Water Sparkplug

[Aaron]

Auto Ignition

This was a simple idea I had a few months back about using an alternator to charge the cap. Untested and probably obsolete from all the advancements already done.

[lapperl]

Bill's Nexus circuit in vehicle_2 update

Well I finally recieved my HV diodes was able to rewire the circuit. I installed the custom spark plug wires I made and ran the dipole wires directly to the distributor cap. So far the system works great. I took it on a 20 mile test drive (10 miles without plasma and 10 miles with) and it did not miss a beat. Long term testing will tell the true story. I will update everyone in a few days or sooner if something comes up.

Mean while, here is a new video link. Just more of the same, but you can see the new wiring.
YouTube - Nexus in vehicle_2


Until the next update,


LapperL

[Ansis Freimanis]

Thank, You jibbguy!
I try to find it in internet (or You can send me with Skype if You have one).

[goldenequity]

Lynnferd Grant interview

Not to distract.... but wanted to alert all to what appears to be a breakthrough on HHO production.
Very interesting audio interview with Lynnferd Grant who has now produced gas not just AT the electrodes..
but BETWEEN them.... a la Stanley Meyers.... no resonance, no tubes..... a paper clip.... and a spoon!

http://www.energeticforum.com/renewa...akthrough.html

Cheeers!

[jstadwater]

@ Greg..................

Thanks Greg, for the PM, that answers my questions completely. Onward with the building and testing..................................Mike

[GotGas]

Hi! I know user "crazzieg". His circuits is multivibators with square wave self oscilator. This kind "square" circuits is not usable in my understanding. Because transformers don`t work right with square...
Thank, You.

Ansis, I didn't suggest that crazyieg has something designed and posted, just that he had the knowledge and skills based in experience to accomplish that.

If "transformers don`t work right with square..." waves then your inverter isn't "usable" since it uses a square wave to drive the transformer.

An inverter produces what is called a modified sine wave and that is a combination of square waves to produce a wave that will satisfy an AC power requirement. It looks like that on the output because it looks like that on the input.

The most common PWM chip used to create that pulse train is made by Texas instruments (TL494) and one can be found in most 12/120 volt inverters. If you own a scope, look at the output of your inverter, it is not a sine wave per say, it will be a modified sine wave:

_
| |
_| |_
| | | |
_| | | |_
| | | | | |
| | | | | |

A series of pulses to drive the transformer and is used to match impedance between the silicone and the electromagnetic properties of the transformer. (See Lentz law.) The frequency set by a typical RC network and operates up to 100K.

That feedback loop on the chip is all about impedance matching and that is what most of you struggle with and don't understand.

If you look at Meyer's transformer schematic, you notice that there is a feedback coil on the transformer, notice that there is a pulse train that builds to minimize impedance reflection from the cell? Notice the feedback pin on the TL494? Huh...

Look at other electrolysis patents and you see the same thing:

US 6638413 Methods and apparatus for electrolysis of water. Huh..

Look at devices like a fence charger, I have one sitting on my bench now that is driven by a SCR and most if not all will use this device to fire the cap that drives the HV coil. Huh... Sounds like what you are trying to do.

US 5872478 SCR Firing circuit for high voltage applications. Huh...

US 4798661 MEYER - Gas generator voltage control circuit. Huh...

The reality is you are playing with 1/2 of Meyer's injector circuit and it works for reasons that I have stated previously.

We don't what we know know. Not everybody gets that.

[gmeast]

Rms

Ansis, I didn't suggest that crazyieg has something designed and posted, just that he had the knowledge and skills based in experience to accomplish that.

If "transformers don`t work right with square..." waves then your inverter isn't "usable" since it uses a square wave to drive the transformer.

An inverter produces what is called a modified sine wave and that is a combination of square waves to produce a wave that will satisfy an AC power requirement. It looks like that on the output because it looks like that on the input.

............................................

Hi GotGas.

