If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Thank you Alex
I think now is more understandable.
Pengrove I guess this answer was given by paper I came up with witch talked about the ions that result from vapor accordingly to the acidity of the water being boil. http://www.free-energy-info.co.uk/P6.pdf
We have now some info:
bi-distilled water
90°C
Charge by induction
Polarization
NO2 (catalyst and probably oxidizer)
NH3
N+
OH-
H+
3 stages
"active nitrogen"
100W
electrolyzer without electrolyte
Nh3 on demand
mixed with water (hydrated) (could become NH4+)
Chain Reaction
So what if he is burning NH3 + NO and or NH3 + NO2 creating N2 and H2O ... this way he start with water and end up with water.
Best Regards
so we have it all now the only thing that remains is this question. How is tut ionizing the water mist?
Hello,
Need that you read better .. I have written.. "you need dissociation of nitrogen with ionized water vapour".. All that is created only in one stage. for dissociate nitrogen molecular and create water vapour you need a lot of heat or source of concentrate energy..
OK, I know that this tests are done with N2 and H2. Maybe ionized water fog is sufficient to create a similar reaction.
Best regards, Tobias
Hello Tobias,
NO! That reaction is valid only fo H2/N2 , you are working with air/water.. you need 3 or 4 stages, these depends on design applied. First stage nitrogen molecular dissociation and water vapour creation, here you can use thermal plasma.. after that you have two or three stages. Regards
Hello Tobias,
NO! That reaction is valid only fo H2/N2 , you are working with air/water.. you need 3 or 4 stages, these depends on design applied. First stage nitrogen molecular dissociation and water vapour creation, here you can use thermal plasma.. after that you have two or three stages. Regards
Hello Alex.
OK, was just a thought that your process maybe similar. I'm not an analytical chemist.
You wrote:
First stage nitrogen molecular dissociation and water vapour creation, here you can use thermal plasma
This first stage are 2 seperate processes?
1st process:
I mean on one side you create atomic notrigen (N) from 80% molecular nitrogen of air (N2) by dissociation. This dissociation of air is introduced by a HV field that produces a soft corona (please see 2nd to last picture on the "$20 Ozone generator" link)? If so, then there is also generation of O3 during this process from my opinion or not?
$20 Ozone Generator: Make a $20 ozone generator.
Was not talking about water mist ionization. Only about water vapour creation.
Regards, Tobias
Yes.. correct .. thermal plasma is used for nitrogen molecular dissociation and creation of water vapor only.. after you need other two or three stages (that depend from design used)..
OK, was just a thought that your process maybe similar. I'm not an analytical chemist.
You wrote:
First stage nitrogen molecular dissociation and water vapour creation, here you can use thermal plasma
This first stage are 2 seperate processes?
1st process:
I mean on one side you create atomic notrigen (N) from 80% molecular nitrogen of air (N2) by dissociation. This dissociation of air is introduced by a HV field that produces a soft corona (please see 2nd to last picture on the "$20 Ozone generator" link)? If so, then there is also generation of O3 during this process from my opinion or not?
$20 Ozone Generator: Make a $20 ozone generator.
2nd process:
Other side water vapour creation from heat/plasma/ultrasonic or so on.
Or is the first stage happening all in one place and not seprate partitions.
If I'm totally wrong, I will shut up for a while and read further.
Best regards, Tobias
If in first stage is used thermal plasma maybe in second stage is used non thermal plasma, however thermal plasma is very similarry to an flame that Meyer use for consume oxygen
If in first stage is used thermal plasma maybe in second stage is used non thermal plasma, however thermal plasma is very similarry to an flame that Meyer use for consume oxygen
Which type of thermal plasma system are you using? Arc or non-arc?
Two general types of plasma discharge regimes can be distinguished by their electrical characteristics and their modes of operation. A non-arcing discharge regime operates at high voltage and low currents, while an arc discharge regime operates at low voltage and high currents. (For a general treatise, see J. Reece Roth, Industrial Plasma Engineering, Vol. 1 and 2 , Institute of Physics: Bristol, UK, 1995).
Non-Arc Patent
US007597860B2
(12) United States Patent
Rabinovich et al.
(io) Patent No.: (45) Date of Patent:
US 7,597,860 B2 *Oct. 6, 2009
(54) LOW CURRENT PLASMATRON FUEL
CONVERTER HAVING ENLARGED VOLUME
DISCHARGES
A novel apparatus and method is disclosed for a plasmatron fuel converter ("plasmatron") that efficiently uses electrical energy to produce hydrogen rich gas. The volume and shape of the plasma discharge is controlled by a fluid flow established in a plasma discharge volume. A plasmatron according to this invention produces a substantially large effective plasma discharge volume allowing for substantially greater volumetric efficiency in the initiation of chemical reactions within a volume of bulk fluid reactant flowing through the plasmatron.
...The plasma discharge is established by supplying high voltage (300 V to 60 kV) (and resulting current in the range of approximately 10 milliamperes to 2 amperes) in the discharge volume 26 between electrodes 20,24.
...The frequency of plasma discharge initiation and extinction is here termed 'cycle frequency'. Natural cycle frequency for a plasmatron fuel converter of the illustrated preferred embodiment will typically be on the order of several kHz (1-10 kHz).
Sebosfato pointed out that the normal engine metals won't
be hot enough for any kind of thermionic emissions and I
mentioned that some other metal may be considered.
Comment