Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Ionization & Water Fuel

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • so we have it all now the only thing that remains is this question. How is tut ionizing the water mist?

    Comment


    • Thank you Alex
      I think now is more understandable.

      Pengrove I guess this answer was given by paper I came up with witch talked about the ions that result from vapor accordingly to the acidity of the water being boil. http://www.free-energy-info.co.uk/P6.pdf

      We have now some info:
      bi-distilled water
      90°C
      Charge by induction
      Polarization
      NO2 (catalyst and probably oxidizer)
      NH3
      N+
      OH-
      H+
      3 stages
      "active nitrogen"
      100W
      electrolyzer without electrolyte
      Nh3 on demand
      mixed with water (hydrated) (could become NH4+)

      Chain Reaction


      So what if he is burning NH3 + NO and or NH3 + NO2 creating N2 and H2O ... this way he start with water and end up with water.


      Best Regards

      Comment


      • Originally posted by pengrove View Post
        so we have it all now the only thing that remains is this question. How is tut ionizing the water mist?
        Hello,
        Need that you read better .. I have written.. "you need dissociation of nitrogen with ionized water vapour".. All that is created only in one stage. for dissociate nitrogen molecular and create water vapour you need a lot of heat or source of concentrate energy..

        Comment


        • Plasma-Chemical Synthesis of Hydrazine, Ammonia

          Hello all,

          just following this thread for a while. Very interesting stuff.
          Maybe this could help understanding the creation of N2H4 and NH3.

          Plasma Chemistry - Google Books - Alexander Fridman Page 407

          OK, I know that this tests are done with N2 and H2. Maybe ionized water fog is sufficient to create a similar reaction.

          Best regards, Tobias

          Comment


          • Originally posted by AtariGenerationX View Post
            Hello all,

            just following this thread for a while. Very interesting stuff.
            Maybe this could help understanding the creation of N2H4 and NH3.

            Plasma Chemistry - Google Books - Alexander Fridman Page 407

            OK, I know that this tests are done with N2 and H2. Maybe ionized water fog is sufficient to create a similar reaction.

            Best regards, Tobias
            Hello Tobias,
            NO! That reaction is valid only fo H2/N2 , you are working with air/water.. you need 3 or 4 stages, these depends on design applied. First stage nitrogen molecular dissociation and water vapour creation, here you can use thermal plasma.. after that you have two or three stages. Regards

            Comment


            • First stage processes

              Originally posted by tutanka View Post
              Hello Tobias,
              NO! That reaction is valid only fo H2/N2 , you are working with air/water.. you need 3 or 4 stages, these depends on design applied. First stage nitrogen molecular dissociation and water vapour creation, here you can use thermal plasma.. after that you have two or three stages. Regards
              Hello Alex.

              OK, was just a thought that your process maybe similar. I'm not an analytical chemist.

              You wrote:
              First stage nitrogen molecular dissociation and water vapour creation, here you can use thermal plasma

              This first stage are 2 seperate processes?

              1st process:
              I mean on one side you create atomic notrigen (N) from 80% molecular nitrogen of air (N2) by dissociation. This dissociation of air is introduced by a HV field that produces a soft corona (please see 2nd to last picture on the "$20 Ozone generator" link)? If so, then there is also generation of O3 during this process from my opinion or not?
              $20 Ozone Generator:
              Make a $20 ozone generator.

              Make some ozone (and maybe atomic nitrogen?):
              Make some ozone.

              2nd process:
              Other side water vapour creation from heat/plasma/ultrasonic or so on.

              Or is the first stage happening all in one place and not seprate partitions.

              If I'm totally wrong, I will shut up for a while and read further.

              Best regards, Tobias

              Comment


              • Plasma can not be used to ionize water mist. The plasma will burn the water.

                Comment


                • Was not talking about water mist ionization. Only about water vapour creation.
                  Regards, Tobias

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by AtariGenerationX View Post
                    Was not talking about water mist ionization. Only about water vapour creation.
                    Regards, Tobias
                    Yes.. correct .. thermal plasma is used for nitrogen molecular dissociation and creation of water vapor only.. after you need other two or three stages (that depend from design used)..

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by AtariGenerationX View Post
                      Hello Alex.

                      OK, was just a thought that your process maybe similar. I'm not an analytical chemist.

                      You wrote:
                      First stage nitrogen molecular dissociation and water vapour creation, here you can use thermal plasma

                      This first stage are 2 seperate processes?

