Bedini Ferris Wheel Regauging Motor

[albertMunich]

I'd also like to wish a happy Christmas to all the experimenters on the forum.

I have also wondered what the specific purpose of the Ferris wheel might be.
What does it do? Where does it go beyond what we have seen before?
Well, I think it might first of all be a demonstration of the benefits of making these machines to a bigger size. I think it is very significant that the trauma of the Watson machine was overcome with this one. This is no toy sized machine anymore.
Where is the difference to a SSG device? First, it has TORQUE, a larger amount of mechanical energy that could be used. Remember that it could almost lift a person off the ground according to people who saw it at the conference? Combining the advantages of a Bedini Cole driven window motor with the SSG wheel.
Then there is the question of input to output ratio. I think with all the tricks that Mr Bedini put into this machine it might have an enormous effect on the input to output ratio compared with a standard SSG.
And one final thought is that it is set up as a cap pulsing machine. I guess this would make it possible to set it up as a one battery system. Disconnect the input batts for a moment and pour the cap output into the drive batts. With the size and inertia of the wheel the disconnect would not affect the torque and/or the run speeds. Mr Bedini has said that 2 battery banks are always better than one but the one battery version would make it clear without any doubt that the SYSTEM in all its components is an OU device. Out go the discussions about wrong measurement methods.

Finally the machine is another proof of principle demonstrator. The size, Leedskalnin, the mag amp, the geometry...all things that Mr Bedini wanted to try in ONE machine. Plus the central "motor".
My two cents on this. Don't know if I'm right or wrong but would like to share these thoughts with you.

Albert

[nilrehob]

Funny how you forget, that you forgot... but I was thinking about what has been stated on the ring twice that has been discussed. And after watching the vids etc I remembered a post on monopole_2 where I did a test of the welding rods we use in the monopole energizer.

in post Message #5911 Monopole_2:
Here is the thing, If you saturate the core what does that mean?
In our application it means that the core becomes magnetically charged. It
retains a magnetic field even after the magnet is removed.

I posted an example of this earlier about neos effect on the R-60 welding rods
we are using. It becomes a magnetic switch. Hit it with north and it becomes
north, then hit it with south and it becomes neutral. hit is with south again it
becomes south. Hit it with north it becomes neutral, hit it with north again it
becomes north.

Is this ringing the bell twice?

Les

What if the magnet nodes on Ed L's generator,
the double norths and double souths,
are not forming sharp single nodes,
but simply two discrete nodes,
to make something ring twice?

/Hob

[redrichie]

hob,
I had thought the same thing myself. I had been trying to picture ED struggling with 24 oppising magnets five times trying to get everything alligned. and locking it down, and cementing the entire thing. But hell, he moved huge boulders sooo........

[txaggie00]

Merry Christmas

Just wanted to wish everyone a Merry Christmas! I also wanted to let you know the progress of our build. You can view the 3D engineering model of it here:

Our Bedini 3GT progress

We are starting a much cheaper prototype build to make sure we can get everything working properly before we machine the new rotors.

We'll keep you posted!

-Scott

[rave154]

Hi,

so does Anybody have an answer as to what the FWB actually "does"?

[Bit's-n-Bytes]

Hi,

so does Anybody have an answer as to what the FWB actually "does"?

Hi David, not only does the wheel power itself to rotate, it also generates power, about 1.3 million joules. I viewed the batts under charge go from 36.2 volts to about 47 volts in 2 revolutions of the wheel and begin to cold boil. Additionally, none of the 47 ft lbs of torque driving the wheel was not tapped into at the conference.

Hope this helps

Jeff

[Ecoman11]

Hi,

so does Anybody have an answer as to what the FWB actually "does"?

So far it's put another mythical halo around Bedini technology. I'm excited and can't wait to see someone replicate it.

Ecoman

[rave154]

bits,

thanks for the reply,

what batts were being used for the input ( amount of batts & AH's ?)..and the same Q for the output batts....

also.re:- 1.3 million Joules.......how long to produce this amount of energy?

Thanks again

[Les_K]

Hi David, not only does the wheel power itself to rotate, it also generates power, about 1.3 million joules. I viewed the batts under charge go from 36.2 volts to about 47 volts in 2 revolutions of the wheel and begin to cold boil. Additionally, none of the 47 ft lbs of torque driving the wheel was not tapped into at the conference.

Hope this helps

Jeff

I just keep picturing Tesla'a little shack in colorado that was 45 miles away from the tower all eq running from an antenea......Or his electric car?
sometimes my imagination is really out there though....

Les

[Turion]

Here is a diagram of the recommended experiment that should be done
first. I think the 3GT (the 3 references the 3 coils) - I think Tony Craddock
came up with that name.

Anyway, with 1 coil perhaps it is a 1GT and S1GT is simplified. Not
simplified in the same way as the SSG but simplified in the way of
not dealing with the regauging motor yet.

@All, it is obvious I don't put food on the table by using graphics
programs so anyone that wants to put this into a single nice drawing
full with 16 magnets on the wheel, etc... go for it! In any case, I think
it is clear enough what the first experiments should be.

Of course the trigger winding that is partially visible on that coil is not
needed - so pretend you don't see that.

@John - if anything needs to be changed for the proposed first
experiment that you already mentioned days ago, let me know.
And if the S1GT nickname makes sense.

Does anyone know where to get the parts:
MJE2955. MJE3055, MPS8599 The Hall 3020T all from the same place? I have been looking for a few days now and can't find all the parts at one location. I can't find that Hall sensor at ALL!!

[everwiser]

The first three items I found at Mouser Electronics - Electronic Component Distributor. Another Hall that triggers on the same magnet pole should work without issue as I don't believe the Hall chemistry is anywhere near as crucial as the other system parameters.

[John_K]

Does anyone know where to get the parts:
MJE2955. MJE3055, MPS8599 The Hall 3020T all from the same place? I have been looking for a few days now and can't find all the parts at one location. I can't find that Hall sensor at ALL!!

Hey free plug for my website, where you can get all of these, except the hall but there is a suitable replacement on there. I can ship worldwide, prices are in Aussie dollars, which are almost the same as the greenbacks...

www.wavelengthenergysolutions.com.au


John K.

[redrichie]

would just like to post this for everyone. its from the Potentialtec website. i think it gives a few answers for dummies like me.
It mentions using actual trigger coils, separated for timing. is there anything wrong with doing it this way. Not trying to get off track. Just remember in an EFTV vid John explaining the trigger when wound with the coil, and it firing at 23 degrees. if the halls are to trigger at 23 degrees and the trigger coil fires 23 degrees after TDC then what is the difference? are halls just more precise? we can adjust the "on" time with the dwell of the disk magnets? anything else?
Also not sure if its related at all, but the Earth is tilted on its axis at 23 degrees.

[Les_K]

Does anyone know where to get the parts:
MJE2955. MJE3055, MPS8599 The Hall 3020T all from the same place? I have been looking for a few days now and can't find all the parts at one location. I can't find that Hall sensor at ALL!!

Mouser has them listed as non-stocked. In fact the 3020T is not even listed.
3020 hall

Jameco and mouser have a 3040; Bop is where the biggest difference is on the data sheet. It's as close as I was able to find today.
3020 hall

OHS3140U: OPTEK TECHNOLOGY: Electromechanical

I started on the circuit today and realized my halls were only 5 volt. That will never do...
Les

[Michael Kishline]

I'd also like to wish a happy Christmas to all the experimenters on the forum.

I have also wondered what the specific purpose of the Ferris wheel might be.
What does it do? Where does it go beyond what we have seen before?
Well, I think it might first of all be a demonstration of the benefits of making these machines to a bigger size. I think it is very significant that the trauma of the Watson machine was overcome with this one. This is no toy sized machine anymore.
Where is the difference to a SSG device? First, it has TORQUE, a larger amount of mechanical energy that could be used. Remember that it could almost lift a person off the ground according to people who saw it at the conference? Combining the advantages of a Bedini Cole driven window motor with the SSG wheel.
Then there is the question of input to output ratio. I think with all the tricks that Mr Bedini put into this machine it might have an enormous effect on the input to output ratio compared with a standard SSG.
And one final thought is that it is set up as a cap pulsing machine. I guess this would make it possible to set it up as a one battery system. Disconnect the input batts for a moment and pour the cap output into the drive batts. With the size and inertia of the wheel the disconnect would not affect the torque and/or the run speeds. Mr Bedini has said that 2 battery banks are always better than one but the one battery version would make it clear without any doubt that the SYSTEM in all its components is an OU device. Out go the discussions about wrong measurement methods.

Finally the machine is another proof of principle demonstrator. The size, Leedskalnin, the mag amp, the geometry...all things that Mr Bedini wanted to try in ONE machine. Plus the central "motor".
My two cents on this. Don't know if I'm right or wrong but would like to share these thoughts with you.

Albert

Watts are units of Power, whereas Joules are units of Energy. Power is Energy in accordance to time: P = E/t . So One Watt of Power is equal to one Joule per second.
P=E/t
1 Watt = 1 Joule/ 1 second

24hours * 60minutes * 60seconds = 86400seconds

I heard John Bedini say at the conference the BFW puts out around 1.5million joules of energy in a 24hour period, then he asked “What could you do with that?”

Well…

1,500,000 joules of energy in a 24hour period

1,500,000 / 86400 = 17.361 joules/second

Average household in America uses 14,400watts/day
14,400/24 = 600watts/hour
600/60min = 10watts/minute
10/60sec = .167watt/second

1,500,000 / 14,400 = 104 houses OR 17.361 /.167 = 104 houses

Now the way I see it is, if each house had it’s own bank of batteries with the BITS&BITES battery switcher all hooked up to the BFW, you could potentially power 104 houses and that’s a whole community. That’s a BFD!

I have been known to be a big thinker and more often I have been known to be wrong, if I have this wrong please correct me.

Thanks Mike