golden rule
Well, that is the EXACT point I am making by documenting that others are
attempting to steal the method that I freely gave to everyone. But the
nonsense as you call it is not in what I'm doing - it is by those that are
perpetrating this fraud against the entire open source community.
I invented the simplified method, which was common sense to me because
I already understood the reverse diode effect such as what John Bedini
showed in his lab notes on the Gray circuit diagrams. I have 100% rights
to make a commercially available ignition system based on this method
without having to pay royalties to anyone - it was my idea. If that patent
would get granted, which is now unlikely to happen, it would block even me
from being able to commercially make and sell the ignition system.
ANYONE is able to commercially make them and sell them without
having to pay royalties to anyone including me, the inventor. However,
if someone does it, I would appreciate anyone having the courtesy to
voluntarily pay me a percentage of the sales since it is my idea to begin
with.
I almost started manufacturing a PLL circuit and stopped the project
because it became obsolete instantly by some other methods that my
team is working on. However, we were trying to track down the inventor
of one particular circuit that first placed it into the public domain because
we wanted to voluntarily pay him x% of the sales just out of principle
even though we didn't have to nor did we require his permission.
I live by the golden rule and unfortunately I am naive sometimes to believe
that others that proclaim they have such an altruistic life also live by the
golden rule.
Originally posted by powerme
attempting to steal the method that I freely gave to everyone. But the
nonsense as you call it is not in what I'm doing - it is by those that are
perpetrating this fraud against the entire open source community.
I invented the simplified method, which was common sense to me because
I already understood the reverse diode effect such as what John Bedini
showed in his lab notes on the Gray circuit diagrams. I have 100% rights
to make a commercially available ignition system based on this method
without having to pay royalties to anyone - it was my idea. If that patent
would get granted, which is now unlikely to happen, it would block even me
from being able to commercially make and sell the ignition system.
ANYONE is able to commercially make them and sell them without
having to pay royalties to anyone including me, the inventor. However,
if someone does it, I would appreciate anyone having the courtesy to
voluntarily pay me a percentage of the sales since it is my idea to begin
with.
I almost started manufacturing a PLL circuit and stopped the project
because it became obsolete instantly by some other methods that my
team is working on. However, we were trying to track down the inventor
of one particular circuit that first placed it into the public domain because
we wanted to voluntarily pay him x% of the sales just out of principle
even though we didn't have to nor did we require his permission.
I live by the golden rule and unfortunately I am naive sometimes to believe
that others that proclaim they have such an altruistic life also live by the
golden rule.
Comment