Tweet
progress
For many, the simply reality that nh3 can be made on demand must be
realized and for them, until they do, they're going to be chasing magic
potions.
These old references I just posted are not showing this method, but it
should open some minds as to the reality that nh3 can be created out
of thin air, literally, with some water and electricity - and once this fact
becomes a reality in their mind, it should be easier to swallow the facts.
The sad thing is that the die hard Meyer believers - (the ones that believe
what he says word for word) - could be the greatest allies and supporters
of the real method but unfortunately, too many of them are more
interested in finding things that support their pre-conceived ideas instead
of being teachable enough to swallow their pride that they may have been
wrong about their perceptions all along. I don't see why it is so hard for
some people to simply let go of what they have believed if something else
comes along that makes more sense. It is one of the few ways I have ever
made progress in my life. Not getting attached to illusions that I created
for myself.
I believed mostly like what H2Opower and the others believed, but it was
several years back that I stopped on that path because it became
overwhelming common sense that it was NOT about producing as much
HHO as possible to run an engine. I knew there was something missing with
the ionization and "non-combustible gases". When the water spark plug
circuit came around, that was the first breath of fresh air because it was
obvious of the implications of a real plasma ignition with water fuel systems.
When Tutanka started to allude to some things in h2opower's thread,
I had no idea he has been posting for almost a year at that point. I just
happened to glance in that thread and saw a few of his posts that alluded
to something that I could feel was exactly what I was looking for and that
was missing from Meyer's explanations.
Some of the Meyer believers had called me the closed-minded one, yet
I was able to transition over to the chemistry and method that actually
did make sense as going by what Meyer says has more holes than a fishing
net. And over a couple weeks of starting this thread, there was more
truth about the water fuel system than any other single thread on the
entire internet. It is just unfortunate that not only do they not see it, it appears
they actually have no desire to see it.
Mike brought up that atomic hydrogen will just go past the rings and
create a serious hazard. This was brought up before and was mentioned
that a bigger molecule was needed that won't create the hazard of working
with just hho - that ought to be a serious common sense clue that hho
only is NOT the way and the Meyer believers that think it is about creating
masses of HHO cannot get around this issue, but of course they'll probably
look the other way, pretend it isn't an issue and will simply post references
to back their beliefs that it MUST be like what they thought it was all
along.
Here's the last thing I'm saying about it - is that anyone interested
should go through this thread and read every post about nitrogen being a
natural EEC - Good luck to everyone and their experiments!
Originally posted by Slovenia
View Post
realized and for them, until they do, they're going to be chasing magic
potions.
These old references I just posted are not showing this method, but it
should open some minds as to the reality that nh3 can be created out
of thin air, literally, with some water and electricity - and once this fact
becomes a reality in their mind, it should be easier to swallow the facts.
The sad thing is that the die hard Meyer believers - (the ones that believe
what he says word for word) - could be the greatest allies and supporters
of the real method but unfortunately, too many of them are more
interested in finding things that support their pre-conceived ideas instead
of being teachable enough to swallow their pride that they may have been
wrong about their perceptions all along. I don't see why it is so hard for
some people to simply let go of what they have believed if something else
comes along that makes more sense. It is one of the few ways I have ever
made progress in my life. Not getting attached to illusions that I created
for myself.
I believed mostly like what H2Opower and the others believed, but it was
several years back that I stopped on that path because it became
overwhelming common sense that it was NOT about producing as much
HHO as possible to run an engine. I knew there was something missing with
the ionization and "non-combustible gases". When the water spark plug
circuit came around, that was the first breath of fresh air because it was
obvious of the implications of a real plasma ignition with water fuel systems.
When Tutanka started to allude to some things in h2opower's thread,
I had no idea he has been posting for almost a year at that point. I just
happened to glance in that thread and saw a few of his posts that alluded
to something that I could feel was exactly what I was looking for and that
was missing from Meyer's explanations.
Some of the Meyer believers had called me the closed-minded one, yet
I was able to transition over to the chemistry and method that actually
did make sense as going by what Meyer says has more holes than a fishing
net. And over a couple weeks of starting this thread, there was more
truth about the water fuel system than any other single thread on the
entire internet. It is just unfortunate that not only do they not see it, it appears
they actually have no desire to see it.
Mike brought up that atomic hydrogen will just go past the rings and
create a serious hazard. This was brought up before and was mentioned
that a bigger molecule was needed that won't create the hazard of working
with just hho - that ought to be a serious common sense clue that hho
only is NOT the way and the Meyer believers that think it is about creating
masses of HHO cannot get around this issue, but of course they'll probably
look the other way, pretend it isn't an issue and will simply post references
to back their beliefs that it MUST be like what they thought it was all
along.
Here's the last thing I'm saying about it - is that anyone interested
should go through this thread and read every post about nitrogen being a
natural EEC - Good luck to everyone and their experiments!
. 
.. Regards
Comment