New Eric Dollard Video

[dmonarch]

Just browsing youtube and found that Eric Dollard has put up a new video. I know your not on this forum but thanks Eric
Heres the link to the first part
YouTube - Part 1 of 6: Eric Dollard Tesla Longitudinal wave Energy SBARC Ham Radio with Chris Carson
Damian

[jeanna]

Thank you damian, that is an awesome set of videos.

jeanna

[morpher44]

thanks

Just browsing youtube and found that Eric Dollard has put up a new video. I know your not on this forum but thanks Eric
Heres the link to the first part
YouTube - Part 1 of 6: Eric Dollard Tesla Longitudinal wave Energy SBARC Ham Radio with Chris Carson
Damian

Very nice talk. I really enjoyed it.
Its good to see a slightly more recent Eric Dollard video.

[rave154]

Good videos !!!!!


interesting point about "how does a transformer work".... in respect to..


if the core/material..is designed specifically to "suck up" and contain magnetic flux ( from the primary )....then WHY does it suddenly "spurt it all out" when in the presence of the secondary?

is there some other "transmission" going on in a tranformer that were not being told about? if thats the case ( and after pondering the above it seems it is ), then we need to build a better "reciever" than the "secondary" thats already being used.... so we would end up with something like the following...


A Coil, energised by AC or pulsed DC, around a core of good magnetic permiability..with a "reciever" in proximity to the core.......is this starting to sound a LOT like a Don smith device or what !?!?!??!?!?

[john_g]

Good videos !!!!!


interesting point about "how does a transformer work".... in respect to..


if the core/material..is designed specifically to "suck up" and contain magnetic flux ( from the primary )....then WHY does it suddenly "spurt it all out" when in the presence of the secondary?

is there some other "transmission" going on in a tranformer that were not being told about? if thats the case ( and after pondering the above it seems it is ), then we need to build a better "reciever" than the "secondary" thats already being used.... so we would end up with something like the following...


A Coil, energised by AC or pulsed DC, around a core of good magnetic permiability..with a "reciever" in proximity to the core.......is this starting to sound a LOT like a Don smith device or what !?!?!??!?!?

rave154

I thought the same while watching the videos - what a shame he did not explain how he thinks a transformer does work. Any takers out there who would like too elaborate on Eric's theorys?

[Sputins]

Eric Dollard #1!

This information Eric & Chris share here is one of the most important concepts ever to be made clear to persons viewing this forum, seeking to develop O.U. or just to understand Nikola Tesla.

[morpher44]

transformer

rave154

I thought the same while watching the videos - what a shame he did not explain how he thinks a transformer does work. Any takers out there who would like too elaborate on Eric's theorys?

That part of the video left me a bit dissapointed as well.

It seems to me that a transformer works on the principal of
CHANGING-FLUX. So as you transition from positive to negative,
and negative to positive on the primary, the magnetic loop
is changing directions. It was going one way ... now its going
the other way. When this occurs, we have the requirement
needed of a changing flux in order to induce current in the
secondary.
I think this is well understood by current theory.

What is complex, however, is the notion of mutual induction
when you have a situation that is more complicated such as
several coils placed in various geometric arrangements and
orientations .... There are phase relationships ... there
is an inductive coupling that will be less than 1 but greater than
zero.
Geometry is key for mutual induction in that certain
arrangements are optimum (at a given frequency) and
certain arrangements are sub-optimum.
So you have to use Maxwell's equations ... do the math ..
and work out the optimum geometries.
Oh geez ... do I have to re-learn differential equations. I always
bragged that I never needed to use them. ... and
if you don't use it ... you loose it.

Those of you students studying physics might want to
really get good at the maxwellian mathematics ... and study
up on Quaternions as well ... so that you can work
out some of these mysterious mutual induction problems.
I think the Hubbard Coil might be a good case-study
in mutual induction.

[morpher44]

BURSTs of energy

if the core/material..is designed specifically to "suck up" and contain magnetic flux ( from the primary )....then WHY does it suddenly "spurt it all out" when in the presence of the secondary?

is there some other "transmission" going on in a tranformer that were not being told about? if thats the case ( and after pondering the above it seems it is ), then we need to build a better "reciever" than the "secondary" thats already being used.... so we would end up with something like the following...

A Coil, energised by AC or pulsed DC, around a core of good magnetic permiability..with a "reciever" in proximity to the core.......is this starting to sound a LOT like a Don smith device or what !?!?!??!?!?

Conventional transformers have very good efficiency now.
Mutual induction is near perfect with these exotic ferro materials
and techniques deployed such as toroidal shapes or laminated plates,
etc.

I think there might be room for improvement here if you can
built a transformer that is near perfect effeciency -- yes --
but also has ambient energy "pickup".

Transformers also have an inductance ... and a Q.
The issue with IRON as the core is that it has hysteresis (B-H curve)
and it damps higher frequencies.
So lets use them at low frequencies..

If you could make a transformer system that had very high Q,
very large inductance ... and you could PING the primary
with a SPIKE of energy (via antenna say), it should ring
for quite a while ... depending upon the resistance of the load.
So efficiency must be kept to be near 100%, resistance
should be kept as low as possible -- implying larger guage wire --
and the resistance should not be too low so as to dampen
too quickly before the next spike arrives.

