Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Ionization & Water Fuel

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by sebosfato View Post
    Can you please than explain to me how can you ionize the n2 or generate your activated nitrogen without inputing energy?
    With preheating. And since exhaust heat is sufficient, LED and HV is a bonus power up.

    Originally posted by sebosfato View Post
    I mean for example if you need at least 55 amps to electrolyze 1 mole of wATER, you would need to extract 55 amps of electrons to ionize 1 mole of any gas, lets say to take of 2 electrons per atom.
    GEET device do not use any electricity and yet the GEET device transform water and oil mix into something else. Heat and vortex and magnetic field is sufficient.

    Originally posted by sebosfato View Post
    The ionization potential of a gas is the energy required to take apart electrons of its orbits. And = the energy it will release if the electrons recombine into the atom.
    It only equal if the reaction work in two direction. There are also many reaction that is only one way.

    Comment


    • Hello, where do I find this report?:
      International Independent Test Evaluation Report

      Comment


      • Nitrogen Is The Gas Combustion Stabilization Process!

        Originally posted by Oneminde View Post
        Thank you for the "Quantum Key" I enoyed that book.

        Now, This question is only for you: Is it possible to use the Grey conversion tube as the HV source for the Voltrolysis? A simple answer will do as I do not want to sidetrack this tread to much.
        Glad you like the book! Thank you

        About 5 years ago, I stated that I think the Gray tube technology would
        be the holy grail of water gas production once it is fully understood.
        But related, in the nitrogen hydroxide 3 page doc I posted, the end has
        a link to the Gray tube thread and I think active nitrogen may just be
        the key there.

        Thanks for the reference to the tech manual. I found more nitrogen
        references...

        ATTN ALL: LOOKS BELOW AT THE REFERENCES FROM THE
        WFC TECHNICAL MANUAL OF STAN MEYERS
        THE NITROGEN ABSOLUTELY IS RESPONSIBLE FOR SLOWING
        DOWN THE BURN OF THE GAS FROM 325 CM/SEC TO 42 CM/SEC

        THAT IS HOW THERMAL EXPLOSIVE ENERGY IS RELEASED
        INSTEAD OF HAVING QUICK HHO BURSTS
        HE EVEN STRAIGHT OUT SAYS THAT THE NITROGEN IS
        RESPONSIBLE FOR HELPING TO PREVENT OXYGEN FROM JOINING
        WITH HYDROGEN!!!

        I HAD NO DOUBTS AND THE PATENT EXCERPTS I POSTED
        CLEARLY SPELL IT OUT BUT THE BELOW FROM THE TECH
        MANUAL ACTUALLY SPELLS IT OUT IN FULL DETAIL.

        ANYONE CLAIMING THAT NITROGEN IS NOT PART OF
        MEYERS' PROCESS IS SPREADING DISINFORMATION
        NON-INTENTIONALLY OR INTENTIONALLY
        EITHER WAY, IT IS 100% FALSE!


        THIS IS NOT A JOKE AND I DON'T APPRECIATE PEOPLE
        BEING ABUSED BECAUSE MANY PEOPLE ARE LOOKING
        FORWARD TO AND COUNTING ON THE FACT THAT
        THIS WATER TECHNOLOGY IS REAL AND STEERING THEM
        AWAY FROM THE MOST OVERWHELMINGLY OBVIOUS KEY
        TO GETTING A SLOW CONTROLLED THERMAL RELEASE BURN
        FROM WATER IS - ABUSING PEOPLE.


        IF THERE ARE OTHER WEBSITES ONLINE THAT BEGIN TO
        DISCOUNT THE IMPORTANCE OF NITROGEN - I AM WARNING
        YOU THAT THOSE ARE THE EXACT PEOPLE WHO WILL ALSO
        BE GUILTY OF SPREADING DISINFORMATION.

        BE ON THE LOOKOUT FOR IT BECAUSE IT IS BOUND TO
        HAPPEN AS SOME PEOPLE ARE AFRAID OF CHANGE AND
        DESTROYING A PRE-CONCEIVED PARADIGM ABOUT
        ANYTHING IS USUALLY A DIFFICULT THING TO GO ALONG WITH.

        AS THE SAYING GOES - "DOING THE SAME THING OVER
        AND OVER AGAIN EXPECTING DIFFERENT RESULTS" = INSANITY

        HOW ARE THE RESULTS SPEAKING IN THE HHO WORLD
        THAT HAS OBVIOUSLY DISCOUNTED THE IMPORTANCE OF
        NITROGEN? NOT VERY WELL...

