Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Perpetual Water Engine Invented. Please Advise.

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Perpetual Water Engine Invented. Please Advise.

    I have developed an engine that is fueled by water. If you placed this engine in a body of water, began the process of energy conversion, and walked away, it would run until a mechanical failure caused the engine to stop, or when the water was gone. I could use ZERO gas and circumnavigate the globe.

  • #2
    details?

    Since you're openly sharing that you have this, please post
    pics, vids, diagrams, etc...
    Sincerely,
    Aaron Murakami

    Books & Videos https://emediapress.com
    Conference http://energyscienceconference.com
    RPX & MWO http://vril.io

    Comment


    • #3
      If I post my idea on this thread would I get the scientific credit for it? or when some guy beats me to the patent office im screwed? shouldn't I get a "provisional patent" first?? Im serious about this, was sent to this forum to get professional advice...if my claim is true, is it a big deal?

      Comment


      • #4
        provisional app

        You can file for a provisional patent app for about $125 - then you have 1 year to file a regular patent app. After you file the prov app, then nobody else can patent it.

        My point is that there is no point in telling about it if you aren't going to show anything.
        Last edited by Aaron; 06-26-2013, 04:00 AM.
        Sincerely,
        Aaron Murakami

        Books & Videos https://emediapress.com
        Conference http://energyscienceconference.com
        RPX & MWO http://vril.io

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by perpetualmachine View Post
          ...began the process of energy conversion...
          What energy are you converting?

          Comment


          • #6
            Damn why are people always so concerned with money and patents. Just share the info. Or at least tease us with how it works somewhat. Look what happened to Stan Meyer and he had tons of patents or even Nikola Tesla... Yea they really profited from their inventions. Just think of how much free energy would flow into this world if just a few of us have freely. Those sucking the life out of us would feel it.

            That being said, Daniel dingle already ran his car on seawater and there are countless patents so good luck. The patent lawyers will make sure that they bleed you real good.

            Comment


            • #7
              Another Rick Roll (Troll)

              Comment


              • #8
                nothing on this world can be perpetual ..

                Also energy depend from the psysical laws on that planet and nothing can be perpetual.. water and air are ABSOLUTELY the key for the energey in the near future but you need every an energy starter.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Kutienkov

                  Is your system like the Kutienkov potential energy ram pump.
                  Look at this link
                  http://www.energeticforum.com/renewa...-ram-pump.html
                  I am interested in replicating this so I am trying to gather any info about it that I can.
                  Thanks Luke V

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Looks like bhaas scared him/her off. BTW, what's a Rick Troll?

                    Originally posted by jtanguay View Post
                    Damn why are people always so concerned with money .....
                    Gee, that's a tough one.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Inventionmaster v2

                      I smell another inventionmaster

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by perpetualmachine
                        If I post my idea on this thread...
                        it would run until a mechanical failure...
                        I could use ZERO gas...
                        What he had was an "idea" of how this engine might work.
                        If the engine was actually built (instead of "developed" on paper)
                        He wouldnt be using "would and could" terminology, he would be using words like "does and will".

                        Alot of things sound good on paper.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by perpetualmachine View Post
                          I have developed an engine that is fueled by water.
                          This isn't a theoretical claim.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by Ein~+ein View Post
                            This isn't a theoretical claim.
                            Its not possible to "develop" an engine on paper?
                            Funny he didnt use the word "built"

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Originally posted by jdodson View Post
                              Its not possible to "develop" an engine on paper?
                              Funny he didnt use the word "built"
                              What difference does it make. A claim is a claim. Once again, note the language:
                              "I have developed...", not "I am developing..."


                              This claim is no different than 99.9% of the one's you'll find here. Note that it only took a few dubious photos, despite all the evidence to the contrary for Inventionmaster to turn some here into true believers.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X