Tweet
Hi B. You are such a welcome find. The only one of the many readers of this thread who actually answered me. Thank you for that. It makes me feel a little less 'on my own'. But I also understand the 'reluctance' to comment - either by those that I'm addressing or by those who simply only 'read' here. The subject is grossly 'over worked'. It's all been covered in previous posts.
But I've learned how critical it is to keep due and proper record. And Ash, for one, carries some considerable authority. There is absolutely no reason to doubt his credentials. He is unquestionably a 'researcher' and promotor of Free Energy. His own site gives ample proof. And he's devoted many years of his adult life to just this cause. So. When Ash comes forward with endorsement? Then I think one owes it to him to pay heed. Therefore is it necessary for me to question the grounds of my own 'lack of endorsement' of both Harvey and Glen. Where exactly am I wrong? The schedule of 'evidence' points somewhat overwhelmingly - to the possibility that they are rendering Open Source a very real disservice.
So far the debunkers are not answering these very critical posts. I think the intention is to ignore me in the belief that either I'll 'go away', or I'll get bored with this monologue. Truth is I need to make a clear 'schedule' of evidence - just for the record. I have devoted very nearly 11 years to the progress of this circuit and the model. I'm certainly not going to let two 'members' trash my hard work - regardless as to whether I eventually discover their actual motives. I know EXACTLY how it needs to be progressed, and you're absolutely right. The testing of that 200 kW hot water cylinder is critical. It will 'put paid' to their nonsense. Their sad little effort at debunking is self-evidently insufficient. I'm just sorry that I do not yet know their motives. But - in the meanwhile - I certainly challenge Ash's endorsements of their integrity - either as experimentalists or as power analysts. The facts simply do not support it.
I owe this forum a great deal. It carries the record of this progress and these extraordinary final chapters. And without it I think this circuit of mine and the model would quite simply have been lost for being debunked or for needing some exposure. Yet again. It's as Ash has said. Open Source is certainly the answer. And Energetic Forum is quite simply the best. I just want to ensure that - in the unhappy event that I die an untimely death - God forbid - that the actual 'history' related to this circuit - is freely available. It will all be here. But I've also gone to some trouble to ensure that should I die there's the immediate public release here and elsewhere of this and other projects that I work on - the release of those 'waveforms' and data that Glen has tried to hide - the release of the appalling correspondence from both Harvey and Glen which better show the true character of Harvey and Glen - together with the release of all the accreditors' correspondence. And finally the development of the hot water cylinder will not be halted. I'm structuring this that it will go ahead - no matter what. Nor will the accreditation of experts be lacking. Everything is on record. And all records are with my attorneys. And I NEVER PHONE NOR EMAIL MY ATTORNEYS. So. To interested parties. Don't try and look for them here. I'm not paranoid. Just careful to progress this knowledge.
EDITED
(mixed emotions. LOL)
ANOTHER EDIT. And indeed B. Sjalom. Am in great need of this. LOL
But I've learned how critical it is to keep due and proper record. And Ash, for one, carries some considerable authority. There is absolutely no reason to doubt his credentials. He is unquestionably a 'researcher' and promotor of Free Energy. His own site gives ample proof. And he's devoted many years of his adult life to just this cause. So. When Ash comes forward with endorsement? Then I think one owes it to him to pay heed. Therefore is it necessary for me to question the grounds of my own 'lack of endorsement' of both Harvey and Glen. Where exactly am I wrong? The schedule of 'evidence' points somewhat overwhelmingly - to the possibility that they are rendering Open Source a very real disservice.
So far the debunkers are not answering these very critical posts. I think the intention is to ignore me in the belief that either I'll 'go away', or I'll get bored with this monologue. Truth is I need to make a clear 'schedule' of evidence - just for the record. I have devoted very nearly 11 years to the progress of this circuit and the model. I'm certainly not going to let two 'members' trash my hard work - regardless as to whether I eventually discover their actual motives. I know EXACTLY how it needs to be progressed, and you're absolutely right. The testing of that 200 kW hot water cylinder is critical. It will 'put paid' to their nonsense. Their sad little effort at debunking is self-evidently insufficient. I'm just sorry that I do not yet know their motives. But - in the meanwhile - I certainly challenge Ash's endorsements of their integrity - either as experimentalists or as power analysts. The facts simply do not support it.
I owe this forum a great deal. It carries the record of this progress and these extraordinary final chapters. And without it I think this circuit of mine and the model would quite simply have been lost for being debunked or for needing some exposure. Yet again. It's as Ash has said. Open Source is certainly the answer. And Energetic Forum is quite simply the best. I just want to ensure that - in the unhappy event that I die an untimely death - God forbid - that the actual 'history' related to this circuit - is freely available. It will all be here. But I've also gone to some trouble to ensure that should I die there's the immediate public release here and elsewhere of this and other projects that I work on - the release of those 'waveforms' and data that Glen has tried to hide - the release of the appalling correspondence from both Harvey and Glen which better show the true character of Harvey and Glen - together with the release of all the accreditors' correspondence. And finally the development of the hot water cylinder will not be halted. I'm structuring this that it will go ahead - no matter what. Nor will the accreditation of experts be lacking. Everything is on record. And all records are with my attorneys. And I NEVER PHONE NOR EMAIL MY ATTORNEYS. So. To interested parties. Don't try and look for them here. I'm not paranoid. Just careful to progress this knowledge.
EDITED
(mixed emotions. LOL)ANOTHER EDIT. And indeed B. Sjalom. Am in great need of this. LOL
Finally there is a new soul on this thread. 
Comment