Stan Meyer': Water Fuel Cell Dealer Manual

[lamare]

Some time ago, I made an analysis of Meyer's system as well as Puharich's and Gray's. While Gray's system probably worked differently after all, I still think my article will give you much insight in how it probably is supposed to work:

Article:Free Electric Energy in Theory and Practice - PESWiki

The basic trick is to use coils resonating in higher order resonance at a high frequency to get free power and high voltage. This signal, a multiple of the natural resonance frequency of the coils, acts as a carrier wave.

On top of that carrier wave, a signal is modulated that matches the acoustic resonance frequency of the water tubes.

On the metal of the water tubes, a dielectric (isolating) layer is formed, such that it can withstand the voltage it is tortured with. This way, the energy is capacitively transferred from the coils to the water, without any exchange of charge carriers. In other words: no current flows from your coils into your water and since everything is in resonance, it takes very little energy to keep the resonance going, while the electric field taps the zero point field to give you the energy to split your water (almost) for free.

[john_g]

Phil Thanks for sharing

Phil

What a great find the manual is - thanks for sharing.

Regards
John

[HairBear]

Some time ago, I made an analysis of Meyer's system as well as Puharich's and Gray's. While Gray's system probably worked differently after all, I still think my article will give you much insight in how it probably is supposed to work:

Article:Free Electric Energy in Theory and Practice - PESWiki

The basic trick is to use coils resonating in higher order resonance at a high frequency to get free power and high voltage. This signal, a multiple of the natural resonance frequency of the coils, acts as a carrier wave.

On top of that carrier wave, a signal is modulated that matches the acoustic resonance frequency of the water tubes.

On the metal of the water tubes, a dielectric (isolating) layer is formed, such that it can withstand the voltage it is tortured with. This way, the energy is capacitively transferred from the coils to the water, without any exchange of charge carriers. In other words: no current flows from your coils into your water and since everything is in resonance, it takes very little energy to keep the resonance going, while the electric field taps the zero point field to give you the energy to split your water (almost) for free.

There are at least two types of acoustic resonances a tube can resonate. One is the bell type, like in wind chimes, and the other is like a flute or whistle. Which type are you suggesting these "water tubes" resonate?

[StweenyA]

Phil, many thanks for all your hard work!!! Lots of effort involved there

Some time ago, I made an analysis of Meyer's system as well as Puharich's and Gray's. While Gray's system probably worked differently after all, I still think my article will give you much insight in how it probably is supposed to work:

Article:Free Electric Energy in Theory and Practice - PESWiki

The basic trick is to use coils resonating in higher order resonance at a high frequency to get free power and high voltage. This signal, a multiple of the natural resonance frequency of the coils, acts as a carrier wave.

On top of that carrier wave, a signal is modulated that matches the acoustic resonance frequency of the water tubes.

On the metal of the water tubes, a dielectric (isolating) layer is formed, such that it can withstand the voltage it is tortured with. This way, the energy is capacitively transferred from the coils to the water, without any exchange of charge carriers. In other words: no current flows from your coils into your water and since everything is in resonance, it takes very little energy to keep the resonance going, while the electric field taps the zero point field to give you the energy to split your water (almost) for free.

The theory is great.... Has anybody put it to use yet though? I was reading the manuals, and mr meyer kept on mentioning a frequency.... yet he never mentioned what that frequency was - is it really that simple?

[MonsieurM]

Phil, many thanks for all your hard work!!! Lots of effort involved there



The theory is great.... Has anybody put it to use yet though? I was reading the manuals, and mr meyer kept on mentioning a frequency.... yet he never mentioned what that frequency was - is it really that simple?

Peter Davey did with his Sonic Boiler; check out this thread http://www.energeticforum.com/renewa...-query-34.html , the team there is working hard at replication , any help is welcome ...

we start by boiling water...then the rest will follow

[HairBear]

Peter Davey did with his Sonic Boiler; check out this thread http://www.energeticforum.com/renewa...-query-34.html , the team there is working hard at replication , any help is welcome ...

we start by boiling water...then the rest will follow

Replications were done some years ago with great accuracy. The results showed there was no increase in heating efficiency at all and the device put contaminants into the water such as chromium. That is why you see several different design changes by Davey as the years went by. Aluminum was ultimately used trying to avoid the leaching of contaminants from the boiler plates. The device only looked as if water was boiling instantly due to not only the massive surface area to water ratio, but, the sonic aspect agitating the water.

I had a brief look through the new Stan Meyer document, I did not see or read anything I haven't heard or seen before? What is claimed to be new?