As for the incoming spikes....
These can arrive at WHATEVER frequency they arrive,
but your antenna system must not dampen them.
Hence you need a totally new sort of antenna system
that is broad-spectrum.
If you went the yagi approach, you would need
several half-wave or quarter-wave branches for
various wavelengths (like a TV antenna on steroids).
For lower frequencies in the 100khz to 200khz range,
the size here would be prohibitive -- unless you have
lots of slaves and can built a giant monolithic structure.

Lighting will produce burst of energy in the 100khz to 200khz
range ... so the trick is to pick up that energy in your
receiver and PING your coil with it ... to make your
coils tank circuit ring for the load.

[pattester]

Eric Dollard Notes on scribd

Eric Dollard Notes (1986--1991)

[Armagdn03]

A current or potential traveling in a loop or toroid will create a magnetic dipole. The magnetic energy contained within this dipole will fill the space around it. Materials with high permeability such as a core, represent much space compacted, and so a great amount of the magnetic action takes place within the core, it is not sucked up, it is simply tons of space compact into a small volume. The magnetic energy will also be equal and opposite to the potential energy which created it.

A magnetic field traveling in a loop or toroid will create an electric dipole. The energy contained within this dipole will fill the space around it. Materials with high permittivity such as copper wire, represent space compacted and so a great amount of electric action takes place within the wire, it is not sucked up, it is simply tons of space compact into a small volume. The electric energy will also be equal and opposite to the magnetic energy which created it.


Therefore a primary creates a magnetic field, which primarily takes place within the toroid. The magnetic field, and the electric potential which created it are equal / one in the same with energy, much like sine cosine functions and the unit circle, we have separated the two mathematically, but they describe the same condition.

The magnetic toroid in turn creates an electric dipole, which is shared by both the primary and the secondary, because they both share the same electric dipole, one cannot put out more energy than the other, because they are both taping one and the same dipole.

The right hand rule applies and controls all of this.


The flaw in the initial argument is to assume that A) the electric potential in the wires, is somehow different than the magnetic potential it creates and can be seperated. B) that irons "sucks up" flux, and that C) There is no electric dipole, there is no electric "flux" and that this "flux" doesn't get "sucked"into areas of high permittivity.

There are many other problems with the initial argument, which lead to it being confusing, but that's just because the creators of the question, don't understand the "rules" they are working with in the first place.

Good videos !!!!!


interesting point about "how does a transformer work".... in respect to..


if the core/material..is designed specifically to "suck up" and contain magnetic flux ( from the primary )....then WHY does it suddenly "spurt it all out" when in the presence of the secondary?

is there some other "transmission" going on in a tranformer that were not being told about? if thats the case ( and after pondering the above it seems it is ), then we need to build a better "reciever" than the "secondary" thats already being used.... so we would end up with something like the following...


A Coil, energised by AC or pulsed DC, around a core of good magnetic permiability..with a "reciever" in proximity to the core.......is this starting to sound a LOT like a Don smith device or what !?!?!??!?!?

[bboj]

A current or potential traveling in a loop or toroid will create a magnetic dipole. The magnetic energy contained within this dipole will fill the space around it. Materials with high permeability such as a core, represent much space compacted, and so a great amount of the magnetic action takes place within the core, it is not sucked up, it is simply tons of space compact into a small volume. The magnetic energy will also be equal and opposite to the potential energy which created it.

A magnetic field traveling in a loop or toroid will create an electric dipole. The energy contained within this dipole will fill the space around it. Materials with high permittivity such as copper wire, represent space compacted and so a great amount of electric action takes place within the wire, it is not sucked up, it is simply tons of space compact into a small volume. The electric energy will also be equal and opposite to the magnetic energy which created it.


Therefore a primary creates a magnetic field, which primarily takes place within the toroid. The magnetic field, and the electric potential which created it are equal / one in the same with energy, much like sine cosine functions and the unit circle, we have separated the two mathematically, but they describe the same condition.

The magnetic toroid in turn creates an electric dipole, which is shared by both the primary and the secondary, because they both share the same electric dipole, one cannot put out more energy than the other, because they are both taping one and the same dipole.

The right hand rule applies and controls all of this.


The flaw in the initial argument is to assume that A) the electric potential in the wires, is somehow different than the magnetic potential it creates and can be seperated. B) that irons "sucks up" flux, and that C) There is no electric dipole, there is no electric "flux" and that this "flux" doesn't get "sucked"into areas of high permittivity.

There are many other problems with the initial argument, which lead to it being confusing, but that's just because the creators of the question, don't understand the "rules" they are working with in the first place.

Reading this I remembered the post (Your response)to the Dr Stiffler thread, regarding the asimetrical transformers as bipolar or probably multipolar units. And I was wondering If you could tell us more about that because I believe that that holds many important keys to a number of threads in this forum.

[baroutologos]

I found that pdf at scribd at least amusing! It states some nice concepts of electricity there.

