Ionization & Water Fuel

[Farrah Day]

More to the point, does any of this have any bearing on your long-awaited, long-promised, ground-breaking, world changing breakthrough?

[tutanka]

Tut,

Where do you get your carbon dioxide in this situation?

Steve

Carbon Dioxide CO2 is present normally inside air!!

[tutanka]

More to the point, does any of this have any bearing on your long-awaited, long-promised, ground-breaking, world changing breakthrough?

REACTOR WORKING!!!

[tutanka]

At This Time I Can't Post Any Photo Or Send You Any Additional Information about REACTOR. That Project Is Covered From Nda And However First I Need Permission From Other Person. Thanks For Read Me.. Regards Alex

[vrand]

CH3-NH2 is chemical formula of Methylamine.. is strange molecule composed from carbon,nitrogen and hydrogen atoms.. no more people know that is an potential car fuel..
Nitrogen (N2), oxygen (O2), argon (Ar), carbon dioxide (CO2), and water vapor (H2O). These gases account for 99.997% of the volumetric composition of standard air and also account for better than 99.9% of most combustion gases (but Meyer don't use air and exaust gas)? . However the water amount isn't stable on air for that Meyer mix an extra amount. Remember one important thing... Meyer use steam resonator for ionized and heated water molecules first of mix with air (or exaust gas). The function of gas processor in fact is extractions of electrons from mixture molecules CO2+H2O+O2+N2 and for absorb electrons (very important) him use EEC. Maybe as result is obtained CH3NH2+O2.
Probably at today exist other better system (reactor) for extract electrons, more advanced but simple at the same time based every on high voltage, in all case your fuel mixture is recomposed out.

Thank you for the info Alex

Methylamine, 3 common ways to make it:
- Hofmann Rearrangement of an Amide to an Amine
- Schmidt Rearrangement of a Carboxylic Acid/Anhydride to an Amine
- Aldehyde to Amine

The Methylamine FAQ

Sounds like you found another way to make Methylamine.

How do you know you are making Methylamine? From a mass spectrometer?

What percentage of Methylamine is in your gas? Other elements/compound percentages?

Thanks, Mike

[Farrah Day]

Carbon Dioxide CO2 is present normally inside air!!

Yes it certainly is... all 0.038% of it!!

I don't see how those figure will possibly stack up with such a low percentage of carbon available from air. Plus of course you've still got to dissociate some water in the first place to get the hydrogen.

[tutanka]

Yes it certainly is... all 0.038% of it!!

I don't see how those figure will possibly stack up with such a low percentage of carbon available from air. Plus of course you've still got to dissociate some water in the first place to get the hydrogen.

Hello..
Seem that you live on the moon and not on the earth! The catalizer of your car produce a lot of CO2,H2O,N2 and these are sended directly in atmosphere..
I don't understand why you reply without read better my words.. maybe problem is mine.. however , if for you it's ok, I can write in italian language.

[tutanka]

Thank you for the info Alex



Sounds like you found another way to make Methylamine.

How do you know you are making Methylamine? From a mass spectrometer?

What percentage of Methylamine is in your gas? Other elements/compound percentages?

Thanks, Mike

Mike.. in base of mixture used with the same reactor you can produce different fuels.. I don't know if meyer used little percentage of gasoline but I'm sure that using an correct gas processor or reactor, as you want call, you can process gasoline exaust gas from catalizer of your car and produce fuel combustible to resend inside engine.. and I'm sure that you produce H3C-NH2.

[stevie1001]

Carbon Dioxide CO2 is present normally inside air!!

True, but in very very small quantitys.
We know that water can absorb CO2.
Is that what you are doing? Recycle the exhaust gasses thru a waterbucket and then use that water for HHO and a bit of carbons?


Steve

[pengrove]

REACTOR WORKING!!!

it looks like a quartz vacuum bulb to me.

[vrand]

Mike.. in base of mixture used with the same reactor you can produce different fuels.. I don't know if meyer used little percentage of gasoline but I'm sure that using an correct gas processor or reactor, as you want call, you can process gasoline exaust gas from catalizer of your car and produce fuel combustible to resend inside engine.. and I'm sure that you produce H3C-NH2.