        SO MAYBE IT IS TIME TO FOCUS ON SLOWING DOWN THE
        WATER FLAME BY MIXING IT WITH NITROGEN
        INSTEAD OF FOCUSING ON THE MISDIRECTION OF THE
        "ORTHO-PARA HYDROGEN" PROPAGANDA.
        THERE MAY BE SOMETHING TO THAT, BUT...
        MEYER IS CLEARLY SPELLING OUT NITROGEN PREVENTS
        THE OXYGEN FROM COMBINING WITH HYDROGEN
        !




        -----------------------------------------

        Gas Mixing Regulator
        Inherently, the Water Fuel Cell allows the "Burn-Rate" of Hydrogen to be "Changed" or
        "adjusted" from 325 cm/sec. to 42 cm/sec. (Co-equalling Natural Gas Burning levels) since Non-
        Combustible Gases (such as Nitrogen, Argon, and other non-burnable gases) derived from Ambient
        Air dissolved in natural water performs the Gas Retarding Process
        ... sustaining and maintaining an
        Open-Air Flame beyond 5000-degrees F, as illustrated in Figure (2-3)
        Natural water acts and performs as a "Gas-Mixing Regulator" when the Fuel-Cell is
        electrically energized by way of voltage stimulation (Electrical Polarization Process) .... producing a
        uniform gas-mixture (B/D) regardless of the Gas Flow-Rate of the Fuel-Cell…producing a
        uniform gas-mixture (B/D) only when needed. In quiescent-state, the supply of gases (BID) being
        released from the water bath is "terminated" and "stopped" when the Fuel-Cell becomes "deenergized".
        The unused water, of course, remains as a non-burnable liquid. The gases (B/D) above
        the water bath is "vented" for safety purposes.

        Flame Temperature Adjustment
        By capturing and recycling the expelled non-combustible gas (D) (derived from and
        supplied by the water bath) back into the sustained hydrogen gas-flame or Fuel-Cell causes the gasflame
        temperature to be "changed" or "altered" by way of the Gas Retarding Process
        , as illustrated
        in Figure (2-4) as to Figure (2-3). The recycling gases (D) controlled by an

        Gas Flow Regulator
        allows the gas flame-temperature to be "adjusted" or "calibrated" to any gas burning level (S), as so
        illustrated in Figure (2-2).
        The "newly" formed and established gas flame-temperature remains constant regardless of
        the gas flow-rate of the Fuel-Cell. Continual feedback of non-combustible gases (D) is, hereinafter,
        called "The Gas Combustion Stabilization Process".

        Automatically, the Gas Combustion Stabilization Process changes the "Burn-Rate" of the
        Fuel Cell gases (B/D) when obtaining the desired gas-flame temperature.

        ----------------
        Gas Modulator Process
        Dissolved air gases (97) of Figure (3-39) being uniformly released from water bath (85) via
        the Electrical Polarization Process (160) of Figure (3-26) is automatically intermixed with released
        hydrogen (86) and oxygen (87) gas atoms (also derived from water bath 85) to form Fuel-Gas
        mixture (88) of Figure (3-24) having a hydrogen gas burn-rate of approximately 47 centimetres per
        seconds (cm/see) in ambient air, as illustrated in (330) of Figure (3-37). Volatility of hydrogen fuelmixture
        or Fuel-Gas (88) is reduced from 325 cm/sec. to approximately 47 cm/sec. since ambient
        air gases (97) (dissolved air gases in water) is primarily composed of non-combustible gases (74)
        (such as nitrogen, argon, and other non-burnable gases) of Figure (3-39) which acts and performs as
        a "Gas Modulator" during thermal gas ignition (98), as illustrated in (320) of Figure (3-36). The
        non-combustible gases (74) physically retards and slows down the speed by which oxygen atom
        (87) unites with (covalent link up) hydrogen atoms ( 86a / 86b) to bring on and support gas ignition
        process
        (gas combustion process) (98), as further illustrated in (340) of Figure (3-38).

        WELL THERE WE GO!



        ------------------
        Meyer obviously sees high value in reclaiming exhaust to get the NO
        pulled apart and put back in the WFC.


