COP 17 Heater | Rosemary Ainslie | Part 2

[witsend]

Still hoping for feeback re those IGBT's. Have any of you experts any advices here?

And Aaron, I'm intrigued. Are you still doing tests on either my circuit - or as Glen prefers to call it - the Mosfet Heating circuit?

And, by the way, there's a problem with the way our first thread has been 'locked'. It seems we can no longer access the 'readership' count. Can you please re-install this? Otherwise it's historical value will be entirely lost.

Thanks

Sorry to quote myself - but I'm simply repeating this question and a couple more to Aaron.

Regarding the IGBT here's what I'm asking. Does one use it in conjunction with a 555 switch. Does it effectly 'cut off' the circuit from the battery supply during the switching process? Does it have an intrisic body diode - like a MOSFET to enable flow of current in an opposite direction? What is the maximum voltage tolerance?

But it's nearly our time when I'll be able to ask these questions directly to the suppliers. But Aaron - the other two questions still need answering.

[ashtweth]

Rose of the uni gets through, it will still be good to mention Open source engineers collaborating to write this paper is the first attempt in getting a FREE energy device accepted into the mainstream curricular in history - BY THE OPEN SOURCE COMMUNITY.

[witsend]

Ash - I rather pride myself on not varying from my first intentions. If my paper does get published - pray God - then it will definitely be published under a collaborated authorship as an 'open source' effort. I get it that you, Donovan, Andrew and myself are on course for this. Harvey has already advised that he does not want to be associated as I am now appropriating authority as first author. And Glen I assume prefers to be disassociated from the 'thesis'. In any event he never answered my invitation to collaborate. The thesis, unfortunately needs must be associated with any publication as it was a REQUIRED result that more energy be dissipated than delivered. I've mentioned this. All over the place.

[witsend]

Guys, here's more on the thesis - another 5 or so paragraphs. This time I'm back to the particle in the fields - having more or less covered the current flow.

http://www.energeticforum.com/renewa...html#post87313

[witsend]

Anyway - on a more postive note - it's our mid week and I can give an update on the progress of our FIRST APPLICATION.

We've secured interest at one of our local campuses to assemble and demonstrate in their labs. This means that the measuring equipment will be zut - calibrated and adequate. And more to the point - accreditation will be courtesy some real expertise. This is a FIRST and we are very grateful for this opportunity.

Then, we've also secured a manufacturer who will be supplying us with the required hot water cylinders - minus the element, obviously. This is under contract. I'm in the process of discussing with various transistor manufacturers to see if I can get some dedicated MOSFETS built. Thus far negotiations are very much in the preliminary phase - but it looks promising. We've assembled the team to do build the switch when the component parts have been fully sourced. I'm still trying to find the resistor manufacturer to order those exotic elements.

Progress is slow. But we're getting there. And the campus testing of the application - that's now with more than one academic. So interest is escalating. Such a change from before.

I anticipate that we'll be ready for testing within a month or so. But I'll keep you all updated.

[witsend]

Hi b4FreeEnergy

Some good news. I've located your nichrome wire 1mm thick - 15 meters at R4 a meter. It's definitely worth a box of chocolates. LOL.

I'm only getting this wire at the weekend. I'll post it on to you when I've got it. You'll need to pm me your address. I'll look out for it. Feeling quite smug I might add.

And guys - I now have the resistor manufacturer also on board. Things are falling into place. Only thing outstanding is that transistor. Hope that God can throw another miracle in our way. They're piling up here.

[b4FreeEnergy]

Send you my address? I’m not equipped yet to withstand attacks from those MIB in my own street. I have a dog but it’s friendly to everybody so I guess I need something more substantial to keep them away! Where could you get it so easily from? Maybe I can order some from there too ..., I would still send you that box of chocolates …

[witsend]

Send you my address? I’m not equipped yet to withstand attacks from those MIB in my own street. I have a dog but it’s friendly to everybody so I guess I need something more substantial to keep them away! Where could you get it so easily from? Maybe I can order some from there too ..., I would still send you that box of chocolates …

LOL. I've had the first laugh in a long time. I kept thinking of your friendly dog and all those men in black - lurking - suspiciously. If you need to identify them - they wear dark glasses - always.

I'll still need to get the wire for you. It's a bit of a favour. Maybe you can use an anonymous address somewhere. I know Aaron used a shop address when he took delivery of the Fluke scope meter. And I'm not too sure I want those chocolates. I'm afraid you'll pay for them retail. God forbid. But it's your choice B. I'm only trying to keep to my undertaking here.

EDIT - here's what to look out for. LOL

[Aaron]

@Rosemary

Sorry to quote myself - but I'm simply repeating this question and a couple more to Aaron.

