Starting this thread for the discussion of John Bedini's Monopole Energizer as outlined in this patent:
US Patent 6545444 (2003)
http://www.google.com/patents?vid=USPAT6545444
(oddly google is giving me "Internal Server Error" just for this patent)
(image hosted by Rex Research)
Full details of the patents can be found on Rex Research
www.rexresearch.com/ bedini/bedini.htm
The main differnece between the Monopole Energizer from the SSG and Schoolgirl Motor is primarily the fact that it charges a capacitor with the flyback voltage and then discharges the charged capacitor (by any means eg, mechanical contact, SCR, or relay) into a charging battery bank.
Also, the front end isn't directly connected to the back end as in the SSG. A recovery coil is used and so the coil is normally Trifilar (one primary coil, one recovery coil, and a trigger coil) though it can have many more wires.
It is said that this is the setup neccessary to swap the batteries indefinatly as it converts the output of the coils into a form of energy that is better suited to run inductive loads than direct output into the battery.
It is recommended to use high farad capacitors and to discharge them around 2 volts above the charging voltage.
If multiple coils are to be used, then their recovery windings should be wired in series assuming they are synchronous. However, if the coils are firing independant to each other, then each recovery winding will require its own bridge recifier before being wired in parellel to the capacitor.
The trigger winding can also be substituted for another method of triggering. Bedini has been known to use a Hall Sensor.
I think that is everything covered Other than the differences listed above it is pretty much identical to the SSG setup.
US Patent 6545444 (2003)
http://www.google.com/patents?vid=USPAT6545444
(oddly google is giving me "Internal Server Error" just for this patent)
(image hosted by Rex Research)
Full details of the patents can be found on Rex Research
www.rexresearch.com/ bedini/bedini.htm
The main differnece between the Monopole Energizer from the SSG and Schoolgirl Motor is primarily the fact that it charges a capacitor with the flyback voltage and then discharges the charged capacitor (by any means eg, mechanical contact, SCR, or relay) into a charging battery bank.
Also, the front end isn't directly connected to the back end as in the SSG. A recovery coil is used and so the coil is normally Trifilar (one primary coil, one recovery coil, and a trigger coil) though it can have many more wires.
It is said that this is the setup neccessary to swap the batteries indefinatly as it converts the output of the coils into a form of energy that is better suited to run inductive loads than direct output into the battery.
It is recommended to use high farad capacitors and to discharge them around 2 volts above the charging voltage.
If multiple coils are to be used, then their recovery windings should be wired in series assuming they are synchronous. However, if the coils are firing independant to each other, then each recovery winding will require its own bridge recifier before being wired in parellel to the capacitor.
The trigger winding can also be substituted for another method of triggering. Bedini has been known to use a Hall Sensor.
I think that is everything covered Other than the differences listed above it is pretty much identical to the SSG setup.
Comment