Bedini Ferris Wheel Regauging Motor

[Aaron]

@erfinder

In my opinion the comparison made between Coral Castle and the Philadelphia Masonic lodge that Jeremy of Code144 shared with all, may not be entirely accurate, however, the points made, however far they stretch the imagination are relevant whether the points are correct or not, these are the directors impressions! They were/are relevant to him! The message he prepared was so important to him that he felt the need to share it. Honor should be given where its due, whether the content is flawed or not. If we as viewers of this information know for a fact that some part or parts of the presentation aren't factual, then it is our duty to not only point out that flaw, but to also provide the correct answer, preferably immediately following pointing out the error.

At the end of the day, no one save a Mason in the know....is in the position to verify or discredit the story which has been presented by Code144... Now if the stories we hear about that group of individuals (Masons) are true, we won't see one on these pages telling us whether the information provided by Code144 is accurate or not. That being said...The Masonic connection deserves some attention as well...but now is not the time nor place for such a discussion....

Erfinder,

I can appreciate what you're saying but you did NOT comprehend my post.

Obviously it is his impression - that needs to be pointed out? You should
go back and read my message instead of posting that something should
be done that I already did!

I posted my opinion of the video in addition to presenting one blatant
FACT, which seems to have popped your kool-aid balloon.

I SAID - he is a wiz and I think that he has the most accurate decryption
of the numbers. I'm not sure what you find in that statement that does
not honor him. I think credit should go
where it is deserved but he CLAIMED that this particular Lodge is designed
to display this knowledge about magnetic current when it is NOT. Some
things he asks if they are not mere coincidences for example and in others
he is stating them as facts, when they are NOT.

And if we know something isn't factual it is our duty to point it out and
show what the correct answer is?? First of all that is YOUR life philosophy
and I don't know who you are to think that anyone else in the world should
abide by it. I'll point something out that is blatantly wrong even if the
right answer isn't known as I don't have to subscribe to what you think
is any one else's duty or not. I happen to mostly agree with that life
philosophy of yours, but you're out of line telling me what my duty should be.

However, in light of your flawed comprehension of what I posted, I stated
a correct answer that what was in the middle of the sun is a LEVEL! What
part about that correct answer giving do you not understand, which
happened to immediately follow what was pointed out as being
incorrect? You gripe about me not doing something that I actually DID!

Please don't answer - we're not turning this thread into a debate on
something that you think needs to be done, when I did it but you obviously
didn't comprehend that in my post.



The Immovable Jewels of the lodge - Unzipped - Square, Plumb and Level

A Mason cannot discredit the 144 story? Basically, showing that the
image was a Level and not a Bell has ALREADY discredited his story
IN REGARDS TO COMPARING IT TO THE DESIGN OF A LODGE . And if you
comprehend it - that has NOTHING to do with his idea about the
numbers. One point doesn't necessarily have to do with another and for
real critical thinking, the distinctions between these matters should be
comprehended.

And you do NOT know if any Mason is in the position to verify or discredit
the code144 story or not! And if you think you can make that claim, you
are confusing your beliefs with facts that can be verified. These blanket
claims are a pitfall and are out of touch with reality.

And that being said... by the way, there IS a Masonic connection to all
of this but sorry, this Lodge design has nothing to do with it.

Now is not the time for discussion? You're not going to tell me what it
is time for me to do or not. I watched the
recommended videos, point out some flaws and showed a correction and
I'm interested in the truth - not a delusion. Actually, I am interested in
the wild imagination part of it because that is pretty fun but I'm not going
to sit by and let people believe something false when I know the answer.

Again, I think the presentation is awesome, which - um, I think I already
said but I just said it again. I think he (again) has the most accurate
decryption of the numbers mystery of Coral Castle. And I am a person
interested in the FACTS, I have pointed out a FACT and have given a
FACT - one of many FACTS that can be pointed out about his claims that
that Lodge is build to embody the magnetic current principles, which is
FALSE. A MASONIC LEVEL is what that image was and NOT a bell. That
is quite a HOLE that got punched right through his analogy. Numbers -
yes, he seems to be right on, but his revelation of what the Lodge
is emblematic of is WRONG.

Bottom line is that you can be high on the kool-aid all you want, but I'm
interested in the FACTS and will continue to point them out as I see them
and if I don't, I'm guilty of letting people move down a a path with rose
colored glasses that could be avoided. I did the RIGHT thing by pointing
out what I pointed out - at least that is what my value system leads me
to believe and evidently you want people to shave their heads and slap
a tambourine.