Regarding the IGBT here's what I'm asking. Does one use it in conjunction with a 555 switch. Does it effectly 'cut off' the circuit from the battery supply during the switching process? Does it have an intrisic body diode - like a MOSFET to enable flow of current in an opposite direction? What is the maximum voltage tolerance?

But it's nearly our time when I'll be able to ask these questions directly to the suppliers. But Aaron - the other two questions still need answering.

Sorry for the delay in responding to this.
I am not very familiar with IGBT.

What are all the ?'s Rosemary?

[witsend]

Hi Aaron. At last. 'No worries', as Ash puts it - on the IGBT. I'm trying to advance the manufacture of a dedicated MOSFET. Not yet entirely thrown out - so I'm hoping against hope.

The question is this. Our 'locked thread' no longer shows a 'hit' count. Only relevant in that I've been monitoring this to see if there is continued interest and to ensure that Tektronix is still getting exposure. Can this number be shown? Somehow? Nothwithstanding it's being locked? Otherwise if the number cannot be shown is it still being recorded - somewhere?

[witsend]

A second local university campus has also undertaken that application accreditation. And I've got a meeting next week at a third campus. Skittles are falling and barriers are tumbling Guys. And all that is left now is to resolve that switch. Again. Thank you God.

And Harvey? Eat your heart out.

[Aaron]

thread status

Hi Aaron. At last. 'No worries', as Ash puts it - on the IGBT. I'm trying to advance the manufacture of a dedicated MOSFET. Not yet entirely thrown out - so I'm hoping against hope.

The question is this. Our 'locked thread' no longer shows a 'hit' count. Only relevant in that I've been monitoring this to see if there is continued interest and to ensure that Tektronix is still getting exposure. Can this number be shown? Somehow? Nothwithstanding it's being locked? Otherwise if the number cannot be shown is it still being recorded - somewhere?

The "views" are there. Go to
http://www.energeticforum.com/renewable-energy/

Scroll down, look at the view column. Click on VIEWS and it will sort
by views and you will see that it still monitors the views.

COP 17 Heater | Rosemary Ainslie ( 1 2 3 ... Last Page)
Aaron

01-20-2010 02:10 AM
by Aaron

3,433 115,778

That is 3433 replies and 115,778 views.

[witsend]

The "views" are there. Go to
http://www.energeticforum.com/renewable-energy/

That is 3433 replies and 115,778 views.

GOT IT. Thanks Aaron

[witsend]

Guys, I'm indulging here - not in the thesis but in a single concept. Just wrap your minds around this and use this as a 'key' to getting an idea of where this thesis is pointing. This exercise is for one of our members who I know does not read the 'thesis' thread.

Everything in our world and, for that matter, in our universe is identified by having a three dimensional shape. This applies to galaxies and stars and on a more prosaic level - to our computers, to bricks in our houses - to trees, flowers - name it. If it's there and if it's identifiable, then it also occupies space and it has three dimensions. For now just know that I am referring to all that stuff as 'amalgams'. Some of that stuff - those amalgams - seem to have a really stable bound condition. Some - like some plants, only have a brief life span - that barely lasts out a season.

Now I need you to forget just about everything you've ever learned about fire and chemistry and about the electromagnetic interaction that mainstream attribute to that bound condition. Just put it away until you've finished reading here.

Now consider that all those atoms that make up that amalgam? Some are bound into a molecular state. Some are simply grouped as atoms. Every amalgam is different. What I'm proposing is that those atoms and molecules are 'bound' by magnetic fields. They're tiny little fields that have nothing to do with the bigger magnetic fields on our earth - or in space or anywhere at all. They're just small little numbers that hold atoms together. Every molecule is bound by these fields. Every amalgam is bound by these fields.

Now consider this. Apply friction to a dried stick and you'll get a spark. What I propose is that spark is the result of a 'broken magnetic field'. These little particles unravel from the 'field'. Their 'orbit' slows down. They now become as slow and as hot as big as they were first fast and cold and small. We see this as a spark. That spark is still a tiny little magnetic dipole. Or. Just think of it as a magnet. Other magnets tumble into the first one - so that the first spark now becomes a flame and that flame becomes a fire. And while this fire burns all it does is to continually 'unravel' those binding fields. More and more little magnets join it - very compulsively. Until - when the fire has burned out - we're left with the unbound carbon atoms that first made up that stick. And the fire is gone.