Thank you Alex for the update.

Yes, I would be interested in what is the composition of your gas going into the engine.

Do you have access to a gas mass spectrometer? Maybe your local University physics or chemistry department has one and a professor can test your gas?

What kind of voltage & current are you inputting into the reactor? Are you using an arc or spark or corona?

Thanks, Mike

[Farrah Day]

Hello..
Seem that you live on the moon and not on the earth! The catalizer of your car produce a lot of CO2,H2O,N2 and these are sended directly in atmosphere..

Me living on the Moon. Hello... Earth calling Tut... anybody out there?

So, let me get this straight we use the CO2 exhaust emissions and feed them back into the front end... OK, right, I see now! Oh... but wait a minute, if we're no longer using fossil fuels, we no longer have the carbon element. So where's the carbon coming from?

Seems like a bit of a catch 22 situation to me.

I don't understand why you reply without read better my words.. maybe problem is mine.. however , if for you it's ok, I can write in italian language

I do read better your words, but your pigeon English doesn't make for a very coherrent read at the best of times. Please don't write in Italian, you're hard enough to understand as it is!

[Farrah Day]

Mike.. in base of mixture used with the same reactor you can produce different fuels.. I don't know if meyer used little percentage of gasoline but I'm sure that using an correct gas processor or reactor, as you want call, you can process gasoline exaust gas from catalizer of your car and produce fuel combustible to resend inside engine.. and I'm sure that you produce H3C-NH2.

Maybe it's just me, but looking over the recent posts there seems to be an awful lot of conjecture coming from Tut, considering he claims to have solved the worlds dependency on fossil fuels. What is going on? I mean, c'mon, what are those blurred images supposed to be of? Are they supposed to renew faith? Sorry, doesn't work for me, Tut.

I shouldn't hold your breath waiting for a reply Mike, I get the distinct impression it's still one big guessing game.

[tutanka]

Maybe it's just me, but looking over the recent posts there seems to be an awful lot of conjecture coming from Tut, considering he claims to have solved the worlds dependency on fossil fuels. What is going on? I mean, c'mon, what are those blurred images supposed to be of? Are they supposed to renew faith? Sorry, doesn't work for me, Tut.

I shouldn't hold your breath waiting for a reply Mike, I get the distinct impression it's still one big guessing game.

Farrah .. ISN'T AN BIG GUESSING GAME!!

Analyzing better the Meyer Gas Processor we are in presence of one system that is created for change state to molecules. Im pretty sure that -ONLY- function of gas processor is stripped electrons from molecules and eliminate these with EEC circuit
Using this principle you can create some different fuels if you use different components mixture inside gas processor.
For that you can process - ALSO- gasoline exaust gas and obtain new gas combustible that I have identified in H3C-NH2.

[Farrah Day]

Farrah .. ISN'T AN BIG GUESSING GAME!!

Analyzing better the Meyer Gas Processor we are in presence of one system that is created for change state to molecules. Im pretty sure that -ONLY- function of gas processor is stripped electrons from molecules and eliminate these with EEC circuit
Using this principle you can create some different fuels if you use different components mixture inside gas processor.
For that you can process - ALSO- gasoline exaust gas and obtain new gas combustible that I have identified in H3C-NH2.

Well Tut, the others may be fine with what you say, but I'm certainly not. 'You're pretty sure', instills no confidence in me whatsoever. We were led to believe that you have cracked this thing... were we not? Sounds to me like you've gone off half-cocked here and are now grasping at tenuous threads.

Personally Tut, I think that you're all talk and that nothing substantial will ever be forthcoming from you... but by all means prove me wrong!

Oh, but you won't ever be able to do that will you because of your NDA. Handy little get-out-of-jail-free cards those NDAs. Seems to me like a few people around here conveniently use them when they come unstuck.

What are you doing here? Do you not understand the principle behind an open source forum?