Peter, whatever happened with Eric P. Dollard?

[Raui]

@Amigo and anyone else interested in Daniel64's theories.

His posts about this topic start http://www.energeticforum.com/renewa...html#post76705. I have spoken with Dan on a number of occasions and I truly believe he is onto something. He is very knowledgeable and is working on a device to prove his theories which is why he isn't too quick at replying to people's queries. If he allows me to I will help explain he's theories to you all as it would be a great pleasure.

-Raui

[Aaron]

Seb

Amigo,

http://www.energeticforum.com/renewa...rth-brick.html

Of course there is equipment necessary, but pays for itself in savings
on the home building cost. Lower cost, superior strength, insulation, etc...
And you can reuse it to build as many homes as you want, just get more
additive.

[amigo]

Stabalized Earthbrick technology is the way to go. Made of dirt with good clay content and organic compound makes them harder than you can believe, fireproof and hydrophobic so repels water (opposite of what that dirt and clay does without that organic compound). You can make a press to make any shape bricks you want. Heat moves through dirt SLOWLY. And it is DIRT CHEAP. Dig a basement in the right soil and you have ALL your building material for the whole house.

I wasn't aware of this, thank you for bringing it up. Do you have any handy links to point me in the right direction for further research?

[Aaron]

solutions

I prefer organic and round shapes, domes is my aim.

What I was refering to was more precise than the solutions that you say are already available.

Stabalized Earthbrick technology is the way to go. Made of dirt with good
clay content and organic compound makes them harder than you can
believe, fireproof and hydrophobic so repels water (opposite of what that
dirt and clay does without that organic compound). You can make a press
to make any shape bricks you want. Heat moves through dirt SLOWLY.
And it is DIRT CHEAP. Dig a basement in the right soil and you have ALL
your building material for the whole house.

Anyway, the distinction between the exotic technologies and other
solutions is that people fail to mention preferred solutions.

For example, people blame Peter and John for not "saving the world" by
not giving their proprietary info and that the world is doomed because
of it implying that it must be some exotic wild technology that is needed
to solve energy problems, when it is not. That is all I'm pointing out.

There is no energy crisis, there is a solution to EVERY "crisis" already
available and most is ignored.

So anyway, I'm just hoping people are being authentic about what they
want when asking for "solutions" because they haven't been hiding. I want
the solution you mention by the way. I want to plug something into my
outlet and never have to pay another power bill even if I don't know how
it works.

The most practical solution I see short term with any exotic circuit is
Good insulated home so energy need is at minimum. Then only a few
"small" solar cells are needed with a Bedini solar charger to charge a bank
and that can run an entire home no problem. That is practical and doable
and even incorporates Tesla technology

[Allcanadian]

@Daniel64

Yes, I have the solution. It is simple, and has been right in front you for many years. Eric dollard describes it in his writings.
I have tried to explain it to you all in another topic line here. I also came along ten years ago, and tried then, but without a full understanding myself, I failed.
Now, I get it. Are you ready?

You say you have the answer in an OU forum and no response?
I will listen to anything you have to say, especially if it is in regards to Tesla and Dollard. Bring it on
Regards
AC

[amigo]

Yes, I have the solution. It is simple, and has been right in front you for many years. Eric dollard describes it in his writings.

I have tried to explain it to you all in another topic line here. I also came along ten years ago, and tried then, but without a full understanding myself, I failed.

Now, I get it. Are you ready?

Daniel.

Daniel,

I am all eyes and ears (and have been ever since I was born.)

Question is, do you really "know" or do you just "believe" to know?

The difference is as they say just like being in love. You just know you are in love and nobody can tell you any different.

[amigo]

@Aaron,

That's all nice and dandy, the things you speak of, but I have no use of them right now. I do not own a home and perhaps one day when I do, my home will incorporate all those things and more. Matter a fact, I do not want a "normal" house like everyone else. Wooden or cardboard boxes do not appeal to me - I prefer organic and round shapes, domes is my aim.

What I was refering to was more precise than the solutions that you say are already available. I am talking about the "black box" that any Joe Blow can plug-in and get energy out of, without knowing what's inside it. And why should he know?

