Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Rwgresearch - WFC Injector.. wrong design

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Rwgresearch - WFC Injector.. wrong design

    Here the image extracted from http://rwgresearch.com/wp-content/up...arch.com_1.bmp of WFC Injector of Meyer..

    This is an wrong design.. that can't work!!!

    Inside Meyer patents and documents some wrong informations

    When you ionize the air you are dissociating the nitrogen and oxygen molecules producing more nitrogen oxide..

    That is what you produce normally with an High Voltage ionization..

    And that result is what Meyer use inside the injector..


    BUT THE MAIN QUESTION IS..

    WHY STANLEY MEYER WANT USE THAT????

  • #2
    that depends on the voltage you're using.. you might as well dislodge some electrons..have you made tests, why make NO?
    The pure in heart will see the light.

    Comment


    • #3
      Originally posted by tachyon View Post
      that depends on the voltage you're using.. you might as well dislodge some electrons..have you made tests, why make NO?
      Air ionization is maked with the gas processor. . Good question.. if the GP Stanley Meyer make (simply) just nitrogen oxides with high voltage what is the next usage?

      Comment


      • #4
        Ammonia again...

        As I have written for more times into some threads Stanley Meyer make ammonia and burn immediately.. referring to NO the only possible reaction is NO + H2O = NH3 + O2. Unfortunately that reaction is possible ONLY with an high temperature.. But.. if you know the right chemical formula you can think how make the process. Just for informations I have make an working device for test my theory.. the device produce an energetic yellow flame. As Stanley Meyer wrote this device can be useful for heating or for powerup an engine.
        Last edited by tutanka; 09-18-2014, 01:34 PM.

        Comment


        • #5
          why an yellow flame..

          Extracted from: The Ammonia Flame : Abstract : Nature

          IT is generally recognised that Strutt’s discovery of an active form of nitrogen is one of the most interesting results of recent investigations: it may be opportune, then, to direct attention to a phenomenon which seems to have some connection with active nitrogen. The colour of the flame of ammonia burning in oxygen is yellow, and of the same tint as the nitrogen glow in Strutt’s experiment; the spectrum of the light emitted is similar. The structure of the flame is also exceptionally interesting; it consists of an inner bright yellow cone and an outer, almost non-luminous, flame. It would seem that the ammonia is first of all split up into nitrogen and hydrogen, and that the light of the inner cone is due to the combination of nitrogen atoms to nitrogen molecules, as is suggested in the case of the nitrogen glow, while in the outer flame hydrogen burns to water and some nitrogen combines with oxygen to give nitric oxide. An analysis of the products of combustion showed that nitrogen and water were the main resulting substances, but that nitrogen peroxide was also produced in considerable quantity.


          WHY STANLEY MEYER RECYCLE THE EXAUST GAS?? BECAUSE MAKE NO, O2 AND WATER AGAIN..


          N2O4 (NITROGEN PEROXIDE) +H2O (WATER VAPOUR) =HNO2 +HNO3

          HNO2 + HNO3 = 2 NO2 + H2O

          Nitrogen dioxide is widely used in industry.

          It decomposes at 150°C as follows: 2NO2 =2NO +O2.


          AN NEW ERA IS VERY NEAR? PROBABLY YES...
          Last edited by tutanka; 09-28-2013, 12:45 PM.

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by tutanka View Post
            Extracted from: The Ammonia Flame : Abstract : Nature

            IT is generally recognised that Strutt’s discovery of an active form of nitrogen is one of the most interesting results of recent investigations: it may be opportune, then, to direct attention to a phenomenon which seems to have some connection with active nitrogen. The colour of the flame of ammonia burning in oxygen is yellow, and of the same tint as the nitrogen glow in Strutt’s experiment; the spectrum of the light emitted is similar. The structure of the flame is also exceptionally interesting; it consists of an inner bright yellow cone and an outer, almost non-luminous, flame. It would seem that the ammonia is first of all split up into nitrogen and hydrogen, and that the light of the inner cone is due to the combination of nitrogen atoms to nitrogen molecules, as is suggested in the case of the nitrogen glow, while in the outer flame hydrogen burns to water and some nitrogen combines with oxygen to give nitric oxide. An analysis of the products of combustion showed that nitrogen and water were the main resulting substances, but that nitrogen peroxide was also produced in considerable quantity.


            WHY STANLEY MEYER RECYCLE THE EXAUST GAS?? BECAUSE MAKE NO, O2 AND WATER AGAIN..


            N2O4 (NITROGEN PEROXIDE) +H2O (WATER VAPOUR) =HNO2 +HNO3

            HNO2 + HNO3 = 2 NO2 + H2O

            Nitrogen dioxide is widely used in industry.

            It decomposes at 150°C as follows: 2NO2 =2NO +O2.


            AN NEW ERA IS VERY NEAR? PROBABLY YES...
            interesting
            The pure in heart will see the light.

            Comment


            • #7
              it's nice..

              it's nice to see how much interest there is in the technology of Stanley Meyer and how many people are interested in replicating it ..

              Comment


              • #8
                Nitrogen Cycle

                Trying to research and understand the Nitrogen Cycle that you describe. The only part that is somewhat unproven (at least I haven't found a reference as a of yet - nor had a chance to replicate) is the conversion of NO + H20 to NH3 and O2 (4NO + 6H2O + O2(Heat) = 4NH3 + 6O2?).

                The other parts of the conversion as you stated all make sense.

                Best regards, Wireguy

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by Wireguy View Post
                  Trying to research and understand the Nitrogen Cycle that you describe. The only part that is somewhat unproven (at least I haven't found a reference as a of yet - nor had a chance to replicate) is the conversion of NO + H20 to NH3 and O2 (4NO + 6H2O + O2(Heat) = 4NH3 + 6O2?).

                  The other parts of the conversion as you stated all make sense.

                  Best regards, Wireguy
                  The correct balanced formula is: 4 NO + 6 H2O = 4 NH3 + 5 O2

                  For obtain that reaction with water steam you need NO to high temperature at 750°C

                  Comment

                  Working...
                  X