[John_Bedini]

Big Bedini Motor

Here is the answer.
John B

erfinder,

I think you are right about the tetrahedron:

Tetrahedron - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

especially this part:

"Electricity and electronics

If four equal resistors are soldered together to form a tetrahedron, then the resistance measured between any two vertices is half that of one resistor.[8]

Since silicon is the most common semiconductor used in solid-state electronics, and silicon has a valence of four, the tetrahedral shape of the four chemical bonds in silicon is a strong influence on how crystals of silicon form and what shapes they assume."

We have four resistors in the 3 coils (all in parallel), has John configured them to form a (non-linear) tetrahedron?

Also, what do you see in the attached picture? (Star of David) I think I can see the geometry of the 3 coils.

Or I could be barking up the wrong tree


John K.

[John_Bedini]

Big Bedini Motor

No,
The make up is 10 poles and two five pointed stars, five worked better then six here.

Aaron is right as most of it is hogwash at code 144 but the math is right. I know a 33 degree Mason and you never remove the books which discuss all of this, they build all of the buildings to take advantage of the forces.

Remember what I said about devices, since you only look at them one way. Do not think that you can not use them in reverse. The reason I say this because I built them right out of school at TRW "Whole Flow BS". Most of them will power themselves if you use them right, but the book teaches a closed loop circuit and to clamp them with all kinds of built in diodes and "Zeners" get it.

Just build the machine and do your best to collect the charges, I'm not the only one that can do this.

Or go to Africa and look up those little girls. Peter did give you he answer to the machine.
John B

It was early when I typed my last post. I may have not thought it out all the way before posting. But in the axel there are 10 coils. if 6 were the star that would leave 4 left over . 2 for each set of 3 coils/ magnets. basically I am thinking that the axel is is doing the same thing as the bottom, but doubled to make up for itself? Ramblings I know. and I should have waited for clarity before I posted the last post. Appologies.

[Armagdn03]

@ Mr. Bedini & others.

Here is a statement, or thought, which pertains to a couple threads, but I believe has relevance here.

If one were to travel to a distant Galaxy and land on a distant planet, would he find the same periodic table of elements in this new location?


Answer: No.

One could view atoms as harmonic divisions of the parent overtone known as our sun. Our sun is but a harmonic division of the parent overtone known as our galactic sun. Hence the transcendent saying "As above so below". This is one of the fundamental reasons for the "quanta" of energy we experience. One might also say the sun is an electron (or eddy current) of the galactic sun, and that our planet is an electron of our sun.

Furthering this train of thought one might say that our sun would not exist were it not being continually fed by the galactic sun. To that extent, our planet would not exist were it not being continually fed by our sun, and on and on down the line.

If all elements of a system are harmonically related, and can be reduced to a fundamental quanta both on the macroscopic and microscopic world (planks constant)... And these elements MUST be this way, or else they stop existing... Then in order to successfully interact with this energy, we must build devices which are in and of themselves a harmonic division of the grand overtone of our planet (sun or galaxy) and a multiple of the undertones known as our fundamental quanta of energy. (which is a redundant statement, since what is a fundamental quanta on the micro, is the same as a overtone on the macro, as above so below remember?)

This is my current train of thought in order to understand how the work of Leedskalnin and the sweet 16 plays into this device.

It would appear to me that 16 represents the fourth division of unity.
(first division of one =2, second = 4, third = 8 fourth = 16. )

(Mr. Bedini,I would be interested to discuss further along these lines, but It seems that most are more interested in the blueprints to the device rather than theory, so I wont derail the popular direction of this thread further. Hope to hear from you.)

[John_Bedini]

Big Bedini Field

Another thing here is the Axial Motor with pie cut magnets, What did ED say about his Perpetual motion holder, except Ed clamped it shut I did not do that I took advantage of the forces between poles in a series configuration and only needed to switch two little pulsed or what is called Re-gauging, read the Radus work pull the patents and see if you get it. In some of them Radus called that Buck, Boost, Westinghouse did not let all the information out but enough if you were ingenious enough you could build a permanent magnet motor. You only need one switch and not two for a motor. Look at his BH curves. You have all the answers here to build this machine.