Does everyone know how their TV or refridgerator or cell-phone or any other device works or do they just use it. Only we here care how a FE device would work because that is our passion, and other people have other passions. These things are technology and they should be there to make our lives better not make them more cumbersome. We should not be subservient or enslaved to any of them, or rever them in any way. And yet...

Solutions

phi1.62

you raise an interesting point about startegy of implementation and release of information. I agree that many technologiea and even more knowledge has been hidden away from us (I'd say we have been robbed of it) by corporate interests, but what are we supposed to do instead?

Do you have a clue on how to resolve our current predicament? I freely admit that I surely don't have a clue, if I compare myself to Eric and his knowledge and understanding of Tesla. I might know other things better than Eric, but so what, that does not give me the answer we all seek, which seems to be in Tesla's work.

Hoping that someone will somehow stumble upon a solution is stupidiculous and in this thinking we are no better than peasants in feudal Spain or France of 15th Century who believed the Earth was flat. The fact that we are all "hoping" for a solution to happen is silly, to say the least. Hope is a wish for the future that never comes.

We need to move away from the age of belief to the age of knowing, and since only a few have the "know" we must invest in those individuals. They will in turn teach the rest of us, so everyone else "knows", rather than continuing to believe, as is the case right now.

Yes, I have the solution. It is simple, and has been right in front you for many years. Eric dollard describes it in his writings.

I have tried to explain it to you all in another topic line here. I also came along ten years ago, and tried then, but without a full understanding myself, I failed.

Now, I get it. Are you ready?

Daniel.

Research

On page 7 of the document:



Based on that I assume he chose to live in near poverty to pursue his hobby and research rather than waste his time maintaining technologies for corporate interests Dollard would consider inferior compared to what he knows, even it means sacrificing a potentially high wage.

Regarding the issue that you raised, I don't think that pooling our financial resources together to help a few inventors rather than pursuing our own research is necessarily the best course of action. Could we pool together an amount of money that would be sufficient to fund their research and even if we did what strategy/ies would we implement to ensure that these technologies are made available to the public? To me, the latter seems to be the biggest issue as we are all aware of energy technologies that should have been made available long before we were born but have never seen the light of day in spite of the intelligence of the inventor and numerous testimonials that the technology worked.

If we give up our research completely to put all our eggs into a few baskets, even if the basket is someone as knowledgeable as Eric Dollard, we could sacrifice the possibility of discovering a method to generate abundant energy that is cheap, simple and without doubt unexplainable by any current scientific principle by a mere accident. Some of the greatest inventions came into being due the presistence of the inventor, who wasn't necessarily the smartest person in the world.

Well, I can think of at least one method that would gaurantee a complete and continuous dissemination of findings and a focus of intent on the practical applications.....it is called a religion. This is different to a business, or a democracy, as the fundamental core principles cannot be altered once set in place. Or else the basis for the religious beleif falls down.

The next viable option would be a democratic non - profit global organisation of funders and workers, with a common goal, and the smae operating parameters.

As to the lack of concrete and substantial results, I have tried to tell everyone here, the nature of their shortcomings, and yet, who has listened??

The answer is right before you all, and was even described by Eric Dollard years ago, as I have only just discovered. The trouble is, it is to simple, and you have all missed it.....

Daniel.

I'll take that offer!!

I can educate you.

If you want to listen.

Daniel.

[Aaron]

"Grass is always greener on the other side."

We spend hundreds, if not thousands, of dollars on our dinky experiments in this quest for the solution, yet we do not have a single clue what we are doing, whatsoever. (I challenge you to prove me wrong)

Here is a clue as to what to do...simply ALWAYS design every system to
be non-equilibrium/open - all the real things that I've seen are always
fitting in that parameter and the proof of concept machines I've built
are also fitting in that...that also work and demonstrate over 1.0 cop.
Good funding and the right tools goes a long way and if everyone had
the money to make their Bedini machines 10 times bigger, the results
get bigger too - that's just how it is. I've seen John charge MONSTER
200amp 2 volt batteries in 12/24 banks...I'm talking about 3-500 pound
batteries from cell phone towers with his 10 coiler - you better believe
there is something to having bigger system like this instead of small table
top models. Those are good for learning but for charging a battery bank
of a home, that could be like $15000+ to make one of those. I'm
surprised how much those 10 coiler kits are going to be available for that
are coming out...only a fraction of the original prototype.

