Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Peter, whatever happened with Eric P. Dollard?

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
This is a sticky topic.
X
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Raui
    replied
    @Sucahyo:
    No problem mate

    Has anyone been able to find a translated version of the russian paper or translated it themselves? I found on JL Naudins website most of the first page;

    As we have shown earlier, starting from energy considerations it is
    easy to account for the physical aspects of the excitation of oscillations
    by periodic (stepwise) variation of the capacitance of an oscillatory
    system not containing any explicit sources of magnetic or electric fields.
    We shall briefly repeat this argument for the case of variation of
    self-inductance. Suppose that a current i is flowing in an oscillatory
    system consisting of a capacitance C, ohmic resistance R, and self
    inductance L, at some instant of time which we shall take as the starting
    instant. At this moment we change L by dL, which is equivalent to
    increasing the energy by 1/2 dLi^2. The system is now left to itself.
    After a time equal to 1/4 of the period of the tuned frequency of the
    system, all of the energy transforms from magnetic to electrostatic. At
    this moment, when the current falls to zero, we return the self-induction
    to its original value, which can evidently be done without expending work,
    and again we leave the system alone. After the next 1/4 period of
    resonance oscillations the electrostatic energy transforms fully into
    magnetic energy and we can begin a new cycle of variation of L. If the
    energy put in at the beginning of the cycle exceeds that lost during the
    cycle, i.e., if

    1/2 dLi^2 > 1/2Ri^2 (T/2)

    or

    dL/L > e

    where e is the logarithmic decrement of the natural oscillations of the
    system, then the current will be larger at the end of each cycle than at
    the beginning.
    Thus, repeating these cycles, i.e. changing L with a
    frequency twice the mean resonance frequency of the system in such a way
    that

    dL/L > e

    we can excite oscillations in the system without any EMF acting on it, no
    matter how small the initial charge.
    Even in the absence of the
    practically always present random inductions (due to power transmission
    lines, terrestrial magnetic fields, atmospheric charges) we can in
    principle always find "random charges" in the circuit on account of
    statistical fluctuations.
    Apparently Lawrence Livermore Laboratories got it translated circa. 1968. I have emailed them regarding this to see if I can get this paper but they haven't replied yet. I'll keep you all posted. Here's the source: PARAMETRIC POWER CONVERSION

    Raui
    Last edited by Raui; 04-04-2010, 06:00 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • sucahyo
    replied
    Wow, thanks for the references .

    Leave a comment:


  • Raui
    replied
    Hey guys, I've complied a list of texts by authors Eric has recommended in the past/in this thread. I've stuck to english ones and a lot of the papers might not be of any use but at the same time some will be.
    Charles P. Steinmetz (Mathematician/Electrical Engineer)
    Electric Discharges, Waves, and Impulses
    Theory and Calculation of Alternating Current Phenomena
    - REACTION MACHINES
    Theory and Calculation of Transient Electrical Phenomena and Oscillations

    Oliver Heaviside(Electrical Engineer)
    Electromagnetic Theory 01
    Electromagnetic Theory 02
    Electromagnetic Theory 03

    Michael Faraday (Electrical Engineer/Physicist)
    Experimental Researches Into Electricity
    On The Various Forces Of Nature And Their Relations To Each Other

    Arthur E. Kennelly (Electrical Engineer)
    The Application Of Hyperbolic Functions To Electrical Engineering Problems
    Electricity Made Easy
    Electrodynamic Machinery for Continuous Currents
    Tables of Complex Hyperbolic and Circular Functions
    The Electric Telephone
    Alternating Electric Currents
    Theoretical Elements of Electrodynamic Machinery
    Electricity in electro-therapeutics
    Magnetism
    Two other important texts are: Vector Power in A.C. Circuits and Impedance, Angular Velocities & Frequencies of Oscillating Currents

    Loyal Vivan Bewley (Electrical Engineer)
    Travelling Waves on Electrical Power Systems

    Alexander Macfarlane (Mathematician)
    Fundamental Principals of Algebra
    Physical Arithmetic
    Vector Analysis and Quaternions
    Principals of the Algebra of Physics
    Application of Hyperbolic Analysis to the Discharge of a Condenser
    Another good reference "The Imaginary of Algebra" can be found in Principals of the Algebra of Physics starting at pg 68.

