars. If you enter the “in door” on the earth unit, you exit the “out door” on the mars unit.

In performing this operation you did NOT travel from earth to mars thru any intervening dimensional relation of space. No velocity or space per time, was effected. However time has not been altered so it may be said that the dimension of space has been cancelled out. Space was the transmission obstacle and the electro-geometrical structure of the Integratron neutralized the dimension of space. This is called a SPACE SCALAR, no variation in space.

At this point the Einsteiner would say that you traveled from earth to mars in “another dimension.” Then, after a big blast off the bong, now it’s a wormhole!

Another example, long distance D.C. power transmission. Long distance power transmission utilizing alternating current suffers from the effects of electro-motive force, E and the displacement current I both time derivatives. The compounding of E & I over long distances results in serious transmission impairments. The dimension of time is eliminated. Thus the dimensional relations involving time such as E and I disappear, but not into “another dimension”, there is none.

D.C. has zero frequency hence it has no relation to time. It is eternal, invariable, constant. Direct current is a TIME SCALAR, no variation in time. The Quantum Car Mechanics and the Soviet Scalar Xenophobes, each in their self edification, have twisted this basic dimensional reality of the engineer into a distorted labyrinth of utter confusion. Wormholes, scalar waves, and etc. represent an oral/anal equivalency. Such concepts confuse, not clarify, engineering concepts. Yet the parrots lap it up eagerly, it has such a sweet taste. So does anti-freeze.

73 DE N6KPH

[LtBolo]

Transmission received. Previous post has been removed for inciting violence ...
Please don't equate a lack of response to a lack of interest. Lamare, myself and I'm sure others have been diligently compiling what we can of your work, Lamare especially has done a lot in this area. This is his internet archive of your work if your in need of any copies for whatever reason

Directory contents of /pdf/Eric_Dollard_Document_Collection/

I definitely agree we're straying way off topic. People looking for a convenient filter can simply look for the T-Rex posts specifically, but perhaps we can contain the intervening discussion to Eric's theories specifically ... Also, the above document collection is a good place to start if anyone wants to get up to speed and save Eric some typing ...

Looking forward to the next T-Rex transmission

I'm not sure if EPD's comments were directed at my post or not, nor am I sure if yours is. I will say that my comments were offered in complete sincerity, and unlike much of what has been posted here, is based on much lab time and even more thought time.

Unlike many that post here, I have actually built a functional inductive parametric generator, and was able to power a load with it. The Mandelstam paper has been cited by several as proof that such a generator will 'synthesize' energy. That was not our experience, as the energy manifested was clearly offset by an increase in load on the drive motor. I think that was also borne out in the paper itself though, when on page 25 of the English translation of the paper, the author suggests that they were not able to increase the current output above 5A due in part to the drive motor capacity. That tells me that they too saw the motor load increasing with the output.

While that doesn't invalidate any of EPD's theories, it does suggest that the problem of 'synthesizing' power isn't simply related to synchronous parameter change alone. While parameter change may be capable of solving this, there is clearly more to the problem. If EPD has solved the full problem, I haven't yet seen the presentation that quantifies that. It is my hope that his recent postings are moving in that direction.

In my prior posting, I attempted to build a case, albeit clumsily perhaps, for a resonant solenoid to reach a point where the coil's internal capacity reaches what is effectively a saturation point, and in doing so will result in what amounts to a synchronously varying capacitance. I hardly consider that to be off-topic, as if true, would support the notion that the Magnifying Transmitter truly was 'magnifying' and its gain came from a capacitive parameter variation.

If any here would like to have that discussion, I would certainly love to as well. If you consider that a disruption, I will keep it to myself.

[MJL]

Information Overload

Transmission received. Previous post has been removed for inciting violence ...
Please don't equate a lack of response to a lack of interest. Lamare, myself and I'm sure others have been diligently compiling what we can of your work, Lamare especially has done a lot in this area. This is his internet archive of your work if your in need of any copies for whatever reason

Directory contents of /pdf/Eric_Dollard_Document_Collection/

I definitely agree we're straying way off topic. People looking for a convenient filter can simply look for the T-Rex posts specifically, but perhaps we can contain the intervening discussion to Eric's theories specifically ... Also, the above document collection is a good place to start if anyone wants to get up to speed and save Eric some typing ...

Looking forward to the next T-Rex transmission