        WFC Exhaust Air Reclaimer
        To eliminate the possibility of expelling out any Nitric Oxide NO gas which is generally
        produced when an electrical spade occurs inside an internal combustion (lC) engine or any other
        chemical-oxide that may be present in the exhaust-air, WFC Exhaust Air Reclaimer (900) of Figure (9-
        1) can be utilized to comply with U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) clean Air Act Similar
        in construction to Voltage Intensifier Circuit (110) of Figure (4-9), WFC Exhaust Air Reclaimer (900)
        of Figure (9-1) utilizes opposite electrical attraction force (RR' - SS') of voltage potential (Va xxx Vn)
        to separate the atoms of the Nitric Oxide NO molecule (typically < 1ppm when running on water) by
        overcoming Electrovalent Attraction Force (q - q') that exist between the polar-charged Nitrogen (B+)
        and oxygen (B-) atoms. This is accomplished since the Voltage Intensifier Circuit (110) of Figure (4-9)
        is pulsed sensitive (49a xxx 49n) to tune-in to the dielectric properties of the airborne gas-molecule to
        not only activate Covalent Switch-Off phenomenon (550) of Figure (5-8) by restricting amp influxing
        to cause "Electrical Stress" across
        RE: Exhaust Air Reclaimer Memo WFC 428
        Stanley A Meyer 9-4
        capacitor gap (Cp) (690) of Figure (7-6) but, also, elongates the electrically polarized Nitric Oxide NO
        molecule to change the time share-rate of covalent electron (s) .•• performing the same function as
        Electrical Polarization Process (160) of Figure (3-26) by which the positive electrical voltage potential
        (71) attracts the negative charged oxygen atom; while, simultaneously, negative electrical voltage
        potential (61) attracts the positive charged Nitrogen Atom ... pulling apart and separating the atoms of
        the Nitric Oxide NO molecule by way of Voltage Dynamics (220) of Figure (3-29) under the law of
        physics which states "opposite electrical charges attracts", as so illustrated in (900) of Figure (9-1).
        Likewise, other chemical-oxide gas molecule (s) such as Nitrogen Dioxide N02 (940) of Figure (9-5)
        exposed to Electrical Polarization Process (160) utilizing Gas Resonant Cavity (140) undergoes the
        same molecule-to-atom separation ... thereby, reversing the degradation effect of burning fossil-fuels
        •.. liberating oxygen 02 molecule once again for reuse under "Earth Ecological Life Support System"
        ... collecting atoms under static charged for Industrial reuse •.. resulting in revitalized clean air once
        again to Sustain all life-forms on Earth. Of course, water mist derived from hydrogen combustion is
        removed prior to engine exhaust air-gases entering into and passing through WFC Exhaust Air
        Reclaimer System (900).
        Sincerely,
        Aaron Murakami

        Books & Videos https://emediapress.com
        Conference http://energyscienceconference.com
        RPX & MWO http://vril.io

        Comment


        • Here you go;

          http://www.waterfuelcell.org/ForumPD...n%20Report.pdf
          - Behold the truth -

          Comment


          • tech manual

            Originally posted by pengrove View Post
            Hello, where do I find this report?:
            International Independent Test Evaluation Report
            water to combustable - Stanley Meyers-Water Fuel-Cell-Technical Brief-FULL

            It is the Meyer's tech manual. Not sure how independent it is, but
            look at the excerpts I took from it in my last post.
            Sincerely,
            Aaron Murakami

            Books & Videos https://emediapress.com
            Conference http://energyscienceconference.com
            RPX & MWO http://vril.io

            Comment


            • thermodynamics

              Originally posted by sebosfato View Post
              Can you please than explain to me how can you ionize the n2 or generate your activated nitrogen without inputing energy?

              I mean we all might have understood that in the world of physics for an action there is a reaction and vice versa. This is called thermodynamics principle.
              You have to get rid of the idea that anyone is talking about perpetual
              motion or anything and nobody is talking about doing something without
              inputting energy.

              I already spelled out for you that there is non-equilibrium thermodynamics
              that you have not studied and if you did, you would see that this system
              or anything like it simply conforms to these principles and not to the
              thermodynamics that you mention.

              Also, it is a MYTH that a reaction has to be in the opposite direction.
              Sincerely,
              Aaron Murakami

              Books & Videos https://emediapress.com
              Conference http://energyscienceconference.com
              RPX & MWO http://vril.io

              Comment


              • sorry about that I am posting duplicates now? Anyway if you remember right in one of Stans videos where he was very excited jumping around saying praise the Lord. Well remember how he mentioned that the exhaust gases were also reduced on his buggy while he held his hand over the pipe. He had a tall tube set up sitting beside the buggy holding 30psi.