Thanks! Yes modified sine wave inverters have a square-wise wave train that approximates the sine wave RMS spec so that most audio and video devices will work properly. They still lack a little when it comes to driving inductive loads like motors and microwaves. But a sufficiently overpowered inverter will run a 1000Watt microwave oven but it might ruin the oven because the microwave transformer in it IS frequency sensitive and expects ONLY a pure sine wave on its primary(s). Many inductive loads will protests with heat and noise.

Peace,

Greg

[jstadwater]

Has anyone, other than me, listened to that audio stream that goldenequity found and posted? It is an hour long, but I found that it makes so much sense.........I am setting up a test to see just what happens. Who's to say at this point, if the resonance Meyers was talking about was actually NOT from the electrical circuit. Patents ALL hide some key info to thwart replication. I made an observation months ago that I dismissed, now thinking of it again. When I have my hydroxy cell on the bench, it makes X amount of gas (powered by the Suburban's charging system). When I mount it on the front of the Suburban, the vibration created from the 350 running increases the gas production! Not exponentially, but enough to see a visual difference in the amount being generated. This, coupled with the plasma ignition circuits we have, may get us closer than we have been thus far. I feel the plasma spark is a VERY important ingredient in making all of this happen effectively. Just my 2 cents..........................Mike

[GotGas]

[QUOTE=jstadwater;34973]Has anyone, other than me, listened to that audio stream that goldenequity found and posted? It is an hour long, but I found that it makes so much sense.........I am setting up a test to see just what happens. Who's to say at this point, if the resonance Meyers was talking about was actually NOT from the electrical circuit. Patents ALL hide some key info to thwart replication. I made an observation months ago that I dismissed, now thinking of it again. When I have my hydroxy cell on the bench, it makes X amount of gas (powered by the Suburban's charging system). When I mount it on the front of the Suburban, the vibration created from the 350 running increases the gas production! Not exponentially, but enough to see a visual difference in the amount being generated. This, coupled with the plasma ignition circuits we have, may get us closer than we have been thus far. I feel the plasma spark is a VERY important ingredient in making all of this happen effectively. Just my 2 cents..........................Mike

I wrote a long flame in regard to that guys audio recording but thought better and didn't post it.

He is reciting what I have been writing on free energy web sites for years regarding cavitation, electron clusters and electron cascade effect. ALL FREE ENERGY MACHINES USE THIS PROCESS TO CONVERT MASS INTO THE ATOMIC ENERGY CONTAINED WITHIN THE MASS - ALL OF THEM.

That being said, he does not understand wave particle duality and so he goes off into magical thinking land with dark matter and the ever magical aether.

I wrote the information on this web site but see that it appears to have been deleted and could only speculate as to why.

So I will make two posts, one that is a description of what Meyer was doing in his final product to clear up that guys mistakes and repost something regarding cavitation.

Here is a description of Meyer's final product and what he wrongly assumes he is producing:

If you look at the bottom of Meyer's resonant cavity, you see a grill with 40 prongs on it. That is where the "fracture" part of the water fracture term comes from. The prongs alternate in length and so they "resonate" opposite to each other to stretch and compress the water at ultrasonic frequencies. This produces cavitation, the cavitation produces electron clusters and then they explode back out and convert mass into the atomic energy contained in the mass through electron cascade effect.

The ultrasonics alone will not fracture much water at all. However, if you look at the side of the cavity you see a connector with two contacts on a box. Inside the box is most likely a step up DC pulse generator and a diode with a negative voltage output. That will connect to a foil capacitor plate inside the cavity wall and wrapped around that, an insulation layer and wrapped around that, a coil to drive the ultrasonic transducer that sits in the stainless can below the resonator grill.

The center electrode is opposite charged to that capacitor and so the electrostatic charge attracts the water in two different directions producing "pure voltage potential". Since the Delrin or acetal plastic is a very good dielectric no electron transfer takes place and the the electrons, as always flow to the anode. "prevent electron leakage"

If you look at the photo of Meyers water hydrogen fracture generator in
the MeyerPhotos.zip file, you notice there are four channels. You also notice that he stacks the cells up in stacks of four. As the water flows up through the four cells, the frequency increases as shown in the photo with some photo enhancement software.

