COP 17 Heater | Rosemary Ainslie

[Joit]

Hi folks, I really wonder if some in this thread are interested in the truth, folks its a simple wire wound resistor with a flyback diode recirculated back into the resistor. Why can i say with some certainty that some are not interested in the truth, the only one to comment on my recent results with just the resistor have been Rosemary, how interesting. At this point, its obvious we have much distracting going on here. I built the circuit with just the resistor and it works, and i would assume with proper part matching and tuning one could achieve better results.
peace love light

That are my guessing at first View too. Even when its mentioned, not to change it, till it works.
But seems still, the matching of the Parts is importend.

Ramset. i dont think, its a matter of your Location, its more a matter of polite way of talking.
Usual you should show the same Respect, as you expect from others, and there is noone just for Fun here, or to fool around.
And most try to do her best, no reason, to profile themself.
Do you think, you sleep better, when she use it, or not??
I dont think anway, it is at last a helpful Answer to rebuild or dont rebuild this Circuit.

[RAMSET]

Jolt
TK's attempts
He has put a great expedient effort into this and is openly sharing his findings
here
YouTube YouTube - Electric OU 1: Preliminary Tests of the Rosemary Ainslie Claimed OU circuit
and here
YouTube - YouTube - ainslie 2

And you are correct also,courtesy is contagious,and necessary

BTW TK is still most curious about Rosemary's circuit!!

[TinselKoala]

Thanks for linking those again, Ramset. I feel that I need to make a comment here for clarity.

First, of course, I am using the 2sk1548 mosfet in these videos, but the problem I identified is unrelated to the transistor.

Second, the duty cycle issue is a result of the 555 timer circuit which is taken from the Quantum article, which Rosemary now acknowledges is WRONG.

It sure would have saved me a lot of trouble had I known that when I started.

After all, I downloaded the article from her website.

Third, the batteries used in the second video are nearly depleted at the start of the video. My current testing is using 2 brand new fully charged 12 volt 20 amp-hour batteries, and I did see load heating comparable to Rosemary's at 3.7 percent ON, with the new batteries.

Please note that my scope probes are attached exactly as shown in the EIT paper.

Also please note that I am doing this in my basement kitchen; I have access to a lot more and a lot more sophisticated gear if it should become necessary.

The main point of these videos is to show that I am actually doing something, not just talking, and to illustrate once again the effect of the inverted duty cycle produced by the Quantum circuit (which we now know is wrong.)

[Joit]

I saw his Videos allready, but its nothing, what knocks my socks off,
and anyhow, its more ambiguous for me, if they show the good side or only the bad side of the Circuit.
I wont count the Time, where i tried to figure out some more from some Circuits,
even countless rewinding from Coils, and after all, you should be rebuild it twice, once, you did find something.
A lot of Effort as usual, but at last, the further Steps do count.

There are still N and P Channel Mosfets, what you surly allerady know, but just to mention, Tk used a N-Channel still, same as the PG50
And sometimes, the direction of Winding from my Coils/this Case maybe the heating Element, did do a different
and of course the Size of it, because of the Energie, what you do pump in.
Something else, with the F-Generator you get a direct earth ground, what can make a different too.

[RAMSET]

Together

Jolt
please don't assume you are alone in this quest [for the truth]
To say that thousands of hours have been spent in this quest ,is an understatement,

Please do not dismiss the efforts of TK as negative to this cause "F.E."

This is not a detractor ,[T.K.] But a beacon of light

LET THE LIGHT SHINE

Chet

And Rosemary may your light shine the brightest

[SkyWatcher]

Hi folks, I mentioned in my post #291 how when I measured the flyback output separately through a dmm that it only showed 40 millivolts when on the dc volts setting. Can anyone shed light on this, Is it possible the dmm cannot pick up the true voltage that may be there or could that be the actual voltage and if it is the actual flyback voltage output then It may be that something else is responsible for the faster heat rise in the resistor. Let me hear your thoughts in this, thanks.
peace love light

[Justalabrat]

Skywatcher, A DMM is not designed to catch spikes, you must use an oscilloscope.

[SkyWatcher]

Hi justalabrat, thanks for reply. Hmm, with a copper coil i can see high voltage spikes off the diode using the dmm, maybe you mean the dmm cant see the full extent of the spike. My guess is, is that it may be a very brief spike off of the resistor and that may be why. Anyone else have any ideas, thanks.

[SkyWatcher]

Hi again, let me rephrase what i said. I checked with the copper coil and i was mistaken it only shows a lower voltage like 7 volts and doesnt show the high voltage spike, so yes your correct. Still though the resistor only shows 40 millivolts, any ideas what a scope might show as far as a voltage spike on for the resistor, anyone. wish i had a scope now.

