ionization by collision?
1NRG,
I agree on the plasma. It was evident to me 5 or 6 years ago or something
when an experimenter Tero??? was running a lawnmower on 100% HHO +
ambient air. Filled up a balloon with HHO and it ran but he couldn't make
enough to keep the engine running. He was doing some kind of interesting
spark mechanism like a CDI or something and I was convinced a plasma
ignition was needed to help release the energy. But at that time, I only
saw overly complicated circuits that gave really just glorified CDI sparks.
When I first saw Luc's diode effect, I instantly saw the HV and LV combo
as an analogy to the Gray circuit. Anyway, that one single diode just opened a can of worms.
From early on, my feeling was HHO + atomized water + the plasma in a
Bourke engine because of its high efficiency and high compression could
completely run. But I saw it as simply having the plasma "explode water"
as we have seen in the water sparkplug experiments and igniting the
HHO at the same time. I really didn't FOCUS on the monoatomic hydrogen
part. I just was focused on the common explosion of those two that will
inevitably make water as a byproduct.
Anyway, a Bourke engine wasn't going to happen anytime around then.
So someone gave me a lawnmower and Peter and I started to incorporate
hot steam injection from an ultrasonic humidifier and plasma. We had to
run it on gas but were able to get FULL POWER with only the idle jet open.
Anyway, I ripped the rip cord mechanism straight off the thing so had to
stop that experiment. lol
If nothing else is disclosed about Tutanka's project, I think it is still very
valuable. For one, it got me to focus on the nitrogen again because I
never looked at the significance of it as anything other than "non-
combustible gas" as Meyer's explained it. But seeing it as a medium to
assist or prevent a reaction - I think that really needs to be looked at.
I can't dismiss 75% of the content of our air as being insignificant.
It's a refreshing way to look at this I think.
He said there is no nitrous (n2o), but there is nitrogen dioxide ONO
and nitric oxide NO, the vasodilator.
There's O2 in the air as well. O2 is paramagnetic and becomes a magnet
when exposed to a magnetic field. Tutanka showed an air processor with
a magnet on top by the lights.
If we strip electrons with his air processor with the copper grounded
grids and hv + in the middle and put the air through several stages,
there would be highly positively charged oxygen. When it hits HHO,
it seems it might pull an electron separating H from HO.
Anyway, whatever the exact mixture is, it gets compressed, heated
more, plasma hits and ionizes the whole mixture.
I think it must be
ionization by collision so that when an electron is yanked from HHO,
it makes a lot of H1 maybe. And that electron causes a cascade effect
that synergizes with the positively charged oxygen to instantly create
on demand abundant H1 that has the oxygen to full combust.
There would be a whole swarm of flying electrons knocking other electrons
out from HHO freeing up the hydrogen. Those two things working together,
cascade effect and positive oxygen may be the most efficient way to
instantly have enough H1 to run an engine from low volume HHO and
positive charged air.
1NRG,
I agree on the plasma. It was evident to me 5 or 6 years ago or something
when an experimenter Tero??? was running a lawnmower on 100% HHO +
ambient air. Filled up a balloon with HHO and it ran but he couldn't make
enough to keep the engine running. He was doing some kind of interesting
spark mechanism like a CDI or something and I was convinced a plasma
ignition was needed to help release the energy. But at that time, I only
saw overly complicated circuits that gave really just glorified CDI sparks.
When I first saw Luc's diode effect, I instantly saw the HV and LV combo
as an analogy to the Gray circuit. Anyway, that one single diode just opened a can of worms.
From early on, my feeling was HHO + atomized water + the plasma in a
Bourke engine because of its high efficiency and high compression could
completely run. But I saw it as simply having the plasma "explode water"
as we have seen in the water sparkplug experiments and igniting the
HHO at the same time. I really didn't FOCUS on the monoatomic hydrogen
part. I just was focused on the common explosion of those two that will
inevitably make water as a byproduct.
Anyway, a Bourke engine wasn't going to happen anytime around then.
So someone gave me a lawnmower and Peter and I started to incorporate
hot steam injection from an ultrasonic humidifier and plasma. We had to
run it on gas but were able to get FULL POWER with only the idle jet open.
Anyway, I ripped the rip cord mechanism straight off the thing so had to
stop that experiment. lol
If nothing else is disclosed about Tutanka's project, I think it is still very
valuable. For one, it got me to focus on the nitrogen again because I
never looked at the significance of it as anything other than "non-
combustible gas" as Meyer's explained it. But seeing it as a medium to
assist or prevent a reaction - I think that really needs to be looked at.
I can't dismiss 75% of the content of our air as being insignificant.
It's a refreshing way to look at this I think.
He said there is no nitrous (n2o), but there is nitrogen dioxide ONO
and nitric oxide NO, the vasodilator.
There's O2 in the air as well. O2 is paramagnetic and becomes a magnet
when exposed to a magnetic field. Tutanka showed an air processor with
a magnet on top by the lights.
If we strip electrons with his air processor with the copper grounded
grids and hv + in the middle and put the air through several stages,
there would be highly positively charged oxygen. When it hits HHO,
it seems it might pull an electron separating H from HO.
Anyway, whatever the exact mixture is, it gets compressed, heated
more, plasma hits and ionizes the whole mixture.
I think it must be
ionization by collision so that when an electron is yanked from HHO,
it makes a lot of H1 maybe. And that electron causes a cascade effect
that synergizes with the positively charged oxygen to instantly create
on demand abundant H1 that has the oxygen to full combust.
There would be a whole swarm of flying electrons knocking other electrons
out from HHO freeing up the hydrogen. Those two things working together,
cascade effect and positive oxygen may be the most efficient way to
instantly have enough H1 to run an engine from low volume HHO and
positive charged air.
Comment