                Comment


                • NOx production can be directly controled by the combustion temperatur and duration another hint there.
                  The reason why so "much" NOx is produced in gasolin/diesel engines is becouse of the long burntime and temperatur...
                  And also remember that Meyer used some of the water to produce steam, similar to the water manipulation engine.. and I think also that we should take that into acount here.

                  Yes Aaron - "pure voltage pulses going ot the cell" that is what it is about and thank you for that.
                  - Behold the truth -

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by Aaron View Post
                    water to combustable - Stanley Meyers-Water Fuel-Cell-Technical Brief-FULL

                    It is the Meyer's tech manual. Not sure how independent it is, but
                    look at the excerpts I took from it in my last post.
                    It is not the same as I posted... so be sure to look at that - the nitrogen part in the WFC is on page 27 in the link I provided.
                    - Behold the truth -

                    Comment


                    • I have checked aron and no one answer my question.

                      Of course you can use the heat loss when using a combustion engine, Very low efficiency recover but you can, but there are other 5 ways 100 times more efficient.

                      You all talk too generally to get any result.

                      You all now discovered that unburned gases and nitrogen would slow down the combustion speed and think that will be the solution and tomorrow you will change idea again...

                      Stan clearly states that uses the ambient gases to retard the combustion ...
                      I don't understand how you didn't understood it before.

                      I talk about energy source and as i made specific question, a general answer wont tell me anything.


                      Is too easy to say thermodynamic non equilibrium...

                      I know how it works and i can tell you that its more than thermodynamic non equilibrium. Is all about resonance. Energy multiplication. (perpetual motion is adequate as is possible to make it works also without extra input energy) And particle acceleration.

                      It don't break any law in physics. It respect every laws. And use them all in its favor.

                      So if you understand my point you may see that what i want from you is that you don't lose your time talking about non related things when what every one wants here is OU.

                      You are talking about ionizing nitrogen to make it react bla bla bla

                      What i'm saying is that you need a net energy gain to do this ionization, otherwise you are not ionizing anything you are just making people waste their times.

                      H20 theory fails when he say oh lets spend 40w and ionize the oxygen to its 4 ionization potential. Big Bull ****...Why
                      the energy in joules he describe he can gain is not the energy he can gain, is the energy necessary to ionize the gas. So you ionize the gas and you have the same energy back from its burning. Not accounting that using 40w you can ionize a ridiculous amount of gas the way that has being described...
                      So don't hold for h20 and not even to tutanka until he prove me wrong. I'm saying this because i doesn't matter if you ionize oxygen or nitrogen or whatever it is because to make any chemical change in a chemical element you need to apply energy!

                      I know a way to ionize the gas while generating an energy gain the way stan proposed but stan don't even dreamed to explain it well on the patents so without learning real physics you are all out line. He didn't explained it at all. While the reason for so many patents is so evident.

                      Ou is simple, more simple than you can imagine. Is a closed loop with the right components in the right order in a loop.

                      Answer to my questions if you can. This can clear up the way to you.

                      Best Regards

                      sincerely
                      sebosfacts

                      Comment


                      • experiments

                        Sebosfato,

                        Do you have a youtube account with some experiments that you have
                        done?
                        Sincerely,
                        Aaron Murakami

                        Books & Videos https://emediapress.com
                        Conference http://energyscienceconference.com
                        RPX & MWO http://vril.io

                        Comment


                        • I answer your question twice already sebosfato. My main point is exhaust heat is more than enough to ionize nitrogen, oxygen or water.

                          http://www.energeticforum.com/renewa...html#post83374

                          and just now:
                          http://www.energeticforum.com/renewa...html#post83704

                          Comment


                          • Originally posted by sebosfato View Post
                            I have checked aron and no one answer my question.

                            Of course you can use the heat loss when using a combustion engine, Very low efficiency recover but you can, but there are other 5 ways 100 times more efficient.

                            You all talk too generally to get any result.

                            You all now discovered that unburned gases and nitrogen would slow down the combustion speed and think that will be the solution and tomorrow you will change idea again...

                            Stan clearly states that uses the ambient gases to retard the combustion ...
                            I don't understand how you didn't understood it before.

                            I talk about energy source and as i made specific question, a general answer wont tell me anything.


                            Is too easy to say thermodynamic non equilibrium...