Armagdn03
Yes that would be fine with me and some of what I just posted may help you understand Ed's work. The best is his flywheel as that magnetic arrangement is using north and south pole magnets pushed together to form magnetic beams and narrow beams. that would make the switching very sharp, more like spikes. by doing that Ed has moved the Bloch wall of the magnet to where the iron on the top is collecting that Phi field. and one of my investors has gone and looked under the flywheel and yes you can connect a wire to that point. So what was Ed doing with that current is to be discover buy us as his notes were all burnt up in a fire, like Tesla.
John B

[Aaron]

@Erfinder & @All

Thanks ERfinder for revealing EXACTLY who you are and what you stand
for and that you're post talking about honor and so on are completely
hypocritical and contradictory to your recent post which has been
deleted that clearly displays that you have serious cognitive dissonance
and that your internal struggle between two opposing frames of mind
has gotten the better of you. Preaching about honor and then turning
around and intentionally dishonoring someone is a sad place to be.
Good luck to you!

@All, this is in reference to a wonderfully colorful post with pornographic
references - and in a forum that people of ALL ages read - and this is
why he is no longer a member.

[Mark]

Erfinder,

I can appreciate what you're saying but you did NOT comprehend my post.

Obviously it is his impression - that needs to be pointed out? You should
go back and read my message instead of posting that something should
be done that I already did!

I posted my opinion of the video in addition to presenting one blatant
FACT, which seems to have popped your kool-aid balloon.

I SAID - he is a wiz and I think that he has the most accurate decryption
of the numbers. I'm not sure what you find in that statement that does
not honor him. I think credit should go
where it is deserved but he CLAIMED that this particular Lodge is designed
to display this knowledge about magnetic current when it is NOT. Some
things he asks if they are not mere coincidences for example and in others
he is stating them as facts, when they are NOT.

And if we know something isn't factual it is our duty to point it out and
show what the correct answer is?? First of all that is YOUR life philosophy
and I don't know who you are to think that anyone else in the world should
abide by it. I'll point something out that is blatantly wrong even if the
right answer isn't known as I don't have to subscribe to what you think
is any one else's duty or not. I happen to mostly agree with that life
philosophy of yours, but you're out of line telling me what my duty should be.

However, in light of your flawed comprehension of what I posted, I stated
a correct answer that what was in the middle of the sun is a LEVEL! What
part about that correct answer giving do you not understand, which
happened to immediately follow what was pointed out as being
incorrect? You gripe about me not doing something that I actually DID!

Please don't answer - we're not turning this thread into a debate on
something that you think needs to be done, when I did it but you obviously
didn't comprehend that in my post.



The Immovable Jewels of the lodge - Unzipped - Square, Plumb and Level

A Mason cannot discredit the 144 story? Basically, showing that the
image was a Level and not a Bell has ALREADY discredited his story
IN REGARDS TO COMPARING IT TO THE DESIGN OF A LODGE . And if you
comprehend it - that has NOTHING to do with his idea about the
numbers. One point doesn't necessarily have to do with another and for
real critical thinking, the distinctions between these matters should be
comprehended.

And you do NOT know if any Mason is in the position to verify or discredit
the code144 story or not! And if you think you can make that claim, you
are confusing your beliefs with facts that can be verified. These blanket
claims are a pitfall and are out of touch with reality.

And that being said... by the way, there IS a Masonic connection to all
of this but sorry, this Lodge design has nothing to do with it.

Now is not the time for discussion? You're not going to tell me what it
is time for me to do or not. I watched the
recommended videos, point out some flaws and showed a correction and
I'm interested in the truth - not a delusion. Actually, I am interested in
the wild imagination part of it because that is pretty fun but I'm not going
to sit by and let people believe something false when I know the answer.

Again, I think the presentation is awesome, which - um, I think I already
said but I just said it again. I think he (again) has the most accurate
decryption of the numbers mystery of Coral Castle. And I am a person
interested in the FACTS, I have pointed out a FACT and have given a
FACT - one of many FACTS that can be pointed out about his claims that
that Lodge is build to embody the magnetic current principles, which is
FALSE. A MASONIC LEVEL is what that image was and NOT a bell. That
is quite a HOLE that got punched right through his analogy. Numbers -
yes, he seems to be right on, but his revelation of what the Lodge
is emblematic of is WRONG.

Bottom line is that you can be high on the kool-aid all you want, but I'm
interested in the FACTS and will continue to point them out as I see them
and if I don't, I'm guilty of letting people move down a a path with rose
colored glasses that could be avoided. I did the RIGHT thing by pointing
out what I pointed out - at least that is what my value system leads me
to believe and evidently you want people to shave their heads and slap
a tambourine.