By the way, Eric Dollard interview is hilarious. "Quit your jobs and smash your tvs"! He is also saying that the absolute majority of those claiming free energy are frauds.

No wonder.


Baroutologos

[Armagdn03]

Reading this I remembered the post (Your response)to the Dr Stiffler thread, regarding the asimetrical transformers as bipolar or probably multipolar units. And I was wondering If you could tell us more about that because I believe that that holds many important keys to a number of threads in this forum.

Sure,

This is actually what I am in the middle of writing a dissertation on at the moment, along with a lot of lab time. I have been in correspondence with several parties who can verify my ongoing work in this field. This represents a lot of my hard time invested, and as such I would really appreciate it if people respected my copyrights, and will not hesitate to enforce them myself.

Below is a copy of an email I sent to Dr. Stiffler, which sums up the bulk of the effect.

According to Faraday's law (put in this convenient permutation)

Voltage Generated = (-N)(delta (BA))/delta t)

Where we have replaced the unit of inductance with its terms:
-N = number of turns
B = Magnetic field strength in Tesla
A = Area of turns (as the radius doubles, the area increases by a factor of four)


Assuming the primary and secondary are concentric (about the same center) Lenz law applies in the standard way, giving us an equal and opposite EMF.

This essentially describes the bulk of the "transformation" process mechanism for this example. It may not be readily apparent, but the Inverse Squared law of electromagnetic radiation is also in effect, though it is hidden to us in conventional designs.

According to the inverse squared law, as we increase the diameter of the secondary (around the primary, concentrically) the magnitude of the EMF created by the primary will decrease accordingly. As we get one radius away from the primary, the magnitude will be 1/4 of the source. But we have also increased area by a factor of four (area of a circle increases by 4 with a doubling of the radius). Therefore in the equation for Faraday's law, the factors of 1/4 and 4 cancel out for no net effect.

Its almost as if the law of inverse squares was never applied because it is "invisible".

However, if the primary and secondary do NOT share centers, there is a whole new area available for study.

For example:

Say a Primary emits a field with a strength of 16 units. A secondary with the same characteristics of the primary is placed one radius away from the primary. The secondary will feel an average of 4 units of field strength due to the inverse squared law. Now Lenz law comes into play, and we have an "equal and opposite" EMF created and emitted from the secondary, which must also travel back at least 1 radius in order to impinge back on the primary. Say this is reduced by a factor of 1/4, meaning the primary only feels an emf due to lenz law of 1 unit.

So we have expended 16 units, to "create" 4, which pushes back for a total of 1. Hugely inefficient, unless you consider the primary and secondaries to be charge conserving resonant "coils". In this situation, minus the average reduction due to Q loss, 16 units gets dinged for 1, to create 4. 15 units now remain, and the cycle continues.

Here the "equal and opposite" apparent in all areas of electromagnetic's has not been circumvented in any way, simply the geometry has been changed to our advantage.

Also, this quite nicely leads into "valence shells" or "orbits" which manifest around such resonant coils, showing preferred distances for generation, and "transmission" of energy.

Hope you found this somewhat interesting,

take care

Andrew Manrique.

As you can see transformer action happening around one center acts as one system, One dipole, with only ratios changing from what goes in to what goes out. Transformer action about different centers creates a very different set of events. One dipole creates another, which effect each other in equal and opposite ways, which is not quite what is expected when one draws to mind "equal and opposite"

There are many design considerations to be taken into account. Mathematically, the further the pickup is from the transmitter, the more efficient the process becomes. At the same time, the closer to the transmitter you get, the more power is created in the pickup coil. Therefore if both sets are graphed, there will be a point where they meet which represents an area of maximum power transmission, balanced out with maximum efficiency. These happen at very nice geometric relations to the transmitter coil.

Kapanadze is the closest I have seen in another party working along these lines. However it is strongly apparent from his patent that there are huge slices of information he is either leaving out (which I doubt) or that he does not understand. Much of his device is not necessary, and misleading.

Many people know the tuning fork in a room full of forks analogy, this expounds upon that. The second tuning fork WILL affect the first, but to a certain degree based upon its distance from the source, and its own internal Q. There are optimal spacings. There are optimal parameters for each coil, and they should not be equal. I consider this to be one of two technologies I am developing which have great promise, and am excited to share.

[bboj]

This way than we can place in the field more than 1 secondary and push back more than 1 unit.
What do you think about the field (its shape) surrounding the tesla coil - that is a tesla coil that is storing all the energy.
When I look at the Don smith device I can't see how can he collect excess energy with his arrangement of components.
I hope I don't sound stupid. I am psychologist and will have to refresh the basic laws of electromagnetism including the equations.

[SkyWatcher]

Hi folks, I noticed in the video the second speaker talking about a simple transformer and how conventional explanations don't cut it, is there are reference anywhere else on the web where he talks about this in more depth as to how he thinks they function. He pointed out that a permeable toroid holds all the flux and so doesnt touch the secondary coil or affect it magnetically or thats what i assumed he was getting at. So is it a capacitor type effect or dielectric effect maybe, they have me thinking about it now. Any ideas appreciated.
peace love light
Tyson