If you think there needs to be a "solution" for energy, there are many
solutions all around us without these fancy technologies.

However, if anyone wants and EXOTIC solution to it, then that is what this
free energy field is about, with hopes of having self powering supplies,
running on all kinds of exotic theories...all the cool stuff.

People can heat their home for free by pumping heat during
the hot season 3 feet under their home's foundation for the amount of
power it takes to run one single little fan. And then during the winter
months, that heat moves up and warms the house for free. Takes 3 months
for heat to move through that much earth. Fact is, this is already being
done and anyone can incorporate it into any new home built, they just
don't. And the fan power can be powered by a solar cell/battery bank
so after that, there is no further input required from us. That is free
energy for real and is a very simple process.

If you have an R100 insulation home, which everyone should aim to do
that, then you can warm the home with incandescent light bulbs,
heat from fridge compressor, cooking heat, body heat, etc... because you won't be losing any of that heat.

There are PAINT ON solutions that have R20 PER LAYER!!! Plus they're
radiant reflective. If you have an R60 home and paint it on the outside
and inside, you have R100! I'm not talking about nasa ceramic additive,
something else, but the point is insulation should be everyone's priority
as boring as it is...it is the truth. Then you don't need hardly anything
for heating and cooling and your entire energy usage just dropped by
50%. Then small scale energy production is all you need and suddenly
solar is economically viable.

There are so many simple concepts like this that are absolutely doable,
so anytime I see that people blame lack of progress in free energy
technologies for not having the "solution" to an energy crisis, is really
not realistic in any sense of the matter - there never has been a crisis,
it has always been manufactured by the oil companies, etc...

The fact is that these real solutions that are ALREADY here are just not
sexy enough and everyone wants the water power Ferarri or self running
perpetual motion generator, etc...

The reality is there is no energy crisis - people have been complacent
and have simply failed to apply what is already known.

As the saying goes, "The grass is always greener on the other side."

[amigo]

phi1.62

you raise an interesting point about startegy of implementation and release of information. I agree that many technologiea and even more knowledge has been hidden away from us (I'd say we have been robbed of it) by corporate interests, but what are we supposed to do instead?

Do you have a clue on how to resolve our current predicament? I freely admit that I surely don't have a clue, if I compare myself to Eric and his knowledge and understanding of Tesla. I might know other things better than Eric, but so what, that does not give me the answer we all seek, which seems to be in Tesla's work.

Hoping that someone will somehow stumble upon a solution is stupidiculous and in this thinking we are no better than peasants in feudal Spain or France of 15th Century who believed the Earth was flat. The fact that we are all "hoping" for a solution to happen is silly, to say the least. Hope is a wish for the future that never comes.

We need to move away from the age of belief to the age of knowing, and since only a few have the "know" we must invest in those individuals. They will in turn teach the rest of us, so everyone else "knows", rather than continuing to believe, as is the case right now.

[phi1.62]

I just read the document about Eric that phi1.62 posted and it disturbed me greatly. Eric is such a great potential, and has been for a long time, yet it appears he can barely make the ends meet.

Whether he lives like this on purpose or not, I can not say. Personally I feel that he does not want to "sell out" to the corporate interests and thus chooses to do what he loves, instead of having a day job that might pay him fair amount but would in turn kill his free spirit.

What boils my nooodle is that there are thousands of people in this so-called Free Energy field, you, me, everyone else, rookies and amateurs alike. We spend hundreds, if not thousands, of dollars on our dinky experiments in this quest for the solution, yet we do not have a single clue what we are doing, whatsoever. (I challenge you to prove me wrong)

On the other hand we have someone right there in Eric who I believe could deliver what we all seek, but has no funding or support to do so. If all of us would fund him instead of wasting money on our measly attempts we would've gotten somewhere probably.