Aaron

I believe we are all allowed to have our own opinion whether they're write or wrong. Why do you have go on a such a long winded tagent when someone doesn't agree with you.

I posted my opinion of the video in addition to presenting one blatant
FACT, which seems to have popped your kool-aid balloon.
Don't look in the mirror here partner I think it was your ballon that got popped.

Erfinder deleted post was also out of line but Aaron you need to relax and not be so offended when someone doesn't agree with you. Erfinders original response did not deserve your demeaning comments.

Mark

[John_Bedini]

Big Bedini Machine

Aaron give me a call.
JohnB

[Ecoman11]

@Aaron

I told you once and I'll say it again. Stop being a Free Energy Officer and learn to take criticism about your views. If you're a true spiritual entrepreneur and have some faith, you would trust that any objective views will eventually be ruled out once the free energy theories are proven.

I'm sure many would agree here that your defense mimics the preaching of a disciple. Get real man.

Ecoman

[Jetijs]

Armagdn03
Yes that would be fine with me and some of what I just posted may help you understand Ed's work. The best is his flywheel as that magnetic arrangement is using north and south pole magnets pushed together to form magnetic beams and narrow beams. that would make the switching very sharp, more like spikes. by doing that Ed has moved the Bloch wall of the magnet to where the iron on the top is collecting that Phi field. and one of my investors has gone and looked under the flywheel and yes you can connect a wire to that point. So what was Ed doing with that current is to be discover buy us as his notes were all burnt up in a fire, like Tesla.
John B

Hi John,
Which iron do you mean, that lets you collect the phi field?
Here is my wheel so far:

[qvision]

Wouldn't a more helpful approach be for JB to post circuit diagrams ??

At the moment this is looking like a puzzle-solving contest, with everyone having to spend money to solve it.

I thought forums like this were for sharing information ...

[Armagdn03]

Hi John,
Which iron do you mean, that lets you collect the phi field?
Here is my wheel so far:

Hot damn, thas purdy.

[Raui]

Wouldn't a more helpful approach be for JB to post circuit diagrams ??

At the moment this is looking like a puzzle-solving contest, with everyone having to spend money to solve it.

I thought forums like this were for sharing information ...

If he just told us everything then, when a day comes that the man is unfortunately no longer with us, we'd be out fending for ourselves and we mightn't be able to figure things out because our minds aren't used to working in the ways that they are required to in order to understand this stuff.

@Jetjs,
I agree with Armagdn03, very nice!

[Armagdn03]

Wouldn't a more helpful approach be for JB to post circuit diagrams ??

At the moment this is looking like a puzzle-solving contest, with everyone having to spend money to solve it.

I thought forums like this were for sharing information ...

It is diffucult because....

Most are trained to view the potential centers (electrons) as the end all and be all of electromagnetic theory. These centers, which the radial system of potential point towards (like the spokes on a wheel point towards its center (except in this case with an inverse square quality)) are one half of the coin. In reality they are a one dimension point, which defines an entire sphere of space surrounding the point. This sphere becomes more and more B field dominant (S field in my favorite cosmology) the further from center you move. The spherical system and the radial system (potential and B field) are inverses of one another, and at the same time, cause one another. You can view the potential centers as causing the spherical system, or the spherical system as causing the radial potential system. We tend to use only one of these choices.

The circuit diagrams depict only the potential center pathways. This machine plays with the spherical system of S field which can define the potential centers, not the other way around like classically thought.

How do we want to shape and play with the B (S) field, how should our electronics follow suit to accomplish this? Theory is waaaaaaaay more important at this point than diagrams. I personally don't care to build a damn thing I don't understand.

Just my thoughts.

[Mark]

If he just told us everything then, when a day comes that the man is unfortunately no longer with us, we'd be out fending for ourselves and we mightn't be able to figure things out because our minds aren't used to working in the ways that they are required to in order to understand this stuff.

@Jetjs,
I agree with Armagdn03, very nice!

Raui

I find it much easier to understand how something works If I actually have a working model. Have you ever worked on a car engine before. It breaks down, you take it apart and fix it. Tear the whole engine down and rebuild it. You'll understand how it works. If you never worked on an engine before and someone just threw all the parts in a box and said here put it together, you'd never figure it out! No one is going to hand us a working model, we'll have to put it together. It's great if we understand the theory too but if we're never able to build a working model then understanding the theory wont do us much good.

I hope all of us or at least some of us are able to figure the whole thing out and replicate this machine, but what if we never do?

Mark