[witsend]

Aaron - there's the problem - again. I tried to correct the word 'necessarily' and only managed to duplicate. When I delete the original post I delete both. What am I doing wrong?

EDIT IGNORE THIS MESSAGE. Somehow we're back to one edited post. Perhaps I was just not patient enough to allow it to load. Thanks anyway.

[witsend]

RAMSET - you asked what I'm using to heat our house? I'm afraid I'm linked to ESKOM which is the utility supplier. Nor have we any special insulation as such which is what Peter rightly recommends. The point is that there is no way that I know of to apply this system anywhere as my knowledge of electric circuit application is only experimental as it relates to small energies. But I do know that my co-author has wired up a house in our Town - that uses some small part of this system to help recharge batteries. That house is entirely 'grid free'. The problem here is that ESKOM use watt meters that are blocked to deny the opportunity of putting energy back to the grid. And - I do not know how to apply this energy on high wattages as required by the typical household. But henieck has some ideas here that I'm sure he'd be happy to share.

EDIT henieck - if you see this post could you answer?

[witsend]

TinselKoala - I'm referring again to your question regarding the patent. I do hope that I will not be required to answer it for the third time.

The patent was applied for from the international patenting offices in Europe. It was applied for at no cost to me but as a favour from the patenting attorney. But we did not want to REGISTER the patent - only APPLY for it.

By applying there is the required publication of all such. The claims in the paper are then put out there for the public to look at, comment, claim prior rights - et al. It is part of the procedure for patent application. This means that as a function of the patent office there is a prior required publication of the knowledge in that paper. It is effectively PUT IN THE PUBLIC DOMAIN.

However, I did not want to REGISTER the patent as my object was to use the patent offices ONLY TO ENSURE PUBLICATION of the technology. In effect, once you've applied for a patent and then do not register it - then the result will be that you forfeit all rights to patenting it again. But it also prevents anyone else from patenting the device - precisely because it is has now been put in the public domain. It is no longer that novel that you can claim the unique properties required to qualify for a patent.

Edit Cloxxki - I hope you read this in view of your entrepreneurial skills.

This means, effectively, that no-one will be able to claim the right to lodge a patent or to exploit the technology for royalties on any switching device that is applied for purposes of generating radiant energy - in any application at all. The technology therefore belongs to the public - or to all those interested in exploiting the technology. You can make money on any device that is manufactured to exploit the technology. You cannot make money on the principles used to generate that extra energy.

In effect, it was intended as a 'gift' to encourage less pollutant energy. But it has substantially backfired as no-one, thus far, seems to appreciate the point of that PATENT. I do not want royalties. I want the technology widely used. It works.

And Aaron, I hope you also read this post that you can comment if TinselKoala again brings this point up.

[Mark]

She doesn't want money, gave it freely to all and is now trying to help us understand and replicate. Rosemary obviously has no ulterior motives and is not hiding anything.

I hope that everyone can get back to what is important now.

Rosemary you have a kind spirit, thank you for your generosity.

[witsend]

Mark - many thanks. Nice to see someone finally understands what I'm trying to do.

I agree that we're getting off tack. I wrote some more replies to TinselKoala and actually deleted them. The points are getting boring and one hopes to keep the interest of the readers to this thread.

I think one needs to remember that one's persona is actually somewhat hidden by these chosen identities and - behind them - one can indulge in the kind of retributive comments that may satisfy the moment but do nothing to promote the cause.

I guess we really need to keep the focus on the bigger picture.

[witsend]

Skywalker - your tests. Can I ask which circuit you're testing? I'm reasonably sure that if you're in a reasonably big city, then most precision engineering shops or electrical engineering firms have the kind of scopes that are needed. I'ts a haul to phone and ask around - but it's what I did in the early days. And that's where I made my friends that stuck with me through this whole exercise.

They seem to be glad to give some access to their equipment - provided, obviously, that the tests are done in situ. The only thing is that if they have storage scopes - then ask to take those results away with you.

What I'm actually saying that I don't think there's a shortcut to finding the answers without some precision equipment. What's actually needed is a way to measure the 'shunt' values (on our circuit) with a dump of all the voltage values across a few sample waveforms. That way you'll get an immediate means to 'sum' those voltages and work out the actual wattage dissipated by the battery. It doesn't take too many samples to find the optimum frequency - with or without that oscillating frequency. In any event, I hope this helps. Obviously it all depends on where you live - whether such a shop has the required equipment - and whether they'll give you access.

My own experience, as mentioned, is that most people are intrigued with the experiment itself. So you satisfy your need for experimental numbers and their curiosity - both. Hope that helps.