Now consider this. Those little magnets - those tiny little dipoles that were binding the stick? Where did they go? Well here's the thing. Let's presume, for now that we have that flame cooking a ceramic pot. And inside that pot is a handful of iron filings - some loose aggregate of iron. As a flame - in this hot condition the magnetic dipoles - those little magnets - are in a transitional phase. They're looking for something to move into. They're looking for an 'atomic abode' - something that can house them and then they can regroup into orderly hidden fields. They have a compulsive need to order their environment into a state of charge balance. I've termed this an 'immutable imperative'. They have to find somewhere to 'live' and they have to establish a balance. The bound condition of the ceramic pot is such that they cannot find a 'slot' - or as I've termed it - an 'atomic abode'. So they move through the pot. Then they find that iron aggregate. Now they've got something to work with. They move into this aggregate and they systematically start joining up all those atoms. And when the fire is exhausted and the amalgam has 'melted' into a single lump of metal? Then those little fields simply disappear from our dimensions. But they're right there. This time they're holding the iron atoms together. Before this they were holding the carbon atoms of the stick together. And as the fire is exhausted - as all that source energy is depleted then those little fields go from a hot, slow, big state and they group into their fields and they become cold and fast and small. And they're so fast they simply cant be found. They're effectively no longer in our dimensions.

So. That's the transfer of energy as heat. It has simply taken fields from one condition of binding - to another. And the cost? It forfeited its first bound condition to find abodes in a second bound condition. It has been transferred through space and in time. But it has not been destroyed. Only transferred.

[witsend]

Here's my reply.

Here's the thing. It is not the existence of 'fringe' technology. That's always been there - from the beginning of time. The difficulty facing us all now is that there needs to be a 'thesis'. Without an explanation for this 'extra' energy then mainstream and our reading public will remain sceptical. And with good reason. What you will also read is that the so called 'theories' in support of this 'dark energy' or 'zero point energy' are fraught with contention and they usually contradict each other and they none of them explain the 'effects'. And as you rightly point out, there have been many effects, many proofs.

Add to that the kind of difficulties that we face even on this little circuit of ours. It can only be exposed through the use of really zut equipment. And it can only be measured with that same equipment. And one doesn't simply walk into the effect. To maximise it took us three years of continual searching. I knew what I was looking for. But it's elusive. It does not come to the forefront of the test and bite you in the face. It ducks and dives in the background. To make it repeatable one first needs to understand it. Fully.

Then look at the 'vested interests'. The attacks on my circuit was probably subject to the strongest attack of any new device everywhere. Members on our forums are literally funded by these 'entities' who look to steal emerging new technologies - or who look to squash them. I've had both and more strongly applied than anywhere else because I have a rare condition in this claim. It can be measured. And not only that - but it was required to substantiate a thesis. Such is usually lacking. But add to that that I can prove the historical sequence to this requirement for proof of thesis and the entire claim gets dangerously desirable or dangerously undesirable - depending on that mandate of those 'entities'.

The problem is that there has been an intuitive understanding - something that has permeated our universal awareness - probably on a subliminal level - that this energy is indeed there. But chance evidence will never satisfy our mainstream scientists. It needs to be part of a theory. That's why it's just so significant that Harvey first attempted to take the theory out of the paper - thereby rendering it unpublishable - or he needed to deny the effects. In fact he's tried both. That's the main reason that he's motivated another thread. It's not free for posting by everyone. He can claim what he likes there. And he has positioned himself to edit the thread from public comment. He's definitely in one of those two camps. Not sure which yet. That I never realised this, or that I never believed it - because truth to tell - I was indeed warned? This is proof of how clever these people are. I pride myself on being reasonably intelligent. But I was entirely 'taken in'.

But I promise you that once the 'thesis' is understood - then not they nor anyone will be able to stop this emerging technology. Then all kinds of discoveries will be re-investigated and re-explored and - indeed - widely implemented. I assure you that this is true. Academics are not party to that conspiracy of 'silence' or 'misinformation'. They don't share these agendas. They're thinking honest members of our community - on the whole. They're just absolutely not allowed to investigate 'fringe' science. It does their reputations untold harm. And that's my goal. I need to get this to the academic forum. That usually requires publication in an academic journal. But if the application is evaluated on campus it will be as good as publishing. I'll see to it. Add to that the assistance on my field model - and that's a winning combination. EDITED. Either one - ACCREDITATION OF THE APPLIANCE OR PUBLICATION OF THE THESIS IN A REVIEWED JOURNAL - and it will no longer be fringe science. Then it will become a respectable avenue of investigation by our experts. And we need this. Badly

And guys, by the way - while I freely admit that the thesis is 'skeletal' it's also bang on. If any of you have the time - try and wrap your minds around it. It's really, really simple. And it will, without question, make this search for this energy - far less subject to random 'effects'. It's preposterous to say that this thesis of mine is right. But actually I need to be just that preposterous because it is right.