                            I know how it works and i can tell you that its more than thermodynamic non equilibrium. Is all about resonance. Energy multiplication. (perpetual motion is adequate as is possible to make it works also without extra input energy) And particle acceleration.

                            It don't break any law in physics. It respect every laws. And use them all in its favor.

                            So if you understand my point you may see that what i want from you is that you don't lose your time talking about non related things when what every one wants here is OU.

                            You are talking about ionizing nitrogen to make it react bla bla bla

                            What i'm saying is that you need a net energy gain to do this ionization, otherwise you are not ionizing anything you are just making people waste their times.

                            H20 theory fails when he say oh lets spend 40w and ionize the oxygen to its 4 ionization potential. Big Bull ****...Why
                            the energy in joules he describe he can gain is not the energy he can gain, is the energy necessary to ionize the gas. So you ionize the gas and you have the same energy back from its burning. Not accounting that using 40w you can ionize a ridiculous amount of gas the way that has being described...
                            So don't hold for h20 and not even to tutanka until he prove me wrong. I'm saying this because i doesn't matter if you ionize oxygen or nitrogen or whatever it is because to make any chemical change in a chemical element you need to apply energy!

                            I know a way to ionize the gas while generating an energy gain the way stan proposed but stan don't even dreamed to explain it well on the patents so without learning real physics you are all out line. He didn't explained it at all. While the reason for so many patents is so evident.

                            Ou is simple, more simple than you can imagine. Is a closed loop with the right components in the right order in a loop.

                            Answer to my questions if you can. This can clear up the way to you.

                            Best Regards

                            sincerely
                            sebosfacts
                            Sebosfato,
                            You create ONLY confusion and nothing else. You are oriented to hydrogen creation. Ok is clear that your object is find money for your STUDY. I repeat you again, again and again .. HYDROGEN CREATION ISN'T THE RIGHT WAY for some things that are been written in that thread. We are talking of interaction and new molecule creation with different atom mass. In fact nitrogen atom is used inside engine similarry carbon atom.. but using atomic change state you obtain more controlled exothermic power. Answer to that ... You ask that you create some hydrogen and spent low energy with your innovative method.. why that is valid only for you? And when you have produced your hydrogen in big quantity what is your method for use inside engine? Theory is important but more important is start real test, without that are only words like some peoples present in this forum.
                            Last edited by tutanka; 02-03-2010, 10:29 AM.

                            Comment


                            • First of all i'm not here to raise interest in my project.

                              I'm here only to try making you think!

                              You keep running away from my questions. I will answer yours anyway.

                              Bmw used compressed h2 in a car and it works as perfect as gasoline. So my hydrogen is going to work like a charm in any engine. You just need to understand that hydrogen must be injected using like direct injection (like diesel) common rail...

                              2°My method is more valid because without any kind of doubt it multiply the energy inputed by more than 100. So is clear enough that i have a net gain in energy. I'm not that interested in having a car running on h2 yet as there are other industries that would benefit from it more readily.

                              Of course i could excite the gas with my extra energy as to be able to use less water for a big travel. However my principles as human being don't allow me to use it this way or even to study something that is know to avoid the reformation of the water molecule. This i will study further in the future but i would only release this technology when i will have absolutely sure that water molecule reform completely. Imagine if we release a technology that consumes the water in this world... is the end of the world in few centuries...

                              For me 50km with one liter is more than enough

                              Ok Nitrogen as i said is very important. Yes it will retard the combustion of the hydrogen. But if you use air you are going to create nox on the exhaust. So thats another reason to use only or mostly the exhaust gases as the flame retardant because they wont burn again because have no extra oxygen for the reaction. This is already used in gasoline cars but is to reduce emissions only, it makes worst the burning efficiency of the gasoline anyway.

                              Sucayo read your answers and think to your self if you have being enough specific as i'm requiring.

                              Aron Yes i have youtube channel is YouTube - sebosfato's Channel
                              You will find info on my concept and my first prototypes that allowed me to discover everything.

                              tutanka i guess i answered your question. Now please answer mine questions.

                              Regards

                              Comment


                              • I am starting to think that the only thing that most of us are missing is atomizing water and misting and mixing it into the hydrogen gasses. Patrick Kelly seems to believe the same thing.

                                Meyers defiantly seems to of been onto something. I wish we would all get together and figure this out so we can carry it along with us into the future. The dark ages are here and the stone age is about to arrive.

                                Are we over looking the steam RESONATOR on the buggy?
                                Last edited by pengrove; 02-03-2010, 12:23 PM.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X