    James Clerk Maxwell (Theoretical Physicist/Mathematician)
    James Clerk Maxwell Scientific Papers 01
    James Clerk Maxwell Scientific Papers 02

    Leonid Isaakovich Mandelstam (Electrical Engineer)
    Russian Paper - "Concerning the Excitation of Electrical Waves Through Parameter Changes" Thanks Amigo.
    Recent report on recent research into non-linear oscillations

    Ferninand Cap
    US Patent 4622510 - Parametric Electric Machine

    Nicholas Minorsky
    Parametric Excitation

    L. F. Blume
    Abnormal Voltages Within Transformers (Co-authored with A. Boyajian)

    The ones in red are ones that definitely deal with parameter changing.
    There is a lot of maths in these and does require knowledge of mathematics. Eric perhaps you could say which ones out of the list you recommend and perhaps others to add? Hope this helps everyone out

    Raui
    Last edited by Raui; 07-19-2010, 01:33 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • boguslaw
    replied
    Correa are clever
    What is EM wave is composed of two opposite pure magnetic waves flowing in opposite directions ? Hmm...interesting idea....

    Leave a comment:


  • sucahyo
    replied
    Originally posted by Schpankme View Post
    Please show me the Photon and/or the Photon Field; until you do we will chalk this up to Einstein-Relativistic-Babble.

    "...during the passage of electromagnetic energy, a condition of aetheric stress exists, which is called the electric field..." - Eric Dollard (The Fallacy of Conductors).
    Just a reference, that is only their conclusion. They have some controversial experiment result, notifiebly on the experiment with ORAC which contrasted with James Demeo finding. Even if Tesla is said to be an od-sensitive, they seems to never read odyle book which should help their orgone research tremendously.

    Eric Dollard should know which part is wrong. I hope he can give light of how the radiant process happen.
    Last edited by sucahyo; 03-31-2010, 08:58 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • Schpankme
    replied
    Originally posted by sucahyo View Post
    ...we demonstrate this fact experimentally; both electrostatic and photonic fields are secondary effects...
    Please show me the Photon and/or the Photon Field; until you do we will chalk this up to Einstein-Relativistic-Babble.

    "...during the passage of electromagnetic energy, a condition of aetheric stress exists, which is called the electric field..." - Eric Dollard (The Fallacy of Conductors).

    Schpankme

    "The power of Christ compels you!" - unknown exorcist

    Leave a comment:


  • sucahyo
    replied
    Thanks for the explanation again Eric . Scalar is a DC explain a lot of thing in my mind including DC arc use in spark gap. I think that its stinging effect felt by Tesla is more like DC explosion instead or RF radiation.

    If you don't mind can you give your vote in this thread bellow?
    http://www.energeticforum.com/renewa...echnology.html

    Scalar as DC component remind me of what the Correa's conclude (which give different opinion):
    Abstracts - Experimental Aetherometry, Vol. 2A
    Taken together, these results suggest that there is a complex process of conversion of energy at work in these induction coils. The pulsed input to the primary coil induces in the space of the closely coupled secondary a conversion of the local aether energy into electric form. Aether wave energy is tapped by the capacito-inductive properties of the secondary coil to yield resonant, synchronized, superimposed, but distinct 'electric' (electrocapacitative) and 'magnetic' (magnetoinductive) waves. These wave functions properly constitute the massfree radiative field energy emitted by the coil, but they also induce or assemble, within the secondary, an alternate current of massbound charges, or electrons. In turn, this alternate current of electrons in the secondary couples its own 'magnetic' field to the electrocapacitative waves of the coil, to yield a proximal field effect which is responsible for drawing valence and conduction charge from metallic bodies. Beyond the limit of this proximal massbound field effect, the radiated (distal) field of what is known as 'Tesla waves' is composed solely of the 'electric' and 'magnetic' massfree waves radiated from the coil, and is only able to draw charges from the conduction band of metallic bodies. There are therefore quite distinct field effects of Tesla coils. Unfortunately, the proximal field energy has been confusedly assimilated to a "DC or electrostatic field", just as the distal field has been confusedly assimilated to an "AC electromagnetic field". But both fields possess "AC characteristics" and their real difference stems from the fact that one is both proximal and distal, and composed of primary massfree charges, while the other is only proximal, and the effect of the secondary flux of massbound charges. All happens as if the these coils synthesized two different kinds of electric fields, one proximal and massbound, and the other massfree and responsible for all distal effects. It is the massfree electric field that serves as the conduit for the massbound electric field, since only the former exists both proximally and distally, and thus all observable distal effects are due to it - such as the observed acceleration of leakage rates in electroscopes placed at greater distances from the coil. Conversely, it is the induced massbound charge field that is responsible for the observed spontaneous positive charging of the electroscope in the proximity of the coil, but since the radiated electric energy is not an ionizing one, nor does it consist of ion emission, the observed proximal monopolar (positive) charging of metal objects depends solely on the metallic nature of the targeted bodies, not upon any supposed "DC characteristic of an electrostatic field" output by the coil. In a parallel fashion, the primary massfree charge field is no less electrical than the proximal field - and thus fully undeserving of the epithet "electromagnetic".