You will also see some light filters. These are needed to filter out the two unwanted bands of light that a nitrogen laser produces leaving the UV which is useful in electrolysis. Exactly how the laser aspect works is unknown to me other than it sits on top of the stack. The LED laser claim would not really be true in my opinion since it outputs a single wavelength and there is nothing to filter. If you look at the water testing Meyer does, you notice that he always tests for nitrogen.

So that should explain that version of Meyer, the terms he used and why and what the various parts do. I did some experiments last spring and it worked as advertised.

If you have doubt about what I share regarding cavitation being a mass to atomic energy conversion process, do this little experiment:

Place your water spark plug in a vacuum chamber and pull a hard vacuum on it. Notice it no longer goes bang? There is no appreciable mass (air) to convert other than the electrodes themselves.

The reverse:
You notice that you get a bigger bang when you spray water on the electrodes. You are not hearing hydrogen exploding, you are hearing an atom bomb going off or as Meyer put it, "a tiny controllable Sun"

[GotGas]

Cavitation and The Free Energy Link

All OU devices have to possess cavitation somewhere in the process. Free energy devices are nothing more than a device that converts mass into the atomic energy of that mass.

A good example would be Meyer and his little controllable Sun. The Sun converts the mass of hydrogen into fusion which releases the atomic energy of the hydrogen atom.

Where cavitation comes into play is that is what triggers the reaction.

The best example of cavitation and that little controllable sun is found in a video of the pistol shrimp. YouTube - Pistol Shrimp

The way we create cavitition is by opening a hole in the ambient medium by accelerating mass faster than it can move without cavitation. An electric arc is a cavitaion, a plasma is cavitation, a jet traveling through the sound barrier is a cavitation and so on.

When we pop a hole in the surrounding medium, the universe pushes back from every direction and in the process creates trillions of little accelerators all pointing at the center of that bubble and when the atoms meet, the electrons cluster and then explode back out and scatter more electrons through electron cascade effect. This is how mass is converted into the atomic energy contained within the mass.

Show me a free energy device and I will show you where the cavitation is taking place.

[Inquorate]

Hi guys. I've been conversing with bodkins on page 2 and 3 of earth battery thread, gotten off topic. There's details there relevant to radiant oscillator thread and water spark plug thread. :-)

[jstadwater]

It seems you have it nailed down pretty well. Finally, someone with a working Meyer cell! If you are willing to share your knowledge with us, would you please post pics and description of your Meyer cell so we can replicate it and get out of all this expensive experimenting and enjoy the exponential gains in our cars? If you have already posted the info, please direct me to the thread it's in so I can get started. Thanks in advance........................Mike

[Ansis Freimanis]

to GotGas

Hi! I read Your and Greg’s reply to Your post. Yes- the "industry" works like you sad. It’s true, but we "here" in "sparkplug forum" making an original device- sinusoidal generator for secondary voltage. With this (very primitive) circuit we satisfied our needs- no destructible (like concrete) device. I know and I prove it in my life (I make very primitive Tube Audio Amplifier+ very primitive Speakers system+ very primitive filters for my audio) and that "nothing" sounds excellent! Before it I make MOSFET devices with feedback’s and all was sounding bed and blowing up every time...
My today’s philosophy is "I have no money for experiments- I need a quality and simplicity and device must working."
P.S. Why to make something "no usable" or with Idea: "I am, I’ll try, I must make... and so on and- to nowhere... "
Thank, You!

[GotGas]

Hi Ansis,

I take it English is not your first language and I don't understand what you mean.

All I was saying is that everything you need to know can be found in the products around you. You need a pulse circuit to charge the capacitor. (Crazieg) A fence charger or as Linderman pointed out a strobe light has the circuitry you need as well. My only point was that professional power conversion person willing to help is available on the web.

You could probably do away with the isolation transformer and the big power loss by strapping a varistor found in a surge suppressor across the inverter output. ;-) And so on..

Good luck with your project.

[gotoluc]

Hi everyone,

here is a video that was poster in a engine vapor system topic at Overunity and I though some of you may want to see it.

YouTube - Mover runing on diesel vapors!

Ultrasonic diesel vapors on a GEET but with no reactor rod in.

Luc