                      1st process:
                      I mean on one side you create atomic notrigen (N) from 80% molecular nitrogen of air (N2) by dissociation. This dissociation of air is introduced by a HV field that produces a soft corona (please see 2nd to last picture on the "$20 Ozone generator" link)? If so, then there is also generation of O3 during this process from my opinion or not?
                      $20 Ozone Generator:
                      Make a $20 ozone generator.

                      Make some ozone (and maybe atomic nitrogen?):
                      Make some ozone.

                      2nd process:
                      Other side water vapour creation from heat/plasma/ultrasonic or so on.

                      Or is the first stage happening all in one place and not seprate partitions.

                      If I'm totally wrong, I will shut up for a while and read further.

                      Best regards, Tobias
                      If in first stage is used thermal plasma maybe in second stage is used non thermal plasma, however thermal plasma is very similarry to an flame that Meyer use for consume oxygen
                      Last edited by tutanka; 05-14-2010, 12:16 PM.

                      Comment


                      • Originally posted by tutanka View Post
                        If in first stage is used thermal plasma maybe in second stage is used non thermal plasma, however thermal plasma is very similarry to an flame that Meyer use for consume oxygen
                        Which type of thermal plasma system are you using? Arc or non-arc?

                        Low current plasmatron fuel ... - Google Patent Search
                        Two general types of plasma discharge regimes can be distinguished by their electrical characteristics and their modes of operation. A non-arcing discharge regime operates at high voltage and low currents, while an arc discharge regime operates at low voltage and high currents. (For a general treatise, see J. Reece Roth, Industrial Plasma Engineering, Vol. 1 and 2 , Institute of Physics: Bristol, UK, 1995).
                        Non-Arc Patent
                        US007597860B2

                        (12) United States Patent

                        Rabinovich et al.

                        (io) Patent No.: (45) Date of Patent:

                        US 7,597,860 B2 *Oct. 6, 2009

                        (54) LOW CURRENT PLASMATRON FUEL

                        CONVERTER HAVING ENLARGED VOLUME
                        DISCHARGES
                        A novel apparatus and method is disclosed for a plasmatron fuel converter ("plasmatron") that efficiently uses electrical energy to produce hydrogen rich gas. The volume and shape of the plasma discharge is controlled by a fluid flow established in a plasma discharge volume. A plasmatron according to this invention produces a substantially large effective plasma discharge volume allowing for substantially greater volumetric efficiency in the initiation of chemical reactions within a volume of bulk fluid reactant flowing through the plasmatron.


                        ...The plasma discharge is established by supplying high voltage (300 V to 60 kV) (and resulting current in the range of approximately 10 milliamperes to 2 amperes) in the discharge volume 26 between electrodes 20,24.

                        ...The frequency of plasma discharge initiation and extinction is here termed 'cycle frequency'. Natural cycle frequency for a plasmatron fuel converter of the illustrated preferred embodiment will typically be on the order of several kHz (1-10 kHz).
                        This patent is similar to Meyers:

                        Comment


                        • Which type of thermal plasma system are you using? Arc or non-arc?

                          THERMAL PLASMA IS ONLY WITH ARC
                          Last edited by tutanka; 05-14-2010, 06:33 PM.

                          Comment


                          • Originally posted by tutanka View Post

                            THERMAL PLASMA IS ONLY WITH ARC
                            Ok. thanks.

                            What type of electrodes do you use for creating the arc? Tungsten or carbon?





                            Do you a center electrode?
                            http://www.informaworld.com/ampp/ima...1_o_f0001g.png
                            Last edited by vrand; 05-14-2010, 07:53 PM.

                            Comment


                            • Originally posted by Aaron View Post
                              IF platinum were to be used, where in the combustion chamber would
                              it be?
                              Allready got Platnum Plugs! Thats just TOO easy. Hum Simple????

                              FrznWtr

                              Comment


                              • Originally posted by Aaron View Post
                                You're right - plugs. But we don't want platinum.

                                But that is where the other metal is.

                                Langmuir invented the term Plasma and thermionic emissions were a crucial
                                part of this research.

                                Lateral Science - Atomic Hydrogen Welding
                                Lateral Science - Atomic Hydrogen Blowtorch

                                Sebosfato pointed out that the normal engine metals won't
                                be hot enough for any kind of thermionic emissions and I
                                mentioned that some other metal may be considered.

                                So what metal is it?
                                Tungsten !
                                FrznWtr

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X