    We can only speak of production of photons or the presence of electromagnetic energy when the primary superimposition of the two synchronous wave functions of the massfree energy field is resolved, at the surface of the metallic bodies that it is emitted from or strikes, to yield the "characteristic electromagnetic" or photonic frequency of the coil in the form of damped waves. Light, and also heat, are therefore indirect effects of Tesla waves, mere secondary emissions from metallic bodies exposed to Tesla radiation. The true "electromagnetic AC component "must therefore be understood as the secondary mechanical result of resolving the superimposition of Tesla waves. From this vantage point, the so-called 'electrostatic' and 'electromagnetic' fields of the Tesla coil cannot be thought of in the traditional manner where the former is the result of the latter, as mediated by ionization, and where the latter alone constitutes the primary emission. There is neither an electrostatic DC field nor an AC electromagnetic field (let alone an ionizing one), and we demonstrate this fact experimentally; both electrostatic and photonic fields are secondary effects resulting from the interaction of metallic matter with resonant 'electric' and 'magnetic' waves, such that the superimposition of these waves is subsequently resolved either to charge that matter or to induce it to emit light and heat.
    Last edited by sucahyo; 03-31-2010, 05:14 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • Cloxxki
    replied
    Mr. Dollard,
    Thank you so much for posting here. I hope the respect offered by this forum's posters can somewhat dim the pain of the bad experiences of human nature that the success of your work brought upon you.
    It's remarkable what you've acomplished, exactly despite these equal and opposite forces that seem to be created on the path of any noteworthy energy researcher.
    My heart has never never been in such a dark place, I've only met greaer ignorance than my own as resistance, never real evil. Understandably, it's immensely hard to find the strength to continue to share your knowledge, and set out assignments for students to take your work to another level, still during, and certainly after your own life.
    Should I ever find myself in a situation like yours, biblication counter forces preventing my propagation of truths that every human could benifit from, and dozens of worthy students eager to research and replicate your work, at no pay, with no degree to be rewarded...I hope I'll find the strength and compassion to devote a part of my remaining life to those students, and the changes they will bring to the betterment of mankind. They'll need to face evil as well, but they may have their numbers, and the new global pact of the internet to make them succeed.

    I hope you can appreciate the respect offered by the above posters, each real people with real passions and the same dreams as yours. They may not all be of Tesla's and your pedigree, talent is not divided equally at birth. BUt they are numerous, could form a team, and establish your name and work where it belongs. They may be the ones facilitating every city in the world to have a street named after you some day. If not for ego flattering reasons, this might offer you a well granted sence of accomplishment, gratitude from your fellow men, and your fellow free thinkers.

    Wishing you a long life, with positive emotions and reflections.

    Respectfully,

    J from The Netherlands

    Leave a comment:


  • SuperCaviTationIstic
    replied
    Guys, Please give my threads some more consideration now that you've heard that electricity can be made from the square root of -1
    http://www.energeticforum.com/renewa...ead.php?t=5546

    and this one deals with differential equations basically...(well at least differentially wound transformers)
    http://www.energeticforum.com/renewa...ead.php?t=5542
    Last edited by SuperCaviTationIstic; 03-30-2010, 07:00 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • boguslaw
    replied
    Be a child , find the swing, enjoy yourself and you will find free energy ...

    Leave a comment:


  • Slovenia
    replied
    Intuitive Thinker

    Originally posted by Peter Lindemann View Post
    Eric,

    It is good to see you in this thread, helping people understand some of your vast knowledge. I was, however, deeply saddened to see my name associated with the episode quoted above. As you know, I was not a party to any of these transactions. I was not present, I did not put you in contact with these people, and I had nothing to do with what happened.

    It is deeply disturbing to see my name associated with this account in your post, as if I was guilty of something I knew nothing about. In my own defense, I openly state that I have never done anything to cause any harm to your person, your property, or your reputation.

    On behalf of the other participants in this forum, I also hope you stay and post more. You will find many people here who deeply respect you and your work. This forum has intelligent and skillful experimenters from all over the world, eager to learn the truth. To the best of my knowledge, you know more about the real nature of electricity than anyone alive today.

    I think the world would be a better place if more people knew what you know. .........Think about it.

    I wish you all the best!

    Peter

    Peter,

    It's always good to hear from you. You are a very bright intuitive thinker.

    We don't hear from you as much as we would like.

    Best Regards,
    Slovenia

    Leave a comment:


  • stonewater
    replied
    where to start

    Eric,

    I just wanted to add my debt of gratitude for all you have done. time is too short, too much to learn, I just want to build something that works. I will keep studying your work!

    Tom C

    Leave a comment:


  • morpher44
    replied
    He ain't Heaviside -- He's my bro

    Eric wrote:
    >Hence (RG + XB) is what is going on in the room, the disinformers have >convinced you that this whole quantity (RB + XB) is scalar, RG is the only >scalar component. It is DC and has NO FREQUENCY, no WAVELENGTH and >thus NO WAVE! SCALER = NO WAVE - GET IT???

    Resistance is not always scalar actually. A true physical resistor
    isn't exactly linear. The resistance is one value when hot ... another
    when cold. There is actually a curve there ... but for mathematical
    convenience it is made linear (within a range), not unlike
    the gain in a transistor only working in a range.
    I would think that most electronic components are in fact NOT
    linear .. but subject to certain curved responses.

    So possibly the attitude should be that EVERYTHING is non-linear ...
    which of course would make you need to go to some mathematics
    that are a little bit more edgy ... ala Maxwell.

    So isn't the message really to OVER-TURN Heaviside.
    This is a Bearden mantra.

    We are now in the age of parallel processing computers ... and
    non-linear algorithms are something that can be modeled
    in simulation. Yeah its not easy in tools like SPICE ...
    so we need better tools.

    Is there a SPICE equivalent that can operate in Quaternions ... and
    Maxwell's equations only?

    I think the answer to the question:

    "How do I make my oscillator sustain with very little energy input?"

    will come from an arrangement of NON-LINEAR components ... which
    operate in a bounded chaos.

    This is an intuitive thought only which I cannot back up with any proof,
    or experience...
    Wouldn't it be cool though.
    -Morpher44

    Leave a comment:


  • Peter Lindemann
    replied
    No Guilt by Inuendo

    QUOTE:

    A group in Missoula (which was later found out to be a group of international criminals) showed up to “HELP ME” and in trade I would help them extract gold from spent tailings utilizing Tesla methodologies. They helped me alright, by entrapping me, assaulting me and stealing my classic Celica and threatened to kill me if I were to do anything about it. They strong armed their way into my Desert laboratory to steal all related equipment. The property owner of the desert lab died shortly thereafter, within weeks of Chris Carson’s death. Friends of yours Peter?


    Eric,

    It is good to see you in this thread, helping people understand some of your vast knowledge. I was, however, deeply saddened to see my name associated with the episode quoted above. As you know, I was not a party to any of these transactions. I was not present, I did not put you in contact with these people, and I had nothing to do with what happened.

    It is deeply disturbing to see my name associated with this account in your post, as if I was guilty of something I knew nothing about. In my own defense, I openly state that I have never done anything to cause any harm to your person, your property, or your reputation.

    On behalf of the other participants in this forum, I also hope you stay and post more. You will find many people here who deeply respect you and your work. This forum has intelligent and skillful experimenters from all over the world, eager to learn the truth. To the best of my knowledge, you know more about the real nature of electricity than anyone alive today.

    I think the world would be a better place if more people knew what you know. .........Think about it.

    I wish you all the best!

    Peter

    Leave a comment:


  • amigo
    replied
    Originally posted by Dollard, E. P. (N6KPH) View Post
    ...for those who’s minds have been polluted by the prevalent quantum goddess reality:

    Let us turn to the Heaviside Equation which is the most fundamental equations in all of Electrical Engineering:

    (RG + XB) + j (XG – RB) = propagation constant squared

    where:

    R resistance in Ohms
    G conductance in Siemens
    X reactance in Henrys per second
    B susceptance in Farads per second

    Therefore:

    RG is the scalar or DC component that is NOT A WAVE,
    XB is the longitudinal or AC component and is an alternating electric wave

    XG is the transverse or OC component and is a forward moving oscillating electric wave. RB is the transverse or OC component and is a reverse moving oscillating electric wave

    ......

    Hence (RG + XB) is what is going on in the room, the disinformers have convinced you that this whole quantity (RB + XB) is scalar, RG is the only scalar component. It is DC and has NO FREQUENCY, no WAVELENGTH and thus NO WAVE! SCALER = NO WAVE - GET IT???
    Hi Eric,

    I've been looking at this Heaviside equation and trying to understand what you wrote but I am rather unclear on something.

    Looking from the purely mathematical point of view, the Propagation Constant is supposed to be a dimensionless value, or measured per unit such as per meter.

    My understanding also is that it being a complex number, j(XG-RB) is the imaginary part referring to the phase, which people generally discard?

    Wouldn't that imply that what remains (RG+XB) must be dimensionless to satisfy the equal sign requirement?

    But if XB is a longitudinal component, an electric wave as you stated, then it itself must also be dimensionless?

    Lastly, you said that X is a reactance in Henrys per second. Are we thus assuming that it is inductive in nature (X = wL = 2pifL)?

    Thanks for your attention.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X