Tweet
Bingo fuel site:
BingoFuel (Alternative Fuels researches) by Jean-Louis Naudin
The BingoFuel Reactor v1.0 by JL Naudin
Other name:
Aquafuel™, Aqualene™, Magnegas™, TrueFuel™, Carbo-hydrogen™
I just did experiment with sparking carbon. Not exactly the same, I use copper and carbon, not both carbon like mentioned. And I use radiant oscillator output for power, not normal electricity, the benefit is I do not have to worry about impedance and do not have to worry about electrode stick together which would actually reduce the load of the transistor which run cool.
Video:
YouTube - Bingofuel replication with radiant oscillator output
Experiment detail:
- electrode are replacing the charged battery
- VR is set between 200 to 800 ohm
- carbon positive
- copper negative
- 11.5V radiant oscillator input
- maybe 0.3A input, 1A if secondary coil is loaded with CFL which light up at full brightness if radiant output is not utilized.
- unknown output voltage, it is enough to light up neon bulb with one wire at secondary high voltage (under 240V).
- tap water
The result which is not clearly shown in video, the hydrogen bubble generation at copper negative is clearly better when there is no spark. I think normal electrolysis is much better at generating HHO than bingofuel method.
Anyone has the same opinion?
BingoFuel (Alternative Fuels researches) by Jean-Louis Naudin
The BingoFuel Reactor v1.0 by JL Naudin
Other name:
Aquafuel™, Aqualene™, Magnegas™, TrueFuel™, Carbo-hydrogen™
I just did experiment with sparking carbon. Not exactly the same, I use copper and carbon, not both carbon like mentioned. And I use radiant oscillator output for power, not normal electricity, the benefit is I do not have to worry about impedance and do not have to worry about electrode stick together which would actually reduce the load of the transistor which run cool.
Video:
YouTube - Bingofuel replication with radiant oscillator output
Experiment detail:
- electrode are replacing the charged battery
- VR is set between 200 to 800 ohm
- carbon positive
- copper negative
- 11.5V radiant oscillator input
- maybe 0.3A input, 1A if secondary coil is loaded with CFL which light up at full brightness if radiant output is not utilized.
- unknown output voltage, it is enough to light up neon bulb with one wire at secondary high voltage (under 240V).
- tap water
The result which is not clearly shown in video, the hydrogen bubble generation at copper negative is clearly better when there is no spark. I think normal electrolysis is much better at generating HHO than bingofuel method.
Anyone has the same opinion?