Hi guys,
I have been posting some of my experiment results in other peoples threads. Now, I create new topic to discuss and report testing results based on my experiment with hydroxy and Honda Accord 1.8L (1981 model).
So far I made few test run before and after car repair (engine oil leakage problem). I'm going to report test results after the repair.
Base millage reading taken without hydroxy
Distance : 100KM
Average speed : 100KM per hour
Fuel consumption : 6.34L/100KM (0% savings)
I use 13 plates semi series cell (3mm hole at bottom of each plate) to generate hydroxy which runs above 90% efficiency. The gas goes in to vacuum manifold at carburetor.
Leaning fuel done as below:
Millage reading taken with hydroxy and lean fuel maximum (Test 1)
Distance : 100KM
Average speed : 100KM per hour
Fuel consumption : 6.49L/100KM (2.31% lose)
Test observation
I feel the engine power reduced a bit. I need to shift to lower gear to climb up hill road or by press more gas. Onces I had the high idling speed problem (2000 rpm at half way testing) so I turned off the electrolyser and race the engine few times and the idling rpm comes to normal even after turn on electrolyser. So I think the high rpm could be due to carburetor fuel cable spring doesn't work properly to pull back.
I didn't notice any other problem by running hydroxy into intake manifold. At the end of run the electrolyser consumes about 20A so I guess hydroxy production is somewhere 1.5LPM to 1.8LPM.
Question
Why the car uses more fuel compared?
Is it because of fuel leaned too much and I need to press fuel peddal lower during up hill climbing?
Next testing plan
I'm thinking of increase more fuel into carburetor by turning know anti clock wise. Probably I need to set fuel not too lean. I may increase the fuel while observing the rpm meter (should not fluctuate) with load.
Please help to post your suggestion to improve my future test results.
I have been posting some of my experiment results in other peoples threads. Now, I create new topic to discuss and report testing results based on my experiment with hydroxy and Honda Accord 1.8L (1981 model).
So far I made few test run before and after car repair (engine oil leakage problem). I'm going to report test results after the repair.
Base millage reading taken without hydroxy
Distance : 100KM
Average speed : 100KM per hour
Fuel consumption : 6.34L/100KM (0% savings)
I use 13 plates semi series cell (3mm hole at bottom of each plate) to generate hydroxy which runs above 90% efficiency. The gas goes in to vacuum manifold at carburetor.
Leaning fuel done as below:
- Start the engine and let it run a while to warm up.
- Engine speed reaches 1000 rpm (idle speed).
- Turn on the electrolyser without injecting hydroxy into engine. Engine speed reduced slightly lower than 1000 rpm.
- Start to turn fuel knob clock wise until engine starts jerking (almost fully closed). Engine speed drop to 750 rpm and fluctuates a bit.
- Inject hydroxy into intake manifold vacuum. The engine rpm stablize a bit.
- Take the car for test ride.
Millage reading taken with hydroxy and lean fuel maximum (Test 1)
Distance : 100KM
Average speed : 100KM per hour
Fuel consumption : 6.49L/100KM (2.31% lose)
Test observation
I feel the engine power reduced a bit. I need to shift to lower gear to climb up hill road or by press more gas. Onces I had the high idling speed problem (2000 rpm at half way testing) so I turned off the electrolyser and race the engine few times and the idling rpm comes to normal even after turn on electrolyser. So I think the high rpm could be due to carburetor fuel cable spring doesn't work properly to pull back.
I didn't notice any other problem by running hydroxy into intake manifold. At the end of run the electrolyser consumes about 20A so I guess hydroxy production is somewhere 1.5LPM to 1.8LPM.
Question
Why the car uses more fuel compared?
Is it because of fuel leaned too much and I need to press fuel peddal lower during up hill climbing?
Next testing plan
I'm thinking of increase more fuel into carburetor by turning know anti clock wise. Probably I need to set fuel not too lean. I may increase the fuel while observing the rpm meter (should not fluctuate) with load.
Please help to post your suggestion to improve my future test results.
Comment