I know I have spent thousands of dollars over the years on equipment, parts and what not without getting any closer to the answer. I can't even calculate the time that was spent and how much that might be worth.

In retrospect, maybe I should've somehow given Eric that money instead, to do research into Tesla related technologies. My lame understanding of Tesla can not hold water compared to Eric's and, even now I'd be willing to give up my attempts if they would help someone else like him produce results.

On page 7 of the document:

Caring little for the pleasures of a home or job, Dollard listens throughout the day to police transmissions, private cellular telephone conversations, and aircraft communications at his electronics haven on Overlook Drive.

Based on that I assume he chose to live in near poverty to pursue his hobby and research rather than waste his time maintaining technologies for corporate interests Dollard would consider inferior compared to what he knows, even it means sacrificing a potentially high wage.

Regarding the issue that you raised, I don't think that pooling our financial resources together to help a few inventors rather than pursuing our own research is necessarily the best course of action. Could we pool together an amount of money that would be sufficient to fund their research and even if we did what strategy/ies would we implement to ensure that these technologies are made available to the public? To me, the latter seems to be the biggest issue as we are all aware of energy technologies that should have been made available long before we were born but have never seen the light of day in spite of the intelligence of the inventor and numerous testimonials that the technology worked.

If we give up our research completely to put all our eggs into a few baskets, even if the basket is someone as knowledgeable as Eric Dollard, we could sacrifice the possibility of discovering a method to generate abundant energy that is cheap, simple and without doubt unexplainable by any current scientific principle by a mere accident. Some of the greatest inventions came into being due the presistence of the inventor, who wasn't necessarily the smartest person in the world.

[baroutologos]

Greatly said Amigo. Actually i have made a thread calling for a "sifu" to guide us to the solution and get paid in the process. Noone is willing to do that.

All are eager to spread the word and save the world, but when boils down to actually to do that, it seems they have nothing to tell actually.
That's why all prefer selling books and DVDs.
There is a old saying going.. "If you cannot do, teach!"

...
Regarding Eric, i am fascinated by Borderland videos and his theories. His word has sense.
If he could tell me how to produce surplus economical energy, (assuming it can be done) i can give as much as 1,000 USD asap. Me alone.

[amigo]

I just read the document about Eric that phi1.62 posted and it disturbed me greatly. Eric is such a great potential, and has been for a long time, yet it appears he can barely make the ends meet.

Whether he lives like this on purpose or not, I can not say. Personally I feel that he does not want to "sell out" to the corporate interests and thus chooses to do what he loves, instead of having a day job that might pay him fair amount but would in turn kill his free spirit.

What boils my nooodle is that there are thousands of people in this so-called Free Energy field, you, me, everyone else, rookies and amateurs alike. We spend hundreds, if not thousands, of dollars on our dinky experiments in this quest for the solution, yet we do not have a single clue what we are doing, whatsoever. (I challenge you to prove me wrong)

On the other hand we have someone right there in Eric who I believe could deliver what we all seek, but has no funding or support to do so. If all of us would fund him instead of wasting money on our measly attempts we would've gotten somewhere probably.

I know I have spent thousands of dollars over the years on equipment, parts and what not without getting any closer to the answer. I can't even calculate the time that was spent and how much that might be worth.

In retrospect, maybe I should've somehow given Eric that money instead, to do research into Tesla related technologies. My lame understanding of Tesla can not hold water compared to Eric's and, even now I'd be willing to give up my attempts if they would help someone else like him produce results.

Lastly, what is this talk about Eric P. Dollard inventing the Log-Periodic Antenna?!?!?

From page 10 of that document, second paragraph:

In the early 1980s, Dollard presented his findings about a "log-periodic antenna," which he invented, to a group of engineers at the Institute of Electical Electronic Engineers in Chicago.

I mean we are talking about THE Log-periodic antenna, something that in my opinion revolutionized the antenna world and changed it forever.

If this is true, is Eric even recognized for it and how come he did not benefit from his great invention?