Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

New Stan Meyer replication

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • New Stan Meyer replication

    People are being told on this website that no "well-documented" replications exist for the Stan Meyer Water Fuel Cell. That is not true. Please see The JLN Labs home page. I replicated Stan's Water Fuel Cell, also. The correct terminology should be a "Resonant Regenerative Fuel Cell" - not "Water Fuel Cell". My online interview and free plans are here:

    20130114 – The Alternative Energy Hour | The SmartScarecrow Show

    It's fairly easy - it took me 15 months (on and off) to get it working. I received no money or even credit from replicating this, either. Guys like me are hassled by the local, conservative, "science" community, so, there are people who don't want that attention.

    And, many people make implied threats. The nicest grandma on the street will tell you that you are going to get shot or poisoned. That's the attitude in oil-rich North Dakota, for you.

    I own no patents, therefore, have nothing to be afraid of by openly sharing my generic Stan Meyer machine with others.

    If you want to build it, than build it.

    The car companies will not build water-powered cars, until they get a chance at selling natural gas-powered cars, first. It will be decades before a commercially available water-powered car is available. That is what has become of this technology. Build your own, that's all I can say.

  • #2
    Stan Meyer's secret

    The only way Meyer is going to be replicated is if you're ionizing the air and diluting the HHO with it. That IS his "secret" to getting the thermal energy out of the fuel. It isn't debatable. Read ALL his patents - he spells it out.
    Sincerely,
    Aaron Murakami

    Books & Videos https://emediapress.com
    Conference http://energyscienceconference.com
    RPX & MWO http://vril.io

    Comment


    • #3
      Thank You Jon for coming here and sharing and Welcome to the forum.

      dave

      Half of the Answer is knowing the right Question

      Comment


      • #4
        From what I gathered from the vid you havent increased production over normal electrolysis but have made it more efficient? Have you taken it further since then?
        Again Thanks for sharing

        dave
        Half of the Answer is knowing the right Question

        Comment


        • #5
          Hahahahaha! Go do it yourself, then come and criticize. Until then, science is always debatable. Some people's kids.

          Originally posted by Aaron View Post
          The only way Meyer is going to be replicated is if you're ionizing the air and diluting the HHO with it. That IS his "secret" to getting the thermal energy out of the fuel. It isn't debatable. Read ALL his patents - he spells it out.

          Comment


          • #6
            Efficiency

            If you have seen the 7 different videos on my news article, yes, you will see no real increase in production over normal electrolysis. However, the current does drop from 1-2 amps, down to .1-.25 amps during resonance. That should imply better efficiency at a set voltage.


            Originally posted by Dave45 View Post
            From what I gathered from the vid you havent increased production over normal electrolysis but have made it more efficient? Have you taken it further since then?
            Again Thanks for sharing

            dave

            Comment


            • #7
              Status

              And, I have finished my VIC coil system. It is rated at 3630 volts. Ratio is 121 to 1. 36 AWG 430 Stainless Steel is being used for the chokes. I have not turned it on yet. The coil was finished last week, and I am just looking for time to test. Busy, busy....

              Comment


              • #8
                @ Jonabel 1971
                I am glad you are here, I am looking forward to all your insights .
                Can you please post a direct link to your videos, and work.
                THANK. YOU.
                William Reed

                Comment


                • #9
                  Link to article and videos

                  No problem, but if you like fracking or NDSU, you probably won't like what I have to say in the article.

                  Volunteer Jon Abel banned from NDSU for Stanley Meyers lab research



                  Originally posted by rosehillworks View Post
                  @ Jonabel 1971
                  I am glad you are here, I am looking forward to all your insights .
                  Can you please post a direct link to your videos, and work.
                  THANK. YOU.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    I have very deep feelings of disgust toward fracking, so to keep this civil I will refrain from giving my full pinion about it!!!
                    Thanks for the link.
                    William Reed

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      I have been dabbling in this thing myself....been having problems with not driving the FETs properly...For charging chokes I used salvaged coils from TV sets whatever...it did show me that the chokes actually do 'choke' the current.
                      also had a test rig set up about a month ago, ran it for more than an hour continuous producing enough gas to sustain a flame. It stayed ice cold. Having started with electrolysis about 6 years ago, I was impressed....anytime I have made enough gas to sustain flame with straight electrolysis there has been lots of heat....as for ionized ambient air, I'm gonna draw it through the cell to be ionized there. I had luck getting my truck to idle at about 500RPM about 6 years ago with straight electrolysis drawing ambient air through the cell. Dont have accurate measurements of anything but I was NOT blowing a ten amp fuse when I was running my truck....my cell was a bad design then and you really couldn't push it any harder without selfdestructing

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Video mistakes.

                        Hi all,

                        There was never any "warming" of the water. The water stayed cold throughout all of my experimenting. Also, the rust never got tested. It doesn't show up with distilled water, so I believe it to be mostly iron oxide from the heavy iron content of the Fargo ND tap water. Whether any chromium hexavalent leaked out of the pipes - I don't know. NDSU refused to give me the results of the chemical test.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          That's interesting. Do you have any videos or circuit diagrams, jeff?

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Bi-Filar coils

                            Hi Jon, I did some reading on your links, but am limited to internet access.
                            Do you have a direct link to winding your coils, I have your" design and construction of coil" but not sure.
                            A video's worth a thousand words.
                            Welcome aboard ,looking forward to more postes.
                            shylo

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Test cell

                              Hello Jon, Do you have any tips and/or guide lines on how to construct a test cell? Are there any ideal sizes and numbers of tubes that you recommend?
                              I have seen other people's constructions but I like to hear your